<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Column: Obama&#8217;s Responsible Fatherhood Bill&#8211;Not Enough Carrot, Too Much Stick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/07/08/new-column-obamas-responsible-fatherhood-bill-not-enough-carrot-too-much-stick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/07/08/new-column-obamas-responsible-fatherhood-bill-not-enough-carrot-too-much-stick/</link>
	<description>Men&#039;s Rights Activism, MRA Politics, Analysis, Commentary and Global News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:26:43 -1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DadWith2Girls</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/07/08/new-column-obamas-responsible-fatherhood-bill-not-enough-carrot-too-much-stick/comment-page-1/#comment-46346</link>
		<dc:creator>DadWith2Girls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 00:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=896#comment-46346</guid>
		<description>I can sense the anguish of commentators here who want so much to cast their vote for a candidate that they might believe in when 2008 trudges around...

Imagine my dilemma ...

If Hillary gets the Dem nomination, then I have to VOTE REPUBLICAN!!!!

For the first time in my life.

And, unless there&#039;s a Green Party or Ralph Nader option, then I have to vote AGAINST MY PRINCIPLES just to keep that feminist vampire from achieiving the White House.

Democracy is indeed .... a cold bitch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can sense the anguish of commentators here who want so much to cast their vote for a candidate that they might believe in when 2008 trudges around&#8230;</p>
<p>Imagine my dilemma &#8230;</p>
<p>If Hillary gets the Dem nomination, then I have to VOTE REPUBLICAN!!!!</p>
<p>For the first time in my life.</p>
<p>And, unless there&#8217;s a Green Party or Ralph Nader option, then I have to vote AGAINST MY PRINCIPLES just to keep that feminist vampire from achieiving the White House.</p>
<p>Democracy is indeed &#8230;. a cold bitch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Stevens</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/07/08/new-column-obamas-responsible-fatherhood-bill-not-enough-carrot-too-much-stick/comment-page-1/#comment-46278</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 14:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=896#comment-46278</guid>
		<description>Well... if Obamie wants to get elected or any other &quot;politician&quot;( stiffled laugh) they had better get an attitude adjustment reguarding fathers and men.  Some one is going to have to tell these guy what the truth of the matter really is ??
They (politicians) seem to have no idea what is going on in the world around them and that includes the &quot;disaster&quot; that is the familycourt, child custody and child support systems.  They don&#039;t have an inkling as to how  unfair and unjust the system really is. I really believe ,they just don&#039;t give a shit.
The fact that the system is wrong means nothing to them, its a money maker and that is all they care about.  I think ,that if quite a few of these bastards lost their jobs for voting against fathers and men, then they would straighten up.  We would then have to put several million women in jail too.  Because they seem to have the same problem.  They just don&#039;t understand that wrong is wrong.
We have so many people in this country, because of the fraudulent &quot; legal system&quot; , who need to grow up socially,legally and morally.  They have been allowed to get away with things, that I never would even think of doing.  I know right and wrong and I also know that in Gods universe that if you do wrong, you will pay for it .  It won&#039;t matter how pretty and politically correct it was.  
Now.... ifa politician ever does staighten up , then vote for him.  I have one fellow in mind  Senator Ron Paul.  Now that fellow understand  which side is up and that we need to go back to the constitution.  Him I would vote for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230; if Obamie wants to get elected or any other &#8220;politician&#8221;( stiffled laugh) they had better get an attitude adjustment reguarding fathers and men.  Some one is going to have to tell these guy what the truth of the matter really is ??<br />
They (politicians) seem to have no idea what is going on in the world around them and that includes the &#8220;disaster&#8221; that is the familycourt, child custody and child support systems.  They don&#8217;t have an inkling as to how  unfair and unjust the system really is. I really believe ,they just don&#8217;t give a shit.<br />
The fact that the system is wrong means nothing to them, its a money maker and that is all they care about.  I think ,that if quite a few of these bastards lost their jobs for voting against fathers and men, then they would straighten up.  We would then have to put several million women in jail too.  Because they seem to have the same problem.  They just don&#8217;t understand that wrong is wrong.<br />
We have so many people in this country, because of the fraudulent &#8221; legal system&#8221; , who need to grow up socially,legally and morally.  They have been allowed to get away with things, that I never would even think of doing.  I know right and wrong and I also know that in Gods universe that if you do wrong, you will pay for it .  It won&#8217;t matter how pretty and politically correct it was.<br />
Now&#8230;. ifa politician ever does staighten up , then vote for him.  I have one fellow in mind  Senator Ron Paul.  Now that fellow understand  which side is up and that we need to go back to the constitution.  Him I would vote for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Knight</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/07/08/new-column-obamas-responsible-fatherhood-bill-not-enough-carrot-too-much-stick/comment-page-1/#comment-46226</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 21:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=896#comment-46226</guid>
		<description>Obama is just another shitheaded liberal.

Hopefully he won&#039;t hit upon the idea of amending the Antipeonage Act.

Of course they will ignore the obvious truth: most fathers abaondon their families the way a pirate forced to walk the plank abandons his ship!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is just another shitheaded liberal.</p>
<p>Hopefully he won&#8217;t hit upon the idea of amending the Antipeonage Act.</p>
<p>Of course they will ignore the obvious truth: most fathers abaondon their families the way a pirate forced to walk the plank abandons his ship!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/07/08/new-column-obamas-responsible-fatherhood-bill-not-enough-carrot-too-much-stick/comment-page-1/#comment-46222</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 20:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=896#comment-46222</guid>
		<description>You need to send this article to the courier press:

http://employees.courierpress.com/contacts.cfm?refer=courier#Direct%20Mail

As you likely know their coverage and blogs are not particularly informed about what is really at stake here. 

The bottom line is that the &quot;Fathers Responsibility Act&quot; makes fatherlessness sound like it is the fathers fault and this is far from truth - it is our governement&#039;s fault and the fault of some misguided individuals. Can you imagine a &quot;Mother&#039;s Responsibilty Act.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need to send this article to the courier press:</p>
<p><a href="http://employees.courierpress.com/contacts.cfm?refer=courier#Direct%20Mail" rel="nofollow">http://employees.courierpress.com/contacts.cfm?refer=courier#Direct%20Mail</a></p>
<p>As you likely know their coverage and blogs are not particularly informed about what is really at stake here. </p>
<p>The bottom line is that the &#8220;Fathers Responsibility Act&#8221; makes fatherlessness sound like it is the fathers fault and this is far from truth &#8211; it is our governement&#8217;s fault and the fault of some misguided individuals. Can you imagine a &#8220;Mother&#8217;s Responsibilty Act.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/07/08/new-column-obamas-responsible-fatherhood-bill-not-enough-carrot-too-much-stick/comment-page-1/#comment-46181</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 15:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=896#comment-46181</guid>
		<description>Glenn, the article in the Journal is top-notch journalism. I have shared it with a few of my friends - particularly those that support Obama - and while it did not presuade them otherwise - it clearly gae pause to each of them. In addition - they all had positive things to say about the article itself.

We clearly need to make Obama&#039;s projectionist attitudes towards fathers obvious to the public - my guess - his policies and concepts are not going to help fatherhood in this country, in the least. He is going about it from a &quot;hurt-Puppy-Dog&#039;s&quot; angle and this is clearly going to bring about some hidden bias against dads - no matter how much he tries to hide it in rhetoric.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn, the article in the Journal is top-notch journalism. I have shared it with a few of my friends &#8211; particularly those that support Obama &#8211; and while it did not presuade them otherwise &#8211; it clearly gae pause to each of them. In addition &#8211; they all had positive things to say about the article itself.</p>
<p>We clearly need to make Obama&#8217;s projectionist attitudes towards fathers obvious to the public &#8211; my guess &#8211; his policies and concepts are not going to help fatherhood in this country, in the least. He is going about it from a &#8220;hurt-Puppy-Dog&#8217;s&#8221; angle and this is clearly going to bring about some hidden bias against dads &#8211; no matter how much he tries to hide it in rhetoric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
