
Anyone doubting the hypocrisy of liberals should consider the following:
* Execution of a convicted killer is cruel, unusual & barbaric; whereas a woman’s right to abort the life of an innocent child is inalienable;
* Starving a helpless victim like Terri Schaivo to death is acceptable; but using lethal injection to end the life of a brutal killer is not;
* Discrimination based on race or gender is wrong. Except when waged against Caucasian men, in which case it is mandated by law & called Affirmative Action;
* Invading a foreign nation is wrong, except when aliens from Mexico invade America;
* Democrats are the only hope for American families and labor. However, liberals support the influx of millions of illegal aliens who work for lower wages and without benefits, thereby driving down the standard of living for “average” American citizens;
* Outsourcing of American jobs offshore is driven by immoral corporate greed. By contrast, open borders and amnesty are acceptable because the majority of illegal aliens are future Democrats;
* Huge profits are obscene and un-American, except when enjoyed by George Soros, Oprah Winfrey, and other liberals;
* Conservatives who seek to preserve American culture are bigoted hate mongers, whereas new immigrants must be allowed to maintain and celebrate their cultural heritage at all costs;
* The traditional American family consisting of one man and one woman and their offspring is just one of several possible arrangements, all of which are equally moral and acceptable. In addition, marriage is no longer necessary to sanctify man-woman relationships.
* Although the institution of marriage is no longer vital to heterosexual partners, it is absolutely essential that same-sex couples be allowed to marry as if they were straight. To do otherwise is to deny gay couples equality and fairness and is clearly unconstitutional.
* Burning Old Glory is protected free speech, whereas expression of conservative values by people like Rush Limbaugh is unacceptable hate speech and should be subjected to “fairness” controls;
* Freedom of speech must never be quashed, except for criticism directed at minorities and other constituencies of the Democrat party;
* Tax cuts are wrong when returned to people who actually paid taxes, but perfectly fine when sent to those who paid none;
* Skyrocketing gasoline prices devastate working American families, but protecting wild life is a greater priority;
* Anyone who supports English as the official American language is a racist. But those who prefer Spanish and other foreign languages are justified because “diversity is our greatest strength;”
* Blocking the sale of port security to the UAE was necessary to protect homeland security, but securing the border with Mexico is wrong because it would “scapegoat” Hispanics;
* Illegal aliens should be licensed to drive–to avoid breaking the law by driving illegally;
* Symbols of Christianity must be kept out of public view so as to offend no one, whereas Islam must be openly promoted in the name of religious awareness and tolerance;
* Businesses are oppressive institutions that must not be allowed to become too large and powerful. By contrast, government creates wealth & happiness and should be expanded whenever possible;
* Military force must never be used, except when needed to advance interests not vital to the United States, or to obscure a Democrat president’s sexual misconduct in the Oval Office.
Think about it– Are you enough of a hypocrite to be a liberal?
Rate this post:


Stumble It!











Ray Blumhorst said,
That’s a long list and by no means definitive. Hmmm.
March 21, 2007 at 2:14 am
Roger Knight said,
Terrorists who made war on the United States and murderers who are sentenced to death must have their Constitutional rights asserted, enforced, and protected to the most extreme extent possible, but should a noncustodial parent ordered to pay child support dare suggest that he is protected by the same Constitution that protects everyone else, he should be severely punished with sanctions, including prohibitions from filing any future claim with the courts challenging the validity of any support order or any action taken to enforce said support order or any action taken that punishes for violating said support order regardless of whether such support order is reasonable and whether compliace was ever POSSIBLE, and the SCOTUS should never ever grant a writ of cetiorari to any noncustodial parent. Indeed, Zablocki v. Redhail was a wirt of certiorari that was improvidently granted, but having been granted the case should be cited only in matters involving gay marriages and never in cases involving noncustodial parents.
And of course, KSM should be released.
From 1,000 feet above a concrete parking lot.
We should similarly release some family court judges and divorce lawyers.
March 21, 2007 at 3:44 am
S Baker said,
More to the point is differentiating what is right and what is wrong — this is where liberals/progressives don’t have a clue.
March 21, 2007 at 7:04 am
RestoringGuy said,
This list is an excellent analysis. It should be pointed out that, when A is admitted to be much like B, and one supports A but opposes B, indeed one is a hypocrite.
But most of these can be reversed and given a political re-spin to show conservatives plainly support B but oppose A, and somehow don’t see the contradiction. Liberalism is surely a mental disorder at this point, but by simple deduction, it not have a monopoly on it. Only by exposing fallacy in both directions can one gain traction with a legitimate viewpoint.
March 21, 2007 at 8:43 am