Are American Men Leaving Money in Their Wills to Men’s Rights Causes?
We hear all the time how a rich widow just died and left untold millions to foundations which are well known for then parceling out serious funding to feminist organizations. We also often hear how a given woman had been married to a conservative billionaire or millionaire who died before she did and left her 100% of his money. Too often we hear how, like Theresa Heinz, she then turned into a lefty and devoted the rest of her life to supporting worthless left wing causes like John Kerry.
Now I want to ask a simple question without showing too much disrespect for the dearly departed: is this irresponsible of the corpse or what?
Let me talk directly to older wealthy American married males: give us other men a break. Don’t assume that your wife is as conservative as you. Don’t die and leave her all of your money.
In 2007, money is not only flowing into feminist organization coffers from dead widows and vindictive ex-wives like Heather Mills McCartney. The feminist groups are also getting big dollars from big politically correct corporations like Exxon-Mobil (see their support for the women-as-victims Tahirih Justice Center) and, of course, an American Congress which is filled with blackmailed perverts like Senator Larry Craig who have clearly been doing almost everything the feminists wanted just to keep themselves in business at the local mens restroom.
Therefore, you real men who might die in the next 10 years (you could be hit by a truck) have an obligation to leave serious funds to mens rights organizations that can do battle with the above-mentioned juggernaut. Please go change your last will and testament today (tomorrow if it is after 5PM when you read this).
For that matter, all your tax-related donations need to go into mens rights groups that count as tax write-offs. Astonishingly, donating to feminists gets people tax write-offs these days. The feminists do this by calling their organizations womens shelters and operating shelters as a front. Men can start similar organizations that can be donated to with tax write-offs.
Now there are almost zero Mens Rights organizations in the USA in 2007. The British group Fathers 4 Justice has just opened an American office but they have, so far, only concentrated on how the anti-male American justice system, in the words of Marc Rudov, treats women like the Sun and men like Uranus . You are going to want to do some research and find some individuals who seem like they could do battle with all of the misandry coming out of Washington and seriously counter-lobby the Key Street feminists who own the mangina Senator Joe Biden as well as those like Senator Larry Craig, who clearly want to keep their head low because they are not proud of their own extra-curricular activities. Ifsmartmen with proven anti-feminist credentials could only break away from the full-time careers they now have in other industries, they could start working full-time on reversing feminist influence and the USA could be saved before it is too late.
The kind of man who is competent enough to succeed in smashing the influence of knee-jerk feminism, at least within the Republican Party, is probably now making more than $60K per year for marketing and selling products and services other than anti-feminism. Give this guy an offer he cannot refuse and get him working for American men as opposed to working for his current corporation.
Even if you only have $10K to spare in your will, that would sponsor a district-level challenge to a federal law like the so-called Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) the new version of which allows women who shack up with men to call 911, fraudulently claim abuse and keep the guys house. An example of a prime candidate for serious funding would be Dave Usher of the American Coalition of Fathers of Children. Although I am not saying that he should leave his current job immediately, I can say that American men would benefit greatly if Usher were funded to lead a mens rights organization full-time.
Similarly, if you have a problem with the fact that both political parties are interested in background checking men before they can even say hello to women — consider funding Online Dating Rights, which is run by a brilliant Colorado man and his wife, both of whom have to earn their living in the business world now.
Ask a prospective mens rights candidate for a business plan on what he or she could do against feminists if they were funded via your last will and testament. You would be surprised by the difference a little money can make. Compared to a feminist organization that gets $3M per year, I would bet that a counter-organization that gets $150K per year (20 times less) would effectively counter-act the poison and possibly even convince the government and some corporations to stop funding the enemy.
You can also start a 501c3 non-profit before you die. Ask a lawyer about getting one started sooner rather than later.
Remember, no matter how much you love her, please do NOT leave all your money to a woman (wife or daughter) who could knowingly or unknowingly turn your grandson and great-grandson into the slave of a system completely dominated by feminists.
| More from Jim Peterson
Stumble It!
October 17th, 2009 at 9:48 pm
Some Men are leaving the country, that is whats happening.
September 13th, 2007 at 3:53 pm
Because the unthinking knee-jerk feminists hang themselves with their ignorance.
When an American citizen finally challenges IMBRA, it is going to be a turkey shoot.
There is nothing logical or fair about the law.
I am still looking for a millionaire to fund http://www.online-dating-rights.com and/or an American citizen to challenge the law in federal court.
It would not take much time to do this. One can file on one’s lunch hour if one lives in a city with a federal courthouse if one is doing it pro se, meaning without a lawyer (we don’t have the money to afford a lawyer but there are several reasons why lawyers might help one lose a case, with the need to be politically correct a big reason).
Then there will be a trial 2 weeks later which would last 2 or 3 days at the most. Others would do the organizing of the expert witnesses, etc.
After that….well….it would probably be best to file a brief once per month. Others can write the brief for you..,.but the pro se plaintiff would, of course, have to actually file it, etc.
September 13th, 2007 at 8:11 am
When your (rather small) army faces the army of your enemy, it seems unwise to allow even a few enemy soldiers to infiltrate your ranks constantly.
I would say that the same applies psychologically as much as militarily.
Which is why I would not give Jabbering Stooge any space to comment.
I’ve looked at his/her blog and he/she has nothing of interest to say. His/her blog is just full of sneering/snide assertions backed up by nothing. He/she seems like precious little more than a big mouth with an empty head.
Why give him/her the space?
September 12th, 2007 at 6:41 am
I am still quite shocked that Jabbering Stooge and the Feministing Vanessa would take such offense to my article.
How could wanting a men’s rights movement financed be misogynistic?
How could wanting foreign women to be treated as equals by the feminists…somehow seen as wanting them not to be treated as human beings?
Foreign women have the right to decide their own level of security. If a woman wants her new Yahoo email address broadcast to the world, that is her right.
The US Congress and the feminists do NOT have a right to tell a foreign woman that she cannot contact an American without first signing his background check.
In addition, you cannot imply that American women are superior to foreign women which is exactly what you are saying when you say that men are losers for dating them:
Here is a video of some foreign women remarking about this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihW4P8Bcrxc
September 10th, 2007 at 8:28 am
Jabbering Stooge:
It is not treating foreign women as “human beings” if you take away their rights to broadcast their anonymous email addresses and/or cell phone numbers or postal addresses to the world at large.
No American woman has to be protected by federal law in terms of having to sign her personal approval for every man who wants to contact her.
I do not think you understand the IMBRA law Jabbering Stooge. I really don’t.
Go to http://www.veteransabroad.com and http://www.onlinedatingrights.com and read the libraries.
Here is a feminist opinion that says the law goes too far:
http://www.ifeminists.net/introduction/editorials/2006/0111.html
http://www.thenews.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=36775
September 9th, 2007 at 7:52 pm
[...] would appear that I’ve struck a nerve with the author of that atrocious bit of misogyny over at Men’s News Daily. In comments, he writes: That is funny. I am the original author of [...]
September 8th, 2007 at 12:06 am
Awesome article. Thanks for the challenge.
September 7th, 2007 at 10:10 am
I repeat: We are not going to win this by showing grown men cry with real tears on camera. When men do stuff like that, you know the enemy is just playing cat and mouse.
September 7th, 2007 at 10:07 am
That is really great. Let’s remember, hoewver, that Misandry or “Prejudice Against Men” is a much greater problem than just “Prejudice Against Fathers”.
The Fatherhood Movement might fight and fight and then be given a few concessions, while the noose of misandry tightens around all of or necks.
They can murder us and go scott free after a month in jail, they can put up billboards in Virginia with the blessing of manginas like John Walsh of “America’s Most Wanted” which depict a man holding hands with a child and saying “Stop It Now”, they can pass laws stating that men MUST have background checks before they are allowed to say hello to women online (IMBRA).
The Republicans (evangelists) are behind this even more than the Democrats (feminists). Meanwhile, pathetic cowards like Ron Paul ignore their chance to fill in the breach.
In the USA, there is an unholy alliance between Dems and Bush Republicans that cannot be broken via “negotiation” at a low level between local father’s rights groups and state legislatures.
Giuliani is showing signs that he is coming under their influence and not ours.
Meanwhile, Marc Rudov of http://www.thenononsenseman.com is the only American man who is regularly getting on national TV (CNN and Fox News) and telling it like it really is (”Ban alimony” was the message 3 days ago on Fox News and “It is unconstittutional to prejudge the subset of males” was the message on CNN 2 days ago).
We need to think big. We need multimillionaires. We need the patriarchy and the “old boys network” to wake up and/or spring back to life.
If the MRM movement remains only at the level of the recent “Fathers 4 Justice” film with the British man crying on camera about joyous it was to have a weekend with his kids…the enemy is going to throw a few concessions, but we are not going to get any respect overall.
September 7th, 2007 at 5:56 am
Continuing on funding. Among fatherhood asserters who have some funding, there is the American Coalition for Fathers and Children (ACFC), which just co-sponsored the August 18th Family Preservation Day rally in DC. Stephen Baskerville is the President. It has a paid executive director in DC, Mike McCormick, and a national newspaper, The Liberator, which goes out quarterly to 12,000 people. I’m the editor and am interested in professionally written op-ed pieces, which can be sent to theliberator AT comcast.net. ACFC is supported by a philanthropist and by individual contributions. ACFC is an umbrella organization which has state affiliates, the most active of which are currently in Michigan, Boston and West Virginia.