<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Feminist Wolf Writes “End of America”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/02/feminist-wolf-writes-%e2%80%9cend-of-america%e2%80%9d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/02/feminist-wolf-writes-%e2%80%9cend-of-america%e2%80%9d/</link>
	<description>Men&#039;s Rights Activism, MRA Politics, Analysis, Commentary and Global News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:10:49 -1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Selberg</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/02/feminist-wolf-writes-%e2%80%9cend-of-america%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-52624</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Selberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 20:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/02/feminist-wolf-writes-%e2%80%9cend-of-america%e2%80%9d/#comment-52624</guid>
		<description>RE: Tony

You may be correct and support Wolf’s premise.  Be it Clinton or Bush writing executive orders we have a problem.  My point is WHY.  Both derive their power by feeding the fears of a feminized society.    

Recall my opening paragraphs in my essay on parental rights: 

From ancient times to modernity, political philosophy has grappled with the sensitive relationship between the child, family, and state. In The Republic, Plato wrote: 

“The wives of our guardians are to be common, and their children are to be common, and no parent is to know his own child, nor any child his parent. . . . The proper officers will take the offspring of the good parents to the pen or fold, and there they will deposit them with certain nurses who dwell in a separate quarter.” 
In Orthodoxy, G.K. Chesterton observed: 

“In short, the democratic faith is this: that the most terribly important things must be left to ordinary men themselves—the mating of the sexes, the rearing of the young, the laws of the state.” 

Like Plato, modern-day utopian thinkers have always looked upon the parent-child relationship with suspicion at best, and more often as the crucial obstacle to ultimate state power over the individual.   Respect for the autonomy of the family is as central to the democratic ideal as popular sovereignty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: Tony</p>
<p>You may be correct and support Wolf’s premise.  Be it Clinton or Bush writing executive orders we have a problem.  My point is WHY.  Both derive their power by feeding the fears of a feminized society.    </p>
<p>Recall my opening paragraphs in my essay on parental rights: </p>
<p>From ancient times to modernity, political philosophy has grappled with the sensitive relationship between the child, family, and state. In The Republic, Plato wrote: </p>
<p>“The wives of our guardians are to be common, and their children are to be common, and no parent is to know his own child, nor any child his parent. . . . The proper officers will take the offspring of the good parents to the pen or fold, and there they will deposit them with certain nurses who dwell in a separate quarter.”<br />
In Orthodoxy, G.K. Chesterton observed: </p>
<p>“In short, the democratic faith is this: that the most terribly important things must be left to ordinary men themselves—the mating of the sexes, the rearing of the young, the laws of the state.” </p>
<p>Like Plato, modern-day utopian thinkers have always looked upon the parent-child relationship with suspicion at best, and more often as the crucial obstacle to ultimate state power over the individual.   Respect for the autonomy of the family is as central to the democratic ideal as popular sovereignty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mruffolo</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/02/feminist-wolf-writes-%e2%80%9cend-of-america%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-52598</link>
		<dc:creator>mruffolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 14:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/02/feminist-wolf-writes-%e2%80%9cend-of-america%e2%80%9d/#comment-52598</guid>
		<description>Is there a rank list for male friendliest countries (low divorce rate, low imprisonment rate, low dishonoring factor, fewest anti-male laws, no woman, pet worship, little or no feminism (man bad, woman good) attitude)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a rank list for male friendliest countries (low divorce rate, low imprisonment rate, low dishonoring factor, fewest anti-male laws, no woman, pet worship, little or no feminism (man bad, woman good) attitude)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conservativation</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/02/feminist-wolf-writes-%e2%80%9cend-of-america%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-52597</link>
		<dc:creator>conservativation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 13:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/02/feminist-wolf-writes-%e2%80%9cend-of-america%e2%80%9d/#comment-52597</guid>
		<description>This is absurd. I want a detailed list of all of the anti-woman policies she is referring to. What a joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is absurd. I want a detailed list of all of the anti-woman policies she is referring to. What a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tonysprout</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/02/feminist-wolf-writes-%e2%80%9cend-of-america%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-52594</link>
		<dc:creator>tonysprout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 13:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/02/feminist-wolf-writes-%e2%80%9cend-of-america%e2%80%9d/#comment-52594</guid>
		<description>America is close to its end. Whatever your position, all you need to do is see the directives he issued, this one in particular which makes him dictator at his ownwhim. This is similar to marshall law, but gives him the power to ignore Congress and SCOTUS: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/20070509-12.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>America is close to its end. Whatever your position, all you need to do is see the directives he issued, this one in particular which makes him dictator at his ownwhim. This is similar to marshall law, but gives him the power to ignore Congress and SCOTUS: <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/20070509-12.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/20070509-12.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christianj</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/02/feminist-wolf-writes-%e2%80%9cend-of-america%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-52588</link>
		<dc:creator>christianj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 09:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/02/feminist-wolf-writes-%e2%80%9cend-of-america%e2%80%9d/#comment-52588</guid>
		<description>&quot;It is ultimate irony that our fearful feminists now proclaim a fear of what they have created&quot;

Studies have already demonstrated that the privileged sex is the most miserable and one has to wonder why...

Maybe crying Wolf too often has that affect.

Also a fine example that giving a woman everything thing she wants has absolutely no affect whatsoever on her outlook or her state of mind..

It has NO limit...

It should demonstrate to most, excluding manginas, what your life becomes when you hook up with them...Never ending servitude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It is ultimate irony that our fearful feminists now proclaim a fear of what they have created&#8221;</p>
<p>Studies have already demonstrated that the privileged sex is the most miserable and one has to wonder why&#8230;</p>
<p>Maybe crying Wolf too often has that affect.</p>
<p>Also a fine example that giving a woman everything thing she wants has absolutely no affect whatsoever on her outlook or her state of mind..</p>
<p>It has NO limit&#8230;</p>
<p>It should demonstrate to most, excluding manginas, what your life becomes when you hook up with them&#8230;Never ending servitude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Peterson</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/02/feminist-wolf-writes-%e2%80%9cend-of-america%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-52586</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 07:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/02/feminist-wolf-writes-%e2%80%9cend-of-america%e2%80%9d/#comment-52586</guid>
		<description>France is quite anti-feminist in comparison to the USA. I am moving there in December. The US feminists hate the French patriarchy.

Naomi Wolf wrote &quot;Fire With Fire&quot; which was a politically correct attempt to combat the more anti-male &quot;victim feminists&quot; of her movement.

Naomi Wolf is a potential ally for the MRM, but you could only trust her a little because of the weakness she shows in not wanting to hurt the feelings of her radical friends.

I remember Naomi writing in &quot;Fire With Fire&quot; about how it is OK if a man looks at young college cheerleaders with interest as long as he does not touch them, just as a woman can look at young college soccer players with interest.

What she was basically saying is that political war can be fought against the men who actually would abandon their same-age galpals for a college cheerleader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>France is quite anti-feminist in comparison to the USA. I am moving there in December. The US feminists hate the French patriarchy.</p>
<p>Naomi Wolf wrote &#8220;Fire With Fire&#8221; which was a politically correct attempt to combat the more anti-male &#8220;victim feminists&#8221; of her movement.</p>
<p>Naomi Wolf is a potential ally for the MRM, but you could only trust her a little because of the weakness she shows in not wanting to hurt the feelings of her radical friends.</p>
<p>I remember Naomi writing in &#8220;Fire With Fire&#8221; about how it is OK if a man looks at young college cheerleaders with interest as long as he does not touch them, just as a woman can look at young college soccer players with interest.</p>
<p>What she was basically saying is that political war can be fought against the men who actually would abandon their same-age galpals for a college cheerleader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amfortas</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/02/feminist-wolf-writes-%e2%80%9cend-of-america%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-52579</link>
		<dc:creator>amfortas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 02:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/02/feminist-wolf-writes-%e2%80%9cend-of-america%e2%80%9d/#comment-52579</guid>
		<description>Scared folk cry Wolf all the time. She needs to get a grip on her knickers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scared folk cry Wolf all the time. She needs to get a grip on her knickers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mruffolo</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/02/feminist-wolf-writes-%e2%80%9cend-of-america%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-52578</link>
		<dc:creator>mruffolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 02:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/02/feminist-wolf-writes-%e2%80%9cend-of-america%e2%80%9d/#comment-52578</guid>
		<description>&quot;A former president of the Southern Baptist Convention is saddened at what he sees as the &quot;feminization&quot; of church and society.&quot;

&quot;Sixty percent of all your college and university students are now female. Somebody said, &#039;Well, you&#039;re opposed to that?&#039; No, I&#039;m thrilled to death that they&#039;re in upper-level education, as far as women are concerned,&quot; says Patterson. &quot;But I think it is absolutely tragic that only 40 percent of the students are men. [W]hat that means is that increasingly, our country will not have a male intelligentsia,&quot; he stated.

&quot;Dr. Patterson says if that trend continues, the United States will eventually follow in the footsteps of France and England when it comes to social policies and politics.&quot;

http://www.onenewsnow.com/2007/10/southern_baptist_leader_warns.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A former president of the Southern Baptist Convention is saddened at what he sees as the &#8220;feminization&#8221; of church and society.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Sixty percent of all your college and university students are now female. Somebody said, &#8216;Well, you&#8217;re opposed to that?&#8217; No, I&#8217;m thrilled to death that they&#8217;re in upper-level education, as far as women are concerned,&#8221; says Patterson. &#8220;But I think it is absolutely tragic that only 40 percent of the students are men. [W]hat that means is that increasingly, our country will not have a male intelligentsia,&#8221; he stated.</p>
<p>&#8220;Dr. Patterson says if that trend continues, the United States will eventually follow in the footsteps of France and England when it comes to social policies and politics.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/2007/10/southern_baptist_leader_warns.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.onenewsnow.com/2007/10/southern_baptist_leader_warns.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
