http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=485696&in_page_id=1770

How many women are in the picture.

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/1812890/

Even a vending machine needs a man to refill it once a month. Not only do they not get technology and how it works but they don’t even get simple ideas like “if you don’t clean your keyboard once in a while it will stop working”.

Not to worry guys – the automated utopia of this ignoramus’ fantasies will never exist because it can’t – it’s physically impossible. Now if we could just figure out how to do without women :O)

For the past 10,000 years men have protected their families, lead, invented, designed, built, maintain, and replaced stuff that women take for granted.

Without men in man holes, climbing electric poles, repairing streets, designing and building homes, inventing and manufacturing appliances, developing new technologies in electronics, physics, and chemistry, among other things, the world would look and feel different.

Further, men are the largest contributors in ideas like philosophy, religion, and psychology.

What’s interesting to me is that she blatantly states that 1. once technology makes men redundant (by allowing any1 to squish bugs, repair cars, lift heavy objects) she HOPES men will be tossed aside, and 2. she’s essentially stating that this SHOULD BE THE CASE.

If she believes (as you aptly put) that men are here ONLY AND SOLELY for whatever benefit they generate for women, and she believes this viewpoint is valid, then she ain’t got jack sh*t to say about a man who thinks the same and sees women as only tools to provide himself sexual enjoyment.

These are the men feminists love to hate: goes on a cruise and claims he’s a doctor, lies preponderently to get into women’s pants (I love you baby, we have somethings special, I’ll call you tomorrow I promise). This women is (unknowingly) legitimizing the most chauvinistic pig to toss away conquered women as disposible j*zz rags.

When you switch the genders in their statements and viewpoints is when you really start realizing how bigoted and truly insane with hatred these women are.

And a number of very successful ones like Dworkin have swindled their ways into the halls of power to pass incredibly misandrist laws.

Families fall apart wihtout a Father as much as they would like to say it does not.

Women themselves (the non-feminised smarter ones) testify that life with other women is just too much to take (Lesbian relationships are more abusive than hetero relationships by 2/3).

Women prefer the stable, rational and un-emotive attiude that most males introduce into the mix.

So in reality, they’re dreaming as feminists do. They want their sexism and verbal abuse while anyone else has no right to even talk or have a differing opinion out of turn..

It really must take a major effort to be this blatantly obnoxious.

The hallmark of feminism.

But they suffer so much…

Meanwhile I sat and watched my Dad stitch up his arm after cutting a gash of 2 inches, used a sewing needle, cotton and not one anesthetic in sight…

1. “CARE” tells us that most of the poor and starving people in the world are women, with a picture of a woman that appears to be African. While I don’t believe any such statistics about women in the developed world, because virtually all social programs are designed to benefit women (and sometimes children), I do believe it about third world countries. Why then, is this the case? Answer: Matriarchy. With no familial ties to women, men can take care of themselves, and women cannot. So on the one hand we have an article promoting the joys of matriarchy while on the same page we have an ad asking for help for those misfortunate enough to live in it. Ironically, the slogan appealing for donations is “You have the POWER to help her do it.” CARE is appealing to the “power” and “empowerment” trip feminists live for. In other words, women “empowered” by the redistribution of wealth in successful patriarchal cultures should spread that money around to the matriarchal failures, either to prop them up as if they can somehow function on their own or just because feminists allegedly “care” about such female suffering, which they of course do not.

2. Another ad appears entitled “Feminist Social Work”, with a link to CourseAdvisor.com. WTF? No wonder when my ex-wife was proven to be a pedophile, the so-called “Child Protective Services” were capable of responding with nothing other than a witch-hunt against the father, leaving the children to be abused, neglected, and molested by the mother sheerly out of hatred for men. Sadly, yours and my tax dollars go to the ignorant and hate-filled “Women’s Studies” to do “social work”, which explains why they are all such a total dismal failure at accomplishing anything other than promoting the total misery of matriarchy established in the prior ad.

Sorry ad-bots, but I don’t hate men and I already pay heavily to support the matriarchy in America.

She is honest as hell. She directly states what most feminist obfuscate.

Men exist to serve women. They exist to be used by women. What is important is not equality or fairness or anything noble — what is important is women. Period.

Men have no value other than what they can do for women. If women can get along without men, then men can simply cease to exist.

This is kind of what happens in divorce. The man has no significance and his needs and well being is unimportant. If the woman feels her well being will be higher with him kicked out in the street, then he is kicked out in the street (or made a slave, etc.). His well being doesn’t even factor into the equation (niether does her promises, agreements, etc.)

Evey man considering marriage should read this article and realize that most women think much like this at least around the time of divorce.

By the way, virtually no male not even rabid MRA types ever goes as far as females in their disdain and abuse and mistreatment of the opposite sex.

The law is so hung up on the most trivial of DV (mere expression of anger — no matter how justified — invokes the DV Army) yet totally ignores the abuse that women routhinely inflict on men often using the government has hinchman.

Women will undoubtedly need men as they always have, albeit through different means to the same ends.

That particularly sorry bitch was undoubtedly a militant lesbian, with no PERSONAL need for men…….

…….. and little sexual attraction to men.

However in her little misandry-laden fantasy, she glosses over the fact that the vast majority of women ARE heterosexual.

Then there’s her assumption that a modern, technological society “doesn’t need men”.

Again, she fails to gloss over a few pertinent facts:

- no technology is foolproof.
- men are generally, albeit not always the ones called upon to repair, adjust, modify, and create new technology.

Perhaps the next time that silly sow has her automobile break down, she should spend time shopping around for repair services that hire only female mechanics.

I am reminded of the W.A.G. who quipped once that an all-female civilization would be an example of paradise on earth, with every woman living in harmony and peace with one another, all their needs fulfilled, free of fear, free of violence, and free of those pesky men………….

…….. right up until the plumbing breaks down!

And if women don’t “need” men, that’s fine by me.

By all means, do away with the vaginamony and child support laws since men are not “needed”!

The feminazi that wrote the bit of misandry quoted has nothing on Josef Goebbels………..

Ah, but when the asteroids start hitting the earth and the electricity stops flowing to the vibrators, then what? Chaos! And what happens when both of the lesbians want to be on top, with the strap on, and the cops come, who will they arrest then, the hairest woman or the one with the most bruises the shape of the dildo still being held by the other? Life will be far more complex than this Nazi bitch thinks (Nazi, – that’s the first time I have ever called a feminist a Nazi but she thinks like one, so, there it is.)

“The top bishop in the Episcopal Church has made it clear that she supports same-sex unions. A leader among conservative Episcopalians says such a stance illustrates why many people are choosing to leave the American contingent of the worldwide Anglican Communion.”

http://www.onenewsnow.com/2007/10/conservative_pastor_faults_epi.php

Oh yeh? Feminsist oppressed societies, like ours, just don’t reproduce sufficiently to last more than two generations. Then what? Import Mexican women to have more ‘humans’ for them?

AND HERE? They be extinct as soon the the fridges at the supermarket run dry.