<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Women&#8217;s Advocates Counter My Column Criticizing Maine’s Adoption of Predominant Aggressor Doctrine in DV Arrests</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/08/20/womens-advocates-counter-my-column-criticizing-maine%e2%80%99s-adoption-of-predominant-aggressor-doctrine-in-dv-arrests/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/08/20/womens-advocates-counter-my-column-criticizing-maine%e2%80%99s-adoption-of-predominant-aggressor-doctrine-in-dv-arrests/</link>
	<description>Men&#039;s Rights Activism, MRA Politics, Analysis, Commentary and Global News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:12:59 -1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Stevens</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/08/20/womens-advocates-counter-my-column-criticizing-maine%e2%80%99s-adoption-of-predominant-aggressor-doctrine-in-dv-arrests/comment-page-1/#comment-50446</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=1024#comment-50446</guid>
		<description>There are four little words ,the either &quot; evil or misguided&quot;  persons  do not seem to understand.Those words are  &quot; Due Process of Law&quot;   ie noone can be declared guilty on the spot.  As this &quot;law&quot;( stiffled laugh) says to do.  It is totally unlawful and in my eyes, is null and void. 
The people who passed this &quot;law&quot; need to be forced to attend a 400 hour intensive reeducation on the U S constitution  and have loud speaker blasting it in their ears  24/7 until they know if foward and backwards.  Then if they try it again , stamp treason in big red letter on their little asses and prosecute them for that crime.
As for women, well we need to gently explain that &quot;equality &quot;is not all goodies and benefits.   It is a two way street and what that really means.  Like, for example, your rights end where someone elses begins.  That rights and equality have requirements that you are not exempt from.  You are not entitled to any special priveledge that come off my back without express permission from me to do so.
Lastly you will be treated as &quot; equal&quot; when you earn it , it not free and it does require effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are four little words ,the either &#8221; evil or misguided&#8221;  persons  do not seem to understand.Those words are  &#8221; Due Process of Law&#8221;   ie noone can be declared guilty on the spot.  As this &#8220;law&#8221;( stiffled laugh) says to do.  It is totally unlawful and in my eyes, is null and void.<br />
The people who passed this &#8220;law&#8221; need to be forced to attend a 400 hour intensive reeducation on the U S constitution  and have loud speaker blasting it in their ears  24/7 until they know if foward and backwards.  Then if they try it again , stamp treason in big red letter on their little asses and prosecute them for that crime.<br />
As for women, well we need to gently explain that &#8220;equality &#8220;is not all goodies and benefits.   It is a two way street and what that really means.  Like, for example, your rights end where someone elses begins.  That rights and equality have requirements that you are not exempt from.  You are not entitled to any special priveledge that come off my back without express permission from me to do so.<br />
Lastly you will be treated as &#8221; equal&#8221; when you earn it , it not free and it does require effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
