Feminist Wolf Writes “End of America”

2007-10-02
By

The End of America: Letter of Warning to a Young Patriot by feminist icon Namoi Wolf was released this month. Ms. Wolf writes in her 10 September 2007 blog:

“As the title implies, the book is a letter of warning to all Americans about the actions of the Bush administration and the threat these actions pose to our Constitution and our democracy. I hope that you will read this introduction and will be inspired to take action to help save our democracy.”

I happened to catch Ms. Wolf promoting her new book on To the Contrary a PBS show promoted as:

“To The Contrary, Public Broadcasting’s successful all-female news analysis series, is celebrating its 15th season on air. With women in the forefront of politics and on the cutting edge of national agendas, To The Contrary continues to provide an important, timely forum for women to discuss national and international issues and policies. It presents news and views that are rarely, if ever, available elsewhere on television.”

Of interest was Ms. Wolf’s comment that women are always afraid and men are likely equally afraid, continuing that the Bush Administration has put America on the track to become a Fascist state in her “Ten Easy Steps.” It was the first time I have heard a feminist acknowledge that women are by nature afraid and literally depend on government to protect them from everything, from the men in their lives to the right to defy reason and logic. The relationship between feminism and big government and the promotion of every liberal cause should be obvious deriving from the weaker sex natural and now acknowledged fear.

It is ultimate irony that our fearful feminists now proclaim a fear of what they have created; an oppressive government that that sees terrorist threat in every facet of life, from the five year old that make a finger gun, to the man that dares oppose their views. It’s equivalent to the wife that can not be pleased by a husband that follows his wife’s every demand.

For those that seek a true perspective on where the feminist leaders are going, I recommend To The Countrary.  Meanwhile, I’ll just stick with The News Hour.

13 views

  • mruffolo

    “A former president of the Southern Baptist Convention is saddened at what he sees as the “feminization” of church and society.”

    “Sixty percent of all your college and university students are now female. Somebody said, ‘Well, you’re opposed to that?’ No, I’m thrilled to death that they’re in upper-level education, as far as women are concerned,” says Patterson. “But I think it is absolutely tragic that only 40 percent of the students are men. [W]hat that means is that increasingly, our country will not have a male intelligentsia,” he stated.

    “Dr. Patterson says if that trend continues, the United States will eventually follow in the footsteps of France and England when it comes to social policies and politics.”

    http://www.onenewsnow.com/2007/10/southern_baptist_leader_warns.php

  • amfortas

    Scared folk cry Wolf all the time. She needs to get a grip on her knickers.

  • Jim Peterson

    France is quite anti-feminist in comparison to the USA. I am moving there in December. The US feminists hate the French patriarchy.

    Naomi Wolf wrote “Fire With Fire” which was a politically correct attempt to combat the more anti-male “victim feminists” of her movement.

    Naomi Wolf is a potential ally for the MRM, but you could only trust her a little because of the weakness she shows in not wanting to hurt the feelings of her radical friends.

    I remember Naomi writing in “Fire With Fire” about how it is OK if a man looks at young college cheerleaders with interest as long as he does not touch them, just as a woman can look at young college soccer players with interest.

    What she was basically saying is that political war can be fought against the men who actually would abandon their same-age galpals for a college cheerleader.

  • http://whatmenthinkofwomen.blogspot.com/ christianj

    “It is ultimate irony that our fearful feminists now proclaim a fear of what they have created”

    Studies have already demonstrated that the privileged sex is the most miserable and one has to wonder why…

    Maybe crying Wolf too often has that affect.

    Also a fine example that giving a woman everything thing she wants has absolutely no affect whatsoever on her outlook or her state of mind..

    It has NO limit…

    It should demonstrate to most, excluding manginas, what your life becomes when you hook up with them…Never ending servitude.

  • tonysprout

    America is close to its end. Whatever your position, all you need to do is see the directives he issued, this one in particular which makes him dictator at his ownwhim. This is similar to marshall law, but gives him the power to ignore Congress and SCOTUS: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/20070509-12.html

  • conservativation

    This is absurd. I want a detailed list of all of the anti-woman policies she is referring to. What a joke.

  • mruffolo

    Is there a rank list for male friendliest countries (low divorce rate, low imprisonment rate, low dishonoring factor, fewest anti-male laws, no woman, pet worship, little or no feminism (man bad, woman good) attitude)?

  • http://www.mensdefense.org Lloyd Selberg

    RE: Tony

    You may be correct and support Wolf’s premise. Be it Clinton or Bush writing executive orders we have a problem. My point is WHY. Both derive their power by feeding the fears of a feminized society.

    Recall my opening paragraphs in my essay on parental rights:

    From ancient times to modernity, political philosophy has grappled with the sensitive relationship between the child, family, and state. In The Republic, Plato wrote:

    “The wives of our guardians are to be common, and their children are to be common, and no parent is to know his own child, nor any child his parent. . . . The proper officers will take the offspring of the good parents to the pen or fold, and there they will deposit them with certain nurses who dwell in a separate quarter.”
    In Orthodoxy, G.K. Chesterton observed:

    “In short, the democratic faith is this: that the most terribly important things must be left to ordinary men themselves—the mating of the sexes, the rearing of the young, the laws of the state.”

    Like Plato, modern-day utopian thinkers have always looked upon the parent-child relationship with suspicion at best, and more often as the crucial obstacle to ultimate state power over the individual. Respect for the autonomy of the family is as central to the democratic ideal as popular sovereignty.






Search

RSS Amy Alkon

RSS Donna Laframboise