lumigan tramadol tadalafil

Was JFK a Pedophile?

2007-08-28
By

Virginia Hates Dads

You can level many accusations at John F. Kennedy, our 35th president. But, there is one self-evident truth you cannot deny: JFK was a loving and doting father. You can feel it by looking at the many photos of him with his children.

I was in elementary school when Kennedy was assassinated, and that horrible incident made an indelible impression on me — and on the whole country. Even then, I enjoyed watching Caroline and John-John run to greet JFK exiting his helicopter on the White House lawn. There is nothing like the sight of kids and their father sharing mutual love, something critical for the family — and for our country’s bedrock.

So, it is with great pain that I watch the state of Virginia destroying that critical father-child bond by callously vilifying fathers, presuming them to be pedophiles. Not only is such a campaign — funded by Virginia taxpayers — preposterous, outrageous, and immoral, it is unconstitutional. Furthermore, it hurts children by teaching them to fear their fathers and avoid seeking their help and counsel. It engenders a culture where little girls grow up as misandrists and little boys as self-hating shells of human beings.

Virginia’s hatefully indoctrinated children eventually will become the next generation of man-hating cops, judges, senators, district attorneys, mayors, governors, presidential candidates, bureaucrats, journalists, psychiatrists, teachers, movie and TV producers, and parents. Intergenerational misandry will fester like its anti-Semitic and racist cousins.

Would Virginia post highway billboards of Muslims, exhorting Virginians to report them as potential terrorists? Never. Would Virginia post billboards of Hispanics, rallying the townspeople to identify them to ICE as illegal aliens and criminals? Never in a million years — Virginia is a sanctuary state. Yet, Virginia Governor Tim Kaine can sleep at night knowing that his director of sexual and domestic-violence prevention, Rebecca Odor, is incriminating innocent men.

Below is the State Seal of Virginia, with the Latin motto “sic semper tyrannis” (“thus always to tyrants”), adopted in 1776. The two figures, both dressed as warriors, are portraying the motto — the woman, Virtue (naturally), represents Virginia; the man, holding a scourge and chain, is a tyrant (naturally), with his fallen crown nearby. Given its officially negative depiction of men, is anyone surprised by Virginia’s anti-father campaign?

Misandry is both politically correct and institutionalized in Virgina, as it is in all of the American Gynocracy. Anyone who accepts this hatred in silence, whether living inside or outside Virginia, is anti-male, anti-child, and anti-family.

It dawned on me that, were JFK alive today and living in Virginia, he would be a suspected pedophile. Any Virginian, according to Tim Kaine and Rebecca Odor, would be compelled, upon seeing this father alone with his daughter, to report him to the “StopItNow” hotline. In fact, I can envision a Virginia billboard, along the roadside of I-95 in Richmond, showing JFK and daughter Caroline like this:

The NoNonsense Bottom Line

There are those who believe that abusing fathers, Virginia style, is the way to stop child abuse. First, because mothers, according to the US Department of Health & Human Services, are the champion child abusers, vilifying fathers is numerically nuts. Second, it is illegal: the US Constitution guarantees due process, equal protection, and presumption of innocence. But, as we have seen over and over again in America (think Duke University Lacrosse scandal), our so-called “justice” system presumes men guilty and invents laws on the fly to bash them.

Every country’s fate is tied to its ability to abide by the rule of law and to respect its citizens equally. Nazi Germany proved that. Venezuela, under dictator Hugo Chavez, is proving that now. The way to stop child abuse is to prosecute child abusers, using due process — not to unjustly and nefariously condemn men. Unless America begins valuing men, its fate is nihilistic.

Was JFK a pedophile? Yes, according to Virginia Governor Kaine.

About the Author

Marc H. Rudov is an internationally recognized author of 60+ articles and the books Under the Clitoral Hood: How to Crank Her Engine Without Cash, Booze, or Jumper Cables™ (ISBN 9780974501727), and The Man’s No-Nonsense Guide to Women: How to Succeed in Romance on Planet Earth™ (ISBN 0974501719).

Rudov’s books, articles, blog, and podcasts are available at TheNoNonsenseMan.com.

Copyright © 2007 by Marc H. Rudov. All rights reserved.

422 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • Amy Alkon

    I wrote a column on the crappy stats used to criminalize being male:

    http://www.advicegoddess.com/ag-column-archives/2007/05/diddle_he_or_di.html

  • http://www.decriminalizefatherhood.com DcFather

    While watching a show about cold war bunkers, including one for JFK and family in Florida during the Cuban missile Crisis, there was a video clip of JFK and Caroline out on a boat, and it may well have been from the same day as the above photograph. The clip showed JFK not only hugging Caroline, but with Caroline wearing only a bathing suit, JFK patted his daughter on the butt several times.

    While we are supposed to think nothing of it if a mother does that, can you imagine a father, any father, doing that today? What was good family-oriented press only a few decades ago is now more than enough proof to demand a father prove that he is not a pedophile, possibly even enough proof to find him guilty. With the anti-father hysteria that has swept across America since then, I doubt a President or any man would show this level of father-daughter bonding today, let alone do it in front of a hounding press.

    It is that same hysteria in which Virginia bureaucrats are trying to capitalize upon. The reasoning behind the hysteria is that fathers do not and cannot love their children, and you are supposed to accept that as a foregone conclusion, and so therefore any affection, holding-hands even, must mean the father is a pedophile. Yet this hysteria mentality refuses to acknowledge the simple proven facts not only that fathers actually do love their children, but also that the safest place for any child is with his or her biological father.

    So, are the likes of Kaine/Odor/Walsh simply too driven by hysteria and unwilling to look at the facts as to where children are the safest (ignorant), do they want to leverage hysteria in order to further criminalize normal father-child relationships, forcing more children than we already have into the very dangerous single-mother households and “state care” (anti-child, anti-family), or, as I am beginning to conclude, are Kaine, Odor, and Walsh themselves pedophiles, and looking for redemption by assuming all parents are sickos and pervert pedophiles like them (pedophiles)? Regardless of whether they are motivated by ignorance, a desire to destroy the family, or are themselves pedophiles, they are clearly a danger to children.

    The safest place for a child is with his or her biological father, and the reason children are increasingly unsafe is because they don’t have a father, usually though not always because the father was forced out of his children’s lives without any wrongdoing on his part. For forty years we have been driving fathers away for being guilty of “no fault”, and very predictably, our children are now more unsafe than ever before.

    In any case, the bottom line is: Criminalizing fatherhood is the problem, not the solution.

  • PolishKnight

    In addition, Marc, you may want to confront Walsh over his practice of bringing his youngest child with him to his AMW television show. If he argues that men are basically dangerous dogs, wouldn’t it make sense to always have the mother present? Why is he arguing that it’s safer to leave children with a woman while he runs around with his own kids?

  • PolishKnight

    John Walsh: Crappy father

    John Walsh is quoted as saying:
    “It’s not a witch hunt,” he says. “It’s all about minimizing risks. What dog is more likely to bite and hurt you? A Doberman, not a poodle. Who’s more likely to molest a child? A male.” from WSJ

    Indeed, and John Walsh would know quite a bit about not minimizing risks considering what happened to his own son. Sorry, but it sounds as if he left his own barn door open and let the wolves in and now wants to shoot all the dogs out of revenge.

    Before you might think I’m being rough on him, look at his story in wikipedia:

    Adam was abducted from a Sears department store near his home. Revé had dropped Adam off in the Sears toy department while she looked for a lamp. When she returned, Adam was missing.

    So let me see here what happened: Walsh left his son’s well-being fully in the hands of his wife who then left the boy alone in a store while she went off lamp shopping.

    Oh, folks, it gets better:

    Police records in Adam’s case released in 1996 show that a 17-year-old security guard asked four boys to leave the department store.[1] Adam is believed to have been one of them.

    This is a clear case of negligence on the part of Sears. Kicking 6 year old children out without putting something on the loudspeaker to come claim them first? But even so, the mother ABANDONED her own child while she went shopping.

    In the case of the security guard above, it’s not “safe” to leave a child with a poodle if the poodle walks away or if the poodle has a vicious doberman boyfriend. A male babysitter could possess materity and importantly, security skills to protect a child while a female babysitter would not. If anything, the male babysitter may be held to a higher standard than a female one.

    His anti-male stance also suggests that he doesn’t think much of his own parenting. After all, he’s a man so what credibility does he have then?

  • PolishKnight

    Fourthwire wrote:
    “That’s one of the reasons why I will not marry, co-habitate, or procreate until America’s men gain equal civil, criminal, social, and reproductive rights.”

    I’m reminded of the South Park cartoon where America is invaded by illegal immigrant time travelers from the future and the townsmen decide: “If we stop having children, then the future won’t come! Let’s all go homo and get in a pile!”

    Just because you don’t have children, fourthwire, doesn’t mean the end of the world. The left wants women to become single mothers and to enslave single men as second class citizens. If necessary, they’ll bring in third world immigrants just to keep their agenda alive.

    On the other hand, NOTHING annoys stuck-up women more than seeing men marry FOREIGN women. It doesn ‘t matter if he’s good looking or wealthy (or not). If he’s good looking, that shows they have competition (they hate that.) If he’s not, then it shows that even a dog has his day while millions of career women wind up alone and having to pay thousands for strangers to raise their sperm bank kids.

    Success is the best revenge.

    My friends and co-workers are amazed that I discuss these topics openly with my wife. She’s not shocked because she views me as a human being with my own interests and opinions. On the other hand, men here are terrified to actually openly discuss their gender’s interests with their wife and friends which sends a signal that they don’t think of themselves as worthy of respect. My example sends shock waves to those around me. Really, it’s amazing.

  • WLS

    In my community the principal supervised visitation and exchange provider is a gay man, who by Odor’s line of reasoning should be about the riskiest person one could imagine to have `protect’ children—at least boys—from their fathers. However, his sexular orientation appears to instead contribute importantly to the rapport and esteem he enjoys with the lesbian-domestic violence establishment in town, without whose support he probably wouldn’t be able to keep his job.

  • http://thenononsenseman.mensnewsdaily.com Marc H. Rudov

    Bombard the Virginia Tourism Board, http://www.vatc.org/, with e-mails and calls until the powers that be cry uncle and tell Rebecca Odor to terminate her anti-father campaign.

  • mruffolo

    By feeding the myth that fathers are bad, anti-male group employees, such as, lobbyist, activists, government, quasi-government, lawyers, jailers, social workers, police, judges, and talk show personalities get to keep their jobs.

    I suspect it’s about jobs.

    When there is a war to fight, government spends money to employ citizens to fight the enemy. Then the media gets to report on the war. War is good for economic activity.

    Since the ’60s, feminists claim the enemy is fathers – the leader of the Patriarch.

    Women, children and pets are victimized, oppressed by most men.

    Lately it appears that the American government is more popular to their citizens when they fight a war against its own local men, and the government is less popular when they fight a war in a foreign land.

  • fourthwire

    “The way to stop child abuse is to prosecute child abusers, using due process — not to unjustly and nefariously condemn men.”

    I could not possibly agree more, Marc.

    But those individuals behind Virginia’s misandry-based campaign are not actually attempting to protect children from abuse. They are simply demonizing fathers and sowing public acceptance to separate them from their children, as you know.

    Those vermin behind stopitnow.org don’t want child abuse to end so much as they want fatherhood to end.

    “Unless America begins valuing men, its fate is nihilistic.”

    Again, I could not possibly agree more, Marc. But those individuals who are working so hard to DEVALUE men have little interest in a strong America – quite the opposite, I suspect.

    In America, men have legal status as fourth-class citizens: behind women, children, and pets.

    In fact, women who cheat on their taxes risk far worse consequences from this nation’s law enforcement and judiciary systems than women who murder their husbands.

    Women who abuse pets risk far worse consequences than women who murder their husbands.

    And women who abuse their own children are often given a pass or a token punishment.

    That’s one of the reasons why I will not marry, co-habitate, or procreate until America’s men gain equal civil, criminal, social, and reproductive rights.

  • tonysprout

    Well, Marc you’re absolutely correct. I know it and you know it. But the little boys that populate the lamestream media think that a female pedophile babysitter is a bonus.

  • http://thenononsenseman.mensnewsdaily.com Marc H. Rudov

    Randyf

    If you actually had read this article, you would know that the “child abuse from mothers” stats are there. Click on US Department of Health & Human Services link above. It is important to read these articles, not just post comments at will.

  • randyf

    Please, please please mention the mother vs. father stats. PLEASE. If I’m not mistaken, WOMEN IN GENERAL are much more likely to hurt or kill a child.

    It’s the only fact that really matters, and TOTALLY falsifies the claim being made. BE able to quote the source. All else is only supportive.

    And thanks for taking on the insanity out there.

  • mruffolo

    GreatMRNI, I thought you were joking.

    The seal of Virginia has an image of a female standing over a man with her foot on his neck, and she is holding a spear readied to kill him.

    In feminist fashion, one of her breasts is exposed. She may be this guy’s wife or girlfriend.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seal_of_Virginia

  • GreatMRNI

    It doesn’t surprise me that Virginia hates dads. These ridiculous laws coming out of the state of “vagina” is the norm. These Virginia laws are indicative of a state that has an official state emblem which pictures a woman trampling a man. I guess that speaks volumes! Hoist the Jib!

  • http://thenononsenseman.mensnewsdaily.com Marc H. Rudov

    Tonysprout,

    What’s to say that a female babysitter won’t experiment with boys? Think it doesn’t happen — especially if the girls know they aren’t even under suspicion? You bet it does.

    Paradoxically, if John’s son, Adam, were alive today, John would be advising people not to hire him as a babysitter. And, John would have to warn parents not to trust their daughters around “Mr. America’s Most Wanted” himself.

  • tonysprout

    Mr. Walsh, host of Fox’s “America’s Most Wanted,” began advocating for missing children in 1981, after his son was killed by a stranger. He knows some men are offended by his advice to never hire a male babysitter. But as he sees it, if a teenage boy wants to experiment with sex, you don’t want him using your kids.

    “It’s not a witch hunt,” he says. “It’s all about minimizing risks. What dog is more likely to bite and hurt you? A Doberman, not a poodle. Who’s more likely to molest a child? A male.” from WSJ

    Hey Marc, ask Walsh if he supports taking children away from mothers on the basis of gov’t stats that show that mothers abuse and murder their children at rates in excess of twice that of fathers. Also, I don’t approve of him equating men with dogs. Might be a Mike Vick joke in there.

  • http://thenononsenseman.mensnewsdaily.com Marc H. Rudov

    Gentlemen:

    I have been invited to debate Rebecca Odor and John Walsh (the child advocate) on CNN Headline News next Wednesday, 09.05.07, somewhere between 5:00PM ET and 5:45PM ET. If you were on my mailing list, you would know that.

    Also, please watch and vote in the “Marc vs. Tracy” debate at http://www.FoxFan.com

  • http://www.decriminalizefatherhood.com DcFather

    When a child reports being molested by a woman, even when that woman also comes from a family with a history of pedophilia, government will do nothing, with the exception of teachers who might get a light to moderate slap on the wrist, depending on how good-looking they are.

    Then, men who really are pedophiles are increasingly walking away with a slap on the wrist also, albeit not as light as female perps, especially if they are in America illegally.

    But when a father holds his daughter’s hand, father-haters in government want you to report it so they can go on a feminazi style witch hunt where the father is presumed guilty of being a pedophile.

    Obviously, fatherhood is the only crime they are actually interested in prosecuting, and at best, they have no concern whatsoever for the children.

    It’s too late to protect my children from their female perp, but I sure wish a lot more parents would demand the prosecution of Kaine/Odor and their ilk before it’s too late for their children or grandchildren too.

  • S Baker

    Sniveling liberals win at every turn. Hillary will be the next president and you ain’t seen nothin yet.

  • http://www.shatterdmen.com/ shatteredmen

    Many public places have “baby changing stations” in both the women’s and the men’s restrooms. Some progressive public places have “family” restrooms where women can take their young boys or fathers can take young daughters to use the rest room without having to take them into the main rest rooms.

    I guess we can expect to see this change in Virginia or perhaps a SWAT team will be stationed nearby waiting for a father to take his daughter into one of these rest rooms.

  • mruffolo
  • college activist

    rebecka odor stinks!!







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search

RSS Amy Alkon

RSS Donna Laframboise