lumigan tramadol tadalafil

Gender-Baiting Scorecard

2007-05-24
By

Have you noticed how often politicos are playing the gender card these days? The upswing can be traced back to January – that’s when Nancy Pelosi was confirmed as Speaker of the House and Hillary Clinton announced her presidential run.  

But how many persons truly appreciate the finer points of this latest round of the age-old battle of the sexes? For those who are keeping score, here’s a run-down of the saucy schemes: 

1. Play the Victim. This well-honed gambit appeals both to men’s sense of chivalry and women’s sense of angst.  

Mrs. Pelosi employed it when she crowed, “I’ve broken the marble ceiling.” And Hillary Clinton incessantly plays this tune with catch-phrases like “now it’s women’s turn to be heard.”  

Portraying women as victims is a tactic that is used by male politicians, as well. Senator Joseph Biden, for example, is always good for a juicy sound-bite on abused women, somehow forgetting that women assault their partners as often as men. 

And no surprise, Nancy and Hillary are now squaring off in a private contest of play-the-victim one-upmanship. This past Sunday on ABC’s This Week, Pelosi lamented, “it’s harder to become Speaker of the House than president of the United States for a woman.” 

Yes, Mrs. Pelosi, I’m feeling your pain. 

2. Make Preposterous Claims. Make no mistake, this is Mrs. Clinton’s strong suit. These are my favorites from the Hillorama hit parade: 

  • “Women have always been the primary victims of war.”
  • “Here we are at the beginning of the 21st century and women still earn significantly less than men for doing the same jobs.”
  • “Women are 70% of the world’s poor.”
  • “Women were routinely excluded from major clinical trials of most illnesses.”

 3. Pretend to be Mother Superior. San Fran Nan has become the latest poster girl for the “do what mother says if you know what’s good for you” school of political persuasion. 

In January, Pelosi made history by becoming the first Speaker of the House to publicly flex her biceps with seven grandchildren gasping in disbelief. And earlier this month she used the occasion of Mother’s Day as a backdrop for her latest tirade on the Iraq war.  

The mother-knows-best strategy can be deployed against other women, as well. In January, secretary of state Condi Rice went to the Senate to defend president Bush’s Iraq strategy, only to encounter a feisty senator Barbara Boxer. 

“Who pays the price? I’m not going to pay a personal price,” Boxer exclaimed in front of the cameras. “My kids are too old, and my grandchild is too young.” Then turning to Rice: “You’re not going to pay a particular price, as I understand it, with an immediate family.”  

Sometimes the political gets very personal. 

4. Appeal to the Uber-Female. Some feminists believe that women represent a superior species, a higher force for moral enlightenment.  

Like Marie Wilson of the White House Project, who once claimed that female politicians lead “from an other-centered perspective.” In contrast, male pols – the guys who enacted female-friendly laws like Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and breast cancer research — tend to be “self-centered.” 

A couple years ago Hillary made the astonishing claim that “Research shows the presence of women raises the standards of ethical behavior and lowers corruption.” Folks, we’ll let that one pass without comment, OK? 

And one day an unhinged Barbara Jordan, former congresswoman from Texas, came up with this empathic insight: “I believe that women have a capacity for understanding and compassion which a man structurally does not have.” 

5. Resort to Sex Appeal. When female politicians need an extra boost, they have one more high-card up their sleeves – their feminine charms.  

Like representative Loretta Sanchez of California, affectionately known on Capitol Hill as “the babe.” When asked by a reporter who would play her on television, Sanchez replied Jennifer Lopez, since “I’ve got a big booty.” And during a recent interview, Sanchez needed to change for her next appearance, so she stripped down to her black bra in front of the female reporter. [http://www.latimes.com/news/local/politics/cal/la-me-sanchez05mar05,0,3865811.story?coll=la-home-headlines] 

Across the Atlantic, French presidential candidate Ségolène Royal did not hesitate to capitalize on her ou-la-la to garner media attention and male votes, once allowing herself to be photographed in high-heels and a satiny-pink negligee. [www.jakouiller.com/share/presidente_sinon_rien.jpg]  

In the not-too-distant past, candidates for political office scored points based on their record of accomplishment and command of the issues. But now the rational exchange of ideas is at risk of becoming a relic of the patriarchal past.  

One day soon politicians will hopefully renounce the use of gender pandering and shrill stereotypes and will forgo displays of racy undergarments. That’s when they will be viewed as serious candidates working to improve the lot of all Americans.

11 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • conservativation

    Watching the Bell Curve in action….

  • http://whatmenthinkofwomen.blogspot.com/ christianj

    Ahhh yes ! Emma Tom..

    A self-confessing feminist harpie that once had the audacity of accusing me of having a typical “male sensitive ego”, when Idared to question it’s feminasty leanings.

    She suggested that I was too sensitive to her male-bashing, I suggested that it was not me that had a frail ego but herself…

    “by the way” I said ” it is not I that covers my face and hair with chemicals to make myself appeal to others”…

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,1860524-12275,00.html

    She changed it all right after our little tête-à-tête !

  • amfortas

    hahahaha, conservativation, I like the male pollies in swimmers comment – “I wonder what it would be like in a world where male candidates make overt claims……, where they photgraphed wearing swim trunks ”

    Come to OZ and experience what it is like. We Aussies love the beach and we have just had our summer fill of pollies in speedos (budgie-smugglers, as they are called here) striding manfully into and out of the sea, rippling muscle dripping water. All that was missing was the vaseline lens on the cameras. The sight of all the hairy navels sitting like cherries on fat guts puts a chap right off his cornflakes. Give me a look at Segoline in a cozzi or a nightie anyday. Women do do cozzie-shots so much better. There should be shouts in Congress whenever Nancy appears – “get’em-off” (to which opposers could shout, “Get’em on again”)

    And the other comments have missed the most egregious player of all. The Italian stripper- MP who was always quick to get-em-off whenever she heard a camera-shutter.

    James H, thanks for the Emma Tom piece. It is an historical one-off. A collector’s item. Someone – a man of course – has spiked her drink with a clear-view pill. She usually writes venomously, decrying men over anything and everything, and bulling up women with pretty well every outrageous claim for their superiority and perfection ever copied from another’s pen.

  • jjtaup

    JamesH, not to quibble too much with you in #5, but there is no principle inscribed into God’s stone tablets proclaiming that chicks should fill about half of the plantet’s leadership positions. If we accept that then the next step is to mandate that all the moons should provide half of the universe’s light, the other provided by the suns.

    Unless you really do mean chicks–the little furry yellow ones.

  • jjtaup

    Who the hell voted that 19th ammendment into place? Ahh, the chivalrous fools.

  • scottkirk

    in the book “the mascilist meme”…the author proposes a very good, and documented argument that in fact women may be more barbaric then men.

    He concludeds men at the genetic level are the xy chromozone..and women are the yy chromozone…
    At the root of our nature, men simply adapt quicker to their environment than women do…”we civilize quicker”

    he concludes womens barbaric selfishness served them and the children well 5000 years ago..
    but as we move into modernity…
    The deeply rooted selfish nature of the women; and all the power our culture has given to the women; has led to some serious consequences to all others…

    namelly the sufferring of men/boys…Its quite selfish for the women to demand even more entitlements from men when the fact is men are allready working themselves to an early death for women..

    men in 1920 died 1 year earlier than women and are now dying on average 10 years earlier..
    and the barbaricly selfish women is still screaming for more of everything…..thats vulgar, barbaric, selfishness, that the women simply has not evolved enough into civilization to even realise..

  • JamesH

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,21777884-12274,00.html
    “If chicks ruled the world, it would look much the same.
    THE WRY SIDE
    Emma Tom
    23may07

    IF one more person says the world would be a better place if it was ruled by women, I’ll scream. Loudly, with lots of unladylike grimaces and flying spit.

    Feminists are right to say chicks should fill about half the planet’s leadership positions. But claiming this will result in a better, kinder, gentler globe is unmitigated crap, right up there with “I don’t usually do this sort of thing on a first date” and (from Brazilian waxers) “it won’t grow back for at least six weeks”.

    Contrary to popular mythology, women are not the fairer sex.

    The harsh truth is that they can be as devious, vindictive and violent as the next man.

    One of history’s most prolific killers was Erzsebet Bathory, a Hungarian countess who tortured and murdered hundreds of girls on her family estate in Transylvania in the 16th century.

    Bathory’s modus operandi was to slit her victims’ throats and bathe in their warm blood, sometimes after setting their pubes on fire.

    Very feminine.

    No doubt she would have loved a cup of tea and a little chitchat with Katherine Knight from rural NSW. This former abattoir worker was jailed for life in 2001 after stabbing her de facto partner 37 times and then skinning him, boiling his head and baking pieces of his buttocks with vegies.

    Very Country Women’s Association.

    New research shows women are taking a leading role in terrorist attacks and blowing themselves up more often in suicide bombings.

    They’re also stepping up their involvement in sex crimes, with a disturbing increase in the number of women teachers arrested for inappropriate relationships with kiddies.

    (If you’re one of those sniggerers who reckons no sexual attention from a woman is ever unwanted by a bloke, put yourself in the place of the teenage boy gang raped with a rolling pin in Sydney in 2005 and imagine how you’d feel about the two girls charged over the attack. My guess is that it wouldn’t be hubba-hubba.)

    She-devils are starting young, too. In October 2005, an Australian psychologist told a conference that alpha females were embracing their inner bitches and female bullying was rampant in the nation’s schools.

    In Bulgaria, several young women were injured in a bloody brawl between schoolgirls last October. These desperados used knuckledusters, chains and beer bottles to fight over the attentions of a spunky male peer.

    Far more serious was the case of the two West Australian teenagers sentenced to life imprisonment earlier this month for garrotting a 15-year-old friend. The pair slaughtered two kittens as practice and said they killed Eliza Jane Davis because it just felt right.

    She-thugs are starting young, but age certainly isn’t slowing them down. In LA in mid-2005, two women in their 70s were arrested after allegedly befriending homeless men, taking out multiple life insurance policies and filing claims worth more than $US2.2 million when the transients died in mysterious hit-and-run accidents.

    It’s hard to say whether nannas are becoming nastier or whether their nastiness is just getting more press.

    What’s definite, however, is that continuing to claim that women occupy some higher moral ground is both outlandishly incorrect and extraordinarily unhelpful to the feminist cause.

    First, it gives chicks a false sense of superiority. Second, it means their exclusion from positions of power can be justified on the grounds that firm, male hands are required for the world’s steering wheels: hands attached to leaders who don’t blubber over lost kittens and get all thingy about their bum sizes during nuclear showdowns.

    Like men, women come in a range of colours, flavours and calibres. Some are paragons of statesfolkship, while others think its big and clever to pummel each other with nunchakus on the off-chance they score a date with the school heart-throb.

    If women ruled the world, it would not be a better place. Odds are it would look a whole lot like it does now, minus the irrational sexism that falsely elevates chicks morally while unfairly thwarting them logistically.

    Ironically enough, the key to women achieving more power may be owning up to the large numbers of the sistren who don’t deserve it. ”

    info@emmatom.com.au

  • MartianBachelor

    > Have you noticed how often politicos are playing the gender card these days?

    Correction. Only politicos on the Dem side are doing this. I don’t sense that anyone on the R’s team knows how to play in the same league without shooting themselves in both feet. Same goes for Obama and race.

  • mruffolo

    Tools of the feminist trade
    * Victim
    * Lie
    * Good Mother
    * Pride
    * Sexual

    When I look at the feminists I meet daily, I see and hear these same traits.

    These tactics are used by feminists to persuade men to give them money, attention, and effort, among other things.

    If men discern and associate based on character and competence, we would be feminist free.

  • badger

    Sorry Carey but that “photo” of Ségolène Royal has been photo shopped. The body is Jennifer Garners and is the poster for her movie Thirty Something. Of course the original photo could have been photo shopped to make Jennifer Garners body look better. I ‘ll stop now while I’m ahead.

  • conservativation

    I wonder what it would be like in a world where male candidates make overt claims that they would lead better because they are men, where they photgraphed wearing swim trunks (after an intense few months developing a six pack) and boasted they could out shoot, out lift, out run, whatever the case…even if not true.







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search