I am looking foward to Valentines day to give my wife a nice gift, she deserves it. She is a good woman, a good partner, and I have meet other women who are good women and good partners too. She works harder than I do, earns more money, initiates sex, and we are not young.

I expect some readers to think, ya, sure, … the problem with most men and women is that the want to go up a level or two for a partner. Ask a man or woman what they want from the other gender and you get this impressive list: fun, kind, smart, exciting, beautiful, sexy, on and on. And you look at them and they are a f*&$^ troll. They are not in shape, the are not funny or kind themselves, they are not half of what they are looking for yet they are too lazy to go to the gym, read about enough topics in a well-rounded way to be interesting, they talk to f&#^# much (like I do) on and on, and then, so sad, they can’t fet the beauty queen.

For those of you who missed me on Cavuto, here’s the link:

http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player06.html?021307/021307_yahoo_valentine&Yahoo_Cavuto&Valentine%26%2392%3B%26%2339%3Bs%20Day%20Boycott%3F&Valentine%26%2392%3B%26%2339%3Bs%20Day%20Boycott%3F&FOX%20Business%20Now&-1&Business&221&&&exp

When she brought up the valentines day subject I told her I don’t do that and she accepted it without question.

Marc, you make it so much easier. Thanks.

I have made my own odyssey from date-hungry teenager to self-confident 30-year-old. With the help of various books, including Marc’s, I came to realize what spoiled princesses most women are, & how much better it is to be alone than to even try to relate to them on an intimate level. On a just-friends level they’re fine, but once dating enters the mix they turn into Ms. Hyde. Neither the feminist left (who incessantly advocate laws like VAWA) nor the religious right (who incessantly tout marriage as the bedrock of society) are any friends of mine.

The mate selection process is a 2-way street. Just as women mercilessly analyze our intentions toward them, WE must read between the lines in THEIR motives toward us–on V-day or any other day.

“…her objective is to lure Marc in and tell her friends after. The jerk actually thought he gave me an orgasm, hahahaha”

amfortas, I don’t see what is so objectionable about Marc’s message. It’s quite simple, actually. Men benefit in relationships when they reject double standards, and reject the idea of female privilege. Men also benefit when they make themselves more sexually appealing to women, rather than more financially appealing. It would seem, based on your last comment, that you believe women simply are incapable of enjoying the sexual company of men without resorting to pretense. If she’s faking it sexually, and not getting financial goodies either, what is her incentive for being in the relationship? Even the proverbial girlfriends you mentioned might call her on that one. Perhaps it is true that women are the less rational, more emotional gender. But I highly doubt that women would seek out a relationship with absolutely no benefits to themselves. Marc is merely saying that their primary benefit ought to be sexual and emotional. Any financial goodies (bestowed by the man, not earned on her own) are completely the prerogative of the man — and the less entitled she feels to these financial goodies, the better.

What could be simpler?

Marc: Good luck on Fox News channel tomorrow!

If you know anything about anything about the message I constantly give you could not possibly come up with – ‘The way to stop playing the game is not to play it. That is precisely what KateM is telling you’. As though this was news! As though Kate actually said that.

I have been saying ’stop playing the game’ for years, cloth ears. And lots of other ‘games’ women wanna play.

As for this – “It matters not what you learned at 13″ – so what do you say to the 14, 15, 18 year old who has the ‘no pay, no play’ reinforced every ten minutes? Don’t play? Good idea. So get thee to the school playground and give your lessons there and don’t be so patronising to grown men here.

Not a good idea to proposition your married female correspondents either.

How about this sage advice – “You must take responsibility for your choices and stop thinking of yourself as a victim”. Wow, Dr Phil. Reminds me of the hippy, hit by a truck. He looks up at his friend and says “call me an ambulance, man’, and his friend replies, ‘OK man, you’re an ambulance, cool’.

Frankly, if women were the sex fiends that you describe, they would not sabotage themselves so readily by playing stupid games. But let’s be realistic. The average woman is pretty thick when it comes to sex. To her it is a game to win and the prize isn’t an orgasm. She will take ‘one of those that she’s having’ of course like a dog with a piece of string but her objective is to lure Marc in and tell her friends after. “The jerk actually thought he gave me an orgasm, hahahaha”

On here you may get the occasional woman appluading your books, but what do the woman you have actually been with say afterwards, Marc, when you are out of earshot and your sex-shooter has been fired out of ammo?

Perhaps you are amongst the most fortunate men who have only ever met adult women. Most women however are children, They never get beyond the schoolyard where they taught the 13 year olds to ‘pay before you play’. They keep doing it all thir lives. Instead of lecturing men, maybe you should turn your talent to writing ABOUT women instead of for them. You don’t seem to write for men except to call them jerks.

Author Michelle Langley said the following on the Leykis program some time ago: (paraphrasing)

“Men spread the seed, but women GATHER it”

What do you think? Thanks,

They’re choosier than we men. A man wants to have sex and will accept it from a wide variety of women: her personality or character often doesn’t matter. A woman can look at a man, find him extremely attractive, yet not find him sexually desirable. A woman wants to have sex with a man she wants to have sex with. Their sexuality is deeper. It’s beyond looks and attractiveness. But when she meets that man who flips her switch, she can’t get enough of him…

Now if this doesn’t help, in the past three years I’ve been blown away by how many women I’ve met who have confessed to having or have had vibrators, dildos, “rabbits”, etc. They love to orgasm, but, in lieu of the right man, most will use the substite.

Just my thoughts.

Buy them for yourself. She’ll steal your home, your kids and your pension for ?????? And please, spare me and everyone else the “you just don’t get love there Ed” look at the divorce rate and who is initiating the overwhelming number of divorces.

And hey, hows about that Astro-nut. Now, how long before they spin this till it’s a man’s fault for what she did. The Astro hunk she was gonna shoot the Air Force “Other Woman” for, the ex-husband, daddy, the dog (male of course). Then she’s on Oprey Windbag crying and sobbing as Oprey and Dr. Silly tell the all female audience how valuble they all are and how, if only Ms. Astro-nut’s husband had attended his “husband camp” her “needs” wouldn’t have been neglected and “Dang, what wuz he thinkin”.

Then we’ll hear about the brand new “BREAKTHROUGH FEMALE ASTRONAUT DIET PLAN: EAT EVERYTHING IN SIGHT AND LOSE WEIGHT”. For only $699.

The movie rights to her “victimized” life will be sold and a new line of female “impowerment” clothing will hit the mall.

Later, gotta get back out on the ledge.

Emphasis on BUSINESS. Read it now!

Not sure how your question relates to anything I’ve said. Perhaps you can clarify…

“WEDNESDAY — IT’S EASY TO SAY I L-O-V-E YOU. In case you forgot, Romeo, it’s Valentine’s Day. Find ideas by clicking on the events calendar at mercurynews.com.”

More proof that Valentine’s Day is officially and institutionally devoted to women. Men can stop this any time they want. But, they won’t. Too chicken.

Here is a nice comment from earlier:

“We guys need to keep our hearts just soft enough not to hate women, yet hard enough to say no to their little-girl demands.”

I believe this.

Lindt & Sprüngli, notable Swiss chocolatier, did a Valentine’s Day survey of men and women — presumably in the US, where the so-called holiday is prevalent. What did it find?

What I expected, that’s what. According to Lindt & Sprüngli:

• 70% of men surveyed said they do NOT expect a return gift on Valentine’s Day
• 52% of women surveyed said that men are correct in NOT expecting a valentine.

That says it all for me. American men — vaginized eunuchs — are the reason women feel entitled. Until men start acting like men, demanding reciprocity from women, women will continue to treat them like ATM machines.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lindt & Sprüngli is recognized as a leader in the market for premium quality chocolate, offering a large selection of products in more than 80 countries around the world. During the nearly 160 years of Lindt & Sprüngli’s existence, it has become known as one of the most innovative and creative companies making premium chocolate.