Comments on: Dobson is Right

By: Roger F. Gay

Roger F. Gay — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 01:39:50 +0000

OK. Who’s your running mate?

By: amfortas

amfortas — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 01:00:20 +0000

I have been intimating a ‘third party’ solution for some time. The ‘Durn Furriner’ Party which will be unattached to popular Nationalist / Ideological notions and re-instate the key elements of the original American Vision for a Nation dedicated to Truth and Justice and the Integrity of the Individual.

At some point, before its time fades away from lack of sustenance, America needs to accept that its consituency is the Western World, not simply Illinois and the Everglades. The Vision was that of Durn Furriner Colonial Brits who could see a better way and fought to create it. In doing so they took over leadership from the Parent country.

The capture of the voter mind so evocatively described by Roger – The Klingon Wars! – is spot on. If we are to prevent the imagination ranging so far into the abyss then we need to turn it to something useful, like the Gnome who will slay the Dragon that David identifies with such ease and accuracy – the legal rent-seekers, parasites, self-interested carrion who are destroying the Vision that the Founding Fathers once enunciated, and the Nation along with it.

Vote #1 Amfortas. Not just any old alternative. The No Alternative, alternative.

By: Roger F. Gay

Roger F. Gay — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:05:47 +0000

The word is out now. There is no excuse for not vowing to rid the federal government of anti-father laws and anti-constitutional programs. If they haven’t fixed the problem by November 2008, then they shouldn’t be in office. If a candidate doesn’t vow to fix the problem, they do not deserve anyone’s vote.

By: GreatMRNI

GreatMRNI — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:27:50 +0000

The anti-male bias is so prevalent, that many are victims (including government officials) of the propaganda being spewed. That is not to say all are ignorant, but hopefully most.

By: Roger F. Gay

Roger F. Gay — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:47:50 +0000

I don’t know. Many statements I’ve heard from Republican politicians over the last decade have seemed pretty crackling.

By: GreatMRNI

GreatMRNI — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:43:19 +0000

That is probably true to some degree, but I think it is a result of ignorance rather than overt malicious intent, which is what most cackling feminist’s witches exhibit.

By: Roger F. Gay

Roger F. Gay — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:22:32 +0000

But from the standpoint of policy and legislation supported, they’re all crackling feminist witches.

By: GreatMRNI

GreatMRNI — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:18:02 +0000

That is a scary thought, Roger. lol

The most important issue of the 2008 election is insuring that we don’t put a “cackling feminist witch” in the Whitehouse. If you think your balls are in a vise currently, just see what happens if the cackling feminist witch gets control of that lever.

By: Roger F. Gay

Roger F. Gay — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:02:47 +0000

Hello David.

By: Roger F. Gay

Roger F. Gay — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:02:27 +0000

GreatMRNI; Don’t forget, the left tells us that men of power often stray – it should remind us of JFK. To meet requirements for equality, Hillary will have to have interns under the desk as well – although I’m sure many feminists won’t demand fully reversing the gender roles on that one. (Aarrrgh! Not appealing to the imagination.)

By: David R. Usher

David R. Usher — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:53:00 +0000

The problem is the fourth branch of government — the Bar Association — which runs the other three in abrogation of the Constitution. The Bar is the only trade association that has no external oversight or regulation. It answers to no one.

This is precisely why both parties end up doing such unexplainable and unexplained things, without debate or discussion, things that bolster powers and income of attorneys at the expense of everyone else.

Pass this in your state if you want to bring the Bar under control. See: HOW TO REFORM THE CORRUPT LEGAL SYSTEM, http://www.newswithviews.com/Usher/david12.htm

By: GreatMRNI

GreatMRNI — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:42:24 +0000

Mrs. Clinton is nothing but a communist femina-nazi. She is incompetent, and only got to the US senate because of her husband. She failed on her attempt at health care long ago and will fail at becoming president. She failed as a lawyer, and failed in her marriage. Her views and wishful policies are juvenile and lack any semblance of intelligence or insightful thought. She is a hack as a senator, and a crackpot as a person.

By: Roger F. Gay

Roger F. Gay — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:31:56 +0000

I don’t see Rudy as a real counter-point to Hillary. I don’t see the Republican Party politicians as counter-point to Democrat Party politicians. All I have to do is think of Ronald Reagan and Newt Gingrich – weren’t they conservatives? They talked the talk, and did that extremely well, so well that Reagan, the last century’s symbolic conservative, was dubbed “the great communicator.” But in leadership on fundamentals he leaned so far left that I’m surprised he could walk upright. Gingrich used to say he carried a copy of the constitution in his back pocket, and I used to say – take it out and read it sometime.

By: tonysprout

tonysprout — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:23:39 +0000

In my mind, we need to vote our conscience. The Republicans we turned to because they espoused support for the nuclear family, smaller gov’t, and low taxes got caught up in their own egos; it was about how important they were, not what they stood for. If Hitlery does win, so what? What will change?

As for me, I’m voting on my principles. Screw the two party two-step. Let’s have a real dance!

By: Roger F. Gay

Roger F. Gay — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:57:12 +0000

His statements are still somewhat confusing. He’s saying he is opposed to “starting a third party” but also saying that third parties don’t work. He is also saying that as an individual, rather than representative of his organization, he argued against the “starting a third party.” I’m left wondering whether it’s still valid to talk about the resolution decided by the group, even though a key leader is speaking against it. Might very well be. Reports indicated that the vote for the resolution was “almost” unanimous. 50 organizations represented minus 1 is still a large group of organizations that are willing to support “minor parties” (which is how it is reportedly stated in the resolution).

By: BIGbrotherbites

BIGbrotherbites — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:44:54 +0000

Dobson must’ve got some cash or something from the RINO’s for him to publicly change his mind so drastically.

By: Roger F. Gay

Roger F. Gay — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:31:06 +0000

Sidenote: Just discovered that Dobson is now making strong statements against abandonment of the two-party system – apparently expressing a personal view opposing the the resolution he signed onto. Oh well – the point of the article is still valid even though the title has become wrong.

By: BIGbrotherbites

BIGbrotherbites — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:25:41 +0000

We the People had better wise up and do whats right….. And that is to replace every person in Washington with new blood, people under at least fifty to 55 yrs old.
Most up there are past retirement age and should “be retired” they dont represent the people.
We need to put in a third