Drexler in Newsweek: Boys Raised by Single Mothers or Lesbian Couples Are ‘More Concerned About Others’

2007-05-10
By

Background: In 2005 feminist gender scholar Peggy Drexler released her anti-father book Raising Boys Without Men: How Maverick Moms Are Creating the Next Generation of Exceptional Men. I criticized Drexler and her assertion that lesbian parents are better for boys than straight parents in my columns Are Boys Really Better off Without Fathers? (San Francisco Chronicle, 8/31/05) and Raising Boys Without Men: Lesbian Parents Good, Dads Bad (World Net Daily, 9/10/05).

I explained, “It’s one thing to be respectful of gays and gay parents. It’s quite another to engineer a deceptive study and use it to assert that lesbian families are a better environment in which to raise boys than heterosexual families.”

Drexler just penned a column for Newsweek titled No Such Thing as An ‘Average’ Family (5/14/07), in which she writes that boys raised by single mothers or lesbian couples are “more in touch with themselves, more concerned with the feelings of others than you might expect from teenage boys.” This is a light version of the anti-male bias which runs throughout her book. In one of my columns on the book I wrote:

“In the book’s opening pages Drexler’s message is one of tolerance for various family forms, as she notes that lesbian and single mother families ‘can’ effectively raise boys. But Raising Boys soon devolves into outright advocacy of lesbian parenting. In Drexler’s world, lesbian families—protected from fathers and their toxic masculinity–are the best environments in which to raise boys. Married heterosexual mothers try their best, but the positive influence these hapless moms try to impart to their children is overwhelmed by that of the malevolent family patriarch.

“According to Drexler, lesbian moms are ‘more sophisticated about how they teach their sons right from wrong’ than heterosexual couples, and there are ‘real advantages for a boy being raised in this new type of family.’ Heterosexual mothers don’t measure up in ‘moral attitude,’ and are less likely than lesbian moms to ‘create opportunities for their sons to examine moral and values issues.’ This in turn slows the ‘moral development in their sons.’

“Furthermore, Drexler asserts that boys raised by lesbians ‘grow up emotionally stronger,’ ‘have a wider range of interests and friendships,’ and ‘appear more at ease in situations of conflict’ than boys from ‘traditional’ (i.e., father-present) households.  Fatherless boys ‘exhibit a high degree of emotional savvy…an intuitive grasp of people and situations.’ Best of all, sons of lesbian couples are much more willing to discard traditional masculinity than boys trapped in heterosexual households.

“For example, Fiona’s son paints his nails, while both of Maria’s sons dance ballet. Ursula’s son chose sewing and cooking for his electives in 7th grade. Kathy’s son has rejected playing baseball as being ‘too competitive’—no surprise, because in their local, father-led baseball league, ‘the better players get more playing time.’

“Yet Drexler’s research has obvious flaws. For one, the families she studied were middle to upper class, older women who volunteered to have their lives intimately scrutinized over a multiyear period–an unrepresentative, self-selected sample.

“More importantly, her research suffers from confirmatory bias—Drexler saw what she wanted to see. Drexler is not an objective social scientist, but instead a passionate advocate for lesbian mothers.  She calls the ‘maverick mothers’ raising sons without men ‘avatars of a new social movement,’ and says her book’s ‘stories, voices, data, and findings will reassure, hearten, and empower’ them. Her research did not measure objective indices of child well-being, such as rates of juvenile crime, drop-outs or teen pregnancy. Instead Drexler personally conducted interviews of mothers and their sons and made subjective judgments about their family lives. It is not surprising that Drexler found lesbian families to her liking. In fact, her dogged determination to see only good in
lesbian couples and problems in heterosexual ones at times reaches absurd proportions.

“For example, though Drexler doesn’t seem to notice, her lesbian moms, particularly the ‘social’ (i.e., nonbiological moms), cheerfully endure insults and disrespect that no parent should ever tolerate. Carol’s son calls her ‘stupid.’ Bianca’s son calls her ‘lazy.’ Martha’s son hops into her bed and effectively tells Martha tough luck, sucker–go sleep somewhere else. Thankfully, in each case progressive lesbian mom dealt with the problem through patience and talking. By contrast dad—who Drexler usually portrays as being overly strict–would probably have had junior pull weeds in the yard for a few hours as he waves goodbye to his PlayStation. He is (sigh) sadly unenlightened.

“For Drexler, boys raised by lesbians are a better breed than those raised by heterosexual couples. One day when Drexler was struggling to hold on to her briefcase and her bags, 11 year-old Damien saw ‘that I needed help and immediately offered it.’ Drexler is taken aback—a boy being helpful and caring? She notes ‘when I thought about it later, it clicked in my head: This is a boy being raised by two moms.’ (more…)

FALSELY ACCUSED IN TEXAS?
Domestic Violence. Child Sexual Assault. Child Protective Services Defense.
Contact the Law Office of Stuckle & Ferguson
www.PaulStuckle.com /
falseaccusations@stuckle-ferguson.com
34 views

  • Virtue

    Today’s special is bullshit flavored crap.

  • http://www.false-accusers.com TheManOnTheStreet

    of course. IT is all so clear now. Heterosexuality as a whole is evil. Creates evil. And has no positive input upon society.

    Silly me.

    TMOTS

  • red pill

    With all of history to check for successful representative cultures of similar nature as history allows all permutations of social capacity to rise and fall over time, where was this land and time where feelings and effete noncompetitive comforts trump the daily search for food, warmth and security? Where is this noncompetitive and sensitive society so we may learn its ways and honor its successes? Where is this lland where men are but temporarily nedded as drones and serve only to propagate ever more queens and daughters in obesiance? Where is this land where the natural order of things and even physiology and psychology has been easily redesigned for the good of all with no Y chromosomes?
    Is something bugging you about this as it is me???
    Can it be that the gals would want to turn us into mindless servile ants or bees as if that’s some kind of improvment over the general state of man?
    You gotta wonder about these people….

  • S Baker

    What is the surprise here? This is merely part of the homosexualization of the country; another spoke in the wheel of the marketing of deviance. Actually, this is about child abuse of the highest order to leave kids open to deviant influence and subjugation. Estimates are that 80% of male homosexuals were molested as kids and most become homosexuals, with the remainder becoming homophobes. Next up: Hollywood’s “Stevey and his two playful daddys.

  • thurston861

    Yes, but are more likely to be abused or killed by their Single Mother.

    Abuse does have a way of inciting bravery and resentment that causes some to care about others, yet how does this explain the VT males not fighting for the protection and lives of those around them?…and lining up against a wall and taking bullets in the back of the head?

  • bolwriter

    Another intellectually dishonest feminist. It’s just amazing what these people can get into print. This is the Shere Hite approach to social science – collect data from the demographic group that agrees with you and publish your findings as if they’re applicable to all. It’s intentionally deceptive.

  • conservativation

    At the dinner table, boys raised by lesbians keep saying “tastes like chicken”…..thats a real difference!

  • badger

    Conservativation:

    I thought it was fish.

  • conservativation

    Hook line and sinker buddy

  • roger

    looks like a taco!

  • Squiggy

    The one in the middle looks like Willie Nelson.

  • jackal1994

    I wrote to them at this email address: webeditors@newsweek.com

    The following comments:
    I have some disagreements with your article “No such thing as an ‘average’ family” by Peggy Drexler. The simple fact of the matter (and it is fact because it has been proven in numerous studies which were published in peer-review media) is that the very very best environment to raise children is with two loving parents–a husband and wife.

    There are numerous studies showing that the great liberal experiment (of replacing fathers with big-daddy-government) has been an abysmal failure.
    80% of men in prison for committing violent crimes were raised in fatherless families. Girls are much more likely to wind up as pregnant teens, or in abusive relationships when raised in fatherless homes. Boys and girls are much more likely to drop out of school, get into problems with the law, have a drinking problem, try drugs, and less likely to attend college.

    Drexler in her book tends to rationalize that any good qualities in the sons (of lesbian moms) she witnesses MUST be from the upbringing and never even bothers to interview any traditional families to see if this is so.

    Also, it is well known that Drexler omits many details in her book, like the fact that several of the lesbian moms dress their sons’ hair in hair-extensions and makeup to make the boys look feminine.

    Not that this is a burning issue in itself, but in her book Drexler makes it APPEAR that these boys are BOTH natural rough-and-tumble boys and empathic super-caring boys (in short SUPERIOR to boys from traditional families).

    Would Drexler’s readers so blindly accept these guarantees if they knew how these lesbians dress the boys up like miniature drag queens?

    If there were an evangelical author who stated that the best environment to raise sons was a traditional family your magazine would pick apart, scrutinize, question, analyze every facet of that article–and probably include lots of ‘contrary’ quotes from detractors.

    You have done no such thing in this article. You just mindlessly pass it along as gospel. Where is your sense of journalistic integrity or investigative journalism?

    You have lost one more subscription, good day to you.

  • jackal1994

    Although I don’t really have a subscription to newsweek, but wtf might as well make ‘em sweat a little.

  • scottkirk

    thanks jackal for making an e-mail to their editor so convenient by giving us the adress…Im right behind you in expressing my concerns…






Search