lumigan tramadol tadalafil

The Problem with American Feminists

2007-06-20
By

Christina Hoff Sommers offers a compelling assessment of current feminism in her Sunday, June 17, 2007, Dallas Morning News op-ed piece entitled The Problem with American Feminists.  Seldom does the public get an insider’s revelation of the true nature of what young women are being taught by those now controlling our institutions of higher learning.   Christina Hoff Sommers, is a well know resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, and is the author of “The War Against Boys” and co-author of “One Nation Under Therapy.”  I highly recommend her eye opening books. 

In Summers’ words, “Preoccupied with their own imagined oppression, they are of little help to the women of the world who most need it.” 

If in the Western world where women rule democratically by majority vote, yet show little desire to use their power for good and righteous principles, one might question that religious teachings requiring women subordinate to men should apply. 

If American feminism is the natural product of promoting gender equality, then it may prove to be another case where man should have followed the scriptures rather than believing himself superior to GOD.    Ironically, it will take righteous men willing to die, not radical feminist, to help the women of the world who most need it. 

Summers suggest young women are offered a one-sided totally irrational, self-centered college education in self indulgence and self gratification based on “their own imagined oppression.”  While there is nothing new in such revelation, it receives little direct public attention. 

Imagine what would happen if young men were directly educated with the same doctrine.  In fact, they are indirectly being so educated by observing their female peer’s behavior.   Should this continue it’s only a matter of time until society becomes totally amoral and Western civilization fails.   

The reason modern society is preoccupied with the likes of Parris Hilton and Brittany Spears should be obvious as they are icons of female self indulgence and self gratification.   Radical Moslem males could make a good case based in Summers’ argument for suppressing female rights. 

Ms. Summers correctly points to the fact that that it is a significant minority of American women lead by the apparently amoral, irrational radical few that pervade our educational system and influence government decisions. 

Millions of righteous disenfranchised fathers are required by court order to pay for their daughter’s “feminist” college education in the name of “best interest of the child.”  Little wonder the Amish choose to limit their children’s education.  Given the central common theme of religion is, “Service to others, is service to GOD” the majority of young women are taught exactly the opposite.  What could be more sacrilegious?  

Seldom have I come to realize the extent of change that has occurred in the universities over the last couple of decades than by Summer’s essay.   The decade old following quote seems like déjà vu.   

“There are respected academics in women’s studies departments and elsewhere who argue that Jane Austen was a lesbian, that Beethoven’s ninth symphony is an anthem to rape, that mathematics and science are “phallocentric” disciplines ill-suited to “feminine ways of knowing,” and on and on.” – Mona Charen on progressive higher education.

It leaves one with six decades of life’s perspective to wonder whether today’s professors of women’s studies, promoting radical feminist agenda,  were too busy burning their bras in the sixties to have learned anything in a time when Orwell’s writings were mandatory reading:

“You have to be an intellectual to believe such nonsense.  No ordinary man could be such a fool.” – George Orwell

“Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense.” – George Orwell, 1984

6 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • Robert Stevens

    I ‘ve said it once, I’ve said a thousand times. There is nothing wrong with feminism/women that 15-20 years of “growing up” socially, legally and morally will not fix. Polishknight is right, it is powerful men that are responsible for the current ” feminist rebellion” and the problem started long before feminism was a twinkle in the eyes of it creators .
    You see the government wants, no….. needs complete control of the people and the resources we have . The “feminist idea” is a brain child of the bankers, they are the ones behind it all. It is just a way to A control our children, by getting women, who are flighty and emotional, to rebel against men. Once this happens, the state thinks it can come in and take possession of the children. You see women can’t raise kids by themselves. Oh they have spent billions on a propaganda campaign to try and say otherwise, but they can’t raise children on their own.
    It just does not work and never will. The whole thing will one day, very soon , fall completely apart. And guess who will have to bit the bullet, it will be MEN, men with guns, who are totally fed up with situation and will not put up with the bitchy atitudes of women anymore. We will have order, buts its gonna tough and a lot of people are going to be crying when its over.

  • Denis

    American women are incapable of playing fair with the various powers and privileges that they nowadays possess. As a result, they should have such powers and privileges taken away from them. It’s just that simple.

  • PolishKnight

    Hello Scott,

    You don’t get it: They don’t have any power. NONE! They are simply being indulged and even used by powerful men and their interests: Marxists who need them as a dependent electorate, corporate America that loves lots of stressed out consumers who require more products, lawyers who thrive on conflict in family court, and last but certainly not least: The chivalrous men including on this forum who love to feel good about themselves about supporting “equal rights” for women even as they know that it’s a sham and wouldn’t last a second without special man-hating institutions.

    Marxism and feminism are not popular by accident: It’s nice to believe that there’s a cheap solution to human suffering and moral uncertainty out there. Who wants to say no to a big government sugar-daddy that promises to end poverty? Or to the notion of a sweet young woman being able to study enginneering or someday cure world cancer?

    The problem is that life is a series of tough choices and we have a lot of soft men out there who don’t want to be seen as the grinch. They’re hoping that to change the system they can just go along with it (that’s like thinking that if you help put fuel on a fire, why, it will go out.)

    A men’s movement is very simple: Once there is one, then there won’t be a need for it anymore since feminism and other anti-male ifluences are totally dependent upon men’s support.

    “Stop hitting yourself! Why do you keep on hitting yourself?” — Bully in “The Simpsons”

  • scottkirk

    Mens rights activism requires nerves of steele.

    speaking out against the feminist leviathan requires men of faith who will fight for the truth at all costs…

    Its not the women themselves that scare people…Its the irrational lyncheing power that theyv’e acquired..

  • PolishKnight

    Call me an extremist and radical, but you’ll have to smirk that I have a point below:

    Christina Hoff Sommers is a feminist apologist and hoping that with just a bit of silver polish and a few adjustments here and there, feminism can be reformed from the hedonistic, self-destructive, morally bankrupt philosophy it is. She ponders:

    The condition of Muslim women may be the most pressing women’s issue of our age, but for many contemporary American feminists it is not a high priority. Why not?

    She then goes into detail about RADICAL feminism’s many hedonistic flaws but not the core vulnerability that all feminism, even so-called “egalitarian” feminism shares:

    Feminism is a notion of equality dependent upon the patronizing largesse of chivalrous, western men which makes it paradoxical and meaningless.

    In the states, when women’s suffragists put on protests and even did a few things to get them thrown into jails, there was a sympathetic chivalrous and liberal media that covered it to the hilt. If they tried that kind of stunt outside of their comfort zone, they’d be locked up and forgotten. End-of-story.

    And they know it. And you all know it. Which is what makes the whole situation such a farce. Think about it: If you believe in such nonsense, don’t you deserve to be treated with contempt by those who benefit from it?

    “Stop hitting yorself! Stop hitting yourself! Why do you keep on hitting yourself?” — Bully on “The Simpsons”

  • mruffolo

    Excellent piece.

    I observe on Wikipedia the same sex centered stupidity seeping into our culture from America’s academics. For example, for a William Shakespeare an article states that “In recent decades some scholars have taken another view of Shakespeare’s sexuality, stating that possible homoerotic allusions in a number of his works suggest that Shakespeare was bisexual.”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Shakespeare







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search