A comment on MDN got me thinking. The comment read, “First, we are now in a time when the two most important questions are the war being waged against us by the Islamic terrorists and tacitly supported by much of Islam and also the question of immigration. Nothing, absolutely nothing, is more important than these two dangers.†I had suggested that the commenter was feminized and he could not understand why.
I reviewed Patrick J. Buchanan’s recent article Is Terrorism a Mortal Threat? in which he effectively argues that Islamic terrorist are hardly the threat they are made out to be and that in spite of the unthinkable terrorist nuclear attack America would not be destroyed. Buchanan writes: “But are there any terrorists in the world who can change the American way of life or our political system? No. Can they knock down a building? Yes. Can they kill somebody? Yes. But can they change us? No. Only we can change ourselves. So what is the great threat we are facing?”
I suggest the greatest mortal threat to our nation and Western civilization is the feminization of the society in general. Fear is a feminine characteristic that can and does paralyze society. It’s also the lack of the male risk taking characteristic. A feminized society responds to every problem with an emotional paralyzing response rather than a rational and logical solution.
More airport security and bomb proof trash cans in the subways are no solution to terrorist, yet they are the source of billion dollar Homeland Security spending to pacify a feminized state that is afraid of its own shadow. How can a rational man suggest that immigration is a mortal threat to this nation when we are a nation of immigrants?
Modern technology, medicine and weapons of war are inherently dangerous and the product of male risk taking, reason and logic, not feminine emotion and “wishful thinkingâ€Â. Playing with DNA or fissionable materials is risky business and best left to the male rational mind.
Less than half the public have IQ’s over 100 and it takes IQ’s over 140 to effectively do modern science. When it comes to IQ’s over 160 very few men and far fewer women have it and they are the ones capable of great accomplishments. Recruiting female engineers and scientist is certainly suboptimal recruitment but is the response in our feminized society.
It makes sense only to a feminized society to promote diversity at MIT by admitting women with an IQ’s of 130 while rejecting men with IQ’s of 160. To make the campus truly diversified, we need to include a few with IQ’s of 50 or less don’t we?
It’s the loss of rational thinking and substitution of feminist emotion that are the greatest mortal threat to this county. Society is doomed when we live in Orwell’s world of 1984 where: “Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense.â€Â
It has become taboo to even suggest that men and women are distinctly different and equally important complements. One must promote androgyny and male female competition regardless of obvious physical differences in the genders. Perhaps the feminized psychologist will define a new entry in DSM V for men that suggest the necessity of male dominance. They must have a mental disorder.
We need not look to outside forces to destroy this great civilization, but the rather to the internal changes resulting from woman’s suffrage to find our mortal threat. Winston Churchill had the guts to say what the feminized males of modern society are afraid to say: “The women’s suffrage movement is only the small edge of the wedge, if we allow women to vote it will mean the loss of social structure and the rise of every liberal cause under the sun. Women are well represented by their fathers, brothers, and husbands.â€Â
