Otherwise, just don’t get married. American sluts (almost all American women) will still sleep with you because they sleep with everyone.

Look at Congressman Moran of Virginia who pushed this law: the guy beat up his own wife and the feminists blackmailed him into getting this law passed.

But I have as much respect for him as I do many of the guys who read about IMBRA, say it is horrible, but then do NOTHING about it despite the fact that they could easily walk into the nearest courthouse and lay down a few documents that I have already written that will put an instant restraining order on this.

I can send you a complete case (complaint). All you have to do is carry it into a courthouse.

I cannot do this with my current job and location, but most of my adult life I would have been ready and able to do such a thing.

In fact, for most of my life, if something like IMBRA had happened, I would be front and center as the main plaintiff in federal court.

To do this, I will want someone who understands the issue a little. I have already had a few volunteers but I ended up begging them not to do it because they seemed too stupid to understand the issue.

One guy, after a month of what I thought was prep, said to me “How do I explain to a woman I know about how bad IMBRA is”? I called the whole thing off.

The amount of stupid men in the MRM is enormous.

The amount of gutless men in the MRM is enormous as well.

After that you have lazy “leaders” who tell important people “you can read all about our complaint about VAWA on our website” instead of explaining right there and then the key things that need to be explained…as well as the know-it-alls like the one who goes on television but insists that he will never mention VAWA or IMBRA on Fox News or CNN because the viewers “would only get bored and change the channel”.

Even American women friends who agree that IMBRA is bad…quietly chuckle in their sleeves that women have finally turned the tables on men.

All male politicians in the US now have female legislative assistants who really run the show. This includes Giuliani.

Now for a treat. The following video was just posted showing the two foreign women from the other videos reacting to the concept that American feminists consider them too stupid and non-English speaking to judge men for themselves without background checks being conducted for them first:

http://www.veteransabroad.com/10092007030.mp4

You will have to download this video. It has no viruses.

Hello Fourthwire,

IMBRA can’t prevent American men from dating foreign women. Hell, it can’t even prevent them from using so-called marriage brokers. All they’ve done is thrown humiliating procedural barriers at the men. I don’t doubt that feminists were hoping to keep the numbers to a trickle, but I think you’re both wrong:

I think if hundreds of thousands of men were going overseas using marriage brokers, then it would have an impact on the locals and the quality of the women in the services and more predatory women would slip through.

I’m not being a polyanna but I am an optimist: I think more news stories will show that men continue to date foreign women despite IMBRA *AND* professional career women continuing to wind up alone.

As you pointed out, men have little rights in our society and then the feminists will need to come up with other more “drastic” measures. But one thing isn’t going to change:

American women are going to be more miserable.

Wouldn’t you think that a successful, empowered group would be, well, at least a little more happy? That’s one thing that struck me when I went overseas: Women were strong and even very serious, but overall they were just much happier and optimistic. Strong people are nice people. I try to be a strong person. Yes, it sucks about our lack of rights here but a lot of people out there in the world also have it a lot worse. Always look on the bright side of life… (give a whistle!)

Seriously though: As American women become more and more miserable, I can’t see how this will help them continue to control men with feminine wiles.

Yet after a foreign woman comes to America that they may be Americanized sooner or later. For her, entitlements are rich; worship by men is addictive; and, shopping is fun.

There are too many men ignorant of the realities of feminist rule of law. And too many men unable to resist lusting for a woman.

If sports or music does not get men’s attention, lust will (sex and sex appeal is in a woman’s bag of tricks for persuasion). Drugs and alcohol does not help a man’s judgement.

At the end of the day the overall numbers do to lie: America’s divorce rate is one of the highest in the world’s approximate 240 countries, and that the marriage rate continues to decline.

Small or big every bill and or law that is anti-male ought to not pass or be over turned.

A men’s group ought to better organized to fight each disagreeable law and bill.

I like http://www.afa.net approach to communicating and campaigning.

IMBRA appeals to American single women because they’ve had their noses rubbed into their own feces by the sight of individual American men, apparently happily married to foreign women – agreed.

But I disagree partly with your perspective in that I believe that IMBRA was passed to prevent a TRICKLE of American men marrying foreign women from becoming a FLOOD …….. through making the process of seeking foreign brides as inefficient, risky, and relying on individual men’s own resources as possible.

Think about it – as growing numbers of American men are turning their backs on marriage with American women, many of whom might consider marriage with an “untainted” foreign woman….. wouldn’t it make sense for the NOW-sows to try to throttle international introduction agencies BEFORE more American men resort to those?

And I cannot possible take it as a compliment that IMBRA was passed, only because it resulted in even greater trampling on men’s rights to choose their mates when, how, and where they will.

And IMBRA’s ease of passage presages worse abuse of men’s rights to come….. until enough Men stand up and tell the feminazis and their patrons in Congress “ENOUGH!”.

For all of that, fine post, Polishknight! I do appreciate your posts more often than I show……

I think the total number of such men marrying foreign women was in the 12K per year range or so. Hardly enough to really dent the American women cartel. BUT… just enough for many American women to statistically have met such a couple and observed them happy and content while the numbers of childless, single American women ballooned.

IMBRA is not going to have much impact on those numbers. Look at dating in general: Despite massive laws against men: Sexual harassment, divorce, child-support, etc. millions of men continue to date women in this country (incredibly.) Most of the jealous harpies above really don’t have a man shortage. They can put an ad on match.com and get HUNDREDS of replies from employed, reliable, kind-hearted men which they then look at the first dozen or so, grab out the wealthiest, best looking man, and then fret when he rejects her proposition to marry right away and have babies because her biological clock is ticking.

This dynamic clearly has an feedback loop effect where women who are so stuck-up and have impossible expectations create a WOMAN shortage thereby causing men to try to appease them causing these women to eventually become useless for marriage or relationships contributing to the woman shortage. Kind of like a fire.

Even IMBRA, as obnoxious as it is, is NOTHING compared to the crap most men in this country go through on a Saturday night. (I’m reminded of the opening scene in Cherry 2000 where futuristic yuppies sign “sex contracts” to get a single night of pleasure with a bitchy, angry woman.)

That’s what’s funny about it: Men have it so bad in this country, that IMBRA is a bit of a joke really. And women have it so good, that even a few thousand women entering this country causes them to go into a panic.

Take it as a compliment that IMBRA was passed: These women recognize that young women are panicking. Metro sections are full of urbane professional women complaining that “ideal” men aren’t banging down their door and they’re paranoid that he might be calling up some foreign girl out of her reach.

Recently I had a hysterical gay man yell at me on another blog “You would have an entire generation of American women wiped out”. What he meant was that the fall of the Soviet Union caused a situtation that, if left unregulated, could result in the Generation X American women going without husbands and babies. What is interesting is that he said that without my having fleshed out the concept before. He naturally knew the truth and did not try expounding the usual nonsense that IMBRA is supposedly about protecting foreign women from criminals and men prone to violence.

http://www.ifeminists.net/introduction/editorials/2006/0111.html

Wendi knows Christina Hoff-Sommers well. Yet nobody who opposes IMBRA has been able to speak with Ms. Sommers up to the present moment.

Because Ms. Sommers is the leader of the “Who Stole Feminism” movement, I consider her the most important person in the USA today who could get IMBRA overthrown with a phone call…if she felt it was in her interest.

But as anti-feminist as Ms. Sommers is…why would she try too hard to help American men keep their right to date all those gorgeous 20 somethings in other countries?

It just wouldn’t be in her interest to help American men keep their rights.

Still, I expect her to be honest and help us.

That said, however, she constantly lectures her sons that it’s wrong for a man to hit a woman for ANY reason (even to defend himself) and that men exist to provide financially for women.

She now accepts and tolerates career women because there are so many of them. This is how the anti-male side of even normal seeming American women crept up: They learned to tolerate the goodies for women because they became ubiquos (commonplace). Women’s goodies became law, women’s entitlements weren’t removed, and women decided they liked it that way.

So when I commented I was marrying a foreign woman she sneered “You be careful if you do that because they’ll move here and act just like an American woman. You’ll see. So you might as well stick with a local woman!”

So it’s laughable to imagine that these women care about IMBRA’s unfairness. They’ve been secretly chuckling about unfair divorce laws, domestic violence, etc. for years. They play games during the courtship process to find rich husbands and milk men as suckers for free dinners as if that’s as moral as going fishing.

What TERRIFIES them is the pussy cartel breaking up. That’s why IMBRA was swift and vindictive as much as a neighborhood bully beating up a kid trying to hide his milk money.

IMBRA is not absolute. Men can still marry foreign women. They can use existing match making services such as match.com.

The vast majority of American women apparently do NOT see any link between the loss of American men’s rights and their own, understanding, perhaps correctly that Congress and the courts would not DARE to cross women’s self-appointed lobbyists -the feminazis.

And even relatively good-hearted American women generally don’t give a rat’s ass about American men’s rights, liberties, and freedoms, particularly when increasing numbers of women are finding a dearth of men willing to marry them.

Sorry to say, but in the end, American women’s short-term gratification and hope of gratification trumps any altruistic notions of providing American men with greater freedom.

It would be interesting to see if Wendi McElroy, who wrote against IMBRA would be willing to volunteer to be your “token” female…….

1) American woman challenges IMBRA.
2) She gets an immediate restraining order on the law because she is a woman.

Unmarried women can refer to http://www.meetmenfromeurope.com and complain in court that this site is out of business until IMBRA is overthrown…causing her to miss out on all the great French men she could be meeting.

OK. We can agree that 0 American women have agreed to challenge the law for us although we are asking, over at http://www.onlinedatingrights.com, for such a woman to do the challenge.

Some anti-feminist American women have praised us for wanting to fight IMBRA, but they bow out of doing the challenge themselves by giving excuses such as “I am a happily married woman so I could not challenge IMBRA as an affected person”.

This means that they either do not understand that IMBRA affects everyone who might someday want to say hello to any other person for ANY reason. Anybody can challenge IMBRA saying it stops them from contacting foreign women for ANY reason if the women are on a dating website that deals primarily with introducing foreigners with Americans.

An American married woman could challenge IMBRA in court saying one of 2 things:

1) IMBRA prevents me from contacting the women at http://www.aforeignaffair.com to do a study on what life is like in Russia.

2) IMBRA prevents me from cheating on my husband if I feel like it. The US Government (Congress) must not and cannot pass lies to prevent people from lying to each other socially or cheating on their spouses. If anything that is a states rights issue (although it is not a states rights issue either).

So, yes, the American women who agree with us have let us down because they should know that ONLY AN AMERICAN WOMAN CAN SUCCESSFULLY CHALLENGE IMBRA.

We have Iraq War vets ready to be plaintiffs, but we know that even Iraq War vets have no standing vs women in the justice system.

We have foreign women ready to be plaintiffs but they are not allowed to challenge this law even though it dishonestly professes to protect them.

And those feminists know that by trying to provide American women with a monopoly over marital rights to American women, they can count on at least the tacit political support of the vast majority of American women….. who don’t give a rat’s ass about American men’s rights to meet and marry whom they will.

This madness of stripping the liberties of American men, simply for the convenience of American women MUST be stopped.

And until Congress-critters are voted out of office for supporting feminazis’ misandry-laden lobbying, American men will sink deeper and deeper into servitude.

One week earlier in the Kiev Borispol Airport, the factor had been one sighting every 7 seconds!

That is the difference.

That is what caused insecure American feminists to get IMBRA passed.

That is why the next target is to stop American men from obtaining passports.

Passports are already being denied to men who owe $2500 or more in child support.

Fathers Rights Activists need to perk up and understand that your happiness depends on more than seeing the kids.

For those newcomers who don’t know Glenn’s standing in the American media, check this out:

http://www.glennsacks.com/what_people_are.htm

Someone mentioned above that judges and Congressmen might be scared of the “Brian Baird Treatment” if they came out against IMBRA.

But Brian Baird, the Congressman who voted against the Iraq War but (after visiting our troops in Iraq) later came out in favor of not pulling out of Iraq, was only accosted by 600 Move-On freaks at a townhall meeting in southeast Washington.

Congressman Baird will not suffer politically for his “reversal” of position on the Iraq War.

Similarly, no Congressman or woman would suffer heavily by looking at the human rights abuses of the IMBRA law and saying “Sorry, but this gateway law threatens all of our freedoms. The Republican judge who claimed that Americans have no liberty interest in contacting foreigners was just dead wrong”.

There would not BE a “Brian Baird Treatment” if a Congressman, left or right, simply came out and said something like that. The feminists, unlike the MoveOn anti-war crowd, have to work behind the scenes because everyone, including almost all women, dislike them when they seem them.

Here are two foreign women commenting on IMBRA in a video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xE6dfxZ-5eQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihW4P8Bcrxc