Author Rudov to Appear With Neil Cavuto on Fox News

Its a good message about Valentine’s day that Marc has to tell but oh God, I do hope he resists his urge to treat all men as jerks who are so far less capable as he professes to be at humping women into paroxysms of orgasmic abandon. Keep your cock zipped in your pants, Marc and stick to the point and for God’s sake don’t take any of your Marc’s-phallus-worshipping harem along with you.

Foremost among the ads:

“Every kiss begins with Kay”

In other words, your bitch is a ho, you are just her john, and you better cough up some diamonds from us, to show her what a “special” ho she is, if you be wanting any poontang.

But hey, the women don’t seem to mind. Small wonder half of the men around the world view American women as whores.

Will Marc tell Neil that he is a sorry performer? Maybe best to let Geraldo do this interview, since he fancies himself a PH.D. between the knees, and he and Marc can drain the testosterone from the room.
It all started as they shared “reach” secrets for back shaving.
Marc is announcing a claim to Anna N. Smith’s child, he was in the same city as her, which with that kind of virility, is all it takes.

Good luck with the interview, Marc. I’m glad you’re doing it.

Bah. His angle is still all about HER and NER needs… pleasing HER. EFF that. Yea, most of us know that if you feed a dog well enough, and pet it’s head once in a while, it won’t leave either.

Although I DO like the boycott part though.

TMOTS

Here’s the clip. I thought Neil Cavuto would be sympathetic to Marc’s message against phony romance and double standards in dating. No dice! I keep forgetting that there is a mountain of assumptions and attitudes in gender relations that must be addressed in order for people to really understand how Valentine’s Day disproportionately burdens men. To expect Cavuto to just “get it” just wouldn’t ever be enough. Marc did speak well, and got his points across, but it inevitably led to the same outcome as many of his interviews. Someone accuses him of being bitter about an ex-relationship. Achieving the bliss of a reciprocal, mutually beneficial relationship and the rejection of dating slavery ought not imply some level of bitterness. But that’s the reaction that many uninitiated have to Marc’s message.

Hope Neil has him back on again, perhaps at another time less charged than Valentine’s Day when the conversation can be explored a bit further.

Neil Cavuto agrees with me, but his job on the show is to play devil’s advocate — to create controversy and force his guests to make their points. I think I succeeded. Neil is a pro, and I enjoyed being his guest. He and his producer want me back. I’ve received great e-mails from men and women around the world who agree that V-Day is nonsense.

Today (02.14.07), at 7:18PM ET, I will be on John Gibson’s radio program — on Fox News Radio, XM ch. 188, and Sirius ch. 121. Same topic.

Great interview with Neil Cavuto, Marc. I just watched it. Thanks for speaking up for us.

My only helpful suggestion would be to be careful about how often you blink your eyes when on camera. Blinking too often suggests insincerity.

Other than that, I thought you did an outstanding job. Made your points well in a relatively short time segment. I particularly liked the one where Neil said “It’s (Valentine’s Day is) just one day out of the year”, implying that you and men like you were being jerks for not being able to suck it up for one teensy weensy day each year. You responded that it’s not just one day out of the year. In my mind that was a big point, and I liked that you didn’t belabor it. It came across as it should have — that Valentine’s Day is simply representative of the larger whole, and that men sacrificing themselves for women is the defauilt assumption of most relationships.

Another thing I noted …. Neil’s devil’s advocate argument that “She does things for you all the time, so why can’t you do something for her one day a year?” Embedded in that question is the assumption that she does things for you all the time, AND THAT YOU’RE NOT DOING THINGS FOR HER. The old “women never get appreciated” canard. As we all know, the reverse is more the case.

The appropriate response to Neil’s parry is to reverse roles, and to turn his question back on him, e.g. “…Men do things for women all year long, too, so why isn’t there the same pressure for women to buy gift and be romantic to men on Valentine’s Day?…”. Something to think about.

Excellent job, Marc. Thanks.

Ken