NYTimes: Thomas Friedman Wants America to Get Over 9/11
Thomas Friedman thinks you are “stupid” if you still care about the atrocity committed against this country by Islamofascists in New York on 9/11/2001. He thinks “9/11 is over” and we all should just move on. Even worse, he has decided that we are no longer a great country, but are filled with seemingly meaningless “fear,” that we have a dilapidated infrastructure, and that while America used to be “the gold standard,” he believes “We aren’t anymore.” Friedman is falling for the typical, leftist doom-and-gloom scenario and imagines that China is better than we are, Europe is more inviting, and we have become the new Rome after the fall. His closing line is “We can’t afford to keep being this stupid!” By contrast to Friedman, my opening line to him is “We can’t afford to be this self-loathing!”
Friedman starts his piece off comparing the current state of the U.S. to a satirical piece in the Onion, which is fitting because Frideman’s own piece might be mistaken for a satire on the frivolousness and unserious nature of the left today. Unfortunately, he is serious about his self-inflicted amnesia and seems utterly unconcerned about the threats we face as a nation and a people. Like most truthers he seems to imagine that it has all been hype, a conspiracy theory made up by eeeevil Republicans who merely want to fool enough people to stay in power.
His lack of ability to understand the nature of the enemy we face is a perfect reflection of the Chamberlainesque, “peace in our times” left that would soon have us in thrall to Islamofascism by their ignorant policy prescriptions.
It seems he had an ulterior motive in writing this doggerel, though, as Friedman used his self-immolating New York Times piece as a veiled jab at Rudolph Giuliani who is, in his perception, a “candidate running on 9/11.”
Says Friedman:
We don’t need another president of 9/11. We need a president for 9/12. I will only vote for the 9/12 candidate.
He seems to be repudiating his previous writing on terrorism and, all of a sudden, imagining a world where all is honey and roses, but that the eeeevil terror-mongers are keeping us hiding under the bed in meaningless fear.
What does that mean? This: 9/11 has made us stupid. I honor, and weep for, all those murdered on that day. But our reaction to 9/11 — mine included — has knocked America completely out of balance, and it is time to get things right again.
Friedman goes on to trot out the old leftist trope that all our evil can be wrapped up in the Guantanamo Bay detainment facility.
You may think Guantánamo Bay is a prison camp in Cuba for Al Qaeda terrorists. A lot of the world thinks it’s a place we send visitors who don’t give the right answers at immigration. I will not vote for any candidate who is not committed to dismantling Guantánamo Bay and replacing it with a free field hospital for poor Cubans. Guantánamo Bay is the anti-Statue of Liberty.
I’m sorry, is the security of the U.S.A. something we should be selling with slick, Madison Avenue ad campaigns so that Guantanamo is perceived as a garden spot by the rest of the world, now?
Should we be sad that immigrants might imagine that Guantanamo is a place that “visitors who don’t give the right answers at immigration” are sent to? Few Americans will be too upset that we might be seeing fewer immigrants coming here, for sure. If immigrants fear Guantanamo, many Americans will think it so much the better. But that aside, his claims about Guantanamo are absurd propaganda fed to a willing European populace none of which has a lick of truth in it. It looks like Friedman is only too happy to feed that perception against the better interests and safety of his own countrymen.
Friedman then goes on to worry that foreign business travelers and tourists are avoiding the U.S.A. because we are so worried over terrorism here. But, even if he is right that our current airport restrictions are hurting tourism, he offers no solution. His bromides and whining offers us nothing to solve the problem he thinks he sees.
Friedman then claims that we are a dilapidated country because our infrastructure is falling apart.
Look at our infrastructure. It’s not just the bridge that fell in my hometown, Minneapolis. Fly from Zurich’s ultramodern airport to La Guardia’s dump. It is like flying from the Jetsons to the Flintstones. I still can’t get uninterrupted cellphone service between my home in Bethesda and my office in D.C. But I recently bought a pocket cellphone at the Beijing airport and immediately called my wife in Bethesda — crystal clear.
He can thank his friends in the Democrat Party for the overweening regulation and the graft they have created with unions that hampers construction all of which causes this sort of stuff not the global war on terror or any security concerns across the nation.
And, yes, Friedman thinks China is better than we are.
I just attended the China clean car conference, where Chinese automakers were boasting that their 2008 cars will meet “Euro 4” — European Union — emissions standards. We used to be the gold standard. We aren’t anymore.
I see. Does anyone in the world, ANYONE, think the Red Chinese care a whit about the environment and “emission standards?”
His last paragraph is the “gold standard” of leftist idiocy, though.
We can’t afford to keep being this stupid! We have got to get our groove back. We need a president who will unite us around a common purpose, not a common enemy. Al Qaeda is about 9/11. We are about 9/12, we are about the Fourth of July — which is why I hope that anyone who runs on the 9/11 platform gets trounced.
So, let’s just hide our heads in the sand, folks. Mr. Friedman thinks this whole al Qaeda thing is over. It’s all so yesterday, like bellbottoms and disco. Out with the old and in with the new, baby.
Friedman’s ignorance of the threats we have faced since the 1970s — even as we were unaware of them then — is glaring in this lightheaded piece of fluff and a perfect example of how the left cannot be trusted with our national security.
His ideas are the pet rock of punditry. Sooo yesterday.
| More from Warner Todd Huston
Stumble It!


September 30th, 2007 at 9:37 am
I read Friedman’s article. Maybe we should start basing our intellectual commentary on skits from SNL; do ya think?
September 30th, 2007 at 12:54 pm
Turn Guantanomo into a free field hospital for poor Cubans? According to Michael Moore Cuba has a great health care system. Is Friedman calling Michael Moore a liar?
October 1st, 2007 at 3:22 am
Cuba probably does have pretty good health care benefits. It’s one of those things socialist leaders / dictators have learned to provide for people in a system that guarantees they’ll be too poor to get anything for themselves. Hey – at least you’ve got your health!
October 1st, 2007 at 3:25 am
Wordpress filtering comments again.
October 1st, 2007 at 3:26 am
OK – it worked – but delayed posts for some reason, so I thought it wasn’t going to. Sorry for the duplication.
October 1st, 2007 at 5:24 am
The motives and politican delusions of Friedman – or many other hysterics – is beside the point. Even fools say something close to real sometimes. Even if by accident.
9/11 was a disaster, wicked. But the reactions since have been hysterical. The substantial loss of day to day freedom has been a terrible over-reaction akin to shooting oneslf in the foot with a field ordnance piece.
And that hysteria is par for the course in a western civilisation – led by America – which has capitulated to the faux-fearfulness, the ‘poor meism’, the victim mentality and the rent-seeking scum that have riden the feminist elephant into our living rooms.
Scare the bejesus out of a population with bogymen (especially men bogies) and you have them by the balls. Billions of dollars can be siphoned off to line pockets of the politico-legal-mafia, and the hysterical fear-high junkies on the left and the right will demand more be spent. The greedy, shify, liars on the left and right will gladly exaggerate and take their cut.
The hysteria spreads. Cities get ‘locked down’ whenever a car backfires. Get over 9/11. At least you had one. Australia has the same hysterical response policies and we had only a hundred or so blown up in a pub in Bali. A foreign country, not even on home soil. But we still followed the American lead. After all, Bali is only six thousand miles from Adelaide!! Ahhhgh !! The sky is falling in and James Bond is only fiction. Superman had a riding accident. OMG let’s hide under the table. Better buy a bigger one. Here comes the table salesmen. Send the bloke next door to beat someone up.
London, Madrid. You next. Ashby de la Zouche is doomed.
Brazil. Did you watch the movie?
October 1st, 2007 at 7:52 am
Yet another view: Americans expect to win, not just attain a different state of balance. The list emerges, and the vast majority of Americans are not merely willing to go along but expect politicians to order and support what it takes to eliminate the threat. What differs is the level of tolerance and patience of the people. Some people will tire easily (with short attention spans to begin with).
“It should be over by now” is popular with anyone who can believe it; and will be a natural path for any member of the opposition who prizes politics over principle. If things do not proceed at the rate that maximizes feel-goodedness, there must be something wrong.
October 1st, 2007 at 3:50 pm
To be kind, Thomas Friedman is a nit-wit.
Just what in hell does it take to have the American public realize that in all liklehood we are in for a long hard pull with Islam.
The first one lasted from 632 with the death of the Prophet (and the beginning of the Sunni-Shiite split) until the battle of Vienna in 1659.
Islam is a culture caught in the trap of its own conceptual view of the world which binds government and religion inextricably together.
Turkey has been the only Islamic country to escape this dilemma.
China, despite having a “secular religion” of communism had someone who realized that economically, it would not work. India, despite the evils committed by the British, was left with a tradition of democracy that seems to be working.
Islam has not found that person yet whom they need so desperately.
Islam’s only solution so far has been the delusion of returning to the Caliphate of the 7th to 9th centuries.
Their phantasy of conquering the world is real but ultimately unattainable.
When pushed far enough the world will not allow it (let’s here what they have to say about George W Bush then) and the new generation of Muslims, particularly in Iran, are chafing under the theocracy there.
Whether the Wahabis or westernized Muslims win the battle for young minds is one of the key battles of the Islamic-non-Islamic confrontation.
As far as Mr Friedman goes, there is an old saying that you judge a person by the company he keeps.
What paper does he work for again?
And how many volumes of retractions have they had to make since 2003?
Trustworthy is not a word that springs to my mind.
October 1st, 2007 at 3:55 pm
The whole world is locked in a life-or-death struggle with Islam. And we are supposed to forget one of its most horrible incidents? Mr Friedman should start writing a column on cooking.