On Women’s Anger Towards Men
Dr. Helen has a bit of a discussion on “The Effect of Women’s Anger on Men”
She cites Vox Day, who discusses that (female) anger seems irrational; she in turn states that female anger is very rational – which underlines my whole point is that men and women are different; and to men, female anger thus often makes no sense. As a result, when confronted with an angry female who is bent out of shape over a point most men see as trivial, at best, the reaction of most men is stupefaction.
Most men, mind you. As for me – being a devout asshole – I usually respond to female anger with sarcasm and provoking them to further pouts and foot stomps.
Femherroids will – of course, in the face of scientific, peer reviewed study after study after study after study – deny any innate or intrinsic psychological difference between most men and women (And only grudgingly admit any physical differences). However, to watch groups of males and femals together, and observe the dynamics produces some interesting results.
A few years back I was one of the chaperones for a youth retreat through my church. We had the boys and girls seperate (Never mix 14 year olds and sleeping quarters!) and come the night, myself and the lady chaperoning the girls decided that the kids would have pizza, so we ordered out. Two for the boys. Two for the girls. (Six boys and seven girls – and these were some big honking pies). The boys quickly hammered out their order – I forget it exactly, but it was like one pie with pepperoni and sausage, and another half- and – half of something).
We waited fifteen more minutes for the girls order. Know what it was when it came?
Two cheese pizzas.
Because that was the only thing EVERYONE could agree on.
It was very important to have a consensus. A couple girls had been cajoled (bullied) into going along with what everyone else was getting. And my quizzing over the night revealed that it would have been quite easy for there to have been two half-and-half pies and pleased everyone.
Further – one girl wasn’t going to eat (one of the ones bullied into changing her vote). So – nobody in the girls cabin ate until she was again, cajoled, into taking a piece, which she picked at.
The boys had a couple slices left over, and four of them wanting it. And they were ready to arm-wrestle for it until I just cut the slices in half. Girls had three left over, and four wanting them.
So nobody had any.
None of this made any sense to any of the boys – or me. To the girls, this made perfect sense, and I gotta tell you – socialization only covers part of this. This is an entirely different thought process. Girls are brought up among men, and are exposed to their problem solving techniques – the whole idea is far from alien to them. One thing is apparent, though, is that the girls and boys had different priorities. And “being ladylike” in front of the boys wasn’t part of it.
You tell me. I’m sure many of my female readers nod their head in understanding. I’m sure many men shake their head – in stupefaction.
Men often, as well, don’t know how to respond to women’s anger because they don’t understand WHY women are angry. They see them as being angry about a problem that is easily solved – or which isn’t a problem to begin with.
Something similar happeed to me in my second marriage – one day I decided to have a Mongolian BBQ; my big ol’ hammered wok, a gas turkey-fryer burner, and all kinds of meat, vegetables, and sauces – pick your own, and I cook it. My wife was aghast. “Why can’t everyone eat the SAME thing?” she plaintively asked. She bitched the whole time, and by the time of the cooking, most the women just decided on a common bowl of stuff, and some had cajoled (bullied) their husbands into it too. It was interesting that the exceptions were those couples who were dating, but not living together.
Women and men THINK different. We are different. Watch a husband and wife when she wants to go shopping. It is insufficient that he go. He has to WANT to go – and once she decides “he really doesn’t want to” no amount of “Honey, yes I do” will budge her from her position. To him – she wants to go shopping, apparently she needs a pack mule, he agreed to it – problem solved. Those aren’t the issues for her, and she is frustrated. And angry.
Angry primarily because feminism has set women up for the thoroughly unreasonable expectation that men are really just women with penises – that otherwise they think and react like women. Our feminised Publik Skule system consitantly tries to hammer the square pegs of boys into the round holes of feminine behavior, and drugs them when it predictably fails. Feminism chirps over and over “All the same, all the same, all the same” and when women believe this – and then slam up into reality – the reaction is one of dismay, frustration – and anger.
I can only imagine what would have happened years ago had we put all the boys and girls together and ordered the pizzas. It’s one of the reasons I like to tell women “You want shopping and someone to just listen to you complain? Get one of your friends. You want a problem solved – come see me.”
The sooner women put the nonsense about the equivalence of the sexes aside, the happier they will be.. Your great grandmothers realized this, and it’s why their incidence of stress induced heart problems was so much lower.
| More from The Gonzman
Stumble It!
March 30th, 2007 at 9:24 am
Vox Day has well thought out opinions on gender, marriage, etc. He takes great criticism to share them. Women’s anger is often recreation. The level of control a woman wishes to impart over her man reaches well within not just his thoughts but even his dreams. Ive had a woman angry over a dream I told her about. Hell Ive even had my wife angry because she dreamed I was doing something wrong, and she didnt speak for days. This wanting me to want to go shopping is a prime example of the irrational anger. Linear thought would say, if I want someone to want to do something with me, and they dont want to, I too would prefer they not act and go along. But, the woman will allow the man to go along, she will badger him the entire time about how he doesnt want to be there, and in the end he ends up the object of venom because he went unwillingly. How many men, though, simply say no, they dont want to and they wont go? How quickly is the anger abated then?
March 30th, 2007 at 9:26 am
You just about got it dude! Most excellent! “All the same, all the same, all the same”. That exactly it, thats exactly the problem.
Do you see it yet?
When it comes down to it what the gals don’t understand, and what they don’t want is things not to be the same. They don’t want thngs unpredictable for themselves. They don’t want the responsibility, don’t want to make the effort to be different to survive and thrive on the basis of a MERITOCRACY. They want to hide within the safety of the herd and the popular status quo and snipe at others when the conditions are ripe for it. Without acceptance of an over-riding principle of a meritocracy, the gals will just follow their hormone fluxes and desires of the moment, and continue to find fault with the menfolk to keep them off balance and confused.
Oh no! that cantbe will say the thumbetts of the world. We’re progressive! We’re for change! You’re so wrong you bad, bad man.
Nope, I’m not. The only change to the status quo that’s being changed is the limitations previously in place for the gals. The changes are to disbalance the productive male authority figures. Gays are ok because they’re never gonna grow up, and like self absorbed chilren will for ever befocused on their pee pee and not present a threat to a womans limits. The gals are fervently trying to redefine what is reality more than they’re trying to redefine what they are willing to do within it and take responsibility for…
March 30th, 2007 at 9:26 am
A point missed in that so excellent description. IF the boys had arm wrestled for the right to give the left over pizza to a girl of their choice, the girls would have been cheering them on, whether they liked the pizza or not. ‘Let’s you and him, fight’, is one of the girl’s favourite games.
March 30th, 2007 at 9:51 am
“lets you and him fight” is one of the girls favorite games…I need to relay this to my rhetoric master.. to invent a catchy little phrase for this phenomena….
March 30th, 2007 at 11:39 am
Women have absolute zero comprehension of how a male thinks. Women also do not have any corresponding intelligence to the very world they live in. In the same way women are incapable of knowing which way is north or south, women have no moral, rational, or intellectual compass either. Women may be able to score the same on intelligence tests, but their sense of priorities are so completely bizarre and stupid, their intelligence is of very little use to them on a day to day basis, coupled with the fact that they are virtually insane.
March 30th, 2007 at 12:01 pm
windle2007 said women are “virtually insane”. Sorry, windle, but I think the proper diagnosis for the average woman is more like “functionally psychotic”. It’s in the Bible.
March 30th, 2007 at 12:15 pm
It is not that “innate” brains that are a big contributor. Differences exist, sure, but what is the real problem? Instead, I am sure it is the differing levels of stress, and whether they are “social-stresses”, or based on tangible problem-solving.
Imagine you give a man a government that: though incentives and threats gets women to work more than men and taxes them accordingly, tolerates systematic beating of girls while protecting boys with a vengeance, grants automatic child custody to husbands, gives a free welfare “bonus” for impregnating women, tells him he is special and needs emotional support networks, and says that women are here for the sole purpose of physically defending and financially supporting him, and makes sure through health funding that the man lives longer and has all of the legal rights of a woman plus a few more for good measure. He will certainly be, like any “royals” of centuries ago, angry and pathetic. It’s the same with the “gender-royale” of feminists who suffer from Reason-Anorexia.
Females certainly have all the same capacity for rational thought, but today what is the incentive for her? Sure the man in the relationship is often needed as a pillar of “principles”. Nothing special, it’s just as a woman can sometimes do better at things involving socializing. It does not have to be labelled “hard-wired” biology, it’s just a tendency toward a natural order that works well. But like an atrophied muscle, many people with heads in the sand are just trying to make excuses for not using their brain to its potential.
March 30th, 2007 at 12:18 pm
After reading this and Greg Strange’s little treatise on poor little Cat Stevens the Muslim convert, I believe that Muslim men and non-Muslim Western women have a great deal in common.
Both use anger as a means of attempting to control other people, and not as a means of solving problems.
They would rather be angry at Israel for existing than for actually accepting any solutions that would allow them to live with Israel, and indeed, prosper with Israel.
They will throw a fit over pen and ink drawings!
Western women will scream at their men for leaving the toilet seat up rather than put the toilet seat down.
A western woman will be angry at her husband for “not wanting†to go shopping with her even when he agrees to go shopping with her.
A western man logically would try to avoid problems or to solve problems and avoid the fuss and feathers.
A western woman ENJOYS the fuss and feathers and the agony she imposes on her man with problems that either do not have solutions or by rejecting any and all solutions offered.
Muslim men too enjoy the fuss and feathers and the agony they impose on western men with problems that do not have any solutions or by rejecting any and all solutions offered.
It is all a power play, and western men are right in rejecting it.
March 30th, 2007 at 12:27 pm
So the democratic congress is composed of a bunch of women?
Sorry, that was the first comparison that came to mind.
March 30th, 2007 at 12:29 pm
I observe that most feminist are easily provoked to anger. During the anger, lies flows from their mouths. One sin leads to another. In general but with exception, I’m quick to listen, slow to speak.
“I find something more bitter than death: the woman whose heart is snares and nets, and whose hands are fetters. He who pleases God escapes her, but the sinner is taken by her. Behold, this is what I found, says the Preacher, while adding one thing to another to find the scheme of things which my soul has sought repeatedly, but I have not found. One man among a thousand I found, but a woman among all these I have not found.” Ecclesiastes 7:26
Solomon (about 970-928 BCE), the second son of King David and Bathsheba, King of Israel.
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ecclesiastes%207:26;&version=47;
March 30th, 2007 at 12:39 pm
See??? (psychotic women) I told y’all it was in the Bible… (heh, heh, heh).
March 30th, 2007 at 3:03 pm
Women: Left side of brain
Men: Right side of brain or vice-versa
March 30th, 2007 at 5:21 pm
As a woman, I really, really hate it when men write things like this about women with the assumption that all women are alike. I am getting so depressed. I am really starting to hate being a woman, even though I am not at all like the descriptions you men have given. So I give up! You men win! I withdraw from the human race! You happy now? I hope so!
March 30th, 2007 at 6:21 pm
So what exactly is so insulting? The idea that as a woman you are different?
Sorry to break it to you, but genetically speaking, you are closer to a female chimpanzee than you are to me.
Instead of getting angry about it (Gods, but the irony) embrace it. You might find that once you accept that you can neither change men nor understand them, your stress level will reduce.
Just stop drinking the feminist kool-aid that we’re “all alike” except for what resides in the genitals.
March 30th, 2007 at 6:33 pm
Ms S:
I for one don’t believe anyone must like everyone else, but there are group dynamics and group charactoristics that cannot be denied in clear light of day. Any one person may be different from his/her sibs. You may be the next true conservative woman leader, steadfast, reliable and focused on western values of honor and responsibility and acheivement of self actualization through merit while your twin could be a conniving, backstabbing, irresponsible nihlistic thief and deceiver. When one makes policy and when one deals in ‘culture’ one by need needs to broaden the scope, and often needs to focus on the norm and not the exception. FWIW there are plenty of scum dudes out there, no better’n the bad gals. Life being finite doesnt give us the time and opportunity to get to know each individual personally so points of discrimination must be used as a survival mechanism. All the various ‘isms’ are part of that process of discrimination which is adaptive behavior.
Men will find fault with women and vice versa. Gender is a rather crude and unfortunate discriminator for many things, useful only for life at its’ most basic and brutal. There are other better methods that may be attained but they come through mastery of issues most are not even designed to comprehend at this time on any meaningful scale.
That you are here amongst those that are wont to direct honest but perhaps misdirected rage against you is indeed a positive, if understanding yourself and others be your goal.
Learn how to think, not just what to think…
March 30th, 2007 at 6:33 pm
sstratford: ok. enjoy your withdrawl.
March 30th, 2007 at 6:37 pm
its about time something like this happens….
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070330/ap_on_re_us/texas_affair_slaying
excellent article!!
March 30th, 2007 at 6:37 pm
one more point sstratford…… if i drive the getaway car in a bank robbery and the guy robbing the bank kills the guard, i am tried for murder in about 77 % of the cases. stand for what is right or fall for that which is wrong. get it?
March 30th, 2007 at 6:49 pm
Don’t go, don’t withdraw sstratford. Men here are Expressing their Feelings. That’s one of the many, womany things women demand of men.
So it depresses and upsets you? Think , ‘empathise’, how men feel when they are jailed, dispossessed, after a lifetime of being good chaps, just because a women they loved and supported finds another man or throws a fit at a toilet seat left up. Think , empathise, how men feel when they hear ‘All Men are Rapists’.
You have come here and after a few weeks start to feel angry and marginalised, yet men have had to put up with far worse for forty years now and seen all the anti-male bile and anger put into law.
Yes, get angry and depressed, but don’t shoot the messenger. Shoot the femonazis who caused it all.
March 30th, 2007 at 7:40 pm
S, let your anger at the observed propensity of women cause you to change you.
The comments and articles are about the propensity of the gender. I did not even see where it was said that “all women…”. The words were to the effect that the feminine mind thinks this way or that way as the social manifestations of their willingness to make consesus, as opposed to the male mind which is driven to compete.
If you see in yourself the propensity discussed and observed and you hate it then there are four choices.
Hate it and hate yourself.
Hate it and embrace the fact of your propensity so that you will not only work to change but also catch yourself and avoid making problems and blunders that embarass yoou and make yoou do what EVERYBODY wants to do, that is blame someone else, which is always a person near to you and odds are that is someone that youlove or loves you.
Deny it and live a lie and deceive those around you of your propensities, and blame them for all of the problems you make for yourself.
Embrace your propensities, master them, find where they work for the good of those around you, and beat them down in every other occasion.
Be not depressed that you will never be a Man, or have logic and thought processes of Men. There is a purpose in our differences, and it is the feminist crap that you have been raised in that places you in discontent with your fundamental make up and places the feminist at WAR against the fundamental attributes of man.
What we here as men do is about defining ourselves as different and observing the difference. We have been at WAR with ourselves as we sought to make females happy and believe in us. The result has been misery for all.
Embracing your uniquly feminine attributes, being comfortable and in control, is the beginning of your happiness. After that, and only after that, do you have any HOPE of making another happy.
In conclusion, none of us can be happy either living in denial of what we are or living trying to make someone deny what they are.
So we here write of understanding difference that makes us who we are, and even the dangerous differences that have lead to the disasters of our lives.
March 30th, 2007 at 7:49 pm
Well, I’m not for sugar-coating or begging.
While tendancies among a demographic group may be no predictor of one randomly sampled member, they become far more useful with a larger sampling.
Pick ten women – it becomes more useful. Pick a hundred – even more useful. A thousand, ten thousand, a million – the more you select, the more will fit that norm, that general tendancy.
Any study of statistics in a population of course includes “Not all.” To repeat that mantra over and over is quibbling, cavilling, and doesn’t take one whit of truth away from a general statement.
March 30th, 2007 at 8:11 pm
The problem is all about principles and not statistics. There is simply no evidence that women lack any intellectual capacity. Logic and rational thought, when properly nurtured, do exist in women fully formed. Red Pill had put it best, that gender is a “crude and unfortunate” discriminator. That is an excellent point, in the sense that mental shortcuts are taken so that we need not depend on telepathy. But with regard to rational principles, this discriminator is rarely a necessary one.
To be rational, women can choose to either (1) respect principles, or (2) coexist with a man who respects principles. I realize fully a man must make the same decision with regard to a woman. It’s not a matter of superior brains. But thus far, most women (Ayn Rand being a good exception) are not trying to market themselves as rational thinkers. When they do, there are plenty of men who need their help.
March 30th, 2007 at 8:18 pm
sstratford…pass the word on to a few friends would you…To tell you the truth..as callous as it may seem to some men…when i hear women playing the “see me im a victim card”
It falls on deaf ears…..
March 30th, 2007 at 10:07 pm
sstradford…don’t leave! I would miss you!
As a opinionated nobody woman, when things get real nasty, I suggest taking a nice long bubble bath…and read a really good book.
Always does it for me.
As Paul Simon said to Art Garfunkel, “one’s man’s ceiling is another man’s floor.”
And then they divorced.
March 30th, 2007 at 10:39 pm
sstratford, I will take the risk and draw some deductions on how you managed to stay married to the same man for 30 years. Please do not be offended and irrationally angry if I guess wrong.
When you find the toilet seat in the up position, you put it down.
No fuss, no feathers.
When the dishes need to get done, the garbage needs to be put out, the clothes need to be picked up and washed, these chores get done. By you and by him.
No fuss. No feathers.
If his method of doing the dishes is to let them soak in hot soapy water until halftime or after the game, you let him watch the game and finish the dishes when the crud is soft and rinses off easy.
No fuss. No feathers.
Whether he prefers to carry two garbage cans in one trip or one garbage can in each of two trips, you do not berate him for being “lazy”. You realize instantly that it makes no difference which way it is done. A fathom or two yards each cover the same distance.
No fuss. No feathers.
You understand that a paycheck is a finite resource and accept the fact that some self control and discipline is necessary when it comes to spending the money. Some things, such as the house mortgage payment, come first. You understand the 18% interest on the credit card is a complete waste of money when you can simply wait until a later month to make the purchase. YOUR HUSBAND NEVER NEEDED TO TELL YOU THIS.
No fuss. No feathers.
As he allows you your “space” you allow him his space.
If you fell in love with a dashing man who loved his ‘59 Cadillac convertable, you now allow him to fuss with it in the garage without getting on his case for the time he spends on his hobby. He does not tell you how to grow the carrots in your garden and you don’t tell him how to adjust the dwell on the vintage General Motors engine. But as he shows an interest in your gardening, you show an interest in how to check the oil and keep track of the miles since the last tune up. And you would never dream of taking it to the shop for the tune-up!
No fuss. No feathers.
You accept the fact that as a man, he looks on dishes as a household chore that needs to be done, but you don’t insist that he “wants” to do the dishes. Indeed, you would no more consider engaging in such emotional terrorism with the man you love than you would consider physically assaulting him or trying to provoke him into physically assaulting you.
No fuss. No feathers.
You accept the fact that he is a man, not a woman with a penis. If you wanted one of those, you could have married a cross dresser or moved in with a lesbian who likes to use a strap-on.
But no, you wanted a red blooded American heterosexual man and that is who you love, and you don’t get all disappointed and angry when he fails to act any other way.
If all of the above are true, and if after all these years he is even more in love with you than ever,
It is not a mystery to us.
We just wish our women were the same way, and wish that our legal system would not encourage and profit off the irrationallity of so many women who fail to measure up to what men need in wives and children need in mothers.
March 30th, 2007 at 11:52 pm
Wow Roger!
March 31st, 2007 at 3:17 am
From Zero to Nuclear Explosion at the speed of light, nobody needs to light a womans fuse because it is already smouldering ready to explode without notice.
I have theory that women get angry at men, for approaching them for sex before they thought of it.
They also get angry at men because men don’t approach them when they are feeling ’sexy’.
It’s a bit like russian roulette approaching a woman, its just that all the chambers are loaded except for the one without the bullett. If you’re lucky you hit on the empty chamber.
March 31st, 2007 at 5:57 am
post#25rk: very creative.
March 31st, 2007 at 6:50 am
Roger, that was a nice general description of how a marriage might last 30 years.
I have a more likely scenario. He says, “Yes Dear” ……ALOT, and that combined with the silly yet profound old saw “Its cheaper to keep her” keeps em going decades my friend.
March 31st, 2007 at 9:34 am
There seems to be a general consensus that men and women are different in some fundamental ways.
What do you gents believe this implies about MONOGAMY?
March 31st, 2007 at 11:13 am
Ah, at last, a man on here who makes sense. Roger Knight, I agree with you a hundred percent! Now, once the rest of you have picked yourselves up off the floor and gotten over the shock, let me explain. I am an unusual woman. Yes, I am. First of all, and this may send you to the floor again, I DON’T LIKE TO SHOP! I hate it, and I only do it when I absolutely, positively have to. Second, I respect my husband, and I obey him in all things. I know what you’re thinking (”Sure, she does, uhhuh…”), and it’s true I have been rebellious at times, but I always end up giving in to him because he is most always right. Of course, he is also any unusual man, but I won’t get into that! As far as the toilet seat thing is concerned, we keep both the seat and the lid down so our cat won’t get into it, and so clutzy me won’t drop anything into it (done that a few times before!). That way, both of us have to, sigh, lift something up no matter what we’re doing. That’s not a compromise, it’s common sense. The toothpaste tube has to be rolled up at all times, not for me, but for him. He makes the money, I don’t work, and he is in charge of how it is spent. Because he injured his knee a few years ago, I have had to take over the errand-running and the shopping (I still HATE to do that though), but I use cash since we have no credit cards and I am extremely careful not to overspend. We do not own a house, we rent a tiny little apartment; we have two vehicles, both old and rundown, one not even running at the moment. Because of his knee and now his back, I wait on him literally hand and foot. He sits in his recliner the whole time he is at home (or most of it anyway), and I bring him his food there and his coffee or soda or water and whatever else he needs. He is the head of this household, and I am the feet! Is this the way every marriage should be? Probably not. But almost everyone I know who is still married has made a success of it by basically following the advice that Roger Knight has so nicely posted on here. In general, it’s about compromising, not getting mad over every tiny little thing, and not making mountains out of anthills (I know it’s supposed to be molehills, but let’s face it, anthills fits better). I AGREE that many women are annoying, obnoxious, greedy, and even evil, because I’ve seen some like that. My point is just that not all women are that way, in fact, most aren’t, in spite of the broad experience of the men on here. When all this negativity gets to me, then I take a break from it, and no harm done. I just hate all the women bashing just as much as I hate male bashing.
I am going to take Joyanna’s advice and go read a book now. As soon as I do the dishes, clean the bathroom, and sweep and mop floors. And by the way, I was not angry when I posted earlier. I was sad and somewhat depressed, that’s all. An overdose of negativity does that to me. But I’m fine now. Thank you very much.
And my husband is the closest thing to a perfect husband that anyone will ever find, but the only time he ever “yes, dear”s me is when we’re kidding around!
March 31st, 2007 at 11:42 am
sstratford, thanks for that post. Now it all makes sense. You have the kind of qualities that most of us thought we’d found in a woman, but it all turned out to be a hoax. I, for one, am glad you stayed on board with the subject and told us a little about who you really are. Kudos to you.
And if either of my ex-wives had even half of what you bring to your marriage I’d still be married now (to at least one of them, anyway!). Your husband is a pretty lucky guy as far as I’m concerned.
March 31st, 2007 at 11:46 am
Kudos, sstratford. If either of my ex-wives had half of what you bring to yoru marriage I’d still be married today — to one of them at least!
March 31st, 2007 at 11:48 am
Kudos, sstratford. If either of my ex-wives had half of what you bring to your marriage I’d still be married today — to one of them, at least…
March 31st, 2007 at 11:59 am
sstratford, I am glad I guessed right more than I guessed wrong, and that I guessed right on the essentials.
If your husband is the closest thing to a perfect husband that anyone will ever find, it is not all his doing.
He had assistance, valuable and considerable assistance.
No man can be the perfect husband by himself, he needs the help of a perfect wife.
In case anyone has not noticed, I am also describing the Woman Who Married Dear Old Dad.
To read what I think about my parents, please see
http://www.antipeonage.0catch.com/myownfather.htm
Have some tissues or paper towells ready.
I wrote that the day my brother called to tell me that my father passed away. The only changes I made to this page since is to correct grammer and spelling errors.
Now sstratford, after you have read your book and done your chores, and otherwise relaxed and recharged your batteries, I have but one favor to ask of you.
If you love the United States of America as much as you love your husband, then please join us in our fight against those who willfully and deliberately violate the principles upon which she is founded,
and use our children as the excuse.
March 31st, 2007 at 12:09 pm
Some people simply don’t understand the difference between “equal” and “identical”. One hundred pennies and a dollar bill are equal. However, one makes a passable paperweight and the other a paper airplane. They are both exquisitely useful, but not necessarily for the same thing.
Women and men are equal? Yes. Women and men are idenditcal? No. Each are better at some things than others? Obviously. Do we need to hate, snipe, and belittle each other because of this? Puh-leeeeze. Do we need to accept, embrace, and encourage the strengths each of us, individually, possess. Absolutely.
My wife can do things I can’t. I can do things she can’t. Together we make a terrific team. I get the benefits of her abilities. she gets the benefits of mine. Duh????
March 31st, 2007 at 6:12 pm
You sound like a reasonable woman to get along with sstratford. Personally, I find the ‘obey’ bit a bit naff but all else is fine. By the way, most men have nothing against shopping; its them shopping that they don’t like, like you.
So….. I have asked you several questions on other postings about what were you doing when the women were turning the world inside out…. and what you are going to do about it. I haven’t had any replies from you yet. Are you ignoring me?
March 31st, 2007 at 7:13 pm
Read this quick! Before Mike L. purges this post…. WHY are certain posters being “vaporized” by the editor-mod? Are my pop-up ads generating too little revenue? Am I un-MND-P.C.? Kind-a-Captcha?