A reader’s letter intrigues me. He writes, “I find everything you say about a coming New World Order and One World Government extremely difficult to believe. For one thing, while you yourself obviously display no hate towards anyone, most other conspiracy theorists are anti-Semites.” He further wrote, “An intelligent man such as yourself would do well to distance yourself from these loony theories.”
I will quickly acknowledge that unfortunately there are a significant number of conspiracy theories promulgated by people with obvious anti-Semitic tendencies. I join my reader friend in repudiating such bigotry.
However, just because certain conspiracy theories are advocated by people with personal agendas and extremist ideologies is not reason enough to automatically dismiss the facts that suggest there is a conspiracy to steal America’s sovereignty and independence. These facts are plentiful and powerful. Only foolish people would dismiss them out-of-hand.
As a Christian, I believe the Word of God to be my source of faith and practice. Therefore, I must take seriously the Word’s admonition that, “There is a conspiracy” (Ezek. 22:25). In fact, the conspiracy to overthrow righteousness (and any semblance of it) is ubiquitous.
Furthermore, if one will study American history, he will note our Founding Fathers firmly believed a conspiracy of influential internationalists was behind many of the draconian decisions of old King George. They said as much in the Declaration of Independence.
In the Declaration, Thomas Jefferson wrote, “But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.” If that isn’t a clear reference to conspiracy, I don’t know what is.
As in British-controlled America 200 years ago, policies advanced by like-minded politicos today attempt to erode our constitutional laws and national independence. Only a naïve person would suggest that this is mere coincidence. I remind my readers that George Bush, Sr. first popularized the name “New World Order.” However, he is not the only notable personality that has openly called for such an international order.
Former newsman, Walter Cronkite, has openly called for world government. Others calling for world government include England’s Prime Minister, Tony Blair; former Clinton cabinet member, Strobe Talbott; and a variety of spokesmen for the United Nations, as well as leaders from various multinational corporations. To think that all of these people (whose numbers are multitudinous) should not be taken seriously is the height of idiocy.
Yes, my friends, there is a conspiracy. No, it is not a Jewish conspiracy. It is much more than that. It is a conspiracy of elitists from all races and ethnic backgrounds who deeply despise our constitutional form of government, our national independence, and our Christian heritage. Some are communists; others are socialists. Some call themselves liberals, and some even call themselves conservatives. Labels mean little.
Most of the conspirators are wealthy and well positioned to advance their utopian ideas. Some teach in our nation’s colleges and universities. Some occupy powerful positions in the media and in our political institutions. Some of them are also found behind the pulpits of churches, and, yes, some are found in synagogues.
The promoters of internationalism may not conduct monthly meetings. They may not carry New World Order membership cards in their wallets (albeit, if they are members of the Council of Foreign Relations, people who love liberty should be very wary of them), but collectively they form a credible conspiracy to rob America of its independence. Furthermore, as long as patriotic Americans refuse to acknowledge their existence, the more effective they are at accomplishing their oligarchic objectives.
Rate this post:
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading ...
Stumble It!
jjtaup said,
July 13, 2007 at 6:08 pm
CaptDMO said,
“They Live”
Sadly, those “glasses of clarity” tend to give the normally duped user a headache.j
July 13, 2007 at 8:07 pm
infidel said,
To the guy who said: “An intelligent man such as yourself would do well to distance yourself from these loony theories.”
An intelligent man will examine the facts and not worry about what other people think is loony. But to ignore the issue could well be loony given what is at stake.
July 13, 2007 at 9:54 pm
sc567 said,
#3 infidel, July 13, 2007 at 9:54 pm:
I’m keeping an open mind. Given the number of actual conspiracies throughout history, it should not surprise us.
To the guy who said: “An intelligent man such as yourself would do well to distance yourself from these loony theories.”
An intelligent man will examine the facts and not worry about what other people think is loony. But to ignore the issue could well be loony given what is at stake.
Very, very well said!
You need hours of reading and listening (radio shows, talks on the internet) before the whole picture starts to unfold. And man is it big. This thingie hasn’t been going for some decades but century. Mayor players: aristocracy and priestarchy. The latter one has been replaced with the temples of ‘truth’ we call universities. Aristocracy has gone underground; some ‘theorists’ point out all of the 43 US presidents can be traced back to aristocracy; Bush and Kerry are supposedly cousins (?!).
Jew
The jewish thing: as I understand it, the original word ‘jew’ (about 500 years ago I guess) had nothing to do with people from judea or people in judaism. It supposedly derived from judge.
Sorry no sources yet, but I encourage all of you to read around. Lot of crap, but the picture starts to unfold gradually. It’s kind of unbelievable.
July 14, 2007 at 5:19 am
conservativation said,
July 14, 2007 at 6:27 pm
conservativation said,
July 14, 2007 at 6:28 pm
amfortas said,
I can see where people might see it as a ‘wrong’ being as any cooperative movement includes the giving-up of complete autonomy. But there is no such thing as complete autonomy. That in itself is the faux-utopia.
The human race has gathered together from disparate and separate family groups, tribes, nations of related peoples, States, Blocs, all heading slowly and inexorably in the same direction. The ability of previous era people to move away when they didn’t want the connecting (they wanted their sutonomy) was based on small population and a comparatively empty sphere, - there was space to move away into) - but that very spherical attribute of the Planet means that as population grows, we necessarily move toward now rather than away. Cooperation and connection is forcing a greater need for further, deeper connection and eventual coherence.
It will soon be, if not already, One World. It is prudent to consider a One World system of Governance, even if we are not ready for it yet. The West sees ithe World’s future governance, rightly, approximately, as a Democratic one, but there are competing views and even democracy as we know and practice it may not be up to it.
Inernet connectivity may well allow Real Democracy where ‘representative’ government is passe and everyone can form a decision-making body. Roll on the day when elected Government Officials have no more power than the people give them and become the servants of the people that they are supposed to be.
July 14, 2007 at 8:45 pm
infidel said,
July 14, 2007 at 9:58 pm
infidel said,
If a movement relies on secrecy because people would not support it otherwise, then it is a conspiracy even if it is a social movement.
July 14, 2007 at 10:06 pm
amfortas said,
July 15, 2007 at 1:12 am
infidel said,
The conspirators are those with power (money, political power, influence) who try to dupe us behind our backs. If it’s all out in the open it’s not a conspiracy.
July 15, 2007 at 2:15 am
amfortas said,
What is meant by ‘people’? Many ‘people’ do support the idea, and it isn’t a very well kept secret.
The effect of leaders such as Churchill - many, many others too - has an impact on the minutae of history, for sure. But they have hardly altered the developmental thrust I spoke about in #7 para 3.
July 15, 2007 at 2:35 am
infidel said,
Many people support more international co-operation on issues like global warming (because of the perceived man-made crisis) and free trade, but I don’t think very many would go far enough to support one world government.
But let’s suppose that many people do support a one world government. What form would this government take? Communist? A dictatorship? A democracy? Who would control it? If the people pushing for this want an undemocratic system they won’t do it in the open because the people of the West would oppose it.
So new trade agreements and certain international co-operative efforts are out in the open, but are there leaders who have further plans than what they are telling us about? If so, there is an element of conspiracy, i.e. secrecy.
July 15, 2007 at 11:02 am
Lurk said,
Trivia time: Can you translate the Latin “Novus Ordo Seclorum”? Who put it on the back of the US 1 Dollar bill?
The New World Order has been in the works for some time and it appears to have roots in Socialism.
July 16, 2007 at 9:25 am
amfortas said,
This is a crucial period in mankind’s history. The twin forces of individualism and communism are deep inside the human psyche and resolution will need a coalescence rather than a defeat of one by the other. Both have dark sides and adherents. Both have meritorious parts too.
The American Constitution is probably the most clear definition of what a new world order should create and preserve. Unfortunately Americans have been the only ones with that Constitution and have been busily dismantling it for well over a hundred years now.
The small window of opportunity that the western civilisation, lead by America for the past 60 years, had for determining the shape of the future is closing. It may be that the future is lost.
July 16, 2007 at 9:48 am
anti armchair generals said,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory
When US helped Fidel Castro overthrow the existing governmen, did he have a “conspiracy” in mindof turning Cuba to a Communist nation?
During Russian revolution the leadin factions were Bolsheviks and Mensheviks. Did they have “worker’s paradise” in mind or ulterior motive?
Are off- shore based currency speculators trying to make only profit or is omething more sinister in mind?
There are many more theories, but newsmdia either ifnores them or ae ordered by owners to suppress the stories? Like I said earlier, I saw a slogan.
FREEDOM OF THE PRESS BELONGS TO THOSE WHO OWN THE PRESSES
July 16, 2007 at 10:51 am
anti armchair generals said,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory#Examples_of_common_conspiracy_theories
July 16, 2007 at 11:02 am