lumigan tramadol tadalafil

The Ultimate Scam

2007-02-26
By

You would think/hope that there wouldn’t be people out there stupid enough to fall for this … buuuttt.

Enlightened individuals, those who stay awake at nights wondering what they can do to prevent the polar caps from melting, at least have a growing menu of choices.

Sydney-based Easy Being Green says it will mitigate your cat’s flatulent contribution to global warming for A$8 ($6). The same company could also make your granny “carbon-neutral” at A$10 a year.

BWAAAAHAHAHAHA!!!! It gets better!

Then there’s Carbon Planet Pty … if you are hopping on a short-haul flight between Sydney and Canberra, and feeling bad about the damage you are doing to the ecosystem, you can buy credits worth A$23, for which the Adelaide-based company will guarantee to keep 1 ton of carbon dioxide out of the air for 100 years.

That’s right … if you feel guilty that you aren’t “carbon-neutral” you can send money to these companies, and they “guarantee” that “they” will reduce carbon dioxide. They, of course, don’t tell you how they will do it (I checked), but they’ll take your money just the same.

I have sent an email to Easy Being Green in order to understand just how they will reduce carbon dioxide.

With companies like this telling you your cat’s fart will destroy the world … no wonder kids can’t sleep at night. I’m waiting for some children to go Jeffrey Dahmer on their pet in order to save the world. What happens when they turn on Granny?

Al Gore didn’t invent the carbon-neutral lifestyle … though he might tell you he did. Gore did help propel it as modern day chic. At least his website is free to calculate your carbon-neutrality. Fact is … some entrepreneur scam artist saw Gore’s website and understood that many morons are, in fact, idiots.

The idea that anyone can believe that a cat’s, dog’s, cow’s, or human’s farts/burps can destroy the world is uber asinine. To come to that conclusion you will have to believe one of two things:

  1. (If religious) God has no long term plan for us, and designed us specifically to destroy the world, or worse yet … he made a mistake.
  2. (If not religious) Mother Earth is suicidal. Why would Earth foster the creation of creatures whose own natural bodily functions would eventually destroy it?

Neither of those options make any sense. There is a third option you might want to explore:

  • It’s all … ahem … hot air.

Even if you do believe mankind is responsible for some global warming (volcanoes contribute more than we do) … you can’t possibly believe that the flatulence of our pets and ourselves has doomed us … can you?

If you really feel so guilty about contributing to global warming … why not make an effort to curb your habits? Perhaps give Beano to every animal you come in contact with.

Why would you be so stupid as to send money to a company that will pinkie-swear “promise” that they will reduce greenhouse gases by several to hundreds of tons on your behalf? They don’t send you any products to help you become more carbon-neutral, or even go into detail about how they will use your money for that said purpose. Instead … they send you a certificate that they will “promise” to do as they promised.

I’m even willing to bet the certificate doesn’t come on recycled paper.

Like I always say: “Save the planet … eat a cow.”

4 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • http://lovability.org amfortas

    Those stupid Venusians, MartinB. What a huge carbon-producing crowd they must have been. How many of them do you think there were at the beginning of the end? And I bet some smart-arse there blamed it on being 40 million miles closer to the sun. Huh!

  • MartianBachelor

    WRT #2

    a) ‘Mother Nature’ is a colloquialism, not a scientific term. ‘Ecological homeostasis’ is an undecided issue; Venus having apparently gone through a runaway greenhouse effect in the past argues against the idea being universally true.

    b) ‘Suicide’ would be an anthropomorphism here; the closest appropriate scientific term might be Unstable Equilibrium.

    c) Dumping X tons of carbon dioxide per person per annum by burning fossil fuels is not a natural bodily function. Methane is, but the large number of animals producing it is only possible with modern technology and it’s therefore not natural either.

    It is simply wrong to say “volcanoes contribute more than we do”. They don’t. Major eruptions inject material into the stratosphere which cools the planet.

    A couple of people engaging in some minor silliness or trying to make a buck through possibly questionable means doesn’t mean anything except that people want to do something about this.

    And Inhofe is just a corrupt mouthpiece for the oil and gas industry who took more money from them than just about anyone else in congress.

  • Anderson

    “The greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people.” ~U.S. Senator James M. Inhofe

    ““Skepticism is the first step towards truth.” ~Denis Diderot

    “The crowd of fools who know nothing is infinite.” ~Galileo

    N.

  • Virtue

    This is beautiful I am starting a website to do the same thing for America.







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search