lumigan tramadol tadalafil

American Parents Shanghaied by Radical Feminism

2007-03-25
By

Indentured servants that were kidnapped by crimp gangs and shipped to the Colonies as a product of the Slave Trade in the 1600s, may have had nothing to really complain about. Although their participation may not have been their idea, the ordeal would only last 4 to 7 years – they were housed, fed, and then ‘Freedom Dues’ were paid at the conclusion of service – it all made for a pretty sweet deal. An indentured servant would labor for a landowner who had paid the steerage bill to the Captain of the ship who brought the victim overseas. After the contracted service, the servant would customarily receive his freedom, 50 acres of land, a gun, and supplies.

The indentured servants of today are taken from their own land by Family Law crimp gangs, and must pay for their own steerage before being contracted to spend up to 18 years answering to the other parent of their own children. Rather than providing these Shanghaied landowners with a job, housing, and food – they are responsible for providing their own and must pay their masters an arbitrarily large sum of cash each month to maintain the land that they so recently owned. Failure to keep up their end of the bargain will incur interest on the money the servant failed to earn, and may incur the additional costs of their own persecution by agencies of the States’ Justice department. An uppity slave who misses a payment will be put in debtor’s prison, which will force the financial burden to grow with interest and will increase the length of time to repay it.

The difference between the old and new systems of indentured servitude should be glaring and obvious. The old system targeted only single men who were down on their luck or homeless, while the new system targets only landowning (breadwinning) parents. The old system contracted the servant to spend a specific length of time which would compensate the landowner for bringing the servant to the jobsite, while the new system contracts the servant to spend as much time as it takes to pay off an arbitrary debt which compensates the master for removing the former landowner from the jobsite.

The glory days of old indentured servitude took a turn for the worse in the early 1700s with the passage of a new law in Virginia: “All servants imported and brought into the Country…who were not Christians in their native Country…shall be accounted and be slaves. All Negro, mulatto and Indian slaves within this dominion…shall be held to be real estate. If any slave resist his master…correcting such slave, and shall happen to be killed in such correction…the master shall be free of all punishment…as if such accident never happened.” The new law pulled the rug out from under the involuntary servants who had the wrong color skin and were snatched from a Country that didn’t love the baby Jesus. The new law in Virginia was quickly adopted by the other colonies, since landowners would only need to pay steerage costs for the Slave Trader’s new cash cow that was specified by the new legislation.

The glory days of new indentured servitude took a turn for the worse in the early 1990s with the passage of a new law in Congress: “Since Sen. Biden’s landmark Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) was signed into law in 1994, it has provided over $3.8 billion dollars to combat domestic violence and sexual assault nationwide. The Violence Against Women Act’s programs range from policies to encourage and prosecution of abusers, to victims services like shelters, to education that can prevent violence against women from happening in the first place. VAWA helped forge new alliances between police officers and victim advocates“. The new law lived up to its name by provoking violence against parents who were suddenly empowered to summon crimp gangs from a State’s Justice department, rather than paying out of pocket steerage costs to the Family Law press gangs. Landowning parents who suspected or anticipated resistance or betrayal from the newly empowered parent would usually correct such parent, and if they shall happen to be killed in such correction…the landowner shall attempt to be free of all punishment…as if such accident never happened.

Heterosexual taxpayers who dare to raise children in this country are slowly starting to pick their heads up and finally make eye contact with this intimidating threat to their family’s freedom. Soon American parents will suddenly realize, all at once, that this war is at their doorstep and their children’s future is in their hands.

Stephen Baskerville has continuously condemned this Family Law system of slavery and the radical feminists who are slowly overthrowing this nation’s government. Baskerville’s forthcoming book entitled ‘Taken Into Custody: The War against Fathers, Marriage, and the Family’ will allow parents to fully understand the mechanisms that were created to threaten their family’s freedom and the series of unfortunate events that allowed them to come into existence. Parents who wish to hear testimony from other freedom fighters are urged to virtually attend the recent Family Law Reform Conference sponsored by the American Coalition of Fathers and Children (ACFC) online or on DVD.

“But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.” (Movie: “National Treasure”)

Jim Untershine holds a BSEE from Mississippi State University and has 13 years experience in feedback control system design. Mr. Untershine is currently using the teachings of Werner Heisenberg and Henry David Thoreau to expose Family Law in California as the exploitation of children for money and the indentured servitude of heterosexual taxpayers who dare to raise children in this country.

54 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • Pingback: American Parents Shanghaied by Radical Feminism « GZS of Long Beach

  • jw

    I’m helping my step-daughter file for child support. When I filed for child support, it was easy. Oh, I got about a third of what a woman would have got (given iderntical incomes). The process in the 1970′s was disustingly bigoted to fathers with custody in that way. Now though?

    Now it is all so COMPLEX! It takes a lawyer just to figure out the basic Ontario filing rules. This is crazy. The system is supposed to be an easy one, but it not at all easy.

    I think the new complexity is one part of the reason for some men getting such a nasty shaft.

    This is supposed to be Family Court, a seperate and easy sub-system to resolve family conflict. Small Claims Court is a lot easier, so’s Traffic Court!

  • http://gndzerosrv.com Jim Untershine

    If anyone has ever personally experienced Family Law, they immediately recognize it as a confidence game, a racket, and a railroad. If Family Law were a sport – it would be Championship Wrestling. There are no rules, there is no law – the litigant determined to have the most money will be the one who pays the court costs. Regardless of the finding of fact or regardless of gender.

    Perry Manly was trying to tell us something when he walked into a Federal courthouse with a dud grenade in one hand, his court documents in the other hand, and a cutting board under his shirt. If you replace the dud grenade with due process and the cutting board with your Constitutional rights, you will immediately get blown away in court and nobody will think its news.

  • thurston861

    RG – tighten up your thinking.

    Peonage has to do with being held in slavery or imprisonment for a private debt.

    Children are not sent to school due to a private debt, but the alleged fact that education reduces crime.

    Well, that is a lie, because education without moral education to learn to do the right thing, at the right time, even though you do not want to, is just the intellectual empowerment of criminals to make justification for their lusts (that includes sex, drugs, alcohol, covetusness, materialism….).

    Kind of like…the Clintons and Bushs.

  • RestoringGuy

    By logical deduction, it is not solely men who are targeted, but children as well. If the peonage laws apply, then they also apply to state-forced public schooling, and numerous government constraints placed solely on children. In any case, the specifics on this do not matter, but we only know it is always adult women who are free and unfettered in nearly any course of action whatsoever. This applies to careers, families, or “planning” decisions, as well as choosing to spend their money as they see fit. Any non-woman is under the peonage attack, be they male, or simply less than a magic-number age.

  • http://www.antipeonage.0catch.com Roger Knight

    Scream for the enforcement of the Peonage Law.

    If nothing else, it embarasses the crap out of them.

    But as I say:

    We tried the 14th Amendment, pleading our case to the state courts. We tried the 5th Amendment, pleading our case to the federal courts. We pled our rights under the 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 13th, 14th, and 24th Amendments.
    We pled our right to not be targeted by bills of attainder and ex post facto laws.
    We pled our right under the 14th Amendment to equal protection of state constitutions that prohibit imprisonment for debt.
    We pled the Antipeonage Act, slavery for debt is illegal.
    We tried the 1st Amendment, telling our story to an indifferent public.

    What Amendment does that leave?

  • S Baker

    George Orwell figured this all out in the 1930s and 40s before penning the book 1984. The family unit must be destroyed. The feminist in league with the homosexuals are leading the charge to finish the deed. There is never a shortage of weak-minded individuals that to buy any market.

  • mirwalk

    actually, we only need the male pill to finally hit the market. Once that does and a man can make SURE that there will be no more children without his say so, then you will see the progress. Since the women will not be able to force children.

  • steven deluca

    donnieboy is right – there are not enough men willing to sleep alone – because there are not enough “men”. Men have self-respect but they don’t learn that from women. Boy/men just go along to get laid, or to avoid lonliness. Again, we need to teach our sons to be strong.

  • donnieboy57

    denis has it right., but one fears that there simply aren’t enough men willing to sleep alone to get it done.

  • thurston861

    brmerrick, you are so right.

    Time to deny Feministas their use of Children as Human Sheilds as they Rape and Pillage Men and their Familes, and the Courts make money off the victimization of Men with overbearing support amounts.

  • brmerrick

    It is long past time to take marriage out of the hands of government entirely, and return it to the private sector, where it was when the country was founded. We must form groups of concerned citizens in every state that will bring this issue to the forefront. We do not need the government’s permission anymore to engage in private contracts, to exercise our God-given rights to freedom of religion and freedom of association. We do not need the government’s blessing, nor the government’s condemnation. Destroying all marriage law destroys family courts, and returns to men their natural rights. True libertarianism is the only antidote to activist feminism and activist Leftist homosexual groups, as there will be no more marriage law to include gay couples.

  • CaptDMO

    Sometime before the assumption of Debtor=batterer
    evolves to “give her your money or you’re a child abuser”,
    A practical demonstration of “debt” and “battery” should be made to
    all that support and enable this misguided attempt at
    extortion, imprisonment with stigma, revocation of
    professional “licence”, and official travel documents

  • scottkirk

    EXCELLENT ARTICLE JIM…OTHERS NEED TO HEAR YOURE MESSAGE…

  • dad4justice

    I applaud this article . We have allowed a sub class to grow called non-custodial parents . As it gets bigger , fuelled by a combined relutance to face reality, bias feminazi ideology and misguided compassion which, in pursuit of a kinder society, actually sentences more people to misery , particularly more children and fathers’. Time for change as the utopian people have lost the plot !!

  • Denis

    Nicely put. These are indeed Jim Crow days for ALL men and ALL fathers in America. The Family Courts are absolutely no different than Stalin’s or Hitler’s show trials. A man is guilty before he walks into court on Day One. We are in the midst of a Gender Cold War that started 40 years ago. If I was king, this Cold War would become a Hot War and the blood of feminists would flow in the streets everywhere.







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search