lumigan tramadol tadalafil

Radio Station Bails Out Bobby Brown

2007-03-03
By

Bobby Brown has been arrested more often than Oprah Winfrey has reached for a bon bon. Brown has no socially redeeming features; only when he dies and his carcass is consumed by maggots will he be serving a useful purpose.

The former teen idol hit the jackpot when he married the beautiful, talented and intelligent Whitney Houston. But Brown didn’t appreciate his good fortune – he turned Whitney into a pathetic crack head.  

Whitney finally got rid of the bum, and now Brown  is just another petty criminal.

The singer was serving under stint in jail, this time for owing $19,150 in child-support payments and court fees. The drug addict should have rotted in jail, but a radio station bailed  him out with the understanding that he would pay them back by agreeing to a series of interviews.

From the Associated Press:

“Hot 99.5 FM, which broadcasts in the Washington D.C. area, intervened following on-air discussions and two days of negotiation with Brown’s attorney, the host of the station’s “The Kane Show,” told The Associated Press.‘In exchange for the money, he agreed to be an employee of our radio station for one week,’ where he will discuss what he did wrong and how he could turn his life around, said Kane, who goes by one name. ‘We are going to have a very open and candid conversation.’”

Hot 99.5 should be ashamed for bailing out Brown, he doesn’t deserve another chance. How many has he had already, a hundred and one?

But sometimes stories have a happy ending. Bobby Brown bailed out on his deal with the radio station, he insists he never agreed to be interviewed on the air. The radio is left with egg on its collective face, and Brown will no doubt soon have a white chalky substance on his face.

3 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • Dittohd

    To KVolz:

    >…it would be better to bail out someone who is a better person, and a good father.

    I don’t agree that Bobby Brown is a bad father because he is behind in so-called “child support”. How do you feel about the mother? After all, she had her child by Bobby Brown. with all the choice that goes with that result, both before and after the act. If, for argument’s sake, we say Bobby Brown is a bad father, doesn’t that make the mother a bad mother? And if so, what then? Shouldn’t she also go to jail for having a child/children with a bad father?

    I think if we are going to put men in jail for not supporting their children in accordance with the often irrational decisions of a family court, women should also be equally incarcerated for having their children with such men. Their complicit actions should likewise be against the law.

  • KVolz

    I think it is terrible for the radio station to bail him out, and even worse for him to go back on his word. If the radio station were to bail someone out, it would be better to bail out someone who is a better person, and a good father. But I guess it wouldn’t seem worth it to the radio station if it came down to a “regular guy”.

  • http://www.antipeonage.0catch.com Roger Knight

    Bobby Brown was not in jail for using drugs, for introducing Whitney Houston to drugs, or for any other crime. He was imprisoned for failure to pay money in a state whose constitution prohibits imprisonment for debt and a nation whose constitution prohibits slavery and involuntary servitude and mandates due process of law for any deprivation of liberty or property.
    Here is the deal on child support: it is not based on any wrongdoing, it is imposed regardless of wrongdoing or lack thereof.
    That alone makes it a violation of the Due Process Clause. For what can due process of law be but a requirement that a specific instance of wrongdoing be proven BEFORE we can deprive anyone of their liberty or property?
    Considering that no custodial parent receiving child support is required to account for how the money is spent for the benefit of the child, we can truly say that it is only CALLED child support. This alone gives lie to all of the justifications and excuses dreamed up by the black robes, the state paid attorneys, and the politicians for denying noncustodial parents equal protection of state constitutions that prohibit imprisonment for debt.
    Not to mention denying us parents the protection of the Antipeonage Act, and taking away all of our licenses and passports and denying to us participation in any other activity that requires a “mother may I” from the government.
    And is the child support that was paid by the radio station in their publicity stunt going to Whitney Houston? A wealthy women who arguably does not need to receive any money extorted from Bobby Brown to adequately care for her children?
    Provided she does not spend her money on cocaine or other recreational drugs.
    Obviously RPR does not approve of Bobby Brown.
    But that does not give our society, acting through the government and its enforcement apparatus, the right to violate his constitutional rights and such statutes as the Antipeonage Act.
    Any more then you or I have the right to assault him, kill him, steal his car or other property and to unlawfully imprison him merely because we do not approve of him and how he lives his life.
    I believe in the Rule of Law and the Constitution. We ought to try it sometime.







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search