John Bambenek
If Congressional Approval Falls Below 10%, Do We Get to Have Another Revolution?

The latest Zogby poll shows that only 11 percent of Americans approve of the job Congress is doing. This is contrasted with Bush's underwhelming 29% approval rating. These polls show that Americans of all political stripes are losing faith in their government. Congress' all time low (prior to this poll) is 18% approval. Do we get to disband the government and write a new Constitution if it falls below 10%? For comparison, most foreign governments suffer a coup at these approval ratings.

The partisans on both sides will likely use this poll to show how the other party is ruining America. That's what they do and most people have adopted this approach. It doesn't matter who has the most coherent policy, it just matters how you can spin things to show the other party as a moral evil. This line of thinking misses the point.

The poll shows that the average American and the average politician are simply disconnected. The concerns of the average American aren't represented inside the Beltway and it shows that what's huge news on the cable news channels and in the latest partisan shouting matches isn't what matters most to Americans. And America is fed up.

It's not about a single issue, it's about the sum total of all the issues that America cares about that go ignored or are actively worked against by our politicians. Our candidates are pre-selected by party insiders where people who aren't "team players" (i.e. party hacks) are actively discouraged from running. Sure, they'll take your money but they want yes men in office.

We have representatives from every corner of this country in D.C. Yet all issues are effectively nationalized. How does a representative vote on a particular bill? With his caucus, not with the intentions of his constituents. There are rare exceptions, some of those are honest principled men, many are just media whores who like the press image of being a "maverick". And America is fed up.

This poll shows a population that is conditioned to think that the government will fix the big problems. The sub-prime mortgage fallout (which hasn't begun fully to set in) is a great example. Sure, we had banks with overly liberal lending habits that gave money away to people not likely to repay it. They should know better considering most every economic crisis in history was started by bad lending practices. However, the people taking out those loans aren't even on the radar. People don't think that the average citizen should be responsible for making bad economic decisions, it's the government's job to bail them out. Yet, the government consistently fails at doing so.

Katrina is another great example. Governmental failures abounded at every layer of government. The mayor did not use all the assets he had to protect his people. Over two-thirds of the police department walked off the job (and got free vacations to Vegas). Gov. Blanco and the Louisiana state government were more interested in embezzling disaster money than buying the equipment they needed. When it all came to a head because the governor and mayor did everything wrong, FEMA wasn't up to the task to clean up after them. The government told the people they would protect them, but it was the people who took care of themselves who came out of Katrina unscathed.

In every direction one looks, one can find a promise of government to help and that promise being broken. Corruption is rampant in both parties and the talking points that one party is more corrupt than another are simply absurd. Looking at the field of 2008 presidential contenders, it looks like it'll be more of the same. How much lower do approval ratings need to fall until Americans insist that things change?

John Bambenek is the Assistant Politics Editor for BC Magazine and is an academic professional for the University of Illinois. By trade, he is an information security professional, part of the Internet Storm Center and a courseware author and certification grader for the GIAC family of security certifications. He is a syndicated columnist who blogs at Part-Time Pundit and the executive director of The Tumaini Foundation which helps AIDS orphans and other children in Tanzania to get an education.

Rate this post:

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

| Print This Post Print This Post | 0 views | Other posts by John Bambenek

Possibly Related Posts:

  • wsj
  • ...
  • Bush Welcomes Congressional Approval of India Nuclear Deal
  • ...
  • More Buyer’s Remorse
  • ...
  • Displaced Families In Victoria Falls Struggle With Housing Shortage
  • ...
  • JIM KOURI
  • ...

    Stumble It!

    book mark If Congressional Approval Falls Below 10%, Do We Get to Have Another Revolution? in del.icio.us | If Congressional Approval Falls Below 10%, Do We Get to Have Another Revolution? to Slashdot.com | Submit If Congressional Approval Falls Below 10%, Do We Get to Have Another Revolution? to Digg.com | Submit If Congressional Approval Falls Below 10%, Do We Get to Have Another Revolution? to BoingBoing.net | Bookmark If Congressional Approval Falls Below 10%, Do We Get to Have Another Revolution? in Furl | Bookmark If Congressional Approval Falls Below 10%, Do We Get to Have Another Revolution? in Spurl | Bookmark If Congressional Approval Falls Below 10%, Do We Get to Have Another Revolution? in Reddit | Bookmark If Congressional Approval Falls Below 10%, Do We Get to Have Another Revolution? in Tailrank | Bookmark If Congressional Approval Falls Below 10%, Do We Get to Have Another Revolution? in Newsvine | Bookmark If Congressional Approval Falls Below 10%, Do We Get to Have Another Revolution? to Yahoo! | Bookmark If Congressional Approval Falls Below 10%, Do We Get to Have Another Revolution? to Fark

    4 Comments »

    1. Roger Knight said,

      Mayor Nagin got re-elected.

      Most of Congress gets re-elected.

      I will believe the polls on low approval ratings when the re-election rate reflects the low approval ratings.

      September 26, 2007 at 4:38 am

    2. walvord said,

      Disband the government and start over - yes. Write a new constitution - no, it’s not broken. If a new one would be written, you could forget about what’s currently called the 2nd amendment. And I’m not too sure that there would be anything closely resembling the 1st either.

      September 26, 2007 at 8:37 am

    3. tonysprout said,

      walvord, amen. This Constitution provides means to update it as needed. Something that is well known, but ignored because it’s too difficult to get amendments ratified. They don’t like the 2nd amendment, but instead of doing the honest thing and try to change the Constitution, they make laws about legal exemptions.

      All of Congress should be made to use their thumb to ride home, and those that make it back alive will be allowed to run for office. While we’re at it, get rid of the Repugmocrat system. 43 million people didn’t vote last election. Are they pissed off or have they been pissed on?

      September 26, 2007 at 10:18 am

    4. NotNOW said,

      Hamilton, from “The Federalist #8″:

      “Safety from external danger is the most powerful director of national conduct. Even the ardent love of liberty will, after a time, give way to its dictates. The violent destruction of life and property incident to war - the continual effort and alarm attendant on a state of continual danger, will compel the nations most attached to liberty, to resort for repose and security, to institutions, which have a tendency to destroy their civil and political rights.”

      Ludwig Von Mises, “Liberty and Property”:

      “As regards the social apparatus of repression and coercion, the government, there cannot be any question of freedom. Government is essentially the negation of liberty. It is the recourse to violence or threat of violence in order to make all people obey the orders of the government, whether they like it or not. As far as the government’s jurisdiction extends, there is coercion, not freedom. Government is a necessary institution, the means to make the social system of cooperation work smoothly without being disturbed by violent acts of gangsters whether of domestic or foreign origin. Government is not, as some people like to say, a necessary evil, but a means, the only means available to make peaceful human coexistence possible. But it is the opposite of liberty. It is beating, imprisoning, hanging. Whatever a government does is ultimately supported by the actions of armed constables.”

      “If we take into account the fact that, as human nature is, there can neither be civilization or peace without the functioning of the government apparatus of violent action, we may call government the most beneficial institution. But the fact remains that government is repression, not freedom. Freedom is to be found only in the sphere in which government does not interfere. Liberty is always freedom from the government. It is the restriction of government’s interference. It prevails only in the fields in which the citizens have the opportunity to choose the way in which they want to proceed.”

      People who have no real choice simply stop bothering to choose. And frankly, with the advent of electronic voting, your vote doesn’t mean a damned thing anymore. Continue the fight in the court of public opinion, and in the courts generally. They have superceded legislatures anyway.

      September 27, 2007 at 9:12 am

    Leave a Comment

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Blogwonks: Free Wordpress Blog Hosting
    BLOGWONKS.com is a your online news and blogging partner. Just click here to sign up for your free WordPress blog. You can customize your blog to display the latest RSS postings from your favorite websites. You can keep a diary, upload images and media files, and even register visitors on your site. Sign up now! It's FREE!
    MND Opinion
    editor's bio | article rss | comments rss | itunes podcast | tos | privacy policy
    MensNEWSdaily®, mndnet.com, BlogWonks.com™, BlogWonk.com™, NewsWax.com™, YakVox.com™, DorkWatch.org™, CounterPulse.com™, JavaKing.com™ © 2001 - 2006 Java King, Inc.. Opinions found on this website are expressly those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of this publication, its editorial staff or contributors. Words, graphics, audio, video, and all other content published on this domain must adhere to our Terms of Service . JAVA KING, INC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES, ADVERTISERS, SPONSORS AND AFFILIATES, DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, REPRESENTATIONS OR ENDORSEMENTS HEREIN EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.
    Site Meter
    RETURN TO MENS NEWS DAILY
    counter