lumigan tramadol tadalafil

Two More Good Reasons to Annex Mexico

2007-03-27
By

In my newly-released book, Annexing Mexico: Solving the Border Problem Through Annexation and Assimilation, I outline an in-depth and quite feasible plan for the peaceful annexation of Mexico and the use of resources already present there (rather than U.S. taxpayer dollars) to bring their infrastructure, education and economy up to U.S. standards over a ten-year period. Yes, initially some presume I’m off my rocker, but after familiarization with the plan itself, many skeptics have come around to admitting it is not only sound and viable, but a saner, more straightforward proposal than anything on the table right now.

It probably won’t surprise that some of the most positive feedback has come from first and second-generation Mexican-Americans, either.

As I’ve maintained during the barrage of interviews that have followed the book’s release, it’s likely that the hardest sell will be power brokers in the U.S., and the Spanish-descended behind-the-scenes oligarchs in Mexico. Yet, in Annexing Mexico, I enumerate a myriad of solid reasons why such action would be a good idea (such as control over the current border area and international waters, truly fair opportunities for economic cooperation, national security and energy independence), and why it is indeed a win-win plan.

What I didn’t expect to see was more good reasons revealing themselves on a regular basis.

Obviously with the current Bolshevik control of our congressional leadership, I’m apprehensive with respect to anything good in any area of American politics getting accomplished anytime soon, but inasmuch as the positive feedback I’ve received amongst average Americans has been bipartisan… who knows?

Due to the corruption the squishy, sickmaking far-Left has had upon our system of jurisprudence, Border Patrol agents Jose Compean and Ignacio Ramos are sitting in prison. That they were railroaded is understatement; the Japanese Shinkansen (Bullet Train) couldn’t have done a better job. For those who believe that their convictions were the result of fair jury trials, think about some of the mass miscarriages of justice that used to take place routinely in America as a matter of course (i.e., regarding minority suspects) and the recent Duke Lacrosse case, for example, and you have an idea of what I’m getting at.

So, New Reason Number One for annexing Mexico is obviously the fact that not only has our government refused to uphold its constitutional obligation to keep our borders secure, but our legal system has become more concerned with the rights not only of illegals – but the worst of the worst of illegals.

New Reason Number Two: On March 24, 2007, WorldNetDaily’s Jerome R. Corsi reported that two illegal aliens are suing imprisoned Texas Deputy Sheriff Gilmer Hernandez for injuries suffered from shell fragments that struck them as Hernandez shot at the tires of the van they escaped in whilst avoiding a traffic stop.

“‘Jimmy Parks, defense attorney for Hernandez, told WorldNetDaily the lawsuit ‘has just become standard operating procedure down here on the border,’ according to Corsi’s article. Parks said he was not surprised by the lawsuit and expects ‘the illegal aliens are going to sue for millions in this case.’”

So now we have the worst of the worst of illegals having figured out that we are a pathologically litigious nation with trial lawyers who are not only sufficiently prepared – in the interest of idealism or greed, take your pick – to squeeze settlements out of police officers and (obviously) the law enforcement agencies that employ them, but to create an environment of such intimidation that there is ever-decreasing motivation for the Border Patrol, sheriffs and police departments to do their jobs.

Of course, this will result in more criminal illegals running roughshod over the law – and, more importantly, folks in border states, incidents of which are occur on a daily basis but are downplayed by the propagandist porcines in the employ of ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN and their corresponding pals in print.

Criminal illegals now know that all they have to do is provoke law enforcement to fire upon them; some drug runner or smuggler gets an owwie from bullet fragments or running his vehicle into a ditch and they’ve essentially won the lottery. A trial lawyer will claim that their civil rights were violated, paint them as missionary workers, and the victim organization loses at trial or capitulates with a settlement.

Which, to add insult to injury, is ultimately paid out of taxpayer funds. More to add to the list of economic liabilities the current situation poses to the U.S.

I know: The idea of annexing Mexico is ultrameganuclear radical. It seems even less attainable with a Democrat Congress and apparently only one Republican congressman from Colorado willing to take a stand on border issues. Still, there are ways to pull it off; the proper economic and political pressure from U.S. power brokers, spurred on by the electorate (and guys like me), combined with the threat of those who are champing at the bit to re-ignite Marxist revolution in Central and South America, and the Mexican oligarchs just might cave, knowing they’d be the first to be purged.

Still think I’ve gone off the deep end? Wait until you hear my ideas for neutralizing Iran…

10 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • nighthawk

    So Mexico would be the fifty second state, after Canada?

    mirwalk said,

    “…we have a lot of people who can’t speak English. ”

    Actually, “refuse to learn Engish.” is more accurate.

    Virtue said,

    “Federal Minimum wage…..”

    Minimum wage is irrelevant. As I’ve said before. $10.00 an hour to start at McDonalds. $15.00 an hour plus a good benefit package to start at Kmart.

    Because they can’t get folks to work for less.

    Malakas is correct.
    Massive influx of immigrants (legal or otherwise) into the civilized west. Some for economic reasons. Others to escape Muslim totalitarianism. Yes, the Filipinos have Islamic problems as well. (at least the ones I’ve talked to here tell me so.)

    (thank you for clarifying that for us Malakas.).

  • amfortas

    How about a reverse takeover. America could escape all the international approbations, blame Mexico for all the problems of the world that they were supposed to have fixed, have Mexico, along with all their third world mates, deal with Iran, Iraq and North Korea, demand that the Mexican Government give them jobs and wages etc, etc.

  • Virtue

    Two problems with this.

    1. Federal Minimum wage…..How are mexican business going to be able to pay their workers US Federal Minimum wage?

    2. Social Security. We now have a MASSIVE influx of people who are eligible for Social security that have never paid into the SS fund.

  • Malakas

    O.K. I get it. ‘black humour” (- can I say that?).

    Give me some tips on this particular humorous art-form. Why is trying to paint an uglier and more anarchic/totalitarian picture than anybody else construed as funny?

    If it’s a just take-off of the Nazi version of the ‘Anschlust’ it deserves a mild chuckle for ingenuity.

    I’m still left wondering what’s the point? Mexicans sneak into to the US for money. Filipinos will sell their souls or their genitals (depending on gender) for a US visa. The dollars that go back home mean survival for a sick relative or a minimal education for a bright child.
    This ain’t wishy-washy liberalism, it’s reality. Forget all the drug-runner paranoid media-hype and try living in a poor country without a credit card.
    The border question is a little game in a big world where people constantly migrate for economic reasons.
    Lucky for you that you can sit back and comment on it. Lucky for you that you can watch your most prestigious institutions decay, while more vigorous people from far-distant lands take over, and allow you a few more years of blinkered priveledge – because the bucks (low wages for cheap labor) are temporarily still flowing.

    Seems you’re really into the left-right infighting of US politics and the world-wide audience (including this board) is really well outside this important little squabble.

    Joke over. You pontificate about insular politics as if you knew what you we’re talking about. You have ideas to neutralize Iran?
    Whaddya gonna do? Sell them hamburgers or make a quarter of the earth’s surface uninhabitable?
    It’s a simple question.

  • RestoringGuy

    There are similar good reasons for real Americans to annex Washington DC. Last time I checked, politicians offered more in the way of theft of property than Mexicans have. The number of murders excused by politicians is similarly higher. Annexing Mexico would be only treating one small symptom.

  • Joshuatree

    A large scale military incursion into Mexican territory seems more suitable.
    To be spearheaded, naturally, by ‘Merican female shock troops.

  • JohnG

    Mexico is also a breeding ground for drug cartels. That is a problem better left for somebody else to take care of – our success in the “War on Drugs” is less than stellar.

    The “west” Germans are still pissed off about what came after the wall came down and how everybody’s taxes went through the roof trying to fix the wreck that was “east” Germany – still not complete.

    Mexico’s economic problems are fixable – by Mexico. There just has to be some desire. Currently it’s just easier to let a zillion illegals ship their slave wages home.

    It always cracks me up when stupid libs protest a sweat shop in another country and then insist that we have our own set of underpaid peasants (illegal immigrants) here. Nice to have some piss boy to do your yard for $10.

  • Joshuatree

    Attack Mexico! They could use a little good ol’ fashion ‘Merican deee mocracy.

  • mirwalk

    Well, I see a few problems with this plan. First off how do you get Mexicans to assimilate to American culture? That is one of the biggest problems we currently face, since we have a lot of people who can’t speak English.

    Second, if America looks bad now to the International Community, how are we going to annex a country? Even if the Mexican people wanted it, the politicians in Mexico probably won’t. They would then probably call for the UN to come in an Liberate Mexico.

    Not to mention the issues of the poverty and race differences that will give Liberals ammo to push through the radical BS they always have stored up.

    If you can overcome those obstacles then sure why not?







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search