Does it really have any relevance beyond relationships (and legal social implications thereof)?

I’m also confused about why a group so dissillusioned with marriage would be its biggest supporter. why?

For the real men:

For the real men?

Complaining, saying “not fair” does absolutely nothing.

Get back to me when you, you, and you, are willing to protest…

Get back to me when you are actually willing to go to jail for your beliefs…

Eric Ericson
Eric87443@hotmail.com

If you only spend a few hours a month.

Yes words do get deleated, however, persisteance wins the fight at Wiki.

Also for important statment use hyper links to the document that supports the statement.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divorce

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_domestic_violence

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_Violence

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriage_strike

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_support

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misandry

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bachelor

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_law

There is a ‘movement’ but unorganized and maybe it’s because we men are busily engaged and facing several battles simultaneously, only a few of which are specifically targeted at us men because we are men.

Many of our battles are undefined in yet another undeclared war our tripartrite enemy Zionism/Feminism/BigBrotherism has declared against us mostly white males.

“No man can enter into a strong man’s house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strong man; and then he will spoil his house.”
Mark 3:27

As our house is being spoiled, we men have yet to clearly see our enemy. Maybe we have seen the enemy, but are in denial. Until we get out of denial, we will continue to be unorganized and impotent and our house will continue to be spoiled.

We are also suffering from battle fatigue w/o realizing it.

Among all the daily struggles dissipating our attention and limited energy, we are even now called upon to do battle with the Wikipedia gauleiters.

I think the best strategy for any guerilla warrior or insurgent is to nibble them to death with short phrases here and there in a number of sometimes seemingly unrelated and maybe even trivial entries (like ‘Ugly Betty’ – be creative), rather than go to a lot of wasted trouble writing long treatises which will cause someone to roll their eyes.

> There is no men’s movement because there is no
> central philosophy of manhood and its subsequent
> action…

I couldn’t disagree more. It’s just that we don’t listen to, watch, or care about men as much, so it’s on a different sort of radar screen. Besides, the lack of a central philosophy of femalehood certainly didn’t stop feminism.

Change does not take place by responding to what someone else does. Change takes place by putting your view forward and letting people respond to it. That’s called being assertive.

There is no men’s movement in America nor has there ever been one. All we have are groups of men complaining about the way things are, which is why most of the organizations have become defunct and the few that are left are impotent.

There is no men’s movement because there is no central philosophy of manhood and its subsequent action, which is why feminism came into being.

It all disappeared fairly quickly, although it was mostly matter-of-fact, non-advocacy stuff. While it highlighted things like the role of the Lenore Weitzman post-divorce standard-of-living hoax and hysteria in raising child support that feminists would naturally object to, the flak I saw complained that it didn’t pander to the usual urban legends claiming judges’ pensions are boosted in proportion to its size by each order they issue, that there are 1-to-1 federal matching funds for child support amounts collected, etc.

I always suspected it was the latter crowd which destroyed the evidence.

2. You probably could, however you should not cite yourself or your own book. Entries should be a reflection of the movement “as it is”, as most folks in the movement would see it.

3. I would keep language objective and as scholarly as possible. They will not allow men’s rights rants.

Examples like this show us all how much opposition we face on so many fronts, even what should be an innocuous place such as Wikipedia.

John Dias