Custom Search
Rinaldo Del Gallo, III
A Tale of Two Bike Rides: A Prime Example of Media Bias Against Father’s Rights Activists

Sunday, July 01, 2007

A TALE OF TWO BIKE RIDES: A PRIME EXAMPLE OF MEDIA BIAS

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at PhotobucketTip O’Neil once famously said, “All politics is local.” News stories on the local level, collectively, can form an often-greater impact on an issue than a few national stories. Never underestimate the effect you can have by a letter to the editor, or even an article in a small newspaper. What has happened to our movement in Berkshire County of Massachusetts is on the one hand a local story. But the news pattern is not.

There are innumerable media events “staged” by those that involved in the father’s rights movement which are considered “hokey,” whereas nearly identical situations involving causes in which the media is sympathetic is treated as a quaint human interest story. The Berkshire Eagle—a local daily paper out of Pittsfield, Massachusetts (my hometown)—did a big story today on a guy that was riding a bicycle from the New York Border the state house to promote HIV prevention. The story made the paper (it was what the Eagle considered politically correct), and its link is below.

http://www.berkshireeagle.com/localnews/ci_6267641

Don’t get me wrong, I have nothing against the bike ride or the Eagle covering the story. It is the rank anti-father bias that I mind. When I first started in the father’s rights movement in 2001, there was a kid by the name of Clayton Giles (probably about 20 now). In fact, one of his link is still up, although legalkids.com appears to be down.

http://www.fathers.bc.ca/clayton_giles.htm

It was the year 2001, and Clayton was traveling not across the state, but half across the continent from Canada to the White House. (Clayton was Canadian.) His father had a big Trailer, and the team included Clayton, his father, and his sister. He entered Pittsfield, escorted by local police starting at Hancock Shaker Village. Jim Lenski—then active in our group—had his son ride in to town with Clayton. The city opened his arms to him. We the family up in the Crowne Plaza generously donated by hotel itself. Jimmy’s on West Street provided a free dinner. Plaine’s Bike shop provided a free bike tune-up.

It was a real upbeat, community event. Clayton, as the bike rider in the present Eagle story, greeted the mayor–it was Gerry Doyle, who signed a petition supporting shared parenting. Then mayoral candidate Sara Hathaway signed the petition. In every sense, it was a great local human-interest story. Boy deprived of dad rides bike across county. City opens its arms. Mayor signs proclamation. Touches upon an important issue.

The Eagle refused to run the story. We were told it was a “hokey publicity stunt,” and the Eagle refused to cover Clayton Giles passages into Pittsfield and greeting by the mayor. Of course, almost everything in politics that is done in public and is not a vote on the floor, speeches, conventions, protest, etc., is a publicity stunt—they are mechanisms to shed light on a perspective on a political issue. But this was the beginning of an even more darker side of the Eagle—they would almost never run a positive, upbeat story on us. We did make the paper, but only when they wanted to portray us in an unfavorable light. In fairness to the press, but not the Eagle, Clayton was a story all through New York State, and also in the Eastern part of the state, making the Worchester Telegraph and Gazette (a paper much bigger than the Eagle). In other words, other newspapers and radio stations thought this was a story, but the Berkshire Eagle did not. This was shortly after the famous editorial calling the then “Fatherhood Coalition” an “oxymoron.” So now, why are we in the Pittsfield 4th of July Parade for the 5th year in a row. Why? To let people know we are there, and present a good image of our organization. The Berkshire Eagle wants to ignore us. Many, if not most, local papers want to ignore father’s rights groups, and will not cover us, even though other groups get the coverage with similar, if not even less momentous, events.

This past year, there were dozens of stories that naturally had a father’s rights angle, including numerous stories on the high dropout and teen pregnancy rate in the city of Pittsfield. We also had an initiative to raise the minimum age of compulsory education that was largely ignored. For the first time, here in the City of Pittsfield, a Massachusetts Governor publicly stated that he supported shared parenting. I myself probably put our present Governor’s Councilor in office with my endorsement. The Eagle did not show up for any of these stories or care to write about them. But don’t worry—they were there for all the negative stories.

The Eagle, and the rest of the media in this country, can’t say enough about the subject of gay marriage, but can’t seem to find our phone number when it concerns a far more serious issue affecting far more people. (The Berkshire Fatherhood Coalition is neutral on the issue of gay marriage, but steadfastly maintains that this is an issue of FAR less importance than what is happening to fathers). At the national level, I don’t think there has been a story about father’s rights done by a major television network, and stories by major newspapers are highly rare. It cannot be seriously maintained that gay marriage is the number one family law issue confronting American society and that making children fatherless through our court system is an uninteresting footnote.

The fight must be won at the local level. So we come back to the issue of why are in the 4th of July Parade this time for the 5th year in a row. We need to let the public know why we are here and our part of this community. There are forces out there, like the Berkshire Eagle, that want us to go away. In 2001, a 14 year-old boy riding across the country to protest not being allowed to be with his father was not news to the Berkshire Eagle. If anything, the Eagle’s behavior is only worse. If you run a father’s rights group consider:

  1. Being in a parade.
  2. Running a booth with a fun came at a fair, whether it be a county fair or state fair.
  3. Setting up a booth on a busy city sidewalk.
  4. Doing a public access television show.

In short, don’t rely solely on the media to get your word out.

Rinaldo Del Gallo, III, Esq.

Spokesperson of the Berkshire Fatherhood Coalition

413-445-6789

Click
HERE
to contact Attorney Del Gallo.

Click
HERE
to go to the home page of the Berkshire Fatherhood Coalition.

Rate this post:

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

| Print This Post Print This Post | 0 views | Other posts by Rinaldo Del Gallo, III

Stumble It!

book mark A Tale of Two Bike Rides: A Prime Example of Media Bias Against Father’s Rights Activists in del.icio.us | A Tale of Two Bike Rides: A Prime Example of Media Bias Against Father’s Rights Activists to Slashdot.com | Submit A Tale of Two Bike Rides: A Prime Example of Media Bias Against Father’s Rights Activists to Digg.com | Submit A Tale of Two Bike Rides: A Prime Example of Media Bias Against Father’s Rights Activists to BoingBoing.net | Bookmark A Tale of Two Bike Rides: A Prime Example of Media Bias Against Father’s Rights Activists in Furl | Bookmark A Tale of Two Bike Rides: A Prime Example of Media Bias Against Father’s Rights Activists in Spurl | Bookmark A Tale of Two Bike Rides: A Prime Example of Media Bias Against Father’s Rights Activists in Reddit | Bookmark A Tale of Two Bike Rides: A Prime Example of Media Bias Against Father’s Rights Activists in Tailrank | Bookmark A Tale of Two Bike Rides: A Prime Example of Media Bias Against Father’s Rights Activists in Newsvine | Bookmark A Tale of Two Bike Rides: A Prime Example of Media Bias Against Father’s Rights Activists to Yahoo! | Bookmark A Tale of Two Bike Rides: A Prime Example of Media Bias Against Father’s Rights Activists to Fark

11 Comments »

  1. amfortas said,

    Rinaldo, a great story. A suggestion: In the 4th July Parade, on your Float, why not have a big sign saying something like -

    GREAT AMERICAN DADS, AS IGNORED AND MARGINALISED BY THE EAGLE.

    July 1, 2007 at 10:33 am

  2. anti armchair generals said,

    Why don’t you have a male apply to women-only Smith Co;;ege and if refused saying Section 901

    July 1, 2007 at 6:47 pm

  3. anti armchair generals said,

    (post has jumped on its own about 3 times)Section 901 (a) 5 of Title IX exempt shcools which have been sexually segregated since their “Inception’. The Supreme Court in MUW v. Hogan (1982) ruled that Conngress has no power to “restric, abrogate,or dilute ” equal rotection
    MUw v. Hogan
    http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=458&invol=718&friend=nytimes
    “due process; does the same for federal government, Davis v. Passman

    July 1, 2007 at 6:57 pm

  4. anti armchair generals said,

    Link to Womens Collegege Coalition

    http://www.womenscolleges.org/

    I noticed that the address had changed from Washington, D.C. to Asylum Ave. in Harford ,CT. Perhaps it means that the inmates have take over the asylum.
    But it has a serious side, after District Court dismissed a $25 Title IX lawsuit in Georgia, the appellate court reinstated it
    if you go to Google and clik “news” in upper frame and ask for Title IX, you will see a boatload of puff pieces about womens side and rarely how unfairly mens sports are treated under Title IX. Even George Bush romised reforms as primary candidate, he has done nothin and now he praises Title IX. Perhaps its because he has two daughters and needs cannon fodder from men for his wars.

    July 1, 2007 at 8:12 pm

  5. WLS said,

    Clayton Giles unfortunately had the very worst possible luck with his timing: he had I believe almost reached DC on September 11, 2001; I never heard how his ride actually ended.

    July 1, 2007 at 8:37 pm

  6. WLS said,

    While they won’t use news you bring to them, many smaller, local papers will publish letters to the editor if they aren’t too far out, like talking about hanging family court judges for treason. They often prefer anecdotal pieces from local residents.

    The major, high circulation newspapers will very rarely or never print anything critical of family court, but most people read their local paper too, so if _everyone_ gets a letter in their local press from time the time, it helps the message get out.

    Exploit any hook that presents itself: my most recent letter followed a story about teen pregnancy and a comment that fathers abandoning their children was much of the cause.

    July 1, 2007 at 8:40 pm

  7. roadkill1965 said,

    One thing I try to do is join to any discussion from an online news article, to get our point of view out there. Some topics (eg: child-support, domestic violence, etc) can get pretty heated, and some of the male-bashing gets heavy, but I try to keep an even keel and type a short, concise, logical argument in rebuttal.

    Elsewhere, I was pleasantly surprised to watch a major motion film, The Pursuit Of Happyness, and see how father-positive it was. Maybe we’re becoming more politically acceptable now. Soon, we can be victims too! (woo hoo)

    July 2, 2007 at 11:12 am

  8. mruffolo said,

    There are four (4) men only colleges in America: Deep Springs College, Hampden-Sydney College, Morehouse College, and Wabash College.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men%27s_colleges_in_the_United_States

    There are fifty-seven (57) women only colleges in America.

    http://www.womenscolleges.org/colleges/bycollege.htm

    July 2, 2007 at 11:23 am

  9. anti armchair generals said,

    * mruffolo,
    Thanks, only 4 men only colleges in country. Masschusetts alone has 7women-only colleges. Since they are exempt from Title IX, multi million lawsuits are filed against coed colleges for all kinds of issues. If Title IX is so great as feminist claim, why don’t they set an example by obeying the Constituion.
    Former Department of Justice official, Jessica Gavora, has writen an article (and book) on Title IX
    http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-gavora013103.asp

    July 2, 2007 at 1:35 pm

  10. WLS said,

    The annoying response I frequently receive in my community is that I’m one of the very, very few people to hold my views.

    I’m a sore loser, they say: most people accept what they get in family court even if it’s not what they really wanted; someone has to lose, after all. I don’t respect my child, his mother, the `wisdom’ of the judges and experts. It’s not a public issue: I’ just trying to `use’ others just to wreck some sort of vengeance on my ex-wife.

    Of course it’s all to deflect from the substance of the points I’ve raised, but they are right that it’s rare for anyone else to speak out on the subject.

    July 2, 2007 at 8:33 pm

  11. anti armchair generals said,

    $25 milion Title IX lzawsuit against Univ. of Georgia reinstated by 11th Circuit
    http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200413800op2.pdf

    July 2, 2007 at 10:25 pm

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

MND Opinion
editor's bio | article rss | comments rss | itunes podcast | tos | privacy policy
MensNEWSdaily®, mndnet.com, BlogWonks.com™, BlogWonk.com™, NewsWax.com™, YakVox.com™, DorkWatch.org™, CounterPulse.com™, JavaKing.com™ © 2001 - 2006 Java King, Inc.. Opinions found on this website are expressly those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of this publication, its editorial staff or contributors. Words, graphics, audio, video, and all other content published on this domain must adhere to our Terms of Service . JAVA KING, INC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES, ADVERTISERS, SPONSORS AND AFFILIATES, DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, REPRESENTATIONS OR ENDORSEMENTS HEREIN EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.
Site Meter
RETURN TO MENS NEWS DAILY