lumigan tramadol tadalafil

How Boys Speak When No One Listens

Virginia Tech, the 2006 Amish and Vermont killings, and Columbine make us cry out, “What’s making our children kill?” In fact, it is not our children doing the killing. It is our sons. Yes, violence in the media, the availability of handguns, and poor family values are part of the problem, but our daughters are of the same family’s values, are also exposed to violence in the media, and also able to find the same guns in the same homes. And our daughters are not killing.

What is it with our sons? Start with the common denominator. These homicides were also suicides. When boys and girls are nine, their suicide rates are equal. Between 10 and 14, boys’ rates are twice girls’ rates. Between 15 and 19, it is quadruple. And between 20 and 24, it soars to six times. But we only pay attention when guns allow the suicides to also become homicides.

Boys’ rates go up as boys’ and girls’ gender roles intensify. The women’s movement and our schools have offered girls “girl power” and girls’ suicide rates have gone down. Girls now have the option to ask boys out, but boys still have the expectation; once out, girls have the option to pay for boys, but boys still have the expectation to pay; once dinner is paid for, girls have the option to risk sexual rejection, but boys still have the expectation to risk sexual rejection. And boys’ suicide rates are going up.

In school, our girls are doing better; our boys are doing worse. Girls surpass boys in reading, writing, verbal skills, civics and the arts. Girls get better grades and more honors; they are elected to more offices, are more likely to graduate from high school and college. Boys, on the other hand, are more likely to be suspended or expelled, need special education, have ADD and ADHD, do drugs, repeat a grade, become incarcerated, be illiterate, drop out and be unemployed.

Is the problem our sons? No. The problem is us. It starts with our mixed messages to boys. We want to have sensitive boys willing to die and kill. Which is why we still require only our sons to register for the draft. Girls, parents and male peers are still cheering for football players who abuse others and abuse themselves for love and respect. We still worship men who kill in war and make a killing in Wall Street.

We can’t have it both ways. If boys get love, attention and respect by disconnecting from feelings, they will disconnect from feelings when they lose love, attention and respect.

When girls had problems in math or science, and were underrepresented in law and medicine, we asked parents, schools and political leaders to take responsibility. Now boys have problems. We need to take responsibility. The problem is even bigger with boys than it was with girls because boys learn to repress feelings, not express feelings. If we don’t discover what’s behind boys’ repression boys will use guns as a form of expression.

Boys and men are “losing it.” We need our sons and our dads. And we can do for them what we’ve been doing for our daughters and wives for the past thirty years. Then children will have dads and boys will have more mentors and counselors than guns and explosives.

………….

Warren Farrell, Ph.D., is author of the international best-sellers, The Myth of Male Power and Why Men Are the Way they Are. He is currently working on The Boy Crisis: Our Sons, Our Schools, Our Future. He will be doing a keynote and pre-conference workshop at the Men’s Equality Conference in D.C. on July 13-14, 07. He is married with two children, lives in Mill Valley, Ca., and virtually at www.warrenfarrell.com

 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Boys and the Boy Crisis Conference
July 13-14, Washington DC

A conference for educators, parents, helping professionals and all who care about boys.

Our boys are four times more likely to commit suicide, two times more likely to be diagnosed with learning disabilities, and five times more likely to be murder victims. More than half of African American boys who start high school do not graduate, 40% of the boys in the U.S. are living in homes without their biological fathers, and boys attendence at colleges is steadily decreasing. Our boys are clearly at risk. We have brought in a fascinating group of experts on boys including authors, professors, lawyers and health care professionals to help us learn about the unique qualities of boys and their unique needs.

Speakers include bestselling author Warren Farrell, Founder of Great Britain’s Fathers for Justice Matt O’Connor, Christina Hoff Sommers author of the groundbreaking book “The War Against Boys”, Glenn Sacks, Stephen Baskerville, Paul Nathanson and Katherine Young the authors of Spreading Misandry and Legalizing Misandry, Stephen Svoboda, Gordon Finely, and more.

359 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • Pingback: Male empowerment movement, women you had your turn now its our time; ALL MEN PLEASE READ!!!!!? | Wedding Tips For Morons

  • http://www.jacksonville.com/interact/blog/mayfieldga/2009-09-02/a_possible_reaction_against_boysmen_by_society_and_possible_ver_1 lynn

    The Male Crisis is more complex than many think. The Male Crisis is increasing in many countries. Our society is now entering into a much greater need for information age skills that require a much different manner of upbringing for boys.
    This is the reversal – In the nineteenth century, we lived in a very physical world and one that required much strength and courage for boys and later men. This created a form of treatment from a young age to create this strength.
    1. Boy children even less than a year old were (and are) given more aggressive treatment to make them tough to compete in the big physical world.
    2. Boys were (and are) not given kind, stabilizing, nurturing, mental, emotional, social, verbal, interaction and other kind, caring treatment for fear of coddling the Male child, again to make them tough.
    3. Boys were (and are) by design not given love, honor, respect unless they display some form of achievement, status, image, etc. All of this was designed to make boys tough.
    Girls were (and are) given more protection from that big physical world, because it was very physical and bad back then. Since girls did not have to be tough, girls could be(and are) given much kind, stabilizing, mental, emotional, social, verbal, interaction from a young age without regard to need for strength. Also since girls did not need to be strong, they were (and are) given love honor, and respect simply for being girls. This protective treatment extended (and extends today) through adulthood.
    Now we are living in the information age where the need and means to make a living have been “completely reversed”. The toughness, aggressive, neglectful treatment given boys is still in place even from infancy. This is creating higher average stress that impedes thinking, learning, and motivation to learn (mental reward received for mental work expended). It also creates higher activity in working class Males, less stability there – activity is used as a natural stress relief. In addition, boys fall behind in writing due to higher muscle tension created by the high average stress that greatly affects handwriting ability and motivation to write. This is “not some natural, genetic weakness”. Note, nice Middle/Upper class boys do not have this problem of need for higher activity nor do they have the higher muscle tension that inhibits handwriting skills and motivation to write. The lack of kind, caring mental, emotional, social, verbal interaction create a tremendous lag in mental, emotional, social, and verbal skills. In addition, this creates more wariness of social contact due to lack of accumulated skills and more aggression given to boys from a young age. This defensiveness also creates the Male Ego or defensive front boys, later men put on to help protect them from aggression they have received. This further impedes positive social interaction with significant others (teachers).

  • http://learningtheory.homestead.com/Theory.html mayfieldga

    Trained to be Good little Soldiers and Princesses

    1. I fear followers of the genetic models will try to build a case for genetic learning differences or body mass requiring more activity or tactile learning. Note that nice middle class Males do not have this problem. Also the view of differences in brain activity are more due to large differences in differential mental, emotional, social, physical, and educational reinforcement over time, not organic differences.
    2. I also fear the use of Male classrooms with more discipline and more time on task will only lead to more stern and even more harsh treatment and stereotyping of Males to perform more physical or menial labor to match the growing caste system being portrayed in the media against Males today. These attempts to focus on genetics, learning differences, male role models, or cater to more activity or instruction are destined to failure. The problem is sociological from day one. It is differential treatment Males experience that is creating this problem. Please read Learning Theory and other related articles on this subject.

    Females are leaving the domestic role for information age skills and income. The nineteenth century belief Females should be protected has created much protection and support for Females from day one. Since Females are not required by society to be strong, it is considered proper to not only protect them but to also lavish much mental, emotional, social, academic, support, knowledge, and skills from day one. This creates lower average stress and lots of supported skills that enable girls to really do well in the information age. Girls are also given love, honor, respect, and support simply for being girls. This makes learning and development of skills and competing for jobs somewhat easier for they are given the essentials of self-worth simply for being girls. All of this makes girls “very well prepared” to compete in the information age. This support and protection continues even into adulthood. Today this allows not only much economic advantage but also maintains the same protected freedoms of expression to give verbal, silent abuse, and hollow kindness to Males when they have some advantage (look at how the media allows this).

    Males who are generally anti-feminists and also Females (who tend to reflect for some reason their protected world upon Males) really do not understand how differential treatment from day one is providing Females with such an advantage that is creating the Growing international Male Crisis, but those Males though lacking understanding do feel the effects of that differential treatment.

    Males are given love, honor, support, respect, care, etc. only on the condition of sufficient achievement, money, power, etc. This is what makes Males very competitive; they are competing for feelings of self-worth as reflected upon them by society if they have sufficiency of those things. When they are doing anything they are being weighed and given only the amount of love, honor, respect, and support commensurate with those achievements. Those Males who do not have sufficiency are not only given less of those good things, they are given more aggression by society. This creates a lot more pressure on Males to either succeed in academics, which is good; and if they cannot, then they will search out a more protected and supported area in which they will have some feeling of love, honor, and respect from their peer group.

    Since our society is still following even in the information age, the belief Males should be strong, it still allows much aggression upon Males to make them tough. It also holds that Males should not be given mental/emotional/social/academic love, kindness, care and support for fear of coddling the Male from day one. This is so the Male can become a good little soldier to defend family and country. The problem with this is that it creates high average stress that impedes learning and creates along it more tension that leads more activity in Males and attention to mental/emotional development. This is why girls appear to mature faster, for Males are not given the same supports. This higher average stress and lack of support accumulate to create a large deficit in learning for Males.

    Now in the information age, Males are now competing with Females who have been well supported from day one and Males are beginning fall behind big time, especially from women in their 20′s and early 30′s.
    http://www.reuters.com/article/lifestyleMolt/idUSN0334472920070803

    Men are not only losing jobs, they are losing out on feelings of self-worth or love, honor, and respect from society. It is plainly spelled out in the media that when Males appear weak, it is okay to give them more verbal aggression, more abuse, and more neglect. Since Men have brainwashed to believe they are better (perhaps deserving of more harsh treatment and neglect) they are now finding out that in real life such treatment is somehow helping women to succeed above them. Given the horrible myth of fixed intelligences taught in our society or simply working harder, many men are falsely believing they are less intelligent and/or not working hard enough. Given this false information, they truly feel threatened by those women who are succeeding and they are not. Society itself and its media is now working against the Male to place Male’s into perceived positions of being more suitable for menial labor and for Females to be placed into more white collar, management positions. The Male is now facing much more abuse on the job. Many low paid jobs are also riddled with much abuse, intimidation, and constant berating by managers over them. In many cases, women are the ones doing this. Yes, in society men who take jobs in lower more menial positions are given more abuse. It seems women working those jobs are somewhat more protected by society from this abuse. Many men are not opting out of the workforce to protect their mental/emotional health, which they feel is more important to them than a paycheck.

    On Dr. Phil today a man was very violent toward his wife. She is now very afraid of him. His wife loved him and wanted to help him. It was brought out that man had fallen down on ability to support his wife and family. Even though that man was supported by his wife, the societal belief he should be strong was consuming him. You see even though he had lots of support from his wife, society in general not only does not provide love, honor, respect, and care, the essentials of feelings of self-worth, it rejects that man for not having sufficient achievement, status, image, money, etc.

    Thus, that man like many other men today are losing their feelings of self-worth that women receive simply for being women. His wife could not understand his dilemma. because like many other women, she was reflecting her love, honor, respect, and protection in society upon him, not realizing his world was very different and much more unforgiving for signs of weakness. You see society’s primary antidote for perceived weaknesses in Males is to provide more aggression and neglect to make him strong, and not to support him when he is down. So, although his wife supports him with love, society will take him down for being weak. After years of brainwashing, he and others like him believe it to be true and deserving of punishment. This is why so many Males have a short life and so many more Male suicides. Yes, Males do feel threatened by feminists for they feel the scales are tilted very much against them.
    Complete learning theory to all on request by e-mail at mayfieldga@bellsouth.net

    http://www.reuters.com/article/lifestyleMolt/idUSN0334472920070803

    http://www.lewrockwell.com/mcelroy/mcelroy79.html

    http://www.esquire.com/features/the-state-of-the-american-man/ESQ0706SOTAMBOYS_94

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/02/11/BAGB1H6IFN11.DTL

    http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/006/531ffoaa.asp

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28141411
    updated 1:33 p.m. ET, Tues., Dec. 9, 2008
    • In the U.S., black and Hispanic students still had lower math and science scores than white students, but the gap between them generally shrank since 1995, except for the gap in math scores between white and Hispanic fourth-graders, which didn’t change. Closing this achievement gap is a federal priority.
    • Girls are closing the gender gap across the globe, with half the countries showing no difference in test scores between boys and girls. In the other half, girls did better in a quarter of the countries, and boys did better in a quarter of the countries. In the U.S., boys did slightly better than girls in fourth-grade math, but the gender gap disappeared by eighth grade.

  • http://learningtheory.homestead.com/Theory.html mayfieldga

    I know why Males are falling behind. It is not genetic or effort on the part of Males. It is not learning modes. I feel the differences in brain activity are due to socialized effects over time, not organic differences. While my learning theory (separate from this) explains the Male Crisis, the tools I will give to all will help everyone.

    By showing students how their individual environments greatly affect their ability to think, learn, long-term motivation to learn, and grow mentally and emotionally, students will have much more respect and esteem for themselves and for others. By providing students with tools to approach their lives more delicately and differently to continually change and improve their abilities, students will then have a continuous hope of developing in time, many if not all of the qualities they admire in others over time. Students will then have a continuous hope of changing and becoming better, newer persons with each passing day. This will reduce much hopelessness, many harmful escapes and other problems created by our horrible teachings of fixed intelligences in school such as dropouts, drug/alcohol abuse, catharsis of violence, and suicide. My complete learning theory will go to all on request by e-mail – mayfieldga@bellsouth.net

    Now, since the Male Crisis is the most pressing problem the now international society is facing, I am adding this application of my learning theory to this important, growing problem that will eventually affect all of us in very negative ways.

    Why Males are Falling Behind Academically and Economically

    Males are falling behind in greater numbers each year both academically and economically. Our society is still playing out the nineteenth century belief Males should be strong and Females should be protected. This belief allows much aggression toward Males to make them tough. Any sign of weakness or displaying work that is considered more feminine is a negative in the eyes of society that will only react with more aggression toward such Males. Only Males who have been taught from a young age to not value those physical areas sufficiently and who are valued more so for so-called feminine qualities such as patience, understanding, ease of nature, kindness, mildness, and goodness will be able to also develop other information age skills society still feels is feminine such as mental, emotional, social, and academic skills. You see, all of those skills require more patience, ease of nature, and “low average stress along with proper pace and intensity in approaching those mental areas”. Since society’s belief, Males should be strong allows much more aggression toward Males from day one, Males are operating with much higher average stress that makes learning information age skills much more difficult (and creates more active behavior). Also Males are not given (positive attention) mental, emotional, social, and academic support, knowledge and skills (unless by accident). Society in its ignorance considers such attention and support as coddling the Male child. Society still holds that Males should pull themselves up by their own bootstraps.

    As a result, Males are not given the tools to develop vital mental, emotional, social, and academic areas. This greatly cuts down on their motivation to develop those skills. The combined effect of society only rewarding strength and power to face aggression; neglect in many social and academic areas; not rewarding but acting with more aggression toward Males who attempt to develop mildness, kindness, goodness, and care for others; not caring to reward and in some to many areas even showing more aggression toward Males who display mental, social, and academic knowledge and skills are hurting many Males. Over a period of years, this is leaving many Males grossly unable to compete in the information age. Instead, over those years many Males have sought out and developed over time those qualities that will provide them with a measure of love, honor, respect, and protection from society’s aggression. In this case, we have the power images, body building, and other imagery the Male is seeking to provide them with feelings of self-worth. You see, persons experience feelings of self-worth based on the love, honor, respect, and support they receive from society. Males having been led completely away from those more valuable information age assets from an early age are turning toward those areas society will encourage, reward, and respect in Males. Over a period of years, this leaves Males far behind Females in mental, emotional, social, and academic knowledge and skills. Therefore, this is creating the ever-growing international Male Crisis that will only get worse for Males and then get much worse for Females when Males begin to react in collective ways against women and society. Society will continual maintaining this mistreatment of Males until that critical point is reached.

    The truth is in today’s world, little boys need just as much coddling as the girls and just as much mental, emotional, social, and academic support as the girls. While neglect of Male children and boys may have proved useful in the more physical nineteenth century, it is working opposite of need in the information age where it requires much more accumulated mental, emotional, social and academic skills acquired over time. In these areas, Males are being seriously shortchanged.

    Yes, it is true girls mature faster than boys for the simple reason that mental, emotional, social, and academic support are seen as coddling the boys. Society has long believed in boys pulling themselves by their bootstraps in those areas. This is leaving many Males far behind girls in many social and academic areas.

    The increased aggression Males receive from day one, creates three bad things for Males academically, mentally, emotionally, and socially: 1. It creates higher average layers of mental frictions (redefined from higher average stress) which inhibit thinking, learning, and motivation in mental areas. 2. These higher layers of mental frictions also create improper pace and intensity in approaching mental work (apply too much effort when approaching new material) and higher tension that hurts motivation to learn. 3. The aggression Males receive and less positive (nurturing) attention also create the higher average stress, which then creates the nervous energy or over activity. 4. This extra aggression Males receive creates the Male ego or defensive cushion that the Male develops from an early age to protect them from the aggressions they receive from society. This Male ego or defensive cushion has the negative consequences of further alienating the Male from “any” various mental, emotional, social, and academic supports they “might just” receive from society. When Males hear firm or hard words from others like teachers or others their minds are thinking defense and not thinking about learning and enjoying the learning process.

    The combination of high layers of mental frictions and defensive cushion are working to create an impediment to learning that accumulates in harm over time for men. In society today, men are given love, honor, respect, and support or the essentials of their self-worth only on the “condition of sufficient” achievement, money, power, status or image. They must fight through the still present, nineteenth century confrontations allowed by society upon them from an early age to achieve those benefits and feelings of self-worth. Society has now created through prejudice and stereotyping, a form of Gender Cast System through mistreatment of Males and over support of Females where there is early training for Males to perform more menial or physical tasks while women are being prepared for white collar positions.

    It is incorrect to view the Male Crisis on role models. The lack of role models is the result of the problem, not the cause. If you had a bag full of sand with a hole in the bottom, you would “not” say there is less sand in the bag; you would say there is a hole in the bottom of the bag. Indeed, we should fix the hole in the bag by providing Males with tools to develop long-term, mental/emotional stability so they can better compete mentally and emotionally in the information age. One professional was attempting to find more role models for Male children. He boasted that a Male child’s esteem goes up when they have one positive role model. What he was unknowingly saying was that Males have such little attention that when they do receive that attention, they are very grateful. This creates the large rise in esteem. The fight for attention could be creating misbehavior in Male children.

    This analysis of Free Aggression toward Males explains the African American Male crisis in which African American Males are falling behind African American Females academically and economically. This imbalance of high layers of mental frictions among African American Males is also affecting Caucasian, Hispanic, and other Males. However, since Free Aggression is amplified in lower socioeconomic environments and since more African American Males are in lower socioeconomic environments, Free Aggression is amplified for those persons, thus the so-called African-American Male Crisis. If Caucasian, Hispanic, and other Males were in the same position (this is the case in some areas) then the Male crisis would be just as great for those groups.

    Today, many men are becoming angry because they losing more than jobs and status, they are losing out on those things they are seeking most of all, love, honor, respect, support, the essentials of self-worth. The little bites they receive in the various media and the workplace accumulate over time and create much anger that touches on and erodes their feelings of self-worth. As a person loses feelings of self-worth they also lose regard for consequences. If men fall behind more collectively, they may begin to retaliate more collectively, thus ending the present shield of over-protection for women. This will mean much more abuse and crimes against women. It will do well for all parents, teachers, employers to those in various media to be more kind to others, including Males.

    For women, due to the nineteenth century belief women should be protected and still in effect today, this has created much overprotection and even indulgence for many women. It is creating very low layers of mental frictions collectively for women. This makes thinking, learning, and motivation mental areas much easier. This protection and continuous attention from day one create a high speed expressway that allows for much mental, emotional, social and academic advancement in many areas over time. These two continual supports from society over time create nearly everything a person needs today to succeed in the information age. Since women are given through overprotection, even indulgence, the benefits of love, honor, respect, and continual support, all of the benefits of self-worth from an early age without qualification (simply for being girls), they are working with much more continual support and interaction to accumulate more continual mental, emotional, social, and academic knowledge and skills that can be transformed easily into money, power, status, and image. Even after this, society’s protection, continued support and view toward beauty and charm continually helps them in the information age.

    Women are now surging ahead academically and economically due to this overprotection and men are puzzled as to why they are falling behind in those areas. If you remove the old money from older men, the girls are making more. The current beliefs held by both men and women today is that Males learn differently and/or men are simply lazy and do not try hard enough. These false beliefs only add to the growing Male Crisis. The men who believe this and who do not have information to the contrary may believe they are somehow mentally inferior or just not working hard enough. Somehow, humans, men included, tend to reflect the treatment they receive in their lives upon others and do not know or are not allowed by society to say how differential treatment is hurting them. This may lead Males to give up in developing various mental, emotional, social, and academic skills over time. They may limit their interest and desires to smaller windows of fulfillment within their social connections. They will continue to dress up for display, their Male defensive cushion to at least present a plausible image when dealing in areas where they are not as competent. Worse for these Males, they may advance their beliefs and feelings onto their sons from an early age, thus enabling the continuation of the harmful belief of inferiority in the information age.

    As for women, they having been told the same teaching that persons are naturally better in some areas or simply work harder. They may truly feel they are simply more intelligent or have worked harder to achieve what they have achieved. In our world, again women like men often reflect their environment and treatment upon others and so do not appreciate difference in treatment. Also, in our world of insecurities, it is no wonder when women achieve, to boost their insecurity, as affects everyone, they will believe this achievement is due to more intelligence or greater effort on their part and not due to any environmental variables.

    There is another growing phenomena, this involves the driving of Males from the work place. Part of the reason is there are fewer jobs left for Males in the industrial and other blue collar related areas and more job openings in more white collar areas. But even so, there are other reasons for this change in society. One reason is the nineteenth century belief Males should be strong has left many Males years behind in various mental, emotional, social, and academic areas of learning. This has created a large pool of Male employees who are not able to adapt to information age needs. Another reason is that as more Females enter positions of power and collective control, they are more apt to keep Female employees and lay off Male employees (there is no equal opportunity protection for Males). There is another more complex reason why Females are keeping their jobs and Males are losing their jobs. The nineteenth century belief Females should be protected works in the work place also. It places more constrictions on how jobs, intimidation, force for output, and general respect and care is given to Females. However, society’s allowed aggressions upon Male employees allows much more harsh treatment of Males in terms of verbal abuse, intimidation, job assignments, and lack of respect in general. This difference in treatment over time places the Male in a much more precarious position in deciding whether to continually put up with such mental/emotional abuse or quit or be fired for finally drawing a line at some point. Even when Females face similar treatment on the job, the over all treatment of respect and care usually support them so they are able to carry on and remain employed.

    I suspect these reasons are now being played out in society as Business Week said that in the last six months, “From last November through this April, American women aged 20 and up gained nearly 300,000 jobs, according to the household survey of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). At the same time, American men lost nearly 700,000 jobs. You might even say American men are in recession, and American women are not.”

    Due to the advancement of the information age and the continual increase in domination by Females in white collar positions, I see the media now much more dominated by women who have saturated the airways from very light, tinish, and seemingly patronizing words, tones, and inflections to very strong, hard biting words. Society’s protection for women allows these kinds of expressions with impunity. I do not value such words. Due to the confrontations I have experienced, I find such words in men and women much less valuable and even counterfeit. Perhaps this is why many other Males are tuning out and away from the media. I am a very caring person. I feel for everyone. However, I know there are many persons, who respect only strength and power and who see mildness, kindness, and goodness as weakness. I see bank tellers, postal clerks, grocery check out persons, and even civil servants, using their society protected freedoms of expression to give verbal, silent abuse, and hollow kindness, usually to those individuals who are the most sincere. Yes, this conduct, perhaps due to much modeling from the media, “does poison the well” for women in general. I am now more on guard all the time. I feel this gulf between men and women cannot continue for very long. I am intelligent and can deal with anyone on any level. I just will not allow my words to be exchanged for counterfeit words. LOL; Fortunately for me, I grew up with a speech impediment so rejection is something I have a great deal of experience. I have learned to value my solitude.

    By showing Males and Females how our environments greatly affect thinking and learning, students will have much more respect for themselves and for others. By providing students with tools to approach their lives differently to continually improve their abilities, students will then have a continuous hope of developing in time, many if not all of the qualities they admire in others. Students will then have a continuous hope of changing and becoming better, newer persons with each passing day.

    We need to begin teaching Male and Female, children and adults how our individual environments greatly affect our skills and abilities over time. We need to show Males and Females how differences in treatment do exist in the information age and have hurt Males over time. By providing this understanding, both Males and Females will begin to have much more appreciation for the other in terms of their differences in environment. Males will recognize how their environments are creating their difficulties and remove from their shoulders the false belief they are somehow genetically inferior or simply not working hard enough. Females will perhaps also recognize both how differential treatment has hurt the Male and speak with greater care and understanding rather than the current society allowed verbal, silent abuse, and patronization they presently give Males they feel they have an advantage over. By providing this understanding, the two groups be able to exist in more harmony and maintain better relationships.

    To reduce and eliminate this problem and help Males have a more equal footing, parents, teachers, administrators, and all forms of media need to be taught the cognitive tools presented in my learning theory. Society also needs to realize that the critical point “Large Backlash” and its many areas of Male aggression will begin to increase to a “much higher level” than presently seen. We need to begin teaching parents, teachers, and others who teach and model to children that the extra aggression toward Males and neglect of much social support perceived as coddling Males is hurting the Male children’s ability to grow mentally, emotionally, socially, and academically over time. They need to be taught how to treat Males in society with as much respect and care as they presently provide Female students. This is the only way to help Males begin to catch up in all of the many social areas they are presently lagging. This new way of thinking will be very difficult for the Male parent, teacher, administrator, or other professional for they have been raised with the old, more aggressive ways for many years and have come to base their feelings of self-worth upon their money, power, status, and image. They themselves have also experienced years of aggression, which has been woven into their minds and spirit to create their defensive posture or Male ego that is now more or less imprinted into their personality. Such a spirit will almost invariably imprint this same posture or spirit into the Male children they are raising.

    For many Males it will require much cognitive understanding of the problem and a willingness to begin treating Male children with the same respect and give the same positive attention to the Male children as they do Female children. For women, this means not using Male children as emotional scapegoats as society has allowed them to do in the past. Also women need to begin realizing that using adult Males as emotional scapegoats (with current feelings of protection by society) when they have power over them in some way is a very hazardous way to approach Males. You know, with continuous indulgence so directly related to mental, emotional, social, and academic knowledge and skills over time, society would practically have to treat Female and Male children the same in many areas to achieve equality between genders. I see Males and society losing in the end, but this end may be pushed off much farther into the future provided there is much more understanding and action in this area over time. This problem will only get worse unless action is taken now.

    1. I fear followers of the medical or genetic models will begin to build a case for genetic learning differences and/or body mass requiring more activity and/or tactile learning. Note that nice middle class Males do not have this problem. Also the view of differences in brain activity are more due to large differences in differential mental, emotional, social, physical, and educational reinforcement over time, not organic differences.

    2. I also fear the use of Male classrooms with more discipline and more time on task will only lead to more stern and even more harsh treatment and stereotyping of Males to perform more physical or menial labor to match the growing cast system being portrayed in the media against Males today.

    We must learn to realize that our current, single/multiple intelligence models were simply accepted out of hand years ago and held on to by many who were in control and apparently felt satisfied enough with their own life. Such ones could not see the tremendous disadvantage and damage such narrow, short-sighted beliefs would have on others, even among some persons who are closely related to them.

    I tell those who would still cling to the myth of permanence in ability they are killing their students whereas my learning theory offers two large, cognitive tools to continually improve ability and hope for children and adults. They are free to choose the myth of permanence in ability or my theory that provides hope and improvement.

    The Male Crisis is but one application of my Learning Theory. My Learning Theory provides two large tools we can teach to students and adults to continually improve thinking, learning, motivation to learn, and most importantly, mental/emotional health for all students and adults. My complete Learning Theory and its Cognitive tools are free to all by e-mail – mayfieldga@bellsouth.net Feel free to make copies of all files.

  • scottkirk

    john..her shrink like many others are opportunists!!!
    her shrink told her what she wanted to hear..labled it “proffessional”
    then sent her to grab her checkbook with a new found boldness!!!

  • http://www.dontmakehermad.com/ John Dias

    amfortas wrote:

    Hands up anyone who has known a girl or woman before and after therapy? Any friggin’ differences noted? After two years, any rationality? Even a whiff?

    Prior to my separation/divorce from my Ex, we sought counseling individually. She had been very abusive (emotionally, verbally, psychologically, and yes, even threw objects, so physically too). After seeing her shrink, she become even MORE emboldened, especially on the emotional abuse. When I asked her what good this shrink has been doing her, she responded with all sorts of “empowerment” sentiment, like “I’m not going to take it anymore” kind of crap. This is what she used to mentally justify her own abuses.

    Lovely.

  • amfortas

    TBQ says: “Two, we need to recognize that talking therapy does not work on most boys. ”

    Hands up anyone who has known a girl or woman before and after therapy? Any friggin’ differences noted? After two years, any rationality? Even a whiff?

  • scottkirk

    mruffollo #15…thanks for doing youre homework….them are powerfull figures there…

  • thurston861

    Great point! So to diminsh suicide among Men they need to know they are not the things they own nor the woman they marry. THey need to learn value of themselves outside of woman. THey are MEN!

  • mruffolo

    That husbands murder wives an average 1,400 per year over the last 29 years.

    http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/relationship.htm

    That about 26,000 men killed themselves in 2004.

    http://www.suicidology.org/associations/1045/files/2004datapgs.pdf

    That the feminist media, academics, and government focus on violence against woman as the biggest issue facing us.

  • mruffolo

    That suicide rates are the highest among the divorced and separated (#15).

    http://www.suicidology.org/associations/1045/files/Suicide2002.pdf

    About 80% of the suicides are men.

    That a little over 10% of suicides are people between the age of 15 and 24 years.

    http://www.suicidology.org/associations/1045/files/2004datapgs.pdf

    That feminist organizations ignore these facts, for example, the American Association of Suicidology has Fact Sheets for Youth, Blacks and Elderly, but none for men. (Note the pictures of women). And call papers on “Advancing Suicidology: Embracing Diversity in Research & Practice”.

    http://www.suicidology.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=185
    http://www.suicidology.org/index.cfm

  • thurston861

    Cons- respectfully Masculine is Square in comparison to Feminine which is rounded and soft with no hard angles and rough edges.

    The forcing works well in the Educational System as proved by the Men who lined up agianst the wall at VT to take a bullet in the back of the head instead of fighting.

    As pointed out, you cannot make Men the Feminine over all ina setting and retain any masculine will in the setting. We know that the events at VT would ahve been different in the setting fo the Locker Room fot eh Football Team.

    Nevertheless the ManChild gets matrried and plays the Feminine game to marriage and finally quits playing when he has to be her best friend and go shoppng and get all excited about the lates fashions and what to wear with waht and the endless solutions to modern living.

    This is the masciline line of demarcation that Men cannot handle.

    Oh yes least I get pilloried by the ” What about _______” crowd, yes there are the Men that are Homosexual and like to banter on and on about dress and style like John Edwards.

    But they are not Men, at least not Men who believe in issues that are important to Men of Action in Sustaining and rebuilding society.

    Cons, you have well defined the issue in you that I did not first understand. It is time for women to cater to men, not manipulate, and it is time for men to stop catering to women and just lay down the reality, I resent being poisoned with the Estrogen in the Water reducing the Male Fish Popultaton and Frogs, the Estrogen in the Soy Products, the Estrogen fo the Educational thought, the Estrogen of the Colleges, the Estrogen in Marital Counseling, the Estrogen flowing from the Judicial Bench, the Estrogen in the Advertisments, teh Estrogen in the Program making young boys worshp women, and the Estrogen in the Politics.\

    All this is just so some selfish man and woman can have orgasms together and not contribute life to this society.

    This is killing us all and none dare sa what it is that has made our Society so toxic by ignoring the fact taht it is toxic at all towards men, so that none can ever tell the difference.

    I am declaring war agaisnt my Estrogen/Feminine infected belief and thought processes.

    There is a war against my Y chromosome and every scientific excuse being made to eliminate the need from me and my Y Chromosome and the attriutes that make me a Men, and I simply am not going to cater to that Genocidal Insanity nor Excuse it any longer.

    Y Chromosome counter strike.

  • mruffolo

    brmerrick said in #2 that “The government has taken over education”

    Public schools are the government. Public teachers are government employees.

    In America funding and control of public schools come federal, state and local government. For example, 75% of local property taxes go to administration and federal grants are used to pay for technology like computers and Internet connection.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_school

    The same government that pays the feminist judges, feminized police, feminized politicians, and pay their support staff, also pay the feminist teachers. The same money used to build the family court house and the police station is used to build public schools.

    You can draw a straight line from the demands of hippy feminists of the sixties to the trouble for school boys today.

    Ironically, feminists claim to work for the best interest of our children.

    Conveniently, media, government’s academics, enforcement, and courts blame the failure of America’s youth on fathers.

    In fifty years from today, you may be able to draw a straight line from feminists of the sixties to America’s failure to compete against Muslims, Chinese, and Japan.

  • mruffolo

    Excellent. Well said, however, who is responsible. What needs to change? Usually when things are not working, there is a change of leadership. It’s a political deal. So for our boys and male teachers it’s the politics and policy is wrong.

    The politics of today are “men make women happy” and “men bad/women good”. If you do not, there a expensive consequences – loss of job, no promotion, divorce.

    My son’s elementary school of about 350 students employs one (1) man – an Hispanic janitor. During a parents teacher conference I shred what I observed with my son’s female teacher, adding that the consequence is a lack of male leadership for the boys. The teacher only replied that they had a “male math teacher once.”

    I suspect that if a school was taught by homosexuals, that in general in the long run the straight students may not do as well as the homosexual students. I suspect that at a liberal school, the conservative students may not fair well. I expect at feminist school, boys do not do well.

    Too many women teachers is problem in western world from a United Nation’s report. “Many countries in the world exhibit patterns where most teachers at the primary school level are female, with the proportion of male teachers increasing as the level of schooling increases.”

    http://www.unece.org/stats/gender/genpols/keyinds/education/educonce.htm

    However, like all feminist organization such as the UN, they blame the low pay to teachers that keeps men away (I suppose affirmative action does not apply for men in teaching) .

    The UN also does not mention that in general in western countries the politics of liberal’s feminism is the agenda in academics.

    http://www.indoctrinate-u.com/intro

    Replace feminized leadership with a political leadership that does not worship woman and condemn men, then there is hope for boys in school again.

  • conservativation

    How did I miss this little gem? Warren and Steven, the author and the poster, here here! Outstanding commentary and thought provocation. Then summing it up, WLS came with a fantastic reality about communication, which again dwells in the margins of the biggest debates we’ve been having around here lately about the genders and communication.

    Can anyone see the progression from frustration, in some cases, to hopelessness and suicide, to hopelessness to substance abuse and faux complacency, or to anger and murderous rage? Is it not just the direct discourse among men and women, but of the big picture where men, teen boys, attempt to force the round peg of their masculinity into the square hole of feminized culture? How many teen boys simply say, “NO ONE WILL LISTEN TO ME!!!”? I think men are growing weary, bone weary, of a society that is telling them if they’d just get it right (we all know what societies definition of right is) then they’d fit into the feminine utopia being sought.

    Someone, anyone, please find me a therapeutic effort, in the mainstream, that encourages movement back towards the masculine end of the gender spectrum in terms of communication.

    I was listening to a pastor on the radio. His name as I recall was Stu Weber (and I intend to read more on him as I liked what he was saying) and he was Biblically dissecting gender relations in ways I long to hear and never do. At the break, the program was being hosted by some family association this and that blah blah, and the hosts began their chatter. One of them, claiming to be the resident family life expert, did what I ALWAYS see. He RUSHED to apologize. Not literally. He wanted to foist wiggle room into the conversation. He said something like, “well, Stu’s advise is sage, but I’d add that when combined with another thing, it’s all the better, that being that men must be TEACHABLE by their wives, and I’d say an apt metaphor would be men must be like sponges soaking up the wisdom of the wives”.

    I see this all day every day. I’m not saying men mustn’t be teachable. I’m saying we needn’t ALWAYS be told, in the last word, that despite what the Bible says, lets leave our final thought with what SHE has to say. You will not here the converse when the roles are reversed.

    Don’t seek counsel at most churches if you are struggling in marriage or are suicidal. Find some solid men to help!

  • Dennis Ailor

    Kudos to you Warren
    Examination of the root causes of mens violence on themselves can only lead to a greater understanding of why men are violent to women. My hunch is that at least in part the reasons include their relationship with women (mothers, freinds, lovers, ect) in the absence of a strong, mature and confident man as a role model to feind off the ill affects of too much female influence. Don’t get me wrong. I’m not blaming women for the condition of men and boys in our current society. I am saying that without strong males there is not hope. We need a balance.

    Indeed discussions like this are the only thing that will lead to personal empowerment of men that is not at the expense of women, although it will be a hard sell in a society that is dominated by a gynocentric demogoguery. The social and political milieu has been penetrated do deeply with the “women as victum” consciousness that even the most open minded of women and also men would view this discussion as excusing violence on women.

    It seems that whenever I advocate for mens and boys rights as humans, expecially when there has been violence to women, I am accused of excussing or even advocating violence to women. There is simply no compassion for men or boys, when the bottom line is that until we show that compassion, we can never expect our boys and men to rise above their primal instincts to hurt people.

  • WLS

    But we don’t have to feed the urban legend that men are taciturn and inarticulate while women are verbally facile.

    Although there are some Marlborough types, serious dialogue or negotiation between men and women is more often obstructed because the woman requires a `safe space’—that in other words the scope of the discourse be circumscribed—or that it would be too `threatening’ for her to enter into direct discussion with a man. These are evasive ploys: not evidence of verbal skills, that especially younger women are being systematically taught today.

    They should be being taught negotiating techniques so they can defend themselves on the plane of ideas and principles, in analogy with how they are currently instructed in martial arts for physical defense, if they are really so vulnerable to male bullying.

  • The Biscuit Queen

    Warren, another wonderful article. I look forward to seeing you in two weeks at the conference.

    Steven, what a powerful statement-which would you rather deal with, an attempt or a corpse? Wow. A cry for help is NOT the same thing as a completed suicide. We need to do several things.

    One, publicly acknowledge that while it is serious that girls attempt, it is more serious that boys succeed at much higher rates. You cannot give support to a dead child.

    Two, we need to recognize that talking therapy does not work on most boys. Men tend to be doers, not talkers. We need to look at cognitive behavioral therapy and other types of action therapy. We need our schools to understand these types, and we need to encourage boys that getting help for their problems is not a weakness.

    Three, we need to get people to look at the big picture-misandry in school, 85% female staff, misandry in the media, divorce, fatherlessness- all together equal high boy suicide rates.

    Four, we need to put our money where our mouth is- all the men on this board and other mens rights groups should be a mentor to at least one boy. The men here must reach out to these boys because for a while…no one else will. If I were a man, I would do the same.

    Anyways, great discussion on a vital topic.

  • steven deluca

    Over the years I have often heard others discuss how girls attempting suicide has a deep meaning and that if girls were more familiar with guns more would be dead. Such views are to let us know that it’s not because boys are less happy but that girls are too and they just don’t know quite how to do the job fully with guns.

    A man hating feminist taught a self-defense at my college (more accurately a glass on teaching how to teach self-defense) where in the 70′s she claimed 99% of violence was from men. I told her that this wasn’t true and she said “how abusurd’ so I brought FBI stats from different years, different cities which showe at times that female killings of male partners was higher than that of males killing their partners (Detroit was one city I believe) …

    I told the class that as soon as she saw these statistics she wouldn’t shift her view, she would shift her argument to support her conclusion, “…all men are rapist assholes” .

    She went straight to “it must have been self defense.” I then said “Last week you told us that women’s lower suicide rates was because women didn’t “get it” about guns (So technical, the bullet come out of the hole, – pull the trigger) but are you now suggesting that when it comes to killing themselves women are not “mechanical” enought to get it about guns but when it comes to offing husbands they can figure it out?

    I worked with teen girls and boys in the late 70′s . I have read about suicide and have a very large file on the topic. I know girls do make more attempts but i also know that such attempts are sometimes a joke, a pin scratch across the wrist, wrong side even.

    Yes, as I told my X wife – a feminist educator, it is serious when girls try suicide. (We had worked as house parents with teens and were aware that some attempts were not attempts at all but cries for help, and it’s girls and women who when they have cries for help are held, kissed, provided for in ways material and emotional that are denied boys which leads to more girls and women scratching their arms, or doing a drug when they know someone will find them. I suspect that some female deaths from suicide were accidently with someone not showing up to save them because they didn’t get the message in time.)

    When my wife told me that “YOU KNOW girls attemps are as serious” … I said to her “What would you rather deal with, Anna’s attempt or Jesse’s success ( Our teen daughter and son in that order a few years ago – they were teens at the time of this discussion about “gender issues” … days later a teen boy killed himself at the high school where my X worked. HE was a top scholar, athlete and was staring in a school play. She knew him, liked him. I wondered when I heard she went to the service if her thoughts about attempts versus making damn sure it’s your last breath got “real” and less acacdemic when she realized there would not be any one of changing his story. I wondered if she thought of other local boys, not girls, who had checked out over the years.

    When girls were thought to be behind in school, a myth, feminists and others thought that discrimination was the ONLY possible reason. Nothing else was put on the table. When they later learned that it was boys who were behind and are now farther behind, we never heard the word discrimination once. It was lazy, or disinterested or boys can make more money so school isn’t as important (Not true in general, girls can make as much money or find a man to support them partially or in full) as if being uneducated, as long as you have income, isn’t important to a male.

    Bottom line, really, more boy suicides or more male failures in school most beople just don’t give a damn. And the few that do have a heard time telling their reasons why without feminists making sure that conflicting – even if bogus views, are always present to make sure that the funding goes to girls and women, not boys and men. Educators will comment on boys failing and then walk off without starting one program to address those problems when they know that billions were spent to put girls ahead of boys.

    The price to be paid for such idiocy will be felt by future generations of men and women, boys and girls. When women fully realize that isn’t not a boys fault that his parents and their peers were so shot sighted as to not prepare a couple of generations of men to protect their little Suzy’s from war, or work, or early deaths, then you will see women screaming to treat our sons as well as we treat our daughters because itn’s not in women’s best interest to treat the other half so poorly that many decide to drop out, do drugs, or shoot themselves.

    SD

  • http://www.dontmakehermad.com/ John Dias

    Perhaps a symptom of the problem is the lack of empathy in the teen population. Teens feel incredible pressure to belong, and the clique-atmosphere in middle and high schools cultivate that. The pressure to fit in and belong is so intense that the human trait of empathy becomes suppressed in this environment. Kids in one group mock kids outside the group with stinging insults and alienating tactics. There is no regard for the feelings of others, no concern for the pain being imposed. There is little recognition of “do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” No empathy.

    The lack of empathy is then manifested in the loners, the outcasts, the discards, the rejects. Some turn to violence (Columbine, Virginia Tech) and their lack of empathy becomes expressed through bullets. Some become reclusive, in a narcissistic and solitary demonstration of their lack of empathy. All carry their pain into adulthood, where they internalize it and project their anger onto others.

    Where fathers have been driven away (and especially when intact families are broken up, often by the almighty state, or by divorcing wives), empathy has died. Fatherless kids often cope with the absence of Dad by interpreting their longing for Dad — and their disappointment with his absence — as a shortcoming of their fathers. Later, they project that low opinion of Dad onto all fathers. It is no wonder, then, that adults who never had active fathers in their lives grow up to have no empathy for fathers who are driven away from their families and children. It is no wonder that legislators and judges have such a tough time rejecting the “Tender Years” doctrine that says mothers are essential in the early years, while fathers are superfluous.

    It all comes down to a lack of empathy. One generation of self-centered adults creates the next, allowing fathers to be driven out because their very own fathers were also absent. Lack of sufficient early influence from fathers later matures into lack of empathy for men in general, hence the misandry we see all over our culture.

  • scottkirk

    mr. farrell… thank you sir…after being falselly accussed of rape,and society basically lynching me even know i was innocent…

    It was youre book that got me through it…..It litterally saved my life…

    I truly believe a mans education is incomplete unless he’s read “THE MYTH OF MALE POWER”

    I’m waiting eagerly for the next book…I hear it’s going to be youre magnum opus..

  • ggreen67

    First off Dr. Farrell,

    It is a real pleasure to see your article appear on this site. I believe there are quite a few people here familiar with you work. Though I don’t think everyone here would agree with some of your views (tough crowd), I’ve never heard anyone question your works validity. That in-itself is a very admirable accomplishment as we, as a group, have become very accustomed to questioning, and many times debunking gender related research.

    Your works, from a mans point of view, very fairly places responsibility (or blame) where it is due regardless whether it be men or women. I for one (though not always agreeing with) respect that fairness and must admit; I’ve had my eyes opened more than once to some of the information you present as male shortcomings within our society.

    To the point of your topic. Male acts of violence and suicide. One area that I “bang the drum” towards is ensuring our youth have marketable employment skills directly out of High School.

    Our current educational system seems to work on the premise that 100% of our youth will go on to attend college. The actual number, per interpreted census data is around 30% with only a percentage of that making graduation. Bearing that in mind, our educational system is failing to meet the needs of the remaining 70% of these youth. The number one reason why people (far and away mostly males) are dropping out of High School is they feel it is not providing them any benefits.

    I am a very strong supporter of reviving Vocational Education Centers (in mass, nationwide) for our youth. I believe the revival of these learning centers would particularly benefit men in a number of ways.

    First, most men do not aspire to be “paper-pushers”. They want the gratification of being able to see their accomplishments. Take a normal bridge for example. If you are privileged to know any man who worked on its construction you will know by the pride in his voice when he tells you that he helped build it. Second, any young man or woman will feel much better when looking at their future knowing that it will not involve a life of meaningless unskilled, low paying jobs. Third, they will be able to exit High School and know they already have the skills necessary to prevent them from a life of poverty.

    How does this relate to male suicide and mass violence? Any man filled with confidence and pride in himself will want to stay a productive member of our society. Men with those qualities don’t commit suicide!

    I am also a big supporter of conscription for men and women to build character and discipline, but that is another matter that I don’t want to dwell into here.

    I will stop here as this could get very long, very easily. Again, thanks for taking the time to post here and I hope to see you post more articles here in the future.

  • brmerrick

    ‘The women’s movement and our schools have offered girls “girl power” and girls’ suicide rates have gone down.’

    Where is the data for this? A Harvard study that can be accessed here:

    http://post.economics.harvard.edu/hier/2001papers/HIER1917.pdf

    states that, “Between 1950 and 1990, youth suicide rates tripled (especially among young men)” but it does not state that girls’ suicide rates went down. Futhermore, it states that, “Girls attempt suicide more often than boys” but that boys are six times more successful in the attempt, and that is because boys are more likely to use a gun to do it. Girls are more likely to attempt to poison themselves, which is far more likely to result in a suicide failure.

    I’m no feminist sympathizer. If the data in this paper is correct, youth suicide seems to have a stronger correlation to the rate of divorce than any “strides” made by the modern women’s movement. (The paper even suggests that a higher rate of women in the workforce may be contributing to the higher rate of suicide for men.)

    Therefore, I bristle when I read things like, ‘When girls had problems in math or science, and were underrepresented in law and medicine, we asked parents, schools and political leaders to take responsibility.’ And just look at the result. There are more girls attempting suicide than ever before. I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: the government is a lousy substitute for parenting.

    The answer lies not in pushing the government to do anything. The government has taken over education, and we now spend more money per head on increasingly stupid children. A push for more political interference will not restore rights to men. These boys don’t need school, and they don’t need governmental interference. They need to be given the manhood they are denied. They need parents to keep their promises and voluntarily end the scourge of divorce. We can start by abolishing marriage law, and returning marriage to the private sector where it belongs. This will take the wind out of the sails of the feminist movement to destroy the men they hate, and give this country a lesson in the liberties it has long forgotten.

    As long as we deny teenagers the adulthood that their bodies know they have, putting them in a box all day long in forced schooling so that they can be put in a corporate box their entire working lives, while simultaneously giving the government more power in the destruction of their parents’ marriages, we will see a rise in unsuccessful female suicide attempts, and a rise in successful male suicide attempts.

    Humanity is not designed for enslavement. Our inalienable rights must be restored. Government, as Reagan so rightly said, is the problem, not the solution.

  • amfortas

    557 succinct words that fall on deaf officials’ ears.

    How do dispossessed, villified, calumnied, falsely accused men speak when no one listens?

    The sons teach the fathers. Mao, the darling of the left where femonazis breed, tells us that power comes from the barrel of a gun.







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search