Hillary Clinton has cleavage?
Forget about the Stock Market Plunge and the Drunken Astronauts, the big news story of the week that has all the blogs a buzzing is the Legislative Cleavage of Former First Lady and Presidential Hopeful, Senator Hillary Clinton (D-NY).
Of all the things one could talk about where Senator Hillary Clinton is concerned, her cleavage is the last thing I would have ever thought about, so much so that I have never given it one single thougt, till now!
A recent article in the Washington Post style section about of all things, Hillary Clinton’s Cleavage has sparked outrage by those who support the Icy Queen of the Liberal Left.
WASHINGTON - Hillary Clinton’s handlers are so outraged - outraged! - at a newspaper story musing over her showing a little cleavage that they’re urging equally miffed supporters to fight back by stuffing cash into her coffers.
“Would you believe that The Washington Post wrote a 746-word article on Hillary’s cleavage?” senior campaign adviser Ann Lewis said yesterday in the fund-raising e-mail.“Frankly, focusing on women’s bodies instead of their ideas is insulting. It’s insulting to every woman who has ever tried to be taken seriously in a business meeting,” Lewis wrote.
The offending Post article appeared last week in the Style section after Clinton delivered a higher education speech on the Senate floor that was carried on C-SPAN2. The story’s focus wasn’t student loan policy.
“She was wearing a rose-colored blazer over a black top. The neckline sat low on her chest and had a subtle V-shape. The cleavage registered after only a quick glance. No scrunch-faced scrutiny was necessary,” The Post reported. “There wasn’t an unseemly amount of cleavage showing, but there it was. Undeniable.”
A longtime Democratic operative who is no Clinton fan said it wasn’t surprising that Team Hillary would try to generate a sympathy backlash - and then ask for cash to help ease the pain.
“She looks for every opportunity she can get to be the victim. It’s her playbook,” the party source said. “The question is whether Hillary-as-victim leaves her looking more like a martyr or a whiner.”
A Republican operative mocked the controversy as “a tempest in a B-cup.”
As a self proclaimed “Boob Man”, I can honestly tell you that I have never, ever looked at Hillary Clinton’s cleavage. Even after I read the article in the Washington Post, I said to myself….”Yuck Yuck, Pew Pew!!!”
I will admit that I have often wondered what Senator Clinton’s vagina would say if it had the power of speech. And if the first penis could talk, oh the stories that would tell!
As for you my loyal readers. I am giving you an important assignment. First of all, in the interest of humor and all that is disgusting, I ask that you caption the above Photo Shopped picture of Senator Clinton.
Your second assignment is to think long and hard about this……..If Hillary Clinton’s Vagina could speak, what would it say?
I’ll even give ya one to start with:
“Protest male chauvanism, donate to Hillary Clinton’s War Chest!”
Now you it’s your turn to pick up the ball and run with it!
Rate this post:
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading ...
Stumble It!
anti armchair generals said,
I trust you that photo of Hillary Clinton cleaveage is authentic and not air brushed or altered. Our state made upskirting illegal during the last session. Maybe down blowsing is next in line to make it a criminal offence. It would be difficult for a stuard or stuardess to put a plate or drik in front of Hillry without comiting an “inchoate crime”
TRJ, I’m in same league with you and find cleavage tempting to see. As to Hillary’s “Vagina Monolgues” it’s hard to speculate what the organ would reveal about Bill Clinton’s denial to later confession. In our state if spouse has intercourse with spouse after finding out about adultery, It’s no longer viable evidence. Link to “Inchoate Crime”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inchoate_offense
PS. Please note British spell offence with a “c’ Americans with a “s”
July 29, 2007 at 5:23 pm
steven deluca said,
It’s funny how an article can come out worrying about others seeing a woman as a “sex object” instead of the incredible androgynous women she really is. They are noticing her body while laughing at a presidental contender, a male, wearing lycra bike shorts (Why because he is showing a little buldge?) The idea that women are worse off because men have “given” them the power of being a sex object - at times while males are continually denigrated sexually by either bashing them in the balls for humor, or mocking any man who might dress in a way that some women might consider sexy - is something few discuss and because it’s men who are put down, who notices.
Many times I have heard women say to men in suits that they look very handsome while these same women will mock men in swimsuits and then turn right around and protest women being portrayed as sexual beings who are “attractive” to men and women. Ah, what an arsenal, you get to be the “attractive” sex propped up by male bashing and advertising that makes women look glorious and at the same time you get to protest how you are being seen as the “attractive” sex while denigrating those who notice. Double whammy.
I was thinking about this while at the beach with my wife a few hours ago. There were many overweight people there, both men and women, but there were more obese men than women and more young women in good shape than young man.
How does a male being brought up that women’s breasts are a female power tool to be treated wth awe … that if he is “lucky” or “gets lucky” he can get to second base… that breast should always be respected, never disrespected - while his own gender is told they are “not worthy” of the same sexual respect? How do these pudgy teen boys growing up in America - who grow to be sloppy looking men, who are never taught that male bodies can be beautiful with minimual daily care (another cookie mommy, I love you too) and some discipline (No more beer I am only drinking a six pack today) feel equal in the bedroom to females … I do wonder how such men can be good lovers or feel any sense of equality in the bedroom when men’s bodies continually are shown as fat dorks - and women’s more like Victoria’s secret and even if both are chubby she has the vagina (vagina m raising this sexual organ to heights unknown to a penis) Of course we don’t see the average women in Safeway looking “spectacular” or desirable, but in advertising and cartoons, women’s bodies rock, men’s bodyies suck, end of story.
Hillary’s cleavage, a problem for a presidential candidate? Is that the real problem, or is this just another chance to get the feminist view of gender and politics. You can beat she liked the attention she got from showing a little and you can bet she “got off” on trashing others for reducing her to tits. But did anyone really do that, or did they just comment on her intential showing of a bit of clevage … She decided to show a little - she knew, so why make that choice? To do that does have some relevance in a world where women dress to be looked at, and for power, and at the same time get to say “what the fuck are you looking at you pervert” … Some of us do know that this isn’t just a black and white story and that “women’s ways” are part of the Hillary agenda.
July 29, 2007 at 7:50 pm
anti armchair generals said,
You made good points that I had not even thought of. Remainds me about the movie”Kiss of the Spiderwoman”
http://www.enotes.com/kiss-spider/
Also TV documentary loosely based on true story “Soldier’s Girl”. Sometimes things are not as they seem. Richard Chamberlain on TV about his relationship said actors are “Illusionist”. Maybe politicians are the same way.
July 29, 2007 at 9:46 pm
amfortas said,
Let’s eroticise noses and watch the exhibitionist gender find as many ways that it can to ‘peek a boo’.
Meanwhile we can look for the complaints and 700 word articles about the old and young guys competing for the Presidency, showing their chest hair.
Bring back floor length dresses, I say, so we can catch a glimpse of ankles. Arghh, ankles. I must away to a private room.
July 29, 2007 at 10:35 pm
anti armchair generals said,
Hypothetical question. If a waiter at State Dinner accidentally dropped a hot potato down Hillarys’ cleavage, should he tried to reach for it with his own hand And if misunderstood be charged as sexual predator) or should he let Secret Service rip Hillary’s blouse and bra off so she would not bet burn marks.
Also, since Hillary, unike Brittany Spears has not shown to paparazzis if she shaves “Down Under’ How far could the Secret Service go?
Link to Brttany Spears picture
http://www.hogwild.net/Bubbles/20070224-britney-spears-no-panties-shaved-head-funny-myspace-pictures-01.htm
July 30, 2007 at 12:40 am
jackal1994 said,
July 31, 2007 at 2:53 pm