Mike LaSalle
Man imprisoned over failure to pay $ 50,000 in child support

An Akron man was sentenced to 11 months in prison Monday for failing to pay child support for four children.

Rate this post:

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

| Print This Post Print This Post | 0 views | Other posts by Mike LaSalle

Possibly Related Posts:

  • Court: No Jail for Failure to Pay Child Support
  • ...
  • cmonitor.com
  • ...
  • COURIER-JOURNAL.COM
  • ...
  • Iraqi Document Dump
  • ...
  • law.com
  • ...

    Stumble It!

    book mark Man imprisoned over failure to pay $ 50,000 in child support in del.icio.us | Man imprisoned over failure to pay $ 50,000 in child support to Slashdot.com | Submit Man imprisoned over failure to pay $ 50,000 in child support to Digg.com | Submit Man imprisoned over failure to pay $ 50,000 in child support to BoingBoing.net | Bookmark Man imprisoned over failure to pay $ 50,000 in child support in Furl | Bookmark Man imprisoned over failure to pay $ 50,000 in child support in Spurl | Bookmark Man imprisoned over failure to pay $ 50,000 in child support in Reddit | Bookmark Man imprisoned over failure to pay $ 50,000 in child support in Tailrank | Bookmark Man imprisoned over failure to pay $ 50,000 in child support in Newsvine | Bookmark Man imprisoned over failure to pay $ 50,000 in child support to Yahoo! | Bookmark Man imprisoned over failure to pay $ 50,000 in child support to Fark

    12 Comments »

    1. RestoringGuy said,

      I couldn’t find the part where it said the mother was put in prison for failure to pay $50,000 to the father. Did I miss it?

      February 28, 2007 at 12:42 pm

    2. Roger Knight said,

      During the 19th Century many states, including Ohio, placed prohibitioins of imprisonment for debtr into their constitutions to prevent exactly this.
      Article I Section 1 of the Ohio Constitution declares the inalienable rights of all men, including the right to acquire, possess, and protect property. Apparently does not apply to those ordered to pay child support.
      Article I Section 4 of the Ohio Constitution declares the right of the people to bear arms for their defense and security. God help us if noncustodial parents start doing that!
      Article I Section 6 of the Ohio Constitution prohibits slavery and involuntary servitude. Apparently does not apply to those ordered to pay child support.
      Article I Section 9 of the Ohio Constitution prohibits excessive fines and bails and cruel and unusual punishments. Apparently does not apply to excessive child support.
      Article I Section 15 of the Ohio Constitution prohibits imprisonment for debt except in cases of fraud. Apparently child support is a fraud!

      February 28, 2007 at 2:06 pm

    3. RestoringGuy said,

      RK, it would seem you are right. However, liberals and conservatives judges alike have proven they will cherry-pick the Constitution of any state, and the US Constitution itself. One best give up on trying to salvage what must, at this point, be replaced with more effective tools like the free market. If this guy in Akron gets raped in prison, maybe the 401K company in charge of the judge’s retirement should hand his savings over to the rape victim as compensation? Anyone have a problem with that?

      With regard to the Constitutional issues, on private property, we do not use, and do not need, any Constitution in our daily lives. When is the last time you whipped out the Constitution and subsequently got a lower price at the grocery store? I no longer believe in the mythical unicorn of judicial idealism. To defend it, is like defending the dental care of leprechauns living in another dimension. It’s good, but where does it get you?

      February 28, 2007 at 3:02 pm

    4. Charles Fockaert said,

      Blah, blah blah, meanwhile, thousand of dads are being sent to fight a war half-way around the world for ‘foreign policy’ causing their families to break up and their children to suffer and very few ‘conservatives’ speak up and in fact support such actions.

      “Military men are “dumb, stupid animals to be used” as pawns for foreign policy.”
      Zionist and dual Israel/US citizen Henry Kissinger

      And many innocent men are being held at Gitmo and other ’secret’ interrogation cells around the world and nary a whisper of dissent from many of you. If you don’t raise your voice in protest against the abuse of these men, why should you be surprised if no one sees or joins in your protest about dads being incarcerated?

      The abuse is the same, different people, those society has been trained to accept that this abuse is legit.

      Wake-up.

      February 28, 2007 at 6:20 pm

    5. thurston861 said,

      Education, income, and profession omitted from the report.

      Must be another Judicially Constructed DEADBEAT.

      RK should not have been rebuffed.

      If the court is going to claim authority and legitimacy due to following the societal construct, we must expose that lie and show that it is not benevelent authority, but a corrupt organization, a money racket.

      March 1, 2007 at 8:56 am

    6. RestoringGuy said,

      “…without nary a whisper of dissent…”! Are you kidding? Voices do not work magic, and it does no good to speak to a person who already has their mind irreversibly made up.

      Once a person blows a moral fuse (ie. becomes a dirtbag who feels entitled to take other’s money by force) that person is never coming back from it. Liberals have blown their fuse decades ago, and conservatives now blown every fuse imaginable. If you want to stop abuses on the other side of the world, it is better then we start FIRST in our own neighborhoods and households.

      Sure Charles, I’ll wake up. Your friends, or your family, who still imply they are politically keen on having you killed or imprisoned for refusing to financially fund Mr. Bush’s war, or any project not funded by your own choice, and you let them do that, then that is complacency too. Maybe they are totally out of your life, in which case you are truly backing your words with action.

      March 1, 2007 at 9:19 am

    7. donnieboy57 said,

      fockaert: you’ve done it again. i guy is in jail for a debt so lets talk about iraq. i suppose everyone else here bows to your intellect, however i just don’t see it.

      love ya!

      March 1, 2007 at 5:11 pm

    8. Charles Fockaert said,

      donnieboy, what is happening to our families and particularly us fathters is just one part of the larger war against our culture.

      Before you criticise my attempt to bring this fact to light, please read my book Deadbeat Dad. It’s available at http://www.lulu.com/content/315711. A PDF downloadable copy is available for $10.00. If you can’t afford that, let me know at deadbeatcharles@yahoo.com and I’mm make sure you get a free copy.

      There is a connection between what is going on with the ‘war on terrorism’ and the undeclared ‘war on fathers.’ Don’t be so quick to dismiss just such a possibility, as that is exactily what those who are waging this war against us want you to do.

      March 1, 2007 at 5:27 pm

    9. Charles Fockaert said,

      Restore,

      I’m not sure I follow your point in your comment, but my point was: there is a bigger picture here that many are not seeing. Too many refuse to admit that there it is possible for one group one internationally organized system that is capable of planning and carrying out a war against an entire culture - in this case Western culture - with the intent to destroy it. Separating dads from their children and then financially destroying the father so he can’t fight back is part of their strategy. Sending another 200,000 men off to be killed for ‘foreign policy’ is another. Meanwhile, back home, families are having a tough go and many break-up. A broken family an’t fight as effectively as a intact family.

      I could go on, but this is only a comment.

      March 1, 2007 at 5:37 pm

    10. Charles Fockaert said,

      “i guy is in jail for a debt so lets talk about iraq. i suppose everyone else here bows to your intellect, however i just don’t see it.”

      Here is the connection:

      Abolishing the ‘oppressive’ patriarchal family came next. Toward this end, universal moral law was tossed aside, wives and mothers were forced into factories, abortions made free, and divorces attained within minutes. Catastrophe ensued: “When the Bolsheviki [Zionism] came into power in 1917, they regarded the family…with fierce hatred and set out…to destroy it. One must live in Russia today, amid the atmosphere of torment, disgust, and disillusionment that pervades sex relations, the chaos, uncertainty, and tragedy that hover over the Russian family…Some men have twenty wives, living a week with one, a month with another…Abortions cover our villages with shame. Formerly we did not even hear of them.” (The Russian Effort to Abolish Marriage, by a Woman Resident in Russia; Atlantic Monthly, Vol.138, No.1, pp 108-114, July 1926).

      Bolsheviks {Zionists] ‘liberated’ thousands upon thousands of hapless children from their ‘oppressive’ families. Taking control of schools, they filled the heads of children with worthless propaganda, atheism, and extreme sex education. Additionally, children were psychologically manipulated into not only turning against their own families, but into spying upon them as well. The consequences were enormous: devastated families, destroyed lives: child rapists, murderers, thieves, bullies, and outright sociopaths.”

      http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/01/23/the-new-soviet-union-america-and-the-west/

      March 1, 2007 at 6:09 pm

    11. CaptDMO said,

      “I’m not sure I follow your point in your comment, but my point was: there is a bigger picture here that many are not seeing.”

      And what do you propose Mr. F?

      Personally, I’ll go after the dupes and agents of such a conspiricy tooth and nail, just to inspire other agents that they might reconsider their alliance, as their current masters canmnot protect them.

      It sure beats the hell out of staring in dumb awe at the size of the sky. Get with the program or get out of the way please.

      March 2, 2007 at 12:44 am

    12. Charles Fockaert said,

      “I’ll go after the dupes and agents of such a conspiricy tooth and nail…”

      Great, I’m all for it.

      Just how are you going to ‘go afer’ the dupes while hiding behing a pseudonym?

      March 2, 2007 at 4:04 pm

    Leave a Comment

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Blogwonks: Free Wordpress Blog Hosting
    BLOGWONKS.com is a your online news and blogging partner. Just click here to sign up for your free WordPress blog. You can customize your blog to display the latest RSS postings from your favorite websites. You can keep a diary, upload images and media files, and even register visitors on your site. Sign up now! It's FREE!
    MND Opinion
    editor's bio | article rss | comments rss | itunes podcast | tos | privacy policy
    MensNEWSdaily®, mndnet.com, BlogWonks.com™, BlogWonk.com™, NewsWax.com™, YakVox.com™, DorkWatch.org™, CounterPulse.com™, JavaKing.com™ © 2001 - 2006 Java King, Inc.. Opinions found on this website are expressly those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of this publication, its editorial staff or contributors. Words, graphics, audio, video, and all other content published on this domain must adhere to our Terms of Service . JAVA KING, INC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES, ADVERTISERS, SPONSORS AND AFFILIATES, DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, REPRESENTATIONS OR ENDORSEMENTS HEREIN EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.
    Site Meter
    RETURN TO MENS NEWS DAILY
    counter