Africa’s predictable behaviour

2007-03-31
By

No wonder Africa is called the dark continent. No wonder Africa keeps falling behind the rest of the world. No wonder there is starvation and poverty in Africa. No wonder Africans invest a large proportion of their investments offshore. No wonder so many Africans are leaving Africa. Africa has inflicted demise on itself and it still won’t learn any lessons.

SADC

It seems that if you take logic, put it in a bucket and turn it upside down, you will get close to the logic of how Africa’s leadership thinks and behaves.

Take this week’s emergency SADC meeting in Tanzania. They met to discuss the shocking situation in Zimbabwe. This country was once the breadbasket of Southern Africa. It fed many of its neighbours whose earlier independence and lack of good governance ensured food insecurity. In many cases, its leaders looted their countries’ treasuries.

It didn’t take long for Zimbabwe to fall in line. Mugabe’s rapaciously corrupt regime applied this same “african logic” to ruling Zimbabwe but this time, their intention was to destroy anything and everything that they could not control. In a matter of just 7 years, as a result of losing an election, Mugabe’s zanupf has destroyed productivity in just about every segment of industry, agriculture and mining. One thing is clear, Mugabe’s regime only knows how to destroy. It has added not one iota of value to Zimbabwe since coming to power. It has effectively hijacked Zimbabwe by rigging elections since 2000. As long as zanuPF remain in power, Zimbabwe will continue to go down the plug hole.

Their blueprint for power is rather simplistic, but highly effective. Establish a small loyal elite, destroy the middle class and keep the rest of the population dependent by creating conditions for a large peasant poverty-stricken population. In political terms, their reverse logic keeps them in power – forever. Their overiding priority is power and that is why politics dictates economics in Africa. The reverse is the case in the free world.

This week, we saw Zimbabwe’s vital statistics breaking more barriers. The inflation rate went to 3000% and the currency went through the floor. For the ordinary citizen, there is no hope and that is why so many are risking the crocodile infested waters of the Limpopo to escape the horror.

The President of Tanzania called together an urgent meeting of SADC to discuss the Zimbabwe situation. 14 Presidents flew into Tanzania and deliberated. As expected, they shot the messenger. They blamed everyone else except the culprit. Mugabe came away from this meeting stronger than ever. He gloated on his way out saying that these 14 Presidents gave him their full support and that the beating that opposition leader Morgan Tsvangirai received from the police was because “he deserved it”.

These 14 Presidents believed Mugabe when he told them that Zimbabwe’s economic melt-down was caused by western sanctions. How on earth can travel sanctions on known zanupf human rights violators cause economic melt-down? But that’s the logic and these Presidents believe obviously believe it or surely they wouldn’t have called for their removal.

These 14 Presidents, it seems, also believed that the cause of the breakdown in law and order is caused by the “violent” Movement for Democratic Change (MDC). Is their intelligence so bad as that they don’t know about the 200 odd MDC members who have been kidnapped by Mugabe’s militia and severely beaten in the last two weeks? One has to wonder. The current whereabouts of many of these people remains unknown. In all likelihood, the could be dead as a result of Mugabe’s “Degrees in Violence”, as Mugabe himself has so aptly put it.

Robert Mugabe is a violent dictator with the blood of thousands of Zimbabweans on his hands.

It seems that his kind of uncivilised behaviour must be okay in Africa because over this last week, he was supported by 14 Presidents.

14 views

  • amfortas

    A violent Dictator with a lot of toadying mates who are thankful that he is in the spotlight and not them.

    Zvakwana, you are doing this great job of letting everyone know (well, us) but what do you think can be done? I mean effectively, short and long term.

    It would be easy mouth-music to say overthrow the maniac and establish a better society but even the major western countries societies are failing into strife – gender rather than tribal – and law, governance and institutions of fairness, justice, and education are becoming fractured and distrusted.

  • conservativation

    Wonders if there is a good woman behind the great man Mugabe.

  • http://mensnewsdaily.com/author/zvakwana Zvakwana

    Amfortas, good to see you are on board on a Saturday. Shouldn’t you be out there on the golf course?

    Unfortunately, I do not have all the answers. I suppose what can be done is to apply pressure in certain areas. Mbeki is not only Mr Bush’s pointsman, he is now SADC’s as well. South Africa is in a position to stop this but won’t. Mbeki has had all the time in the world to do something but hasn’t. In fact, he has exacerbated the whole scario by using the South African government to act as Zimbabwe’s de facto foreign affairs. Thabo Mbeki and the ANC government of South Africa have become part of Zimbabwe’s problem. So if you asked me what can be done by western powers, my simple answer is to apply overwhelming pressure on South Africa, just like the USA did once before to get rid of Ian Smith.

    The food crunch is just around the corner. Zimbabwe will have the begging bowl out once again. Stop giving Mugabe grain to use as a political weapon.

    Another way to provide tangible help, is that there are plenty of organisations running on a shoe-string that need funding to become effective. Some are located in South Africa which have been formed by exile groups. There are some very competent people out there but they seriously lack resources to fully mobilise. I estimate there are somewhere in the vacinity of 4 million exiles in South Africa. This is a huge electorate and mobilising this lot could create strong pressure points over a very short time frame.

    Like all these things, assistance of any sort must entail accountability and results and it must be done on a project by project basis.

  • DadWith2Girls

    Zvakwana,

    The current events in Zimbabwe are breaking a lot of hearts. I witnessed up close and personally a minor version of this ancient tragic script while working in Grenada during that “failed” revolutionary experiment.

    The moral of the story is always the same …. and you could find Grenadians reciting it on any street corner in St. George’s even when the Revo was delivering 6% GDP economic growth, free schooling & healthcare, and investments in agriculture and fishing that amazed objective experts from the World Bank.

    The moral? Simply this — “We black people cannot manage we affairs. The Americans mus’ come rescue we….”

    Colonialism at its best …. psychologically speaking.

    Zvakwana, surely you realize that if a mainstream western journalist were to write what you write, he/she would be immediately accused of racism?

    How can one write about evil in Africa in these P.C. days?

  • DadWith2Girls

    By the way, I don’t see Amfortas being too comfortable on a Saturday morning golf outing. He’s more of a slammin’ dominos in the Trenchtown yard type gangster … Read what he writes. It’s obvious he’s not golfing-inclined…..

  • DadWith2Girls

    BTW, are other posters getting a KIND-A-CAPTCHA demon prompt when trying to submit a post? It’s my understanding that the blog-master can disable this irritating “service.”

  • http://wwwkanyattafarms.net donesq

    Give Mugabe, Zimbabweans a break

    2007-03-27 09:19:07
    By Hillary Joseph

    So, Robert Mugabe is the bad guy, the villain, the dictator, the demon, the nyang�au of all the African leaders. And so? He must go, they say. Mugabe is the problem in Zimbabwe.

    The high inflation rate is caused by Mugabe, high unemployment rate is because of Mugabe, the deteriorating farm produce is traced to Mugabe, and the drought is caused by Mugabe.

    So, Mugabe is killing his own people, he is killing the nation, the nation he fought so hard to build, and therefore he must go.

    Indeed, this vile man must go. But wait a minute, who is saying all this? Who is this fellow or fellows demonising Robert Mugabe, the President of Zimbabwe, calling him all sorts of foul names?

    Is it the people of Zimbabwe? Is it Tsvangirai and his workers union centred in urban areas? Or is it the big brothers watching from the UK and America?

    Yes, it is true that the people in Zimbabwe are suffering, just like many other people in poor African countries and elsewhere are suffering, perhaps a bit worse than in some countries.

    Is it that Mugabe has been in office for too long a time? Or perhaps is it because there have been no “free and fair“ (according to British and American standards) elections in Zimbabwe simply because the opposition, no, specifically because Tsvangirai did not win?

    Oh!!! What happened to history? Why do the Western and other Press which demonise Mugabe refuse to acknowledge the historical facts which have pushed Mugabe to where he is now so unfairly cornered?

    The British and the Americans who pretend to be incensed by Mugabe`s actions and pronouncements know very well that they are the cause of all the destruction in Zimbabwe, politically and economically.

    Are we already forgetting how Zimbabweans suffered under the British rule? And the British rule includes the period of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence (UDI) declared by Ian Smith. The UK had all the powers to contain Smith and crush the UDI. The UK refused to take action.

    Civilized world cried foul but the British was adamant, perhaps understandably so, for how could they take action against their kith and kin? Rhodesians (not Zimbabweans) were white and the blacks had no room in white Rhodesia.

    Of course there were some selected black Rhodesians like the Tsvangirai of the yesteryears, but they were there to serve specific purposes for the white, just like Tsvangirai of today is there to serve some specific purpose for the British.

    Because that country `belonged` to Rhodesians, the blacks had to be kicked out from the fertile lands to the arid areas, the reserves, as they were called. There, they had to eke out their living.

    But the white Rhodesians were not satisfied with kicking out the blacks from the fertile lands, they followed them to the dry lands and planted anthrax and other biological poisons in their cattle and the black man`s cattle died in their thousands. The soil was poisoned and could not produce anything. Zimbabweans died in their thousands also.

    Not only that, but Smith did many unspeakable things to the Mugabes, and it was OK for the British. After all, the Mugabes were blacks.

    Because the blacks were pushed to arid land, devoid of any reliable means of survival, they went back to toil for the whites, and that was what the whites wanted, cheap labour.

    But the great patience of the blacks reached breaking point and snapped. They wanted their land back.

    The British played dumb. Smith said “over my dead body.“ The people of Zimbabwe resorted to the only other means available too them – spears, machetes, clubs and occasionally, a gun or two. And all hell broke loose.

    The wrath of Smith and the British descended heavily with sophisticated weaponry on the poorly armed Zimbabweans fighting for their basic rights, their survival. Many Zimbabweans paid their ultimate price; many were maimed for life, physically and psychologically.

    The gallant Zimbabweans did not give up, a much superior force against them notwithstanding. They had a cause, a noble cause, a much superior cause to fight for. They were fighting for survival. In some small way, the war was taking some toll on the Rhodesians too.

    The British thought it was too much, more of their kith and kin were falling victim to the war. So they said enough and asked the Mugabes to sit together at the same table with Smith at Lancaster House in London. Zimbabweans were granted their deserved independence.

    It was here that the seed of betrayal was sowed. The demands of the Zimbabweans were clearly spelt out there and the British agreed to finance the compensations of the settlers in Zimbabwe who would be required to relinquish some of their farms (not all) to the Zimbabwean government to be distributed to the landless.

    The Mugabes were very considerate indeed, considering the circumstances. They agreed to give the settlers ten years grace period after which the British were supposed to start compensating them.

    What happened? Not only did the British not fulfill their part of the bargain, but they also dung up what the Zimbabweans call the stooge, Tsvangirai and financed him instead, in the hope that Mugabe would be removed sooner and let the settlers stay.

    Tsvangirai is now fighting for “freedom.“ Freedom from Zimbabweans? Freedom from his own people? Where was he when true sons of Zimbabwe were in the bush fighting for freedom from the colonialists? Freedom from humiliation, and discrimination, and segregation, and torture and killings at the hands of Smith and his clique.

    True sons of Zimbabwe who were not only beaten up, but were murdered by the Smith regime.

    Tsvangirai has the temerity to shout at the man who gave him the voice to speak in public. Could he have made such noise to Smith? He was there, wasn`t he?

    I do not want to tango with the church, but it gives me the nausea when I hear some Bishop is shouting on top of his voice that he would lead a protest march against Mugabe, and he is ready to die for that. Ready to die, indeed?

    Where was the church when the Mugabes were persecuted by Smith, and by extension, the British? Was the Bishop too young then to understand what was going on in Zimbabwe?

    I shudder to think that the Big Brothers in London and Washington are now turning to the clergy to sow seeds of discord among Zimbabweans, knowing the effect of this on the minds and hearts of the faithful.

    God forbid.
    And now, the British, the Americans and Australians want to use African leaders to put pressure on Mugabe. For what?

    For the settlers to claim back the land they once grabbed from Zimbabweans? Do they want to go back to Rhodesia? No, thank you. And, please, give Mugabe and Zimbabwe a break.

  • http://wwwkanyattafarms.net donesq

    Zimbabwe: Dancing to the tune without knowing why

    2007-03-29 09:33:30
    By Ben Mabula

    Sometime in the year 2002, the writer of this article went to Harare, where he stayed for a few days and also managed to visit some localities near the capital city of Zimbabwe.

    This was precisely at a time when widespread land seizures had taken place in Zimbabwe, to a major outcry from the foreign press, which was understandably, firmly on the side of the white settlers.

    Being a daily watcher of news here in Dar es Salaam, I was constantly watching the foreign news correspondents reporting from Zimbabwe on daily basis about the “total breakdown of law and order in Zimbabwe.“

    So while being driven around the nearby countryside, I would persistently ask my hosts as to where the total breakdown of law and order was, as I could see people going around with their day to day business in Zimbabwe in a peaceful manner.

    “You know,“ replied one of my hosts, “these BBC people sometimes exaggerate these things.“

    On my last day in Harare, I had an opportunity to have lunch with a friend at Meikles Hotel in Harare. The restaurant was full of customers, most of whom were whites.

    I asked a friend of mine about the exodus of white settlers which was being so much reported about.

    “You see,“ said the friend, “when the land seizures began, many whites went to Australia and attempted to settle there. However, most of them have found the going hard and are returning to Zimbabwe in droves.“

    I could see that the interaction between the whites and blacks was normal.
    I flew back to Dar es Salaam in the late afternoon.

    Once at home, I was watching a BBC stringer broadcasting from Harare at 8.00 of the same day.

    His report: “You can sense the tension in Harare, where there is a total breakdown of law and order.“

    I had been to Harare on the same day, yet this professional journalist from a civilized society was telling a deliberate lie for consumption by the whole world.

    Years later, after the Zimbabwe government had formalized its land reform programme, through which white land owners who owned more than one farm were deprived of the rest and remained only with one farm so as to avail land to the black majority, as white farmers owned over 80percent of arable land and the black population was congested in rocky areas after their ancestors were thrown out from their ancestral land by Cecil Rhodes.

    From then onwards, the demonisation of the government of Zimbabwe, especially President Mugabe, began to take root.

    The political opposition and the civil society began receiving millions of dollars from their patrons in Britain, who were eager to reverse the land reform drive.

    All kinds of bankrolled political activists sprang up and began singing the popular calypso of Mugabe bashing, which continues to be fashionable up to this day.

    Many of the people who yearn for freedom and democracy around the globe have been prejudiced by this campaign because most of them have no idea of Zimbabwe�s contemporary history, or whether the whole outcry centres around the issue of land, which is not so simple a matter.

    For one to understand Zimbabwe and form a judgement on its current political state, it is vital to go back to the Lancaster House Agreement.

    The background to the Lancaster House Agreement was the realization by both Britain and the minority regime of Rhodesia led by Ian Smith that the battleground had been lost to ZANU guerillas, who were now striking targets in Salisbury (now Harare) at will.

    The leadership of ZANU was now in the hands of Robert Mugabe, a brilliant and astute strategist, after he was freed from ten years detention without trial for fighting the racist minority rule.

    A meeting of Commonwealth Heads of Government which took place in Lusaka from August 1 to 7, 1979 paved way for the belligerent forces in Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) to meet in the UK for negotiations.

    Indeed, the Lancaster House Conference took place and agreement was reached after 40 plenary sessions.

    The three-month conference almost failed to reach agreement due to disagreement on land reform. Mugabe who headed the ZANU delegation under the ZANu umbrella did not trust that a peace deal transfer of land to the majority would take place once he had placed his signature on the dotted line, and time had proved him right.

    However, Robert Mugabe, who was the key stumbling block, was eventually pressured to sign by the frontline state leaders, especially Mwalimu Nyerere, who told him to accept political independence first and all would follow.

    It was reported then that Mugabe was staying with a British friends during the talks, and he was almost in tears when it became inevitable that he had to sign the agreement without securing a foolproof arrangement for land transfer.

    It was said that he even refused to take his supper because he suspected that Britain would renege on the agreement at some stage. Indeed, this is what is happening even now.

    So the Lancaster House Agreement was signed on December 21, 1979. The agreement ended white rule under Ian Smith.

    The conference was chaired by Lord Carrington, the UK secretary of state for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs.

    It was signed between the Patriotic Front consisting of ZAPU and ZANU, and the Zimbabwe Rhodesia Government represented by Bishop Muzorewa and Ian Smith.

    The conference reached agreement on the following issues:
    *The Independence Constitution
    *Arrangements for the pre-independence period.
    *A ceasefire agreement

    Those who signed the agreement were Lord Carrington, Sir Ian Gilmour, Robert Mugabe, Joshua Nkomo, Bishop Muzorewa and Dr S.C. Mundawarara.

    The agreement provided that the Independence Constitution should not be changed for 10 years and 20 percent of Parliamentary seats had to be reserved for whites during that period.

    Mugabe, who became the new leader, was tied up by the agreement as the Constitution barred him from undertaking any land reforms during the first ten years. He abided to the Independence Constitution for all those ten years.

    To facilitate the Agreement, both the British and American governments offered to buy land from white farmers on willing buyer/willing seller basis for re-distribution to the majority blacks.

    This did not happen for all those 10 years. It was only the first phase of the programme in the 1980s which was faintly accomplished after Britain partially funded the settling of 70,000 landless people.

    When Tony Blair took over, his government refused to accept its Lancaster House obligations and the foreign cooperation minister Clare Short wrote a no-nonsense letter to the government of Zimbabwe disclaiming any responsibility for funding the land reform.

    Mugabe told Britain that he would take over the land by force and this is what he did. Soon after the land seizures began, trade union leaders in Zimbabwe soon became the darling of the British government and took a radical political tone.

    These are the ones who formed the purely foreign funded and controlled MDC, which is enjoying full Western media support.

    The battle in Zimbabwe is between the old oppressive system of the settlers and those who brought the change through armed struggle.

    Several leaders and top advisers of the MDC belonged to the racist Selous Scouts special armed regiment, which was responsible for a lot of atrocities committed against black people, including poisoning wells and infecting communal water sources with viruses of epidemics like cholera.

    These are now the heroes of democracy in Zimbabwe and are fighting to bring about regime change by hooks and crooks.

    Ian Smith, the renegade who said that no black man would rule Rhodesian in 100 years, is a force behind the so-called civil society in Zimbabwe.

    Smith is widely seen by the foreign press as a fighter for democracy in Zimbabwe while Robert Mugabe is the demon, the enemy of the people of Zimbabwe and a man who cannot read the signs of the times!

  • http://mensnewsdaily.com/author/zvakwana Zvakwana

    To dinesq, I say I care not about what Western Media says. I care not about what donesq presents in his argument as donesq is using the very same superficial arguments I have seen time and time again. I simply watch what has gone on and continues to go on at ground level, where the real people are. That’s where I operate and I will continue to articulate and give a voice to the voiceless in Zimbabwe.

    I care not for politicians either. I only care about what they do. As far as Zimbabwe is concerned, I don’t care who the media says are good guys or bad guys. I am in a better position to judge who’s who in the zoo. I speak the languages and I know the country – backwards.

    What is going on in Zimbabwe is criminal. Mugabe is a mass murderer and should be brought before the highest courts at the Hague to face charges of genocide. I do not need the media to tell me this because I have been amongst the very people where genocide the occurred.

    Horriffic human rights abuses continue on a daily basis – day in and day out. These abuses are being carried out by state organs which have become simple extensions of zanupf.

    Here is a mail just in from Zimbabwe:

    Hundreds of resistance figures countrywide are being tortured in police cells AS I WRITE THIS EMAIL. They are being denied food, medical attention and access to lawyers. Even where courts instruct police to release them they are not being released but taken back for more torture.

    This is starting to feel like a very bad nightmare. It is hard to believe that although SADC, KNOWS exactly what is going on, they continue to support their one time fellow freedom fighter who has now turned against the very people he professed to have fought for. It is becomming very clear that this meglomaniac never once cared for the people but only himself and his close circle who enrich themselves at the expense of the rest of the country. Mugabe in the Central Committee meeting yesterday said yes, we hurt Tsvangirai!!!!! He says that the MDC is engaged in terrorist activities – this is so enraging as it is the CIO that are perpetrating the petrol bombings to give the security services the excuse to clamp down on the opposition. We are dealing with a maniac out of control.

    I hope that once we make it to the other side, there will be an acknowledgement by the South African Government, SADC and the AU that they failed to serve mankind – knowing that more than 20,000 people have been murdered by the Mugabe regime since 1984 and doing absolutely nothing about it because there are different rules of democratic governance in Southern Africa – here it is considered by SADC leaders that it is OK to murder and destroy a country and its people as long as it maintains the leadership status quo left over from the freedom struggles.

    The torture orders are coming from the top and one day they will pay for their crimes against humanity but how many more have to die before the outside free world lives up to its responsibility of defending democracy across the globe. South Africa does not deserve to host the Soccer World Cup. Would the world let South Africa host the World Cup if it was they themselves who were committing GENOCIDE? I put it to you that knowing GENOCIDE is occuring on your northern border and doing nothing about it is almost the same as committing these crimes yourself.

    Thabo Mbeki KNOWS that Mugabe is brutalising his own people but he cannot accept the prospect of the MDC getting into power because the implications of one of the old guard political parties that were central to ending illegitimate white minority rule being displaced by a new democratic force are not good for the old status quo, hence a referred threat to the ANC. Surely if one of the liberation groups forgets that the main reason they fought against the colonisers was to remove the oppression and then they themselves become the oppressors, they no longer have the legitimacy to rule? One would think so, but in country where POWER and WEALTH COMES BEFORE HUMAN RIGHTS and neighbouring countries turn a blind eye, perhaps legitimacy is not a general requirement to rule?! The SADC Human Rights Charter lies in stark contrast to what is happening in Zimbabwe today. It seems that this document was only window dressing to entice Western investment.

    In SADC countries it seems that if you were beaten, tortured and raped yesterday, then you have the legitimacy to beat, torture and rape others today, tomorrow and as long as it takes to hold onto the hard earned power that you wrested from those that once beat, tortured and raped you!

    The last time Mugabe trumped up charges against a rival party in order to ‘create’ a reason to kill, he with the North Korean trained Fifth Brigade and their commanders orchestrated the murder of more than 20,000 innocent people. How many will die this time?! Wake up SADC, Mugabe is lying to you – sadly you know this but still choose to lie idle…………

    This is not from the BBC or the Imperialist West, as some people like to present. This is from a simple citizen of Zimbabwe. It is not supposition.

  • amfortas

    Its the same old same old from Marxists. Rewrite history and shout it out loud and long until everyone believes it. Oh, and overlook the mass murders, the dead are only fools and troublemaker lickspittles to the Capitalist overlords in Britain. That PM Blah couldn’t organise a piss up in a brewery hardly matters. Whack an old grandmother, break her arms, she is a terrible threat. Bulldoze thousands out of their homes to make a new Upopia. Throw another dissenter on the fire. Mr Mugabe is a heroic figure in the Joe Stalin minor league.

  • http://mensnewsdaily.com/author/zvakwana Zvakwana

    Absolutely correct Amfortas. History starts in the morning with these same old marxixts and they change with whatever suits their cause.

    Here is what happened in the past few days – personal accounts from people abused by zanupf:

    Saturday 31st March, 2007

    1) FM – On Wednesday 28th March, 2007, I was on the 4th floor Harvest House when the Police raid took place. This floor is leased out to business people. I heard Police saying “where is FM, we want to blow his brains out today?” They found me, instructed me to lie on the ground and take off my jacket, and then beat me with electric wires and baton sticks. The business people were also beaten. After they had finished with them, they beat me again, saying, “you are the master mind of the petrol bombings, your office is your house”. We were told to go down stairs. At the reception area there were 7 riot policemen with rifles. We were then told to lie down again and were beaten on the buttocks and feet. One policeman was grinding his booted foot into my jaw. They put the barrel of a gun into my ear saying they would shoot me. They were taking it in turns to beat me, calling out to each other “next”. I only heard the 4th “next” then I must have passed out. Later we were all forced onto a Police Bus and taken to Harare Central Police Station. I think there were about 60 of us. I was taken on my own to the CID Law and Order office and interrogated by 4 men. They wanted my personal history and then told me that I was the master mind of the petrol bombs in Chitingwiza. They are asked about our DRC’s (Democratic Resistance Campaign) and I told them that through them we are seeking peaceful and non-violent change. They told me that if there was another petrol bombing I would be held responsible. I told them it could be anyone doing the petrol bombing, even ZANU PF. I was then taken to another room where Ian Makone, Brighton Matimba etc. were. We could hear terrible screams coming from surrounding rooms. By this time I could not walk.

    On Thursday 29th March, 2007 we were told to go and wash our faces and were then grouped – it was a selection process taking place. The first to be allowed to go were the business people from Harvest House. A Police Officer in uniform took me to the gate of the Police station, under orders from one of my interrogators of the previous day. I had to walk to Parliament where I was due to Chair a Parliamentary committee meeting.
    Injuries sustained – multiple bruising on both feet (insteps), deep tissue bruising and swelling of both buttocks and upper legs. Bruising and laceration on the back.
    2) LC – member of ZINASU, the Students Union. I was arrested at Harvest House on Wednesday 28th March, 2007. I was beaten on the back and buttocks with baton sticks before being forced onto a Police bus and taken to Harare Central Police Station. The following night at about midnight I was taken to a room where 5 men beat me on my feet with batons. They then handcuffed me and tied my feet together and hung me over a metal bar that was placed between two tables. They continued to beat me with baton sticks and a whip that was rubber but had pieces of metal inside. This was in the CID Law and Order offices. They were saying “ you guys from ZINASU came to MDC to get money to demonstrate – what is your monthly allowance from MDC – what is your link with MDC. Who are the petrol bombers? You will be dealt with if we ever see you again”.
    Injuries sustained – haematoma on sole of foot, lacerations on both wrists from handcuffs, severe deep tissue bruising to buttocks.

  • DadWith2Girls

    Michael Aiello has silenced my voice.

  • red pill

    Z:
    It’s been said that political power comes from the barrel of a gun. Probably no truer words spoken or written. Although I admire your spirit there is little we can provide for you and your struggle. The story of Africa is reprize of terror one group upon one another. I don’t have any further suggestions. Regardless Africa or USA, if tyrants are not in acute fear of their lives or turning in the wind, after a certain point there are no further micro-details to discuss, and in the face of lack of definable action it’s time lube up and just bend over in silence….

  • http://mensnewsdaily.com/author/zvakwana Zvakwana

    Dear Red Pill, many thanks for your comment and I take your points seriously. At the moment, Power does come from the barrel in Zimbabwe or the end of an iron rod against your skull is the fashion during this past few weeks. I’m just hoping that oil will be discovered and that President Bush urgently rescinds his none performing pointsman on Zimbabwe at his earliest convenience.

    In the meantime, we will continue to fight the good fight for freedom with or without help from the free world, knowing that god is on our side and that we have every right to aspire to having the very same freedoms that you have. I also hope that, whilst you acknowledge there is little you can do to assist, that you can sleep well knowing that you have exhausted all possibilities in coming to your conclusion. I differ as I have also lived out of Africa and I know that there is plenty you can do. Try using your imagination, you might just surprise yourself.

    Again, I thank you and say that I respect your views. However, there are some of us who are well prepared to die before bending over.

  • red pill

    Z:
    I for one want in a president someone not so much inclined to be a world policeman but an aggressive advocate for my kind. I myself have felt wronged and been injured by the powers that be, and unlike many I have more than enough will and more than enough resources to press my case fully home to my oppressors should I see fit.
    But I do not.
    My fight is not yet upon us, and likely my fight shall not come during my lifetime.
    War for oil? Hell yeah.
    War for human rights? If not for my benefit or my kind, I don’t much care, sorry old chap.
    Nobody else is fighting for me or my kind for my ‘rights’, and I’m one of the few even having been in the line or prepared to do so again should it come to it. Rights of various sorts have no end of injury. There are no rights for free.
    My friend, the true test of worldly relevance is the capacity to push your agenda and provide for yourself and your kind. Those fearing loss of their comfort or safety without the will and fortitude to take it for themselves and pay the price should not child-like cry and sputter to gain the attention of some other less offensive bully and his minions to save them, for they know not what that price will be. There is no gratitude of any significance when the sacrifice is made on the part of others. The price was too dear for the recipients of the largess and they shall alway find need to critisize as it is the way of the weak to enhance themselves.
    Being so much nearer to that primeaval jungle mother to us all it’s facinating that you have so little apparant understanding of its laws or maybe you seek someone with even less understanding to do your bidding. On this planet, the irrelevant die repeatedly until they die out.
    Ain’t anti-colonialism a biatch?…

  • http://mensnewsdaily.com/author/zvakwana Zvakwana

    Goodness, I’m happy for you. Keep trying.






Search