I suspect that if marriage and divorce was not easy and profitable, family and relationships would be stronger.

It’s more difficult to get a driver’s license that a marriage license. The government’s schools (oublic schools) offer drivers education and sex education, but not marriage education.

The government hates family. It spends more time and resources on divorce, single mother rights and services, homo sex awareness, and abortion than family and fathers.

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

Signed by John Hancock, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Sam Adams, and a host of other Americans fed up with British pompous asses.

Methinks some British men ought to rid themselves of British pompous asses!

EXAMPLE:

all rise. judge high school harry presiding.

1st up – divorce. easy one give woman all, take all from man.
what else does she want? OK. manpay that too. Restraining order needed? OK.
no contact w/ children and the rest.

next

DV (EASIEST OF ALL) – man goes to jail, give woman literature, maybe money, etc., etc,

next

woman shoots man and blows him outside home w/ shotgun. man barely alive.
this one is a little harder – HMMMM. YES I HAVE IT. charge man w/ leaving scene. DV by him? wait till he gets better before you pick him up. might look bad.
does she need some counseling? No? OK. Probation then let ‘er go.

hs harry to himself- man this is some good job. how much did they say i would make? i need a sandwich and a nap. got those private quarters, sweet. sounds like break time to me. maybe 9 holes.

give me that hammer. court ajorned till 4:00.

daveinga: hey folks, this is about what we are getting now.
why all the education & respect if there are no precepts or ethics.
heck i bet a cave man could do it.

happy Independence Day!

No, the whole purpose of divorce is for lawyers and judges and other whores of the court to get rich while selfish and irresponsible women cash in their vaginas and hold out the children as mutilated beggars, and making the sham of justice continue to work depends on people going along with the idea that having a penis means you have no rights.

Or, in simpler terms, divorce is where men are held responsible for women’s irresponsibilty because he once had sex with her.

If a story like this doesn’t wake up men in general from their disillusionment about women as victims and what a joke our judiciaries have become, then nothing will.

Judges will start to exercise fair judgement when they are fewer and a lot of ex-Judges have met up with some men’s inner Darren!

It will happen. A visit from the Tailor and a fitting for a full metal jacket will concentrate the minds of the others wonderfully.

Iknow…. I know, Mike. I don’t advocate it, but the tide of history will see a lot of men take back justice and dole it out themselves.

I DO agree to be a wage-slave for the rest of my life, to be exploited and extorted for money, all my property, my inheritance, my dreams and my soul…

I DO agree that my life is over, should my vampire “soulmate” desire it.

I have agreed to lease a toxic vagina.

The contract is terminal.

True luv?

NYET

Will the court order her to perform wife duties – cook, clean, grocery shop?

Wait. Feminists claim those women are slaves of men if they perform household chores, as I am told that wives now compete in the marketplace.

Equal right have not trickled down to family courts from higher courts, however, I do not hear one feminist’s protest.

“From each according to his ability, to each according to his need”

No, it’s: From each according to his ability, to each according to HER need”

It looks like you can’t get rid of a wife if you are rich and she ends up poor. She doesn’t have your work ethics or talent so you get richer, she gets poorer, but hey, you did share time, sex, life with her once so you owe her forever?

The courts think they are just redistributing wealth but they are supporting treating women like infants and men like parents to women. I am sure the judge found many men and women to support his position. Few see the bigger picture where men become afraid to marry and women learn that there is always help available – like a pick pocket reaching into a rich man’s wallet to get what he was unable to earn. If a judge treated a case where it was the man coming back for more of HER money he would be laughed at and he might lose his job.

The developer husband’s PR staff probably had the item leaked to the press. I doubt the Judge, Clerk or Bailiff, or the wife notified to the press.

Because the husband was successful and a millionaire, the press ran the story.

Because children and families are involved, family courts ought to report their judgments.

(ref)

If you still have a doubt that modern Feminism has taken up a marriage of convenience with old-fashioned Marxism, then you haven’t been paying attention.

Take whatever recourse is available and get that judge ousted.