Comments on: Brussels Louts: UK to Transfer Sovereignty?

By: Artfldgr

Artfldgr — Mon, 09 Jul 2007 02:11:56 +0000

When former Soviet dictator Mikhail Gorbachev visited Britain in 2000, he accurately described the European Union as “the new European Soviet.” He said this with obvious approval, since he sees the evolving EU as fulfilling his vision of a “common European home” stretching “from the Atlantic to the Urals,” as he described it in his 1987 book Perestroika. Mr. Gorbachev is a lifelong Communist overlord who has steadfastly refused to renounce Communism.

In fact, he defiantly remains a Communist. On December 23, 1989, Gorbachev declared to his fellow Soviets, “I am a communist. For some that may be a fantasy. But for me it is my main goal.” On February 26, 1991, Gorbachev said, “I am not ashamed to say that I am a communist and adhere to the communist idea, and with this I will leave for the other world.” He has repeated these sentiments many times. In his book he also stated: “I frankly admit that we are glad that the idea of a ‘common European home’ finds understanding among prominent political and public figures of not only Eastern, but also Western Europe….”

It is highly significant that a top-level Marxist-Leninist such as Mikhail Gorbachev could find such affinity with Western leaders about a “common European home” and then, 13 years later, approvingly note that that common home was moving ever closer to the Soviet model. After all, hadn’t the Soviet model collapsed and died? But Mr. Gorbachev was, at least in this instance, telling the truth; the EU has been, and is now, moving steadily toward Soviet-style tyranny
The new european soviet
By Vilius Brazenas
The New American, September 6, 2004

By: amfortas

amfortas — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 03:43:01 +0000

The biggest British blunder in its entire history was revealed last year – and quickly glossed over. It came out of Cabinet Papers of 1946, embargoed under the 60 year rule. The French are finally getting what they have wanted for 700 years. The demise of Britainnia. And getting a feminine revenge to boot.

France is like a woman in National Character, and there is no fury like a woman scorned.

The French Prime minister in ‘46, secretly asked Britain if it would ‘take-over’ France. He wanted France to have the English King as Head of State and the whole country belong to the British Commonwealth. France was a basket-case at that time. Completely wrecked by war and riven with Nazis, Vichyites, Communists, Napoleonites, and latterly DeGallists with huge friggin’ noses. It’s treasury was empty, its overseas ‘possessions’ were revolting (Vietnam anyone?) and most of the available pretty woman had shaved heads rather than the shaved pudendas we have today.

Churchill told them to get fucked. (He probably used more erudite and witty language).

What a mistake. Europe would be a wholly different place today if Britain had had the nous to get in there and do a take over. Britain itself would be a wholly different place too and I hazard, a whole lot better than it is now.

As it is, the Mad-moselle was snubbed, and has taken her revenge.

Guess who was France’s main ally for those 700 years?

The friggin’ (Gordon Brown) SCOTs.

By: KushinLos

KushinLos — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 03:35:56 +0000

However I’m not sure we can even say that our cousins across the pond are sovereign in the first place. My doubts come from “The Evil Empire: 101 Ways that England ruined the World”.

If what was recorded in that book is true (as opposed to misunderstood or blatantly false) then the subjects of Great Britain are in no way sovereign themselves though their Queen and other royalty are.

By: CaptDMO

CaptDMO — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 00:33:34 +0000

Well golly,
If the Brit folks need to depose opressive governance they can
just take up arms and…..oh, wait….