‘History’ Teacher Asks 14-Year-Olds to Renounce U.S. Citizenship

Sunday, September 16, 2007
By Warner Todd Huston

One often hears that government schools in totalitarian nations brainwash their children to love the government. People in free nations decry that as oppressing the free will of innocent children, and rightly so. In American schools, however, just the opposite is true as with the case of an anti-American teacher in a public school in Chico, California who hates this country so much that he sent a letter home to his student’s parents urging them to renounce their citizenship in the U.S. as he announced he was so doing.

Since the troubling work of the so-called progressives led by John Dewey that has resulted in the near destruction of our institutes of higher learning, American schools have been steadily undermining this country. For a long time, at least, it was isolated mostly in the Universities safely removed from our youngest and most vulnerable students. Now, this pernicious and self-loathing force is commonly seen in even our elementary and high schools all too often. Supposed “teachers” who so hate the United States, its culture, history and ideals that they are willing to cast aside any pretense of teaching and are going straight for political indoctrination of their own hate filled ideology appear everywhere you turn.

This is the case of yet another American hater, another Ward Churchillesque propagandist infesting an American public school, one paid for by public funds, who is advocating the destruction of the United States by teaching things antithetical to our nation.

“Teacher” Mike Brooks is teaching his 14-year-old, middle school children that the U.S. tortures people and that it is better to be a member of “the global community” than to be an American. He is so filled with hate against the U.S.A. that he even sent a letter home to his student’s parents asking them to renounce their citizenship in the U.S.

Worse than this, the school’s principal is so mindless that she is sticking up for this enemy to our country by saying she is sure Brooks “has no political agenda to advance.” Clearly he does with his advocacy that his students turn against their own country.

Parent Michael Hill of Chico tells reporters, “The lesson being taught in class was that the U.S. kidnaps innocent people and takes them to Cuba, where they are kept indefinitely and tortured.”

Hill went on to say that his daughter, “broke into tears when she talked about Brooks mentioning illegal wiretaps and other surveillance directed against innocent people.”

The letter this propagandist for unAmerican ideologies sent out re-imagined the Declaration of Independence in “modern language” and ended with the teacher’s postscript renouncing his citizenship in the U.S.

“After careful consideration of the facts of our current situation, I have decided to announce to everyone that I am no longer a citizen of the United States, but a free and independent member of the global community,” it read.

Then he insisted that parents sign this letter so that his children may return it to his classroom. Many of the children felt pressured into having their parents sign it, though this purported teacher claims he meant only to start a “discussion.”

I would suggest to the Chico, California schools system that they allow this “independent member of the global community” to go find a job in a Madrassa somewhere where his hate-America ideology will be welcomed with open arms and where he will not have his truly wasted salary paid for by the tax payers of the country he so hates.

This story can be added to another recent and outrageous one from Sampson County, North Carolina. There a local High School banned the U.S. flag from being displayed on articles of clothing. In true, mindless “zero tolerance” style, the U.S. flag was banned along with that of any other nation because too many Mexican kids were wearing Mexican flag items to school.

Not only are schools anti-American, but they are filled with gutless and stupid administrators, as well. Here the U.S. flag was banned so that administrators who “didn’t want to be forced to pick and choose which flags should be permissible,” could get away from having to make a decision.

That one would have been easy for a true American. Ban ALL but the U.S. flag. This IS America, after all. Fortunately, the ban was later rescinded but the only thing that changed the minds of the weak spined administrators in North Carolina was the monumentally bad publicity the story raised for them. If no one had reported on this one, the ban would still be in place and our own children would not be able to show their love for the flag of the very country in which they live.

Sadly, stories like this are not isolated and few. They happen every day throughout the country. Our government schools are failures through and through and should be dismantled. Instead of places of learning, they have become dens of the unAmerican left skulking around and undermining the very nature of these United States by teaching our children to hate their country. Parents should make themselves very aware of the indoctrination being foisted upon our children and stories like this sound a clarion call for change.

Vouchers are a start, but the elimination of the teacher’s unions is about the only thing that will begin to fix this problem. Add to that the elimination of Federal funding and a return to local control and we may yet refashion our schools into places to which we would no longer be afraid to send our children.

Tags:

| More from Warner Todd Huston

Stumble It!

Share/Save/Bookmark

How to survive the coming food shortage.

5 Responses to “‘History’ Teacher Asks 14-Year-Olds to Renounce U.S. Citizenship”

  1. 1
    Burton Says:

    Parent Michael Hill of Chico tells reporters, “The lesson being taught in class was that the U.S. kidnaps innocent people and takes them to Cuba, where they are kept indefinitely and tortured…Brooks mentioning illegal wiretaps and other surveillance directed against innocent people.”

    The only problem is, the US does everything stated. Kidnapping? It’s called “extrajudicial rendition.” This got started with the war on drugs, where US agents would kidnap foreign nationals for trial in the US in violation of extradition traties (i.e., the US was breaking the law). Indefinite detention — isn’t that what is going on at Gitmo?

    How about all the stuff the criminal injustice systems pulls in violation of the Bill of Rights? Asset forfeiture. Gun grabs. Drug testing. Profile searches. No-knock raids.

    Illegal wiretaps? Look at Roving wiretaps. Echelon. Data mining. Surveillance cameras everywhere. Welcome to 1984.

    Look at how feminist inspired laws have ripped up such concepts as due process and presumption of innocence. MRAs complain about this all the time. Are we un-American?

    Not only are schools anti-American, but they are filled with gutless and stupid administrators, as well.

    Can’t argue with that one!

  2. 2
    The Vicar Says:

    What a stupid douche!

    If anyone should renounce his citizenship, let him go ahead.

    I’m sure Iran or Russia would welcome this corn hole with a parade!

  3. 3
    Roger F. Gay Says:

    Why aren’t both the teacher and the principle in jail for child abuse?

  4. 4
    The Vicar Says:

    Well Roger F. Gay, it’s stuff like this is the reason I don’t send my kids to public schools.

    Good question though.

  5. 5
    Artfldgr Says:

    Does anyone know their history enough to know how the soviets refered to those people who were traitors to their own country? those people who were from the west, who knew things that the soviet people didnt, who had everything, and yet they would gladly walk into an enemy camp professing freindship….

    that the people helping to turn the state, and who think they will be rewarded, are regarded by those they seek to help as “govnoed”. its not a nice word… it means they eat dung… that they like to eat dung, that its a choice…

    Inside Soviet Military Intelligence by Suvorov Viktor
    (cleaned up text replacing s**t with dung)

    We are talking about the numerous members of overseas societies of friendship with the Soviet Union. Officially, all Soviet representatives regard these parasites with touching feelings of friendship, but privately they call them ‘dung-eaters’ (’govnoed’). It is difficult to say where this expression originated, but it is truly the only name they deserve.

    The use of this word has become so firmly entrenched in Soviet embassies that it is impossible to imagine any other name for these people. A conversation might run as follows: Today we’ve got a friendship evening with dung-eaters’, or Today we’re having some dung-eaters to dinner. Prepare a suitable menu’.

    Officers of both the GRU and the KGB have very much more respect for their agents than for the shit-eaters. The motives of agents are clear — an easy life and plenty of money. If you take risks and lose, then no money and no easy life. To the end of his life the agent will not be able to tear himself away from this servitude — as is the case in the criminal world. But the behaviour of the numerous friends of the Soviet Union is utterly incomprehensible to Soviet people. In the Soviet Union everybody without exception wishes to be abroad, to go absolutely anywhere, even if only with one eye to look at Mongolia or Cambodia. Oh! to be abroad, is the cry, led by the children of Brezhnev, Gromyko and Andropov. When Soviet people want to say that a thing is outstandingly good, they say, ‘Really, this must be foreign.’ It does not matter which country it comes from, or what its quality or age — it has to be foreign. But suddenly one finds these friends of the Soviet Union, who enjoy all the fruits of civilisation down to Gillette razor blades, who can buy anything they want in the shops, even bananas, and yet they praise the Soviet Union. No, these people are nothing but dung-eaters according to Soviet intelligence. The contempt felt for them does not prevent the GRU and KGB from using them whenever they can. They do everything free, and they will even come to meetings in secure places like the Soviet Embassy.

    The recruitment of such people is not recommended by the Central Committee, but why bother to recruit them when they bring such advantages without being recruited? The GRU usually makes use of the dung-eaters ‘in the dark’, in other words not saying what they are used for or how much they benefit from their services. They usually ask from them information about their neighbours, friends, acquaintances, fellow workers and so on. Sometimes one of them is asked to organise an evening party with one or another of his acquaintances, after which the GRU thanks him and tells him to forget what has happened. They are very good people, they forget everything.

    the teacher is a over zealous dung eater…

Leave a Reply

International Mens Day and Fathers Day in Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden

Search MND

Introducing MRm: A New Men's Rights Magazine in PDF format

Download PDF Here

Support Our Sponsors!

Please support MND

Subscribe today:

SUSTAINER: $5/mo.


CONTRIBUTOR: $20/mo.


SUPPORTER: $50/mo.


Or Donate Any Amount

Archives

privacy policy | terms of service


Site Meter

MND: Your Daily Dose of Counter-Theory is Digg proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache!