Devil Dog Brew Want American-Made? BestAmericanBuy.com nowmen.net Business Alliance for Americas Veterans
Google
John Bambenek
New Jersey Department of “Put the Fork Down, Fatty!”

The state of New Jersey has recently announced that it will be creating a state agency to deal with the growing problem of obesity among that state's citizens. This follows on the heels of many other local and state governments taking action against trans fat and other health measures designed to slim down the collective waistlines of the state.

The creation of such an agency is a dangerous political trend. We'll call the political thought behind such actions part of the "Coalition to Protect People from Themselves." People get obese purely through actions (or inaction) of their own. As a society, we eat more and move less than any other nation in the world (though obesity is a growing problem world-wide).

The smoking ban movement, largely successful, has brought into the public consciousness a perception that health decisions are supposed to be part of public policy. In that realm, they could at least pretend to hide behind the effects of second-hand smoke, though anyone who watched close enough knew it was really about sticking to smokers, not about second-hand smoke.

Moves against trans fat, such as what has happened in New York City, and attempts to ban foie gras in Chicago have no such communal health risks. If one person plumps up on trans fat, it means jack to everyone around them. The only one arguably at risk would be the person who ended up underneath these trans fat consumers. These laws are directed purely at citizens who the government believes are not making the best choices and need to be instructed on proper living habits with the force of law.

This near-daily encroachment by the elites in telling us plebes how to live is as meddlesome as it is dangerous. The idea that somehow bureaucratic busy-bodies are better equipped to judge and prescribe our dietary intake is absurd. The key to healthy living is to get the people involved motivated to do it. You can't control peoples' food intake unless you toss them into prison; personal responsibility is key.

More information, sure. Some ads on TV, fine. Trying to do it for people by creating yet more useless state agencies on an already strained budget isn't going to motivate people. Bureaucracies breed dependency, not responsibility. That being said, here's some food for thought.

For now, obesity, smoking, and other "bad health" behaviors are no one's business but the individual involved. There is no societal harm. With the universal health care being pushed by those of the same ideology as the "Coalition to Protect People from Themselves," that dynamic changes greatly. Any personal activity that may theoretically increase the cost of health care no longer is a private matter under a universal health care system. If you get fat and need 12 bypass surgeries, it is society that foots the bill.

One only needs to look to Europe to see how they are handling the problem, since it is their health care system (the one they are moving away from) that the Coalition seeks to emulate. The Health Secretary in the UK has said that the overweight and smokers should be denied health care until they quit smoking or lose weight. That's right, the government says you can't have that "single payer" health care (which should be more appropriately called taxpayer-funded health care) they promised unless you dance to their tune. It's called the Golden Rule. You take the King's gold, you play by the King's rules.

In a universal health care system, the government and society at large have a vested interest in how you live your life - what you eat, how much you workout, your drinking and smoking habits, and so on. You're spending their money, after all.

Government, on one hand, can't be trusted to wiretrap terrorist conversations, but on the other, not only can they be trusted with all of your medical records, but also with authority to make medical decisions regarding your care - indicating how little people have thought through "single payer" health care.

The New Jersey Agency for Fat People is yet another encroachment on the freedom to live out lives undisturbed by silly intrusions by governmental busy-bodies. A free country is no longer free when it has to get Uncle Sam's approval for the family dinner.

John Bambenek is the Assistant Politics Editor for BC Magazine and is an academic professional for the University of Illinois. He is a syndicated columnist who blogs at Part-Time Pundit and the executive director of The Tumaini Foundation which helps AIDS orphans and other children in Tanzania to get an education. He is the current owner of BlogSoldiers, a blog-only traffic exchange.

| Print This Post Print This Post | Other posts by John Bambenek

book mark New Jersey Department of “Put the Fork Down, Fatty!” in del.icio.us | New Jersey Department of “Put the Fork Down, Fatty!” to Slashdot.com | Submit New Jersey Department of “Put the Fork Down, Fatty!” to Digg.com | Submit New Jersey Department of “Put the Fork Down, Fatty!” to BoingBoing.net | Bookmark New Jersey Department of “Put the Fork Down, Fatty!” in Furl | Bookmark New Jersey Department of “Put the Fork Down, Fatty!” in Spurl | Bookmark New Jersey Department of “Put the Fork Down, Fatty!” in Reddit | Bookmark New Jersey Department of “Put the Fork Down, Fatty!” in Tailrank | Bookmark New Jersey Department of “Put the Fork Down, Fatty!” in Newsvine | Bookmark New Jersey Department of “Put the Fork Down, Fatty!” to Yahoo! | Bookmark New Jersey Department of “Put the Fork Down, Fatty!” to Fark

4 Comments »

  1. jjtaup said,

    Ahh, whatever happened to our fouders’ vision of restricted government? Yes, I know they were primarily concerned with federal, not state, government, but the principle of government’s existence solely as the servant of the people is one of the pillars of freedom. It seems we will have to relearn this bitter lesson. How many years and how much more blood?

    June 1, 2007 at 11:08 am

  2. thurston861 said,

    Trans Fat Ban was good, because it is not advertised for a person to make an informed decision, like one Butcher advertising that his sausage only has 20% Rat Feces, and the other across the street advertising only .02%.

    Clearly a consumer issue, not an overt behavior or choice issue.

    New Jersey is a great place for this in light of the High instances of Itallians.

    Perhaps they will rise up and protest this government ban against their ethnicity?

    Perhaps this will make the rest of the Country Revolt against the National Government sooner.

    Bring it on!

    June 1, 2007 at 11:34 am

  3. Garbo said,

    Thank you, John Bambenek, for speaking out against this ruthless assault on personal property rights, including our own bodies. We no longer have a government of the people. It now seems to me it’s an us against them situation, which history has proven to be disastrous. The smoking ban situation seems to have been accepted but this is only because we have have been told thus. In reality there are many outraged citizens, and in particular business owners who object daily to having their property rights removed from them to such an extent that their businesses have closed. The Mom and Pops have suffered severely from the smoking ban legislation, throughout the country. And now they are going after people who are, to their way of thinking,overweight. We are moving in the direction of totalitarianism. How sad.

    June 2, 2007 at 7:21 am

  4. Menck said,

    To paraphrase P.J. O’Rourke for my own selfish purposes, “Trusting government for anything to do with your personal life is like trusting seventeen year old boys with car keys and whiskey.”

    June 2, 2007 at 8:31 am

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

editor's bio | article rss | comments rss | itunes podcast | tos | privacy policy
MensNEWSdaily®, mndnet.com, BlogWonks.com™, BlogWonk.com™, NewsWax.com™, YakVox.com™, DorkWatch.org™, CounterPulse.com™, JavaKing.com™ © 2001 - 2006 Java King, Inc.. Opinions found on this website are expressly those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of this publication, its editorial staff or contributors. Words, graphics, audio, video, and all other content published on this domain must adhere to our Terms of Service . JAVA KING, INC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES, ADVERTISERS, SPONSORS AND AFFILIATES, DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, REPRESENTATIONS OR ENDORSEMENTS HEREIN EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.
Site Meter
RETURN TO MENS NEWS DAILY