Texas criminal defense attorney Paul Stuckle, who specializes in defending men falsely accused of domestic violence or sexual abuse, wrote me recently concerning a Texas judge who is under fire for closing her office in the face of a Death Row inmate’s attorneys emergency request to stay his execution. Within hours after the doors closed, the inmate was executed.
According to the Texas Lawyer article below, “The U.S. Supreme Court had agreed earlier on the day that Richard was executed to consider a Kentucky case, Baze v. Rees, regarding whether the lethal injection method of execution constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.”
I have no idea as to the merits of the emergency request itself, but I share Stuckle’s revulsion at many of the barbaric (and anti-male, and racist) aspects of our criminal justice system, including this incident. Stuckle and I are particularly concerned over the lack of due process afforded men falsely accused of domestic violence.
I also oppose “Three Strikes” laws (for my views on the subject, see my His Side with Glenn Sacks show ‘Three Strikes’ Laws Hurt Low Income, Minority Men.)
Since I’m on the subject, I also oppose the Death Penalty (even though most of those on Death Row have committed terrible crimes) and the War on Drugs (see the His Side with Glenn Sacks show Warehousing Minority Males, or click here).
Anyway, the article Twenty Lawyers Join in Complaint to be Filed Against CCA Presiding Judge Sharon Keller (Texas Lawyer, 10/10/07) explains the case in greater detail. The petition against the judge can be found here. It reads:
“If you are as shocked as we were by Judge Sharon Keller saying ‘We close at 5′ and refusing to accept an appeal 20 minutes after 5 PM by lawyers representing a man about to be executed, then sign on to this complaint. We will submit this complaint to the State Commission on Judicial Conduct on October 30, 2007.”
|


