Comments on: 2008: Gun Control Candidates Need Not Apply. http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/02/13/56281/ Men's Rights Activism, MRA Politics, Analysis, Commentary and Global News Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:52:01 -1000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Alphecca http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/02/13/56281/comment-page-1/#comment-32181 Alphecca Fri, 16 Feb 2007 12:05:55 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/02/13/56281/#comment-32181 <strong>Quick Links...</strong> I've got a busy day ahead and it's starting early so rather than a series of posts, here's some quick links for you to explore... From the LA Times, four new gun control bills proposed. Actually, I shouldn't say they're...... Quick Links…

I’ve got a busy day ahead and it’s starting early so rather than a series of posts, here’s some quick links for you to explore… From the LA Times, four new gun control bills proposed. Actually, I shouldn’t say they’re……

]]> By: Gun News » February 14 - Today in the News http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/02/13/56281/comment-page-1/#comment-31733 Gun News » February 14 - Today in the News Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:28:26 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/02/13/56281/#comment-31733 [...] John Longenecker: 2008: Gun Control Candidates Need Not Apply [...] [...] John Longenecker: 2008: Gun Control Candidates Need Not Apply [...]

]]> By: John Longenecker http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/02/13/56281/comment-page-1/#comment-31713 John Longenecker Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:24:14 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/02/13/56281/#comment-31713 Thanks very much, North Central Idaho. Roger, I think America needs to recognize that 22,000 gun laws profoundly challenge the authority of non-gun owners. They may not feel it, or perhaps they do and don't recognize it as such. You see it in family law as I see it, but homes don't easily make the connection as a challenge to authority following disarmament (and intimidation and force). This is why I write for the non-gun owners in America. To make that connection. Tho we may have 80 million gunnies here, we more profoundly have maybe an aggregate of 220 million adults who could make that connection. The rest of America are minors (I believe). Thanks for your support, guys. Thanks very much, North Central Idaho.

Roger, I think America needs to recognize that 22,000 gun laws profoundly challenge the authority of non-gun owners. They may not feel it, or perhaps they do and don’t recognize it as such.

You see it in family law as I see it, but homes don’t easily make the connection as a challenge to authority following disarmament (and intimidation and force).

This is why I write for the non-gun owners in America. To make that connection. Tho we may have 80 million gunnies here, we more profoundly have maybe an aggregate of 220 million adults who could make that connection. The rest of America are minors (I believe).

Thanks for your support, guys.

]]> By: The View From North Central Idaho http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/02/13/56281/comment-page-1/#comment-31675 The View From North Central Idaho Wed, 14 Feb 2007 07:25:17 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/02/13/56281/#comment-31675 <strong>Quote of the day--John Longenecker...</strong> ... Quote of the day–John Longenecker…

…

]]> By: Scott Strohm http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/02/13/56281/comment-page-1/#comment-31655 Scott Strohm Wed, 14 Feb 2007 04:26:24 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/02/13/56281/#comment-31655 "The Second Amendment isn’t about guns or hunting anymore than the First Amendment is about typewriters" Excellent way to put it. Much appreciate your regular posts, John. “The Second Amendment isn’t about guns or hunting anymore than the First Amendment is about typewriters”

Excellent way to put it.

Much appreciate your regular posts, John.

]]> By: Roger Knight http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/02/13/56281/comment-page-1/#comment-31650 Roger Knight Wed, 14 Feb 2007 04:09:07 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/02/13/56281/#comment-31650 Your comment on Chicago Bear Tank Johnson? He is charged with exercising his constitutional right to keep and bear arms. In this case to arm Bears. The problem is that he apparently neglected to fill out some paperwork with certain government authorities declaring himself a gun owner. I do not believe we have that law here in the State of Washington. Here, only if you are convicted of a felony or domestic violence misdemeanor and have not had your right to keep and bear arms restored by a court order is it unlawful ro possess a firearm. Unless you want a concealed weapon license, you do not have to tell any government authority about your weapons ownership. So I am appalled that Illinois has or allows such a requirement and prosecutes Tank Johnson for not meeting it. I wonder if Louisiana allows or has such a reporting and registration requirement. That would explain how Mayor Nagin knew which citizens were keeping and bearing arms in order to seize them. I still want to know how they were able to order the citizens to turn in their weapons without receiving the ammunition first and at high speeds! Your comment on Chicago Bear Tank Johnson? He is charged with exercising his constitutional right to keep and bear arms. In this case to arm Bears.
The problem is that he apparently neglected to fill out some paperwork with certain government authorities declaring himself a gun owner.
I do not believe we have that law here in the State of Washington. Here, only if you are convicted of a felony or domestic violence misdemeanor and have not had your right to keep and bear arms restored by a court order is it unlawful ro possess a firearm. Unless you want a concealed weapon license, you do not have to tell any government authority about your weapons ownership.
So I am appalled that Illinois has or allows such a requirement and prosecutes Tank Johnson for not meeting it.
I wonder if Louisiana allows or has such a reporting and registration requirement. That would explain how Mayor Nagin knew which citizens were keeping and bearing arms in order to seize them.
I still want to know how they were able to order the citizens to turn in their weapons without receiving the ammunition first and at high speeds!

]]>