Comments on: New Column: Maine’s Adoption of Primary Aggressor Doctrine in DV Arrests Will Ensnare Innocent Men http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/08/06/new-column-maine%e2%80%99s-adoption-of-primary-aggressor-doctrine-in-dv-arrests-will-ensnare-innocent-men/ Men's Rights Activism, MRA Politics, Analysis, Commentary and Global News Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:12:57 -1000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Ray Blumhorst http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/08/06/new-column-maine%e2%80%99s-adoption-of-primary-aggressor-doctrine-in-dv-arrests-will-ensnare-innocent-men/comment-page-1/#comment-49355 Ray Blumhorst Tue, 07 Aug 2007 17:34:25 +0000 http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=987#comment-49355 When it comes to Amerikan government, domestic violence, and VAWA, it helps to understand from the start that Amerika is nothing more than a hate movement against men. Femi Klux Klanners and Feminazis control this area of government with evil tyrannical power, and the rest of the elected politicians just acquiesce to every evil lie and scam coming from the devilish tyrants like blood sucking toadies they truly are. When it comes to Amerikan government, domestic violence, and VAWA, it helps to understand from the start that Amerika is nothing more than a hate movement against men. Femi Klux Klanners and Feminazis control this area of government with evil tyrannical power, and the rest of the elected politicians just acquiesce to every evil lie and scam coming from the devilish tyrants like blood sucking toadies they truly are.

]]> By: mruffolo http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/08/06/new-column-maine%e2%80%99s-adoption-of-primary-aggressor-doctrine-in-dv-arrests-will-ensnare-innocent-men/comment-page-1/#comment-49349 mruffolo Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:57:33 +0000 http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=987#comment-49349 New York City Council legislation to make illegal saying "bitch" or "ho". "The term is hateful and deeply sexist, said Councilwoman Darlene Mealy of Brooklyn, who has introduced a measure against the word, saying it creates “a paradigm of shame and indignity” for all women." http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/07/nyregion/07bword.html?ei=5090&en=8bb9b60b7da0d2ed&ex=1344139200&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=print Feminist (man bad, woman good) legislation New York City Council legislation to make illegal saying “bitch” or “ho”.

“The term is hateful and deeply sexist, said Councilwoman Darlene Mealy of Brooklyn, who has introduced a measure against the word, saying it creates “a paradigm of shame and indignity” for all women.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/07/nyregion/07bword.html?ei=5090&en=8bb9b60b7da0d2ed&ex=1344139200&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=print

Feminist (man bad, woman good) legislation

]]> By: John Dias http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/08/06/new-column-maine%e2%80%99s-adoption-of-primary-aggressor-doctrine-in-dv-arrests-will-ensnare-innocent-men/comment-page-1/#comment-49279 John Dias Tue, 07 Aug 2007 04:52:19 +0000 http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=987#comment-49279 This kind of legislation is exactly why I created my Web site, <a href="http://www.dontmakehermad.com/" rel="nofollow">DontMakeHerMad.com</a>, to teach men how to "prove innocence" in the event that they are ever falsely accused. If you live in an abusive household, or if your partner may be having an affair, you are a prime candidate for a false allegation. Do NOT leave the house abruptly unless your safety is threatened; it will be considered willful abandonment. As my Web site says, <b>use surveillance techniques</b> to document a pattern of abuses. There are many ways to do this without arousing suspicion. And if you have kids, you had better do something like this or risk losing them to your abusive partner (which makes them the newest targets of the wife's abuses -- whether physical, emotional, or both). Abusive women and cheating women must be demonstrated to be abusers, and in the face of a primary aggressor law, only surveillance presents a sure-fire reliable way to deflect false criminal charges away from oneself. This kind of legislation is exactly why I created my Web site, DontMakeHerMad.com, to teach men how to “prove innocence” in the event that they are ever falsely accused. If you live in an abusive household, or if your partner may be having an affair, you are a prime candidate for a false allegation. Do NOT leave the house abruptly unless your safety is threatened; it will be considered willful abandonment. As my Web site says, use surveillance techniques to document a pattern of abuses. There are many ways to do this without arousing suspicion. And if you have kids, you had better do something like this or risk losing them to your abusive partner (which makes them the newest targets of the wife’s abuses — whether physical, emotional, or both).

Abusive women and cheating women must be demonstrated to be abusers, and in the face of a primary aggressor law, only surveillance presents a sure-fire reliable way to deflect false criminal charges away from oneself.

]]> By: cjo http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/08/06/new-column-maine%e2%80%99s-adoption-of-primary-aggressor-doctrine-in-dv-arrests-will-ensnare-innocent-men/comment-page-1/#comment-49267 cjo Tue, 07 Aug 2007 02:29:57 +0000 http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=987#comment-49267 To what extent must the injuries be to the primary aggressor before there is equivocal evidence that HE is not the aggressor? Near death? Maimed? Mortal? Is this statute basically a license to kill for a women, requiring only a simple rational explanation of fearfulness? To what extent must the injuries be to the primary aggressor before there is equivocal evidence that HE is not the aggressor? Near death? Maimed? Mortal?

Is this statute basically a license to kill for a women, requiring only a simple rational explanation of fearfulness?

]]> By: veritas http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/08/06/new-column-maine%e2%80%99s-adoption-of-primary-aggressor-doctrine-in-dv-arrests-will-ensnare-innocent-men/comment-page-1/#comment-49261 veritas Tue, 07 Aug 2007 01:41:35 +0000 http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=987#comment-49261 the femi-porkers in the domestic violence racket should have to face the families they have destroyed!! Turn youre anger into effective action!! support and promote the mens activism movement!! the femi-porkers in the domestic violence racket should have to face the families they have destroyed!!

Turn youre anger into effective action!! support and promote the mens activism movement!!

]]> By: amfortas http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/08/06/new-column-maine%e2%80%99s-adoption-of-primary-aggressor-doctrine-in-dv-arrests-will-ensnare-innocent-men/comment-page-1/#comment-49260 amfortas Tue, 07 Aug 2007 01:30:51 +0000 http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=987#comment-49260 Maine is following Tasmania. Here the Police do the same thing with a 'tick the box ' form which includes items such as being unemployed being depressed and expressing innocence at being arrested. Points are awarded for around thirty issues, few of which have anything to do with the incident. The man is automatically arrested in 97% of the cases and NO BAIL is permitted. Objecting to arrest carries points. Claiming innocence carries points. The police on the spot fill in the form with no input from health professionals. It can take three months to be brought before a magistrate and that depends upon the man signing an undertaking and 'proving' that he is no future 'threat', during which time those who are employed lose their jobs as well as their family. Of course, it all goes against the man in any Family Court case. Just how can one 'prove' a future negative? Maine is following Tasmania. Here the Police do the same thing with a ‘tick the box ‘ form which includes items such as being unemployed being depressed and expressing innocence at being arrested. Points are awarded for around thirty issues, few of which have anything to do with the incident. The man is automatically arrested in 97% of the cases and NO BAIL is permitted. Objecting to arrest carries points. Claiming innocence carries points. The police on the spot fill in the form with no input from health professionals. It can take three months to be brought before a magistrate and that depends upon the man signing an undertaking and ‘proving’ that he is no future ‘threat’, during which time those who are employed lose their jobs as well as their family. Of course, it all goes against the man in any Family Court case. Just how can one ‘prove’ a future negative?

]]> By: fourthwire http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/08/06/new-column-maine%e2%80%99s-adoption-of-primary-aggressor-doctrine-in-dv-arrests-will-ensnare-innocent-men/comment-page-1/#comment-49256 fourthwire Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:44:51 +0000 http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=987#comment-49256 So..... under this misandry-laden bit of public policy, a woman can decide that she's wants a free ride with no responsibilities by calling the police to report that her husband attacked her, then hanging up and attacking her husband, reporting that any wounds on him were infliced through "self-defense", even if he's mortally injured. Either way, men lose. And yet another good reason not to marry in America. So….. under this misandry-laden bit of public policy, a woman can decide that she’s wants a free ride with no responsibilities by calling the police to report that her husband attacked her, then hanging up and attacking her husband, reporting that any wounds on him were infliced through “self-defense”, even if he’s mortally injured.

Either way, men lose. And yet another good reason not to marry in America.

]]>