I don’t follow any banner. I support people who represent my views, and as I can see by the rest of your generalistic ravings, that is the most retrograde stance one can take in today’s American politics. Comfortable illusion or ideal that this country was once built upon, it’s mine and I embrace it.

Not all of us want to hide under sheets of insults in beds made of opinions infested with bitterness. Some of us, however misguided, realize that if we aren’t making an attempt to move forward (

Keep your body as you see fit, just pay with your own money and if you have a unilateral desire pay for it yourself without subterfuge or asking a stranger to enforce your will. If you are desperate for the patter of little feet without a daddy, then pay for it fully by your own efforts as you would if you were to have it sucked out as an inconvenience.
Your brother can have whatever his partner deems needed legally. What he really wants is someone else to supply his medical insurance for his high risk lifestyle of drug use and promiscuous and risky sex practices. His priorities do not mirror those of breeders. No, they don’t.
Gun control as offered by Giuliani is about empowering the state and enforcing its’ lusts without repercussions. If deadly and expensive ramifications of a behaviour are all thats needed to justify disempowering reasonable people, you’d be for getting your brother from going up the down staircase or vice versa by force of gov’t.

ps…btw it’s red pill. Get it right…

There are currently six “true” meanings of the word “progressive” according to Merriam Webster online, as I used it as an adjective, and I was referring to definition #3: moving forward or onward. I presume you assumed I was referring to Progressive as a proper noun (which incidentally I would have capitalized if I’d meant it that way) as in the group that split off from the Republican party in 1912. Sorry to have confused you. My bad. I didn’t mean it in those terms.

What I did mean is that I agree with Giuliani’s views on the areas Mike mentioned. I support a woman’s right to have dominion over her own body. I would like to see my brother’s lover have the same rights and privileges in the case of my brother’s death as any woman who married him and loved him half as much, (aka my ex-sister-in-law). Secondly, I support gun control, simply because I believe that too many angry idiots have ruined it for the law abiding people like my sister who uses her legal Smith and Wesson at the range and God forbid she should ever have to use it to protect herself when she’s home alone.

Furthermore, I do believe that Guiliani is a strong leader, made so by the mistakes he’s made in the past. And if Guiliani having a sense of humor in wearing a wig and tutu can keep him out of the leadership position he deserves, then America deserves what it gets.

PS… BTW, It’s Thumbelina. Get it right.

Potshot aside, I happen to like Giuliani AND his progressive republican stance… except for the amnesty for illegal imigrants thing… after all… if we make them legal, we’ll have to start paying them like Americans, too. Next thing you know, we’ll have to contend with Nanny’s unions, watch the dishes pile up when the maid goes on strike, and worst of all, we’ll actually have to hire real teachers to teach our kids Spanish. In twenty years, every upper Rebuplican household will be in the same straits the Big Three are today.

Ah, but what the H*ll to I know? I’m just a chick who likes Barry Manilow after all….

“…more than Bush.” Is the unspoken next line of this article. The title of this article should have been “Desperately Seeking Reagan.”

These last 7 years have been a total waste with Bush. He’s shredded any concept of a conservative administration.

The only potential candidate I would vote for is Pat Buchanan. I have read well one of his books and states views that I agree with and would be good for America.

Does anybody know how you even sign up for the republican caucus/primary?

I looked on the internet, but couldn’t find any links on this.

I’d look under Marilyn’s dress for the answer. But then, that’s me.

That sinking had much more to do with Perot than Admiral Stockdale, don’t you think?

On June 25, 1998, the New York Times Times printed a retraction: “Editors’ Note
An art review in Weekend on May 22 about the exhibition ‘Police Pictures: The Photograph as Evidence’ at the Grey Art Gallery in Greenwich Village discussed the inherent fascination of such photos and how the viewer’s subjectivity makes them unreliable as evidence. In discussing a publicity photograph of J. Edgar Hoover included in the show, the review referred to the former Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation as the ‘top G-man and (now we know) cross-dresser.’
Assertions that Hoover was a cross-dresser come from a single uncorroborated source quoted in a 1993 book and should not have been presented as fact. A group of former F.B.I. agents alerted The Times as the misstatement on June 3, and this editors’ note was delayed for checking.”

By the way, the last real war hero candidate who was a POW for seven years was my late friend Admiral Jim Stockdale who ran as Vice President to Ross Perot. A far better man than McCain and sank without a trace. McCain and his refusal to consider men’s issues because ‘its too hard’ is a no-go.

Do as the Romans did. Have a furriner. Vote for Amfortas.