Catholic Newspaper–What Inner-City Kids Need Are Fathers

2007-09-05
By

 

The California Catholic Daily gets it right on kids, violence and gangs in its new article What they need are fathers (9/4/07). The paper quotes extensively from my co-authored column CA Anti-Gang Bills Miss Central Truth About Kids & Gangs (Pasadena Star-News & Affiliated Papers, 3/25/07), and cites this incredible finding:

“Deborah Estell, a San Francisco school health worker, polled 60 or so kindergartners at John Muir Elementary School, finding that 90% knew someone in jail, and more than 75% knew someone who had been shot or killed.”

It’s a small sample size, so this study may not be terribly reliable, but what incredible numbers–75% of kindergarteners know somebody who had been shot or killed–wow. I used to teach in South Central LA, and while the 75% figure seems a little high, I can believe a roughly comparable figure.

The California Catholic Daily article is below. Grisha, one of the commenters to the article, criticizes me, saying that gang members’ fathers are bad fathers anyway, so it would be counterproductive for them to be in their kids’ lives. There’s some truth to this, but it’s a limited truth. In my co-authored column referenced above I explained:

“A study just released by Boston College finds that when nonresident fathers are involved in their adolescent children’s lives, the incidence of violence, crime, substance abuse and truancy decrease markedly. Most of the families in the study, which was published in the journal Child Development, are low-income African-American and Hispanic families. The study’s lead author, professor Rebekah Levine Coley, explains:

“‘Nonresident fathers in low-income, minority families appear to be an important protective factor for adolescents…Greater involvement from fathers may help adolescents develop self-control and self-competence, and may decrease the opportunities adolescents have to engage in problem behaviors.’

“The study also found that when teens begin to slide towards delinquency, nonresident fathers increase their involvement in response. The researchers found such involvement to be effective–the impact of father involvement was the greatest on the kids who had previously been the most troubled.”

Grisha also pushes the feminist/Peggy Drexler line that lesbian parenting is better than heterosexual parenting, asking, “Please note that there are not a lot of gangs consisting of boys raised by lesbian couples. What does that tell us?”

What they need are fathers
But California thinks mental health programs are the answer for kids in the state’s “war zones”

California Catholic Daily, 9/4/07

Do children in high-crime areas in California, like children in Baghdad, suffer from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder? If so, why? And what should be done?

An Aug. 26 San Francisco Chronicle story notes that “as many as one-third of children living in our country’s violent urban neighborhoods have PTSD, according to recent research and the country’s top child trauma experts — nearly twice the rate reported for troops returning from war zones in Iraq.”

Deborah Estell, a San Francisco school health worker, polled 60 or so kindergartners at John Muir Elementary School, finding that 90% knew someone in jail, and more than 75% knew someone who had been shot or killed.

The need to deal with PTSD symptoms “is great,” she said. These symptoms, which include angry outbursts, sleep disturbances, anxiety, and preoccupation with shootings and death, make it impossible for many students to concentrate on learning.

According to the Chronicle’s follow-up reports, state and local school officials have converged on one approach to the problem: traumatic stress counseling in the schools, using $250 million raised through Proposition 63 for mental health programs.

However, few are addressing a prime factor in gang violence and the subsequent trauma: defective family structures, lacking a mother and father who are married to each other, and — especially for boys — households deprived of the guidance and authority of fathers.

According to Glenn Sacks, a former Los Angeles elementary and high school teacher writing in the Pasadena Star-News, gangs were responsible for 70% of the shootings last year in Los Angeles, while 73% of the young men in California’s massive juvenile prison system share similar experiences of broken families and fatherlessness.

Sacks cites a 20-year old gang member, incarcerated at the California Youth Authority in Stockton for trying to kill a gang rival, who said, “[My father] was never around when I needed him … [my mom] did OK until I was 10 – she could control me up to then. But then I went to the gangs, like my brothers … It might have mattered if he was around.”

Sacks argues that “the best way to keep teenagers out of gangs is to help them get the much-needed discipline, care and love that so many fathers are skilled at providing.” (more…)

Happily Un-married! Living Together & Loving It!
Living together is becoming widely accepted among all ages. Happily Un-married! is the first book to take a serious & non-judgmental look at helping these couples improve the fitness of their relationships. The rate of cohabitation is skyrocketing–10 million couples, 40% of whom have children. Happily Un-married! helps unmarried couples stabilize and strengthen their relationships. www.cohabitating.org

5 views

  • mruffolo

    Passport As A Means To Collect Unpaid Child Support.

    Under the Passport Denial Program,

    http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cse/newhire/fop/passport.htm,

    the State Department can deny passports to parents who owe more than $2,500 in child support. With the new passport rules requiring passports for travel outside the U.S.A., including Mexico and Canada, the states thus far in 2007 have been able to collect a reported $22.5 million. The money is then forwarded to the parent to whom it is owed. Once the parent satisfies his/her debt, he/she can reapply for a passport. iccle

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap_travel/passports_child_support

  • jackal1994

    As an important point, when Grisha points out that many of these fathers aren’t good rolemodels, she’s really side-stepping the point: Who raise THOSE fathers? Single-mothers, most likely. I agree that kids (especially inner city kids), but I think the finger needs to be pointed equally sternly at mothers and fathers.

    And maybe a lot more sternly at inner-city mothers. After all, it’s mothers that are RAISING these men to be little mysigionists and baby-making and abandoning numbskulls.

    But before that, it’s black women who feel it’s a-ok to carry to term, birth, and raise (with no father) the children of men THEY WOULDN’T TRUST ALONE IN A ROOM WITH THEIR PURSE!

    In summation I agree that inner-city kids need dads, but I think it’s a joke when these articles try to say it’s all the men’s fault.

  • jackal1994

    Sorry I lost a train of thought there:
    The the third sentence should have read:
    I agree that kids (especially inner city kids) need two parents, but I think the finger needs to be pointed equally sternly at mothers and fathers.

  • college activist

    70% of all repeat violent offenders currently in our jails not only grew up without a father in their familly, but there were probably no adult males around at all!!
    NO FATHER = CHAOS!!

    The FEMINIST KLAN and anti -male hysteria is causing societal chaos/criminality!!

  • mruffolo

    The inner city is a high concentration of matriarch – the mother leads the family.

    The dosage of feminism is lethal for a family. For example, the marriage rate is low and the divorce rate is high.

    Compare your zip statistics with an inner city zip code at:

    http://www.zipskinny.com

  • bolwriter

    Glenn – The Office of Child Support Enforcement has some truly amazing studies about its efforts to get mothers on welfare to identify the fathers of their children. They generally do this at the hospital at the time of birth. Interestingly, much of what the caseworkers do to try to convince the mothers to identify the fathers is to recite all of the good ways in which the presence of the father can affect the child. Even so, the mothers refuse to identify the fathers in a large (over 25%) percentage of cases. It’s actually a violation of law to refuse to identify the father, but they do it anyway. Naturally the OCSE does this only to get reimbursement of the welfare paid out, not because they want to promote active fathering, but it’s interesting to know (a) that they know the facts about the importance of fathers in children’s lives and (b) it makes so little difference to the mothers.






Search