lumigan tramadol tadalafil

Have Christians Already Accepted The Mark Of The Beast?

2007-08-14
By

Christians throughout church history have debated the nuances of Eschatology. These debates will doubtless last until Jesus Himself decides to end them. Until then, the theological battles extolling or condemning premillennialism or postmillennialism, pre-tribulation Rapture or post-tribulation Rapture, etc., will continue. To be sure, this column is not an attempt to resolve or even argue these interpretations of Scripture. Let every man be persuaded in his own heart. Personally, I don’t think it’s worth arguing about.

Whether a Christian is premillennial or postmillennial, whether he or she believes in the pre-tribulation Rapture or not is immaterial to our responsibilities. We Christians have a duty to be the “salt” and “light” of society until Jesus returns–whenever that is. And, frankly, the time of His return is His business, not ours. If we would concentrate on those matters that truly belong to us, we would be much more effective. Arguing and battling between Christians over the nuances of Eschatology only serves to advance the cause of the Enemy. It is counterproductive and fruitless to anything worthwhile.

That being said, a brief reference to the belief that a literal antichrist is yet to come is in order. Accepting this interpretation of the Book of Revelation, there will come in the days of “great tribulation” a Western World leader, known as the antichrist, or beast. Christians accepting this interpretation believe that the antichrist will unite the Western World, mainly Europe and the United States, and will implement a satanic despotism.

Part of the antichrist’s reign upon the Western World (called, by some, The Revived Roman Empire) will be the demand that everyone accept “the mark of the beast” in his hand or forehead. Of course, the number Scripture uses is 666. Everyone who does not accept this mark will be deemed to be an outlaw: unable to buy or sell, or contract normal daily business of any kind. However, acceptance of the mark will also mean rejection of God and salvation.

Premillennialists believe they will be “raptured” to Heaven before these events take place. Some believe the church will go through the “great tribulation,” while most postillennialists don’t believe in a literal “tribulation” at all, but believe these Scriptures are related to other events altogether.

Regardless of how one interprets the Book of Revelation, I think most all believers will accept the Apostle John’s warning that the spirit of antichrist is already in the world. (I John 2:18; 4:3) Can we not readily agree that anything that resembles antichrist is a form of antichrist?

Accordingly, did not the German church have an obligation to resist Adolph Hitler? Of course they did. However, at the end of the day, out of over 14,000 pastors and church congregations in Germany at the time, only 800 properly discerned the evil Hitler for who he was and openly opposed him. The rest not only tolerated him, but openly praised him, promoted him, and punished anyone who failed to do the same.

Yet, Hitler definitely personified the spirit of antichrist. While publicly professing to be a Christian, he privately disdained Christians and was caught up in secret societies and the occult. He was driven to lead Germany into preemptive wars of aggression. He cast off Germany’s republican form of government and consolidated power unto himself. He implemented a total surveillance society in the name of national security. He was so completely accepted and adored by Germany’s churchmen that German congregations were told that in order to be good Christians they had to be good Nazis and that to support any other political party than Hitler’s was to fight against God. He enacted strict gun control laws. Why did Germany’s pastors and Christians not recognize Hitler for who he was?

Can we not say that, in their own way, Germany’s pastors and churches accepted the mark of the beast? Sure they did. No, Hitler was not THE antichrist, but he certainly exemplified the spirit of antichrist. As such, he deserved to be resisted.

However, before we become too judgmental toward the Christians of 1930′s Germany, we should look in the mirror. Are not many Christians in these United States behaving in the exact same manner? Have not many of us already embraced the spirit of antichrist? And if so, have we not, in our own way, already accepted the mark of the beast? Sure we have.

Many pastors and Christians embrace the authoritarian policies of one George W. Bush with the same enthusiasm and blind loyalty as Germans did Hitler. For example, according to White House insiders, while publicly embracing conservative Christians, the White House is privately said to have nothing but disdain for Christians. Mr. Bush acknowledged being a member of Skull & Bones, a secret society with a dark history. Others have reported that he is a member of Bohemian Grove, which, according to some, is an occultist society of the most sinister variety. Yet, all of this is rejected out of hand by most Christians today.

Plus, George W. Bush (as did Adolph Hitler) has led America into a preemptive and aggressive war against a foreign nation without provocation. Now, there is even talk at the White House of expanding the war in Iraq with attacks against Iran and Syria, and maybe even Pakistan. In addition, he is in the process of turning America into a Hitlerian surveillance society where our every move, phone call, and email are being monitored by federal police agencies.

Yet, conservative Christians are still so infatuated with President Bush that they actually believe that anyone who resists the President is resisting God. They further believe that if anyone votes for any candidate who is not a Republican (Bush’s party), they are fighting against God. They gladly surrender their constitutional liberties and safeguards. They enthusiastically support an unconstitutional war in Iraq and would no doubt support expanding the war to wherever Bush decided. They happily cede Bush the power to tap their phones, read their emails, or open their mail (without warrant or court order, no less).

Regardless of one’s politics or religion, the spirit of Big Brother, the spirit of military aggression, the spirit of occultism, the spirit of a police state mentality, the spirit of deception are all part of the spirit of antichrist.

Therefore, whether one identifies himself as a premillennialist or a postmillennialist or anything in between; whether we believe in a Rapture or not; no matter what our understanding of Eschatology might be, every Christian has a duty to “resist the devil” in any form in which he reveals himself. And that certainly means that any political leader, regardless of party, who embodies or exemplifies the spirit of antichrist, must be resisted. Anything less means to accept, in a way, the mark of the beast.

19 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • conservativation

    Baldwin, I wish you’d stop posting here. You are offensively arrogant, a socialist wrapped in evangelical cloth, and suffer Bush Hatred syndrome as bad as anyone on daily kos or huffington. Go there, you’ll be welcome sir.
    I’m no blind Bushbot, but your rantings are way out there past the line seperating reality from fantasy…paranoid fantasy.
    If you actually lead a church you might start by telling them to stay married, and love one another. Preaching your macro themes is an exercise in ego masturbation.

  • nighthawk

    Rev 13:17
    “And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.”

    Quran 9:29
    “Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. ”

    “Fight against such of those who have been given the Scripture as believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, and forbid not that which Allah hath forbidden by His messenger, and follow not the Religion of Truth, until they pay the tribute readily, being brought low. ”

    “Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Messenger have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection. ”

    Yep.

    Sure looks like the mark of the beast is the Jizya tax imposed upon tha Kafir.

    Thanks for clarifying this for us Chuck.

  • The Biscuit Queen

    George W Bush the antichrist? Explains how he caused hurricane Katrina and the 911 attacks.

    Geez, what a stretch. You want a better comparison? Sadam to Hitler. Each killing millions of his own people out of spite. Whatever your complaints about Bush going into Iraq, you cannot defend Sadam as some benevolant leader who was attacked without provocation. The man was a sicko.

    The US invading Iraq is not the same as Hitler invading Poland, not one bit.

  • tv2112

    I like Bush. At least he has the balls to stand his ground. He beats the heck out of John “Herman Munster” Kerry and Al “I invented the internet and pants” Gore. In fact, most Dems scare the crap out of me. Billary Clinton, Pelosi, Murtha, Mrs. Edwards all downright creep me out. As to this post…I feel dumber for having read it. I’m going to beat my head on the keyboard a few minutes to try and recover those cells lost. wow.

  • NHTom

    I wouldn’t trust GW to the ends of the Earth – but he’s no anti-christ.

    I’ll add my voice to the “this is dumb” crowd.

  • JohnG

    I didn’t point out also, that because a tool (like a gun) can be misused (as in an execution of three college kids) is not necessarily a reason to get rid of it. You mentioned wiretapping – which incidentally has been going on for decades now – I think that the best you can hope for is that it will not be abused, but otherwise, if used right will save lives. I don’t know why you even brought this up. Google is saving every bit of email and every web search you do already. Some expectation of privacy on the internet (do Zabasearch on yourself) is assinine.

  • JohnG

    I’m no Bush fan, but there is a number of mistakes here.

    The affairs of governments (men) and the wars here and there have nothing to do with the Kingdom of God. Jesus never said anything about the Roman Occupation. John the Baptist gave three admonishments to a Roman soldier: Don’t accuse falsely, don’t extort money and don’t gripe about your pay – NOT “don’t serve evil Rome.” In fact, the Hebrews of old seemed to make out just fine till they insisted they had to have a king – which was great for all of 1 1/2 reigns, and then all went to hell in a handbasket.

    Christians living within a corrupt form of government without openly rebelling is hardly accepting the beast. I suppose by your logic, the Christian revolution in China – which is worse than any single example you can point out about the Bush administration – is bogus, because they do not openly rebel or oppose that government – tantamount to espousing the methodology of a hard core communist government. I don’t remember that many examples of many of my Christian ancestry going out of their way to provoke Rome – maybe not getting fed to the lions is better.

    The Organized Church is being more corrupted as I type in any case. Blatant apostasy is rampant. Pedophiles in the clergy. Entire denominations espouse abomination. Church leaders of huge denominations fancy themselves members of the Councel on Foreign Relations, or worse, jump on the Global Warming bandwagon – which is nowhere listed in the bible, particularly related to end times.

    Christians will not be able to stop any of the things that you listed above. The prince of this world is who he is and script is already written. Go with God and quit worrying about if voting for Bush is the same as accepting the beast. Its not.

  • Squiggy

    I believe George Bush has done exactly three things right – appointing Supreme Court justices, cutting taxes, and fighting a war on people who want you dead.

    You say that means I think you’re resisting God. No I don’t. I think it means you’re resisting common sense. Your enormous ego is what makes me think you’re resisting God.

    Either that, or Halo nailed it: you’re a phony.

  • Halo

    So you’re not a Christian if you support President Bush, eh?

    I give up on you. You’re an all-knowing phony and a leftist.

    Enjoy your lack of readers.

  • BIGbrotherbites

    Thats just dumb and is rediculous.
    You would be better off saying that everyone being in debt and using so many credit cards is more like accepting the mark than saying if you like Bush youve accepted the number.
    Thank God that Gore didnt win. And Kerry too…
    The country would be in far worse shape than it is now had they been in office.
    They wouldve invited Osama for coffee, but it sounds like you wouldnt have a problem with that.

    Up until Rudi all Republicans are against Gay marriage and abortion(infanticide,murder) which the bible clearly says is evil.
    Thus Dems. are all for those two things so they arent Christians, its as simple as that.







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search