I know it is a joke to try to get through to the cowardly manginas in Congress, but here is my letter to about 20 Senators this morning. Anyone hear can copy the text to write to the other 80 Senators if you think any of them are worth the time:ÂÂ
Good Morning,
This is about the Commerce Justice and Science Appropriations Act vote coming up on Monday morning: I represent a veteran’s organization that contends that heterosexual men are not represented in Congress anymore. Does your office read blogs like www.mensnewsdaily.com or does your party leadership say the men’s vote is either expendable or all wrapped up? If a woman calls your office and says she “supports the troops†does that mean your senator will hire her to be a legislative aide and control the senator’s policy on everything related to men?
My organization allied with others to remove Senators Conrad Burns, Jim Talent and George Allen from power in 2006 because they assumed that men would vote for them no matter what and, thus, concentrated irrationally on winning feminists to the Republican side and even hiring them as legislative aides to prove how “progressive†and “in touch with the women’s vote†they were. Of course the media pretended that vets and servicemen voted against these guys because we were supposedly against the Iraq War. Now we are gearing up to remove Senators Sununu, Coleman and Smith from office if they do not remember that veterans and males in general form a significant part of their constituencies.
On Monday morning the US Senate will vote to give $430 Million to radical feminist organizations via the Annual Commerce Justice and Science Appropriations Act. ODR just did a press release on the IMBRA part of this disaster, but someone still needs to do a press release about the $430 Million.
Here is the ODR press release for today: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2007/10/prweb559970.htm.
Here is more information on how this particular feminist group is pulling a hoax:
 http://www.ifeminists.net/introduction/editorials/2006/0111.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihW4P8Bcrxc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xE6dfxZ-5eQ
This vote on Monday, that will give $1Million to enforce the IMBRA law that obstructs communication between men and adult women on the Internet, is called CJS by all the traitors working on Capitol Hill who think spending a whopping $430 on “women’s groups†is OK but will not fund veteran’s groups like mine at all. Some Republicans want to make amendments to the CJS act, but they will pass it mostly intact unless someone like you can help force at least the Republican Senators to insist on postponing the vote until new hearings are held where American men can provide their opinion.
We are asking that you postpone the CJS vote for Monday until after Emergency Senate Hearings can be held about VAWA, IMBRA and other laws that were passed after phony Senate Hearings that only included feminist groups# testimony.
Here is the text from yesterday in case you need it. It is a very long radical feminist spending bill for $430 Million and includes appropriations for many departments, agencies, state and local governments. If this bill gets stopped, it won’t be for a measly $1M to Tahirih but for some other reasons of pork. I could not find Tahirih Justice Center mentioned, so are going by the corrupt Congressman Moran’s web site which I now realize I must copy to hard drive in case he erases it. Probably the $1M is included in the $205M for women’s shelters, or the $3M for stalking prevention, or the $10M for protection for college women from violence or the $63M to encourage arrest policies. This part of the bill is obscene.
VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN PREVENTION AND PROSECUTION PROGRAMS
For grants, contracts, cooperative agreements, and other assistance for the prevention and prosecution of violence against women, as authorized by the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3711 et seq.) (`the 1968 Act’); the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (Public Law 103-322) (`the 1994 Act’); the Victims of Child Abuse Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-647) (`the 1990 Act’); the Prosecutorial Remedies and Other Tools to end the Exploitation of Children Today Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-21); the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-386) (`the 2000 Act’); and the Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-162) (`the 2005 Act’); $430,000,000 (increased by $10,000,000), including amounts for administrative costs, to remain available until expended as follows: (1) $12,000,000 for the court-appointed special advocate program, as authorized by section 217 of the 1990 Act. (2) $3,000,000 for child abuse training programs for judicial personnel and practitioners, as authorized by section 222 of the 1990 Act. (3) $205,000,000 for grants to combat violence against women, as authorized by part T of the 1968 Act, as amended by section 101 of the 2005 Act, of which– (A) $20,000,000 shall be for transitional housing assistance grants for victims of domestic violence, stalking or sexual assault as authorized by section 40299 of the 1994 Act, as amended by section 602 of the 2005 Act; and (B) $2,000,000 shall be for the National Institute of Justice for research and evaluation of violence against women. (4) $63,000,000 for grants to encourage arrest policies as authorized by part U of the 1968 Act, as amended by section 102 of the 2005 Act. (5) $10,000,000 for sexual assault victims assistance, as authorized by section 202 of the 2005 Act. (6) $40,000,000 (increased by $10,000,000) for rural domestic violence and child abuse enforcement assistance grants, as authorized by section 40295 of the 1994 Act, as amended by section 203 of the 2005 Act. (7) $6,000,000 for training programs as authorized by section 40152 of the 1994 Act, as amended by section 108 of the 2005 Act, and for related local demonstration projects. (8) $3,000,000 for grants to improve the stalking and domestic violence databases, as authorized by section 40602 of the 1994 Act, as amended by section 109 of the 2005 Act. (9) $10,000,000 for grants to reduce violent crimes against women on campus, as authorized by section 304 of the 2005 Act. (10) $40,000,000 for legal assistance for victims, as authorized by section 1201 of the 2000 Act, as amended by section 103 of the 2005 Act. (11) $5,000,000 for enhancing protection for older and disabled women from domestic violence and sexual assault, as authorized by section 40802 of the 1994 Act, as amended by section 205 of the 2005 Act. (12) $15,000,000 for the safe havens for children program, as authorized by section 1301 of the 2000 Act, as amended by section 306 of the 2005 Act. (13) $8,000,000 for education and training to end violence against and abuse of women with disabilities, as authorized by section 1402 of the 2000 Act, as amended by section 204 of the 2005 Act. (14) $10,000,000 for an engaging men and youth in prevention program, as authorized by the 2005 Act.
The House of Representatives passed this last Thursday without warning us and with zero media fanfare. The media will only start to crow on Monday after the Senate votes for this. The media does not want to spoil the chances that somebody might try to call their senator today or Friday to get his vote postponed and new hearings held.
Jim Peterson Veterans Abroad
 Gothenburg, Sweden
