Why We Don’t See Eye to Eye (Part II)–Feminist Bloggers on the Duke Case

Friday, June 29, 2007
By Glenn Sacks


Background: From time to time I ponder why there is such a divide between the feminist movement and the men’s and fathers’ movement. I wish this divide didn’t exist, or at least that it were smaller. Yet sometimes I read things which make me believe that the divide will never be breached. One example is Why We Don’t See Eye to Eye (Part I). Another is below.

In the blog entry Progress continues on the march to legalize rape (6/18/07) on the feminist blog Reclusive Leftist, blogger “Violet Socks” discusses the aftermath of the Duke “rape” case. The blog– www.reclusiveleftist.com –is a fairly prominent one, so I don’t think I can be accused of picking obscure extremists to make a point. Reclusive Leftist writes:

“Top story today: Duke terrorists are now actually being rewarded with an undisclosed sum — millions of dollars? Who the fuck knows? The message is clear: You can terrorize some woman all you want, call her a nigger and threaten to shove a broomstick up her and knock her around and probably rape her, and here’s what you win:

“Adoring national media attention

“The fervid devotion of millions of moist-palmed dudes who totally sympathize with how unfair it is to get nailed just for terrorizing some stupid bitch

“The profound satisfaction of seeing the woman you terrorized dragged through the mud, publicly hounded, and even threatened with legal action for committing the GINORMOUS [gigantic and enormous] crime of actually reporting her assault.

“Millions of dollars in prize money from your university to make you feel better about the terrible ordeal you’ve been through.

“Any questions about why every single athletic team in this country now has carte blanche to rape and torture any woman they get their nasty goddamn hands on?

“Throw up, throw up, throw up.”

The full post can be seen at Progress continues on the march to legalize rape. Sigh…

Online Dating Rights
Online Dating Rights opposes the new federal International Marriage Broker Regulation Act, which requires Americans who seek to meet foreigners via the internet to have a criminal background check and an intrusive report about intimate details of one’s life BEFORE any communication–the first time in US history that such checks have been required.

| More from Glenn Sacks

Stumble It!

Share/Save/Bookmark

How to survive the coming food shortage.

13 Responses to “Why We Don’t See Eye to Eye (Part II)–Feminist Bloggers on the Duke Case”

  1. 1
    scottkirk Says:

    glenn..be carefull answering the cries of the siren…

    the greeks had some folklore about a group of women called the sirens.
    the sirens lived on an remote island out at sea. As ships would sail past the island the sirens would line up on shore and cry lovingly sweet and seductive crys for help. Hence the term (siren) is sounding the alarm for help. But those men who answered the sirens seductive crys for help ended their voyage and the lives of their men by crashing their ship into the jagged rocks on the shoreline. Only men who could resist the seductive alluring cries of the siren, were allowed to safely pass by.

  2. 2
    scottkirk Says:

    i spoke with a women the other day that claims these vile victim feminist aren’t even women…

    She say’s she doesn’t know what they are…but they are not women…

  3. 3
    scottkirk Says:

    Iv’e chosen the position that i will not take any of this argument to the women until our life spans are equal again…and guess what, I wil not have to worry about answering any siren calls..

  4. 4
    mruffolo Says:

    Do not give a fool what is true; else they will trample it under foot and turn to attack you.

    It is a better strategy, and time spent, to train up young men. Show an old liberal your interest, but keep your distance.

  5. 5
    daveinga Says:

    the King will give me more ships to wreck. says i can’t be trusted. bit of a relief really. can’t swim as good as i once could anyway. good swimmer i was. gotta watch those sharks too. nasty devils.

    mr – sort of a don’t throw pearls before swine thing, eh? old wisdom. excellent!

  6. 6
    amfortas Says:

    “I wish this divide didn’t exist, or at least that it were smaller. Yet sometimes I read things which make me believe that the divide will never be breached.”

    There are some chasms whose sides are so dissimilar as to make borders for continents. The femonazi continent is not a place to build a bridge to (one bridges a divide; one breaches a wall). The rantings of the example – Miss Reclusive – is one of complete lunacy. There used to be Institutions for the care of such folk and the the thrust to ‘integrate’ them with the ‘community’ was just as disasterous in consequence as trying to reach across to feminazis would be.

    There are saner women to talk to.

  7. 7
    DcFather Says:

    Look, if women could simply point at a man to have government castrate him, torture him, put him to a slow agonizing painful death, then she inherits all of his wealth, including having his children and his children’s children taken as her slaves, the neo-Marxist feminists would still claim women are being discriminated against and victimized.

    I can hear it now: “But some women are afraid to point at a man to have this done to him because he might get angry and say rape her with his eyes, and therefore requiring women to point at the man is merely punishing the victim.” Or, “women should have the choice as to whether the man should be castrated or tortured first, and should not have her choices dictated by some bureaucratic woman-hater in Washington”. Or, “It’s her body, so it should be her choice as to whether she points at the man with a finger, a toe, her elbow, or calls 911″. Or how about “Fingers are a phallic symbol representing male domination and oppresion of women and the law would be that women cup their hand in the shape of a vagina if women are to be truly empowered.”

  8. 8
    bombbombbombbomb Says:

    It seems that when reasonable statements are made about men’s actions (Some people can understand Darren Mack’s actions), there is discussion of the so called men’s movement being undermined and set back 20 years,. Yet it seems that the ramblings of a Feminazi,who does not even come across as coherent, is taken seriously? I guess it’s just a demonstration of more gender bigotry. Take the whiny garbage spouting women seriously, and shun a man who reacts in a non PC manor after his life ruined by our government.

  9. 9
    khankrumthebulgar Says:

    As Tammy Bruce has pointed out the Women’s Movement is full of Mentally Ill Women who have no desire to get well Mentally. They want to wallow in perpetual victimhood. And they are a hate movement in every sense of the word. It is long over due for us to stop being civil with them.

  10. 10
    bolwriter Says:

    There are always some people who don’t care about facts. They’ve got their story and they’re stickin’ to it. We cannot speak to these people and we cannot bring them around to see their own errors, prejudices, etc. Therefore, we should not waste our time trying to change these people whose hatred blinds them. We should stick to repeating the facts and making calm, logical arguments. Most people are open to the truth. Anti-male mythology has a big head start on us, but eventually the truth will win.

  11. 11
    Joi Says:

    reclusiveleftist.com just promotes misandry, the same feminist misandry that has been spread the last 40 years.

  12. 12
    Joi Says:

    She deleted all the comments stating that false allegations can and do happen, etc. Basically deletes anything that doesn’t follow the feminist line. And they talk about “tolerance.”

    Violet says:

    Oh lordy, look what happened while my satellite was out. I’ve been linked again by the male supremacist sites, so they’re swarming over here. I’ll delete these comments – Infidel, I’ll leave yours but it will look weird, like you’re talking to figments of your imagination. Actually that’s not so different from the usual…

  13. 13
    scottkirk Says:

    Men need to realise it is futile and unproductive to bring this dialogue to the feminist first…
    As Esther vilar states in her book “the manipulated male”..most men have been conditioned not unlike pavlovs dogs…to seek out and search the world, and if he finds things along the way, bring it back to her, for her to decide if it’s good enough for her to keep, or its waste….
    This is true with new insights into mens rights being violated…If you bring it back to her,(which you have a conditioned reflex that is hard to change)…since its of no use to her, she will invariably tell you it’s rubish…This new information is simply of no value to her, or getting her more things….so just dispose of it…

Leave a Reply

International Mens Day and Fathers Day in Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden

Search MND

Introducing MRm: A New Men's Rights Magazine in PDF format

Download PDF Here

Support Our Sponsors!

Please support MND

Subscribe today:

SUSTAINER: $5/mo.


CONTRIBUTOR: $20/mo.


SUPPORTER: $50/mo.


Or Donate Any Amount

Archives

privacy policy | terms of service


Site Meter

MND: Your Daily Dose of Counter-Theory is Digg proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache!