He stated that pretty much disqualified her from being someone to trust to watch our government and keep it under control.

The crowd burst to moderate to heavy applause.

Wow! I haven’t read such a gung-ho piece like that in a long time. I would like to see YOU go to war in Iraq (for good reasons!)

Philosophical perspective here: Looking back, many people have mixed feelings about Clinton’s presidency. What you say about him is true but, effectively, he and his wife largely helped to polarize the opposition conservative movement, kill national healthcare and daycare (they didn’t get it in 1994, remember?), de-legitimimize feminism and sexual harassment in the public eye, and and resulted in a (seemingly) balanced budget. This unintentional legacy of theirs lives on in mensnewsdaily.

GW, on the other hand, has been selling out conservative principles left and right and indulged the worst spending impulses of the republican congress. He’s a rockefeller republican and if given a choice between a beast we know (the Clintons) and a political weasel that will drag us down by increments, I would lose less sleep with the Clintons in office compared to someone like McCain.

The ONLY saving grace to a Rockefeller republican president is maybe to get one or two decent Supreme Court nominations out of him. But even then, their record is mixed on this with Democrats nearly always appointing the most marxist and leftist judges they can squeeze on the bench while most S.C. justices are appionted by republicans (including Reagan!) but mixed results: Souter and Sandra Day O’Conner respectively.

Maybe it’s worth the risk to have another “Carter” presidenency to reclarify conservative principles and flush out some RINOs out of the system. The RINOs will run to Hillary and then when her ideas are exposed as impractical (“Hey, Seniors! Want to eat dog food to pay for Hillarycare?”), they go down with her.

It’s time for America to take a dump (figuratively.)