America is pretty well the only country in the world to have the right for citizens to bear arms enshrined in a Constitution. It was, and remains, a very wise decision. It would be retrograde to lose it.

Your question though is apposite: “Why is it that whenever a shooting spree like this happens, they want to take guns away from those who did not do it?” Such is the state of thinking when fear takes over from sound consideration.

xhttp://axisofeviltour.com/nk-images/nk-dmz-sk-soldier-closeup.jpg

the man is from south korea.. read the descriptions that the survivor from the german class gave of what he was wearing… a black vest.. and a brown vest… but under something like a boy scout uniform..

http://axisofeviltour.com/nk-images/nk-dmz…ier-closeup.jpg

i am not a conspiracist… so i cant draw conclusions other than this may have been a south korean soldier at one time

i dont know.. but just do a search and compare that photo with a boy scout uniform…

The problems:
1) People will always find ways to do violence. Evil people will still be evil.
2) Police, almost all of the time, show up AFTER the fact! The simple truth is, as we see EVERY DAY on the news, in a moment of crisis, YOU ARE ON YOUR OWN!! The police mop up afterward, and try to catch the criminal AFTER THE FACT.
3) Had ONE professor had a gun, just ONE, this nut could have been stopped. But like the sheeple people are, they were lambs to a slaughter because GUNS BAD. Reality: PEOPLE BAD, guns inanimate objects.
4) John Lott, a conservative writer, has stats showing how many times a gun was used to stop a crime. It happens every day in this country, you just don’t read it because the news is biased.

Because of feminism, we’ve doped our boys, brain washed them with PC from grade school forward, threatened them, and locked them up. But still, violence happens. Because MEN are AGGRESSIVE. Without that, civilization wouldn’t exist.

Instead of working against the nature of men, why not put a CHECK on violent behavior? AS in an armed citizenry? And teaching codes of ethics that respect men’s natures?

Just an idea…

However, if this person were motivated enough to commit this crime in the first place then they would certainly be motivated enough to find another means of achieving this end sans-firearms.

To quote Archie Bunker, “Would it make you feel any better, if they was pushed out windows?”

Could it be that he got it illegally?

So how do Gun laws stop illegal activity and procurment?

If more laws governing guns make more things about guns illegal then that means there is just that much more activity that the lawless can operate within, and making more people criminals for exercsing G-D given Rights.

It really is simple. Gun regualtion only regulates legal activity.

They will never stop the actions of those who are willing to make a concerted effort to harm others. Chaining doors closed is a sign of serious premeditation to trap a lot of people for an easy kill.

Me, I am stupid. My life insurance is pad up, I have lost my family, and I know when a gun is taken out it is going to be used, it is probably an ambush, and there is only one escape in an ambush – rush the Ambush line.

Meanwhile VT Students took the outrun your classmate Doctrine, the mode of fighting of the Feminists and the (Modern) French.

Oh my! I see a correlation! Both do fight with their feet and fuck with their faces! LOL!

Oh, come on. I listened to a lot of the cable news coverage today (CNN and MSNBC mostly), as well as Katie Couric’s CBS Evening News, and heard nothing remotely resembling your hyperbole. Not even once. Maybe you were just on the wrong channel.

The Second Amendment won’t be repealed day after tomorrow because of this, so I don’t think such a hair-trigger response as yours is either called for or very helpful.

I am quoting someone, I just don’t remember his name. My apologies for my plagerism.

A good question for the thick liberals who want to repeal the Second Amendment, and for the Euroweenies, including the Brits who repealed the right to keep and bear arms from their English Bill of Rights:

Why do we never here of this kind of incident taking place at either a police station or a hunting lodge?