Comments on: A Tale of Two Bike Rides: A Prime Example of Media Bias Against Father’s Rights Activists

By: anti armchair generals

anti armchair generals — Tue, 03 Jul 2007 04:25:26 +0000

$25 milion Title IX lzawsuit against Univ. of Georgia reinstated by 11th Circuit
http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200413800op2.pdf

By: WLS

WLS — Tue, 03 Jul 2007 02:33:48 +0000

The annoying response I frequently receive in my community is that I’m one of the very, very few people to hold my views.

I’m a sore loser, they say: most people accept what they get in family court even if it’s not what they really wanted; someone has to lose, after all. I don’t respect my child, his mother, the `wisdom’ of the judges and experts. It’s not a public issue: I’ just trying to `use’ others just to wreck some sort of vengeance on my ex-wife.

Of course it’s all to deflect from the substance of the points I’ve raised, but they are right that it’s rare for anyone else to speak out on the subject.

By: anti armchair generals

anti armchair generals — Mon, 02 Jul 2007 19:35:06 +0000

* mruffolo,
Thanks, only 4 men only colleges in country. Masschusetts alone has 7women-only colleges. Since they are exempt from Title IX, multi million lawsuits are filed against coed colleges for all kinds of issues. If Title IX is so great as feminist claim, why don’t they set an example by obeying the Constituion.
Former Department of Justice official, Jessica Gavora, has writen an article (and book) on Title IX
http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-gavora013103.asp

By: mruffolo

mruffolo — Mon, 02 Jul 2007 17:23:29 +0000

There are four (4) men only colleges in America: Deep Springs College, Hampden-Sydney College, Morehouse College, and Wabash College.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men%27s_colleges_in_the_United_States

There are fifty-seven (57) women only colleges in America.

http://www.womenscolleges.org/colleges/bycollege.htm

By: roadkill1965

roadkill1965 — Mon, 02 Jul 2007 17:12:17 +0000

One thing I try to do is join to any discussion from an online news article, to get our point of view out there. Some topics (eg: child-support, domestic violence, etc) can get pretty heated, and some of the male-bashing gets heavy, but I try to keep an even keel and type a short, concise, logical argument in rebuttal.

Elsewhere, I was pleasantly surprised to watch a major motion film, The Pursuit Of Happyness, and see how father-positive it was. Maybe we’re becoming more politically acceptable now. Soon, we can be victims too! (woo hoo)

By: WLS

WLS — Mon, 02 Jul 2007 02:40:20 +0000

While they won’t use news you bring to them, many smaller, local papers will publish letters to the editor if they aren’t too far out, like talking about hanging family court judges for treason. They often prefer anecdotal pieces from local residents.

The major, high circulation newspapers will very rarely or never print anything critical of family court, but most people read their local paper too, so if _everyone_ gets a letter in their local press from time the time, it helps the message get out.

Exploit any hook that presents itself: my most recent letter followed a story about teen pregnancy and a comment that fathers abandoning their children was much of the cause.

By: WLS

WLS — Mon, 02 Jul 2007 02:37:34 +0000

Clayton Giles unfortunately had the very worst possible luck with his timing: he had I believe almost reached DC on September 11, 2001; I never heard how his ride actually ended.

By: anti armchair generals

anti armchair generals — Mon, 02 Jul 2007 02:12:46 +0000

Link to Womens Collegege Coalition

http://www.womenscolleges.org/

I noticed that the address had changed from Washington, D.C. to Asylum Ave. in Harford ,CT. Perhaps it means that the inmates have take over the asylum.
But it has a serious side, after District Court dismissed a $25 Title IX lawsuit in Georgia, the appellate court reinstated it
if you go to Google and clik “news” in upper frame and ask for Title IX, you will see a boatload of puff pieces about womens side and rarely how unfairly mens sports are treated under Title IX. Even George Bush romised reforms as primary candidate, he has done nothin and now he praises Title IX. Perhaps its because he has two daughters and needs cannon fodder from men for his wars.

By: anti armchair generals

anti armchair generals — Mon, 02 Jul 2007 00:57:28 +0000

(post has jumped on its own about 3 times)Section 901 (a) 5 of Title IX exempt shcools which have been sexually segregated since their “Inception’. The Supreme Court in MUW v. Hogan (1982) ruled that Conngress has no power to “restric, abrogate,or dilute ” equal rotection
MUw v. Hogan
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=458&invol=718&friend=nytimes
“due process; does the same for federal government, Davis v. Passman

By: anti armchair generals

anti armchair generals — Mon, 02 Jul 2007 00:47:35 +0000

Why don’t you have a male apply to women-only Smith Co;;ege and if refused saying Section 901

By: amfortas

amfortas — Sun, 01 Jul 2007 16:33:13 +0000

Rinaldo, a great story. A suggestion: In the 4th July Parade, on your Float, why not have a big sign saying something like -

GREAT AMERICAN DADS, AS IGNORED AND MARGINALISED BY THE EAGLE.