300 Cretins
It takes a great deal of courage to stand with only 300 men against 100,000. However, unlike the Spartans at the Battle of Thermopylae, the small group of men who goaded President Bush into Iraq did so at no great personal sacrifice. As Bill Bonner explains, it is the common man who will suffer the greatest sacrifice of this War on Terror.
by Bill Bonner Â
Go tell the Cretins, you who read;
We took their orders, and are dead.
            - Based on inscription at Thermopylae, with apologies Â
The Bush administration is hoping that the new film, 300, will give the troop surge a lift with the public. The film glorifies the sacrifice of 300 Spartan warriors who held back an invading army of over 100,000 Persians in 480 B.C. Â
Choosing their terrain well, the Spartans managed to neutralize much of the Persians advantage; while the Persians had many, many more troops, they could only get a few of them to the line of battle at a time. But the Greeks could see they were on the losing side of this fight. The Thespians, fighting alongside the Spartans, withdrew while the Spartans decided to stay and fight to the last man. They might have done so as a purely military necessity, holding off the enemy so as to give their allies time to retreat and regroup; or they might have fought on simply for the glory of it. We don’t know. Â
We do know that they managed to hold their ground for a couple more days, until a fellow Greek, Ephialties, betrayed them by showing Xerxes how to outflank his opponents. Then, the Persians got behind the Spartans and rained down arrows upon them until they were all dead. Â
Leonidas’s body was recovered, beheaded and crucified. But the rest of the surviving Greeks were then able to take up the fight; and, in a number of calamities and misadventures, the Easterners were finally driven back across the straits to Asia Minor. Western civilization was saved. Â
According to today’s neo-conservative apparatchiks, we are once again involved in an epic struggle – a clash of civilizations between the free West and the tyrannical East. Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, Richard Perle, Philip Zelikow – this handful of men (probably no more than 300 of them), pushed a bright, shining war on a dim yahoo of a president. Together, they see themselves like Leonidas at the Pass of Thermopylae, guarding our western way of life, without even getting their suits dirty. The sacrifice of others is worthwhile, they believe. Â
But now, after four years with neither victory nor defeat in hand, it is too late for earnest criticism; instead, the time has come for gratuitous ridicule. Â
The targets are many. For instance, against whom the war in Iraq is being waged (or why) has yet to be fully clarified. Every question on the subject brings a response that only deepens the mystery. Â
But the costs are becoming clearer every day. So far, Britain’s Ministry of Defense admits to having spent 5 billion pounds on the war in direct costs. Indirect costs are sure to be many times that figure. America’s total is much larger – $505 billion of U.S. ‘taxpayers’ money’ has been spent or approved. The biggest of all liar’s loans? Â
Of course, we are already in the Land of Lies. Neither the British taxpayer nor his American counterpart has any spare money; their taxes were already earmarked for other boondoggles. Still, the U.S. President asked for another $100 billion of it on Monday, and is expected to request $140 billion more for 2008, bringing the total to over $700 billion. Looking ahead, to the cost of caring for wounded and incapacitated soldiers, the whole thing is expected to cost more than $1 trillion. Â
Since we’re tallying, we cannot fail to mention the cost in lives. 3,205 U.S. soldiers have died, and 134 British soldiers. More than 24,000 Americans have been seriously wounded. Iraqi casualties, if anyone is keeping score, may top half a million. Â
Meanwhile, George W. Bush asked Congress for the latest $100 billion draw, without strings and without delay – or else the war might have to be called off, he seemed to warn. The politicians bent over and checked under the cushions, but the spare change they recovered came nowhere close to $100 billion. They are already facing budget deficits of a half a trillion over the next two years. Where would the extra money come from? What would the extra strain do to the finances of the nation…or to the value of the dollar? How was the investment expected to pay off? No one knew. No one even asked. Â
But as for the strings, everyone knew exactly what the chief executive was talking about -even the chief executive himself. Lawmakers have come to see the war, not as a real war, but merely as just another spending opportunity, with live ammunition. To the latest demand for cash, the polls have attached a number of pork-barrel provisions, including $25 million for spinach growers, $100 million for citrus growers, $74 million for peanut storage, $4 billion for ‘emergency payments’ to farmers, and $283 million for milk subsidies. Who says there isn’t progress in human affairs? The U.S. congress has managed to improve upon the old Roman formula – they’ve combined bread, circuses and war in a single spending bill. Â
Every war has its profiteers. Neither in love, nor in war do you stop to count the costs. But a phony war is a bigger opportunity than most, because there is no patriotic necessity to win. Unlike the Spartans, the Cretins know Iraq poses no real danger to the homeland. So everyone gets into the spirit of the war as it really is. Â
Halliburton, Lockheed, and Bechtel inflate prices, take money for nothing, and gouge taxpayers for useless weapons and unnecessary supplies. In one report, truckers reported that they were asked to drive empty trucks back and forth across the desert, carrying sailboat fuel so that contractors could bill the government for delivery. A total of $9 billion has been officially lost or unaccounted for. Â
War critics will complain about the waste of money involved. They will point to this week’s polls, showing the war to be so ineffective that the average Iraqi now regards democracy with suspicion, and finds it acceptable to kill U.S. and British troops. The more the U.S. government tries to improve the lives of the Iraqis, the more Iraqis seem to want to get even. Given the deadly drift of things, wasted spending may turn out to be the best spending the Bush team did. Â
“There will be good days and there will be bad days,†said the American president, stoically. And he’s right…but they won’t be shared out equally. The spinach growers, milk producers, and weapons contractors will get the good days. The poor grunts, the Iraqis and the taxpayers will get the bad ones. Â
But what about the Cretins? In the film, as in the battle, the Spartans were wiped out. “Spartans. Tonight we dine in hell,†Leonidas was said to remark. Later, a shower of arrows so thick they blotted out the sun, according to Herodotus, came down on them. The Spartans fell; but Greece was saved. Â
We don’t know how far the parallels go. The U.S. military presence in Iraq hardly seems like 300 Spartans defending the homeland. Instead, it seems more like the Persian Empire invading someone else’s homeland. Â
And the 300 Cretins? Are they really protecting western civilization? Was it worth the billions spent and the thousands of corpses? We don’t know, but we have a feeling that there is already a table reserved for them in Hell.  Â
[Ed. Note: If you would like to read more of the real story of the war between Greece and Persia, please refer to our very own book:Â Â Â The Essential Classics]
Regards, Â
Bill Bonner
The Daily Reckoning Â
Editor’s Note: Bill Bonner is the founder and editor of The Daily Reckoning. He is also the author, with Addison Wiggin, of The Wall Street Journal best seller Financial Reckoning Day: Surviving the Soft Depression of the 21st Century (John Wiley & Sons).Â
In Bonner and Wiggin’s follow-up book, Empire of Debt: The Rise of an Epic Financial Crisis, they wield their sardonic brand of humor to expose the nation for what it really is – an empire built on delusions. Daily Reckoning readers can buy their copy of Empire of Debt at a discount – just click on the link below: Â
| More from Daily Reckoning
Stumble It!



March 24th, 2007 at 9:00 pm
If there was one change I would make in government, I would get rid of railers. All those little funding tack ons that politicians love. If every bill had to pass on its own merit, then a lot of junk would be cut out.
March 24th, 2007 at 11:53 pm
Sparta was a matriarchy, pretending to be macho like the Minoans they took much of their social system from. Not a woman in sight at Thermopylae of course.
I was watching Jim Lehrer’s Newshour the other day (yes, we get it in Oz, a day late) and in one hour there must have been 10 phrases ‘our men and women in Iraq’. The women are there in tiny proportion hanging back and keeping their nail polish at the ready.
300 is a small company. If women in our matriarchy are to really be equal, we need to see 50 Batallions, 50,000 women soldiers in the front line. Maybe then we might have some modern epoch-making heroinics. What the film doesn’t show is the real reason 300 men decided death was the better option. The famous Spartan mother (whose name I forget) who told her son to come back victorious or on a shield. Who’d want to go back to a harridan riven society.
PS. The Thespians were bit-part players, booked to appear in another theatre. Thermopylae was a rehersal.
March 25th, 2007 at 1:39 am
Always trying to badmouth the American effort in the Iraq War? Some people are just invested in American defeat.
As for the Spartans, I’ve always thought the propaganda claim that the Greeks defended Western Civilization and Freedom with their ultimately successful defense against the Persian Invasion is a bit over the top.
Sparta was five villages out in the boondocks where 3/4 of the people were slaves. These slaves grew the crops and raised the livestock to provide the food and fiber for the elites. There was a class of craftsmen who built the buildings and made the weapons for the soldiers. The armed forces tended to be drawn from the landowners whose slaves tilled the fields, and from the other elites. The reason for this is that should the slaves be armed and taught the art of war, the elites would no longer be elites.
They would be dead. Slaves don’t like being slaves and tend to treat their masters badly when they get the upper hand.
The motivation of the Spartans and Thebans to sacrifice themselves at Thermopylae was not Freedom as we modern Americans know it. It was the freedom to continue to lord over their domains without having to answer to a bunch of people from a foreign land who speak a foreign language.
If Xerxes was able to employ an army of slaves, it was because he was from a nation large enough and powerful enoguh to employ a substantial force of layal elite troops to keep the slave army fighting for King Xerxes and not dump him into the Aegean Sea.
Sparta, Athens, and Thebes could not afford to do such.
As for defending Western Civilization, WC owes as much to the Hebrews of Israel as we do the Greeks. Indeed, the Greek Orthodox Church can be said to be directly derived from both traditions.
While the invader of Greece was Xerk the Jerk, his grandfather Cyrus the Great liberated the Hebrews from their Babylonian Captivity and allowed them to resettle in Israel.
The Persians and Babylonians made their contributions as well.
To say that had Xerxes been successful in making Greece a Persian province he would have ended Western Civilization is to say that there would have been no Roman Empire, no Jesus Christ, no France, no Britain, no British Empire, no United States of America and no Canada.
I am a bit sceptical of that proposition.
March 25th, 2007 at 1:19 pm
If you want great coverage of the economy read John Mauldin’s weekly newsletter. Bonner is a gold humping anti-American joke. Buy gold all the time is not sound investment advice.
If you think fighting al Qaeda and Iran in Iraq is expensive wait until we leave Iraq and that country is divided amongst our enemies.
Bonner’s economic analysis is no better than his geopoltical. Mauldin quantifies the emerging credit crunch. His latest missive cogently explains how the problems in the subprime market could spread and doesn’t shy away from the details of what is really happening in the credit markets. Bonner never bothers to delve into specifics.
Do yourself a favor and ignore Bonner. He is a one note Sally who never explains the how and why.
March 26th, 2007 at 9:25 am
The real reason libtards get so worked up about 300 an use it to bash the war in Iraq is;
it’s a movie about duty, honor and country.
Values they don’t or never will have, I think it reminds them of how pitiful they really are.
The movie isn’t about todays political climate..
It’s just a kick ass flick.