lumigan tramadol tadalafil

‘Women are finally figuring out how weak-kneed men really are and are putting them in their place’

2007-05-09
By

Jerry Schaefer of Long Beach, CA didn’t like my recent co-authored column “CA Legislators Vote to Protect Pets from Domestic Violence but Deny Services to Male DV Victims” (Long Beach Press-Telegram, 4/21/07), which opposes a law recently passed by the California Senate Judiciary Committee. He recently wrote a letter to the Press-Telegram–published, remarkably–apparently cheering women who abuse men. The letter is:

“Mike McCormick and Glenn Sacks are worried that men are getting the short end, that all the focus is on men battering women, while women are pulverizing men. And the poor guys have nowhere to go. There are only two facilities in the whole state that accept male victims.

“What they’re afraid to say is that men are up against the ropes. Women are finally figuring out their silly little games, realizing how weak-kneed they really are and putting them in their place. Men cannot stand women standing up for themselves. They’d rather women knew their place, like they do in Taliban country.

“Jerry Schaefer, Long Beach”

Is being a Disneyland Dad taking its toll?
Does your ‘career’ get in the way of seeing your kids?

Learn How To Take Advantage of An Opportunity That Will Change Your Life & Improve Your Financial Situation
www.FreedomQuest.net
8 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • PolishKnight

    It’s amazing and instructive to see how far people will go to deny their own self-interest. Assuming that Jerry Schaefer is a man, why would he say and believe things that are so clearly contrary to his own self-interest? It seems clear that he must perceive a benefit in doing so, which must mean that at least his own milieu supports and encourages him to hold those views. Maybe one day he’ll get a taste of how misandric this culture can be and change his mind.

    I’m reminded of a story/anecdote about a liberal congressman who was mugged and beaten on his way to a townhall to discuss criminal sentencing. He got up in front of the crowd and said: “This experience only shows me how oppressed that poor young man must have been to resort to such a violent act.”

    An old woman stood up and proclaimed: “God! He didn’t hear you the first time. Hit him again!”

    People who hold strong religious and personal beliefs are often not quick to change them despite evidence to the contrary. In many ways, this is a good thing (Christians believing in moral values, for example, despite the evidence of others who are less moral getting ahead.)

    To the average leftist/chivalrous believer, the “rewards” are less obvious than those in a religion which offer spiritual guidance and comfort. One can hope that God will reward us for good, selfless deeds we embrace in this life but what does the liberal get out of it?

    Listen to their language to spot for phrases on why they continue to follow their “faith” in leftist self-hate: Self-importance (they get to feel better/smarter/more “caring” than others in their race/gender who are less enlightened), plausible deniability (bashing others even in a hypocritical manner carries some street cred if they’re doing it to their own kind. It’s hard to accuse a self-hater of a motive. Hell, it’s hard to find one!)

    For many, there is a perceived short-term interest: They see a culture and peer groups who are quick to condemn those who stray too far away from the true faith. They would rather be on the end of the “smart/caring folks who throw the rocks” than on the receiving end.

    Strategy: Crush them by attacking their goals, not their ideology. One leftist looked absolutely crushed when I showed him undeniable stats that proved the obvious (to you or I): Most leftists are poorly educated. After all, most of the beneficiaries of their programs are in that situation so Republicans can’t be winning (or losing) close elections if there aren’t MORE middle and even upper class voters supporting the agenda.

    They love to pretend they’re the party of the middle and working class rather than the poor and uneducated but it’s just the opposite. THAT harms their worldview far moreso than any gaps or contradictions in their ideology PRECISELY because their beliefs is based upon emotional attachments.

  • tonysprout

    Jerry’s hoping to get a piece of ass at the local NOW-COW barn. What better way! (or is that COW-NOW? Oh. CANOW? OK. Should read CAL-NOW.)

  • bolwriter

    It’s amazing and instructive to see how far people will go to deny their own self-interest. Assuming that Jerry Schaefer is a man, why would he say and believe things that are so clearly contrary to his own self-interest? It seems clear that he must perceive a benefit in doing so, which must mean that at least his own milieu supports and encourages him to hold those views. Maybe one day he’ll get a taste of how misandric this culture can be and change his mind.

  • TheRanger

    So, according to this schmuck it’s okay to put men in “their place”, but women should be able to do as they damn well please. And if putting men in “their place” involves government action, well that’s all the better to these slimey liberal/leftwing pigs.

  • jackal1994

    It just goes to show you what disturbed personalities we’re dealing with in feminists. She’s reveling in the concept that women are brutalizing men, and the men have no escape.

    The key lies in galvanizing healthy (or less dysfunctional) women into recognizing the mah-hate these women have. They’re like a gender-based hategroup / superiority group. And also we have to get mainstream men and women alerted to how this incredibly small minority of women (2% or less) is single-handedly driving policies that drastically hurt men/women/children







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search