http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory

When US helped Fidel Castro overthrow the existing governmen, did he have a “conspiracy” in mindof turning Cuba to a Communist nation?

During Russian revolution the leadin factions were Bolsheviks and Mensheviks. Did they have “worker’s paradise” in mind or ulterior motive?

Are off- shore based currency speculators trying to make only profit or is omething more sinister in mind?

There are many more theories, but newsmdia either ifnores them or ae ordered by owners to suppress the stories? Like I said earlier, I saw a slogan.

FREEDOM OF THE PRESS BELONGS TO THOSE WHO OWN THE PRESSES

This is a crucial period in mankind’s history. The twin forces of individualism and communism are deep inside the human psyche and resolution will need a coalescence rather than a defeat of one by the other. Both have dark sides and adherents. Both have meritorious parts too.

The American Constitution is probably the most clear definition of what a new world order should create and preserve. Unfortunately Americans have been the only ones with that Constitution and have been busily dismantling it for well over a hundred years now.

The small window of opportunity that the western civilisation, lead by America for the past 60 years, had for determining the shape of the future is closing. It may be that the future is lost.

Trivia time: Can you translate the Latin “Novus Ordo Seclorum”? Who put it on the back of the US 1 Dollar bill?

The New World Order has been in the works for some time and it appears to have roots in Socialism.

Many people support more international co-operation on issues like global warming (because of the perceived man-made crisis) and free trade, but I don’t think very many would go far enough to support one world government.

But let’s suppose that many people do support a one world government. What form would this government take? Communist? A dictatorship? A democracy? Who would control it? If the people pushing for this want an undemocratic system they won’t do it in the open because the people of the West would oppose it.

So new trade agreements and certain international co-operative efforts are out in the open, but are there leaders who have further plans than what they are telling us about? If so, there is an element of conspiracy, i.e. secrecy.

What is meant by ‘people’? Many ‘people’ do support the idea, and it isn’t a very well kept secret.

The effect of leaders such as Churchill – many, many others too – has an impact on the minutae of history, for sure. But they have hardly altered the developmental thrust I spoke about in #7 para 3.

The conspirators are those with power (money, political power, influence) who try to dupe us behind our backs. If it’s all out in the open it’s not a conspiracy.

If a movement relies on secrecy because people would not support it otherwise, then it is a conspiracy even if it is a social movement.

I can see where people might see it as a ‘wrong’ being as any cooperative movement includes the giving-up of complete autonomy. But there is no such thing as complete autonomy. That in itself is the faux-utopia.

The human race has gathered together from disparate and separate family groups, tribes, nations of related peoples, States, Blocs, all heading slowly and inexorably in the same direction. The ability of previous era people to move away when they didn’t want the connecting (they wanted their sutonomy) was based on small population and a comparatively empty sphere, – there was space to move away into) – but that very spherical attribute of the Planet means that as population grows, we necessarily move toward now rather than away. Cooperation and connection is forcing a greater need for further, deeper connection and eventual coherence.

It will soon be, if not already, One World. It is prudent to consider a One World system of Governance, even if we are not ready for it yet. The West sees ithe World’s future governance, rightly, approximately, as a Democratic one, but there are competing views and even democracy as we know and practice it may not be up to it.

Inernet connectivity may well allow Real Democracy where ‘representative’ government is passe and everyone can form a decision-making body. Roll on the day when elected Government Officials have no more power than the people give them and become the servants of the people that they are supposed to be.

#3 infidel, July 13, 2007 at 9:54 pm:
I’m keeping an open mind. Given the number of actual conspiracies throughout history, it should not surprise us.

To the guy who said: “An intelligent man such as yourself would do well to distance yourself from these loony theories.”

An intelligent man will examine the facts and not worry about what other people think is loony. But to ignore the issue could well be loony given what is at stake.

Very, very well said!

You need hours of reading and listening (radio shows, talks on the internet) before the whole picture starts to unfold. And man is it big. This thingie hasn’t been going for some decades but century. Mayor players: aristocracy and priestarchy. The latter one has been replaced with the temples of ‘truth’ we call universities. Aristocracy has gone underground; some ‘theorists’ point out all of the 43 US presidents can be traced back to aristocracy; Bush and Kerry are supposedly cousins (?!).
Jew

The jewish thing: as I understand it, the original word ‘jew’ (about 500 years ago I guess) had nothing to do with people from judea or people in judaism. It supposedly derived from judge.

Sorry no sources yet, but I encourage all of you to read around. Lot of crap, but the picture starts to unfold gradually. It’s kind of unbelievable.

To the guy who said: “An intelligent man such as yourself would do well to distance yourself from these loony theories.”

An intelligent man will examine the facts and not worry about what other people think is loony. But to ignore the issue could well be loony given what is at stake.