Please note that all major litigation over gay marriage involves lesbian cases filed by N.O.W. Gay men are merely “along for the ride” — the legal precendents are set on behalf of lesbians, and that is the basis on which they operate.

Please note that in the few states where gay marriage or civil unions have been established, it is lesbians who are doing it. Gay men, for the most part, are not taking part.

This occurs on account of two factors:

1. lesbians want to establish a pure matriarchy.
2. Gay men tend to be disinterested in stable “living” arrangements. Studies indicate that they have 800% more sexual partners than their heterosexual counterparts.

So, the situation is this: by “including” gay men in agitprop, N.O.W. pretends it is representing men equally. The reality is that N.O.W. is using gay men as cardboard characters, in creating a pure matriarchy.

Now, having said all this: If somebody wants to be gay or lesbian, that is their business. The many serious problems that invariably arise are their responsibility. Doing these things does not in any way constitute a case for acceptance of these lifestyle choices as either being positive, equivalent, moral lifestyles requiring any special constitutional recognition or special protection. Children have enough problems without subjecting them to a vast experiment growing up under brute lesbian values. And, the final destruction of heterosexual marriage must absolutely be denied.

Hardly anyone on the left or in the queer culture know how to speak without a forked tongue and they hear only what they want to hear. We are talking about people who have ‘their own truth’ and a ’special way of knowing’.

Don’t take it to heart.

Gay males have been duped into thinking liberation for them, comes in the form of joining the feminist/lesbian attacks on men/boys..

I say to my gay friends that I will not judge their “sexual preferences” but if they continue (as a unified voice) to villify the father/mens rights..then they are fair game…

You absolutely cannot support lesbianism and paternal parenting rights at the same time.

The feminist lesbian agenda is to have two mothers, which by definition means NO FATHERS. If you think heterosexual men have it bad getting parental rights, just imagine what happens when you have twice the “mommy magnetism” hiding behind the politically-correct shield of lesbianism.

The idea of lesbian “marriage” (or just living together) is to have two bodies in the household to raise kids, just like the heterosexual family. Since lesbian women have two bodies, and at least six sources of income (their own incomes, at least two sets of child support orders, and various welfare entitlements as a backup, they have absolutely no use of men.

“Heather has two mommies” means exactly what it says. It is an edict operating to full exclusion of fathers.

Glenn, you must stop trying to be politically correct with regard to lesbianism. It makes no sense whatsoever, and it is hurting this movement. Lesbians are never going to support you no matter what you say. Most gay men do quietly agree that I am right when I take them aside to discuss the facts of lesbian bi-maternality. Get with the program — and tell it straight to gay men. After all, should anybody in the men’s movement support giving feminists or lesbians what they want to finally kill fatherhood?

then the femi-nazi (including the eunech males behind the femi’s) that are choking out men/boys will know that they are in trouble..

Most (gender feminists) feminist reading “what men have accomplished” can’t even begin to consider what men have accomplished and they will reflexively go straight to “raping-bastards” – I am sure it’s not unusual for lesbians who decide to bring up a boy to decide he should be a feminist or feminized man.

Ya, he might say he is quit happy with it but that would be after several years of brain washing and a bit of Stockhomle syndrome; identifyingwith your captors. It’s not the views of a boy brought up by a strong and mentally healthy man.

What does a boy do when brought up with feminist beliefs – when he learns that from Domestic Violence, to rape and false rape charges to pay inequity to housework that if feminist are not totally wrong they at least didn’t get it half right about these issues and worse than that, the repressed other points of view that showed men as equals, as fair, as giving and sacrificing which is typical of most men?

The bashing of fathers and men is a huge problem in America and you can’t get most people to even listen because they go straight to myths about men and fathers. Men should not have to defend fathers or men but that’s where we are and when we do we are told that other issues are more pressing. What could be more important than having “normal” parents who are positive role models of both genders to any child they are bringing up. To pretend that most men are not good role models compared to two women or two mommies, which is what some women are teaching and writing about, isexist bigotry.

Protesting sexist bigotry works well if the bigotry is directed toward women but when sexist bigotry toward men is protested, as Glenn S did about Opus, as other men do about male bashing, you can count on more sexist bigotry arriving shortly from the usual suspects.

SD

http://washingtontimes.com/national/20070610-111445-6957r.htm

If you are a family court judge and you see an angry crowd of divorced fathers marching down the street singing La Marseillaise in French, RUN!!!

And in some parts of town, make sure the girl you are kissing is actually a girl before you kiss her! Unless you like that sort of thing.

Dogs. Lying down. Fleas.

Some assembly required.

(And yes, I did just write a piece critical of you. Show where there was a personal attack on your integrity and character…)

Opposition to the Gay Agenda does not arise from opposition to the “Gay,” part, but to the “Agenda” part. Like I said elsewhere – look at what they do – not what they say. Then you tell me if it is about equal rights, or some animals being more equal than others.

Of course here they are saying right out that you, Glenn Sacks, are unimportant to your children as a father, and can easily be replaced or done away with. Yes, that red dot is the targeting laser.

Nice friends you have there. Still comfy being their champion?

The father might point out to his son that crystal meth/and gay sex marathons are not conduceive to a healthy lifestyle…we also should study the results of some of these “medications” some of our youth are on…

Exstacy..a popular drug these days is a seratonin uptake inhibitor..is well known for its super sexual stimulations…

Common anti-depressants (prozack) ect. ect…are also seratonin uptake inhibitors..and is this drug making alot of kids super sexual, to the point of homosexuality.