The American Psychological Association and Parental Alienation Syndrome

2007-05-05
By

The Alec Baldwin controversy has again brought media attention to the debate over Parental Alienation and Parental Alienation Syndrome.

In 2005, PBS aired Breaking the Silence, a film attacking fathers and Parental Alienation Syndrome. We organized a successful campaign against the film which led PBS to promise to make a balanced, fair documentary on the subject–a commitment PBS kept.

During the controversy over the film, the film’s feminist supporters insisted that Parental Alienation Syndrome had been discredited and attacked by the American Psychological Association. In the documentary Joan Meier, a professor of clinical law at George Washington University and one of the film’s chief spokespersons, states that PAS “has been thoroughly debunked by the American Psychological Association.” Connecticut Public Television, one of the film’s producers, put out a press release promoting the film which stated that PAS had been “discredited by the American Psychological Association.”

Rhea K. Farberman, Executive Director of Public and Member Communications of the American Psychological Association, retorted that these feminist these claims are “incorrect” and “inaccurate,” and that the APA “does not have an official position on parental alienation syndrome–pro or con.”

Despite the enormous political pressure put on the APA by misguided women’s advocates who oppose PAS, the APA has put out mixed messages about Parental Alienation Syndrome. During the controversy I asked shared parenting advocate Les Veskrna, MD to write an article for my site sorting out the truth about the APA and PAS. Veskrna asserts, “the APA has, in fact, heretofore made a significant endorsement of the validity of PAS.” Below is his piece.

PAS and the APA

By Les Veskrna, MD

The Public Affairs Office of the American Psychological Association has put out the following press release to answer questions generated by PBS’s recent documentary Breaking the Silence: Children’s Stories regarding APA’s official position on Parental Alienation Syndrome:

“The American Psychological Association (APA) believes that all mental health practitioners as well as law enforcement officials and the courts must take any reports of domestic violence in divorce and child custody cases seriously. An APA 1996 Presidential Task Force on Domestic Violence and the Family noted the lack of data to support so-called ‘parental alienation syndrome,’ and raised concern about the term’s use. However, we have no official position on the purported syndrome.”

Highlighting the word “lack” and using the words “so-called” and “purported” in this press release seems to suggest the APA presumes PAS to be fallacious while, at the same time, uncommitted regarding its validity.

This official statement comes a few days after the APA’s Executive Director of Public and Member Communications, criticized Breaking the Silence for misrepresenting the APA’s position on PAS.

In spite of these puzzling pronouncements, it is apparent that the APA has, in fact, heretofore made a significant endorsement of the validity of PAS, which may be confirmed by simply searching the content of their website at www.apa.org. (more…)

Is being a Disneyland Dad taking its toll?
Does your ‘career’ get in the way of seeing your kids?

Learn How To Take Advantage of An Opportunity That Will Change Your Life & Improve Your Financial Situation
www.FreedomQuest.net
26 views

  • scottkirk

    thanks glenn for the heads up..I just sent this lady a letter thanking her for her article and concern about the growing awareness of parental alienation syndrone..

  • wls1

    Of more acute concern ought to be last week’s California Assembly approval of legislation to proscribe reference to parental alienation in the state’s family courts, and essential endorsement of the view that the concept of PA is nonscientific and nothing more than the means by which violent and abusing parents are currently frequently obtaining custody.

  • chas

    APA endorses PAS. Well, good news I guess, sort of. Maybe like a medical doctor before they understood bacteria and antibiotics saying TB is a real disease and I will try to treat it; I’ll try bloodletting and leeches. Psychology will be legitimate in about one hundred years. Until then Psychologists diagnoses and cures harm more people then they help, and they blame patients for their lack of success. They have changed the way everybody uses the English language, and there is nobody who can speak without using Psychology’s categories and definitions to describe everything. They want to be the experts everybody in the media, in the education system, and in the government, turn to for explanations, so they can baffle everybody with their psychobabble. They can’t impress us with their intelligence so they baffle us with their b—s—. The public schools have created an unprecedented epidemic of mental health problems in young people and the Psychologists are their Band-Aid, getting rich being trying to help turn this trend around. You are more likely to recover without their treatment than with it. I guess even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

  • amfortas

    wls1 says – “….and essential endorsement of the view that the concept of PA is nonscientific and nothing more than the means by which violent and abusing parents are currently frequently obtaining custody.”

    I am unsure, wls1 if this is your view or your reporting of a view held by others. Would you please tell us.

    The only evidence I have seen of violent abusers frequently getting custody is of mothers when they accuse fathers, putative fathers, non-fathers who have been suckered etc.

  • wls1

    I’m saying that if the bill referred to continues to move through the Legislature, the _law_ in California will shortly be that parental alienation will be understood in family court as something that cannot, and never does, happen: that it must as a matter of law, be taken as absolutely patent that any child’s manifestation of aversion toward a parent, or any parent’s pleading for relief from a campaign waged by the other parent of disparaging him to the child, indicates or proves that the target parent is abusing the child.

    NOW and allied, mostly DV oriented, organizations, have been _claiming_ for 15 or more years that family courts preferentially give custody to wife beaters and child abusers, usually pedophiles, because they give credence to the notion of parental alienation, which they claim is discredited and repudiated within the profession of psychology.

    Anyone who observes family court and has a common-sense grasp of interpersonal relations knows that all of this is absurd, and the pitch that asks one to believe it ridiculous—yet the California Assembly has endorsed it. It seems to me fathers and honest parents should stand up and persuade the Senate, and if necessary the Governor, that this proposed law should not be enacted.

  • Robert Stevens

    Well in Nazi Germany it was against the law for a Jew to own anything.. The Nazi’s lost and are now remembered as the bad guys . The samething will happen concerning the feminist, the NOW and all the other politically correct hate groups outthere.
    People are not stupid, they are just trusting and want to believe what their beloved media Gods want sto tell them. But after a while the people , not being stupid, will figure it out. Even some of the Clueless… ie Alec Baldwin are begining to wake up and smell the coffee. ( newsflash all it take to turn a hollywood liberal into a fierce defender of fathers rightr, is for him to be a victim of the very discrimination that all of us ” faceless” people have suffered for years.
    So the feminist will lose, it’s going to take a while , but it’s gonna happen.

  • Denis

    “So the feminist will lose, it’s going to take a while , but it’s gonna happen.”

    Sadly however, not until the victims number in the tens of millions.

    “Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out – because I was not a Jew. ”

    “Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out – because I was not a socialist. ”

    “Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out – because I was not a trade unionist.”

    “Then they came for me – and there was no one left to speak out for me. ”

    Martin Niemoller

    Men ought to FIRST see each other as men and fathers and stop seeing themselves as Republicans, Democrats, Yankee fans, Red Sox fans, management, labor, Christians, Jews, Muslims, atheist, black, white, asian, etc.. In other words, stop seeing our differences and come together over our common interests as men and fathers. Our enemies rely heavily on us to fight each other in political battles based on our differences. This weakens us when fighting THEM.

  • scottkirk

    denis “our enemies rely heavily on us to fight each other in political battles based on our differences”
    Take for instance the duke situation…the fem think tanks tried to spin it as a race thing as best they could to keep us away from the real fact that boys/men have become second class citizens because of the hate propaganda of the womens groups…






Search